> take the scrollbar onto that specific annotation

Already, annotated views within and without Diigo Meta
(examples: http://www.diigo.com/bookmark/http%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Finformation_society%2Fpolicy%2Fesignature%2Feu_legislation%2Ftrusted_lists%2Findex_en.htm?f=m&tab=people&uname=grahamperrin and http://diigo.com/09yyg )
do scroll, automatically, to the position of the uppermost highlight.

> Links for specific annotations

+1

Highlights can be navigated with the 'Jump to' feature of Diigolet 4.0b14.

AFAIR some 3.x versions of Diigolet offered the 'Jump to' feature to all viewers of an annotated link.

Sadly, more modern Diigolet 4.0b5 (which presents to viewers of annotated links) seem to be far less useful for sharing information. No navigation of highlights, and (IMHO the worst bug in Diigo 4.0 beta) all page comments are missing.

> a "Landlord Tenant" tag that somehow got separated into Landlord and Tenant.

That might happen if, whilst using the cloud interface http://www.diigo.com/cloud/ksosnow to edit your tags, you omit one of the two quotation marks that are required for a multiple-word tag.

> comparison feature

Workaround

1. temporarily add the tag 'compare' to all bookmarks at http://www.diigo.com/user/ksosnow/landlord and note the number of bookmarks

2. temporarily add the tag 'compare' to all bookmarks at http://www.diigo.com/user/ksosnow/Tenant and note the number of bookmarks

3. see whether the number of bookmarks at http://www.diigo.com/user/ksosnow/compare makes sense.

> tag my most used bookmarks with a "@daily" tag

I use a macro (command-4) for a Diigo Meta view of the page, then click the Like button.

The like marks show in my network view of myself, but not in my library.

I imagine that one day, Diigo will offer a view of 'things that I like' (excluding all things that do not have my like mark).

Sorting bookmarks

>>> 2 - Sort links by frequency of use.
>>> This would be really handy.. so your most commonly used sites
>>> were always at the top of the list. I've set up a "@daily" tag
>>> of my most visited sites.. but some are more visited than
>>> others.. and right now its hard to pick them out of the long
>>> list. (spurl had this and it was very useful)
>>
>> are you referring to the toolbar or the website?
>
> both. i mostly navigate entirely with the toolbar

Sort by frequency of use would be a useful option.

Amongst my top five problems with Diigo 4.0 beta:
sort by date added — on which I rely heavily — was removed completely.

(Sort nowadays is by date modified, a very different thing. Forcing that change — without retaining the original, as an option — is a real pain.)

> currently i've had to tag my most used bookmarks with a "@daily"
> tag and set up a filter. However s few of those bookmarks are
> used far more often (gmail, google reader, etc..) and it would
> be realy handy if they were at the top of the list.

Like soulgrind r, I use tagging to (re)create a feature. However: it's tedious, even with macros, to add the three tags to every bookmark.

Also a waste of Diigo bandwidth, because I find myself using first Diigolet (to check that Post to Diigo will not blindly cause dataloss), secondly Post to Diigo (customised daily to add the year, month and date tags), thirdly Diigolet.

I'd really appreciate it if Diigo could:

* reintroduce the lost option to sort bookmarks by date added
* introduce an option to sort bookmarks by frequency of use.

Thanks

Try the 'Common Stuff' link that appears on each person's profile. Not exactly what you want, but it could be interesting.

> sites that I bookmarked most

Please enable e-mail notification for
http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/546610 (2007-04-25) which includes the suggestion
option to sort bookmarks by frequency of use

> highlights saved out of order

Disorderly appearance (unpredictable order) is a fairly common issue that seems to come and go.

Reverse order is another issue.

Extracted annotations are presented in the wrong order (2008-12-20)

highlights, sticky notes and page comments are disorderly, sometimes reversed (2009-01-12)

highlights/annotations lost and/or failing to appear and/or duplicated as a result of failure to appear (2009-07-08)

> With "tag cloud" I mean the list of tags

OK, at http://www.diigo.com/user/Bekay00 when I expand the portlet named
'Public Tags'
I see that 6 are counted but then none are matched.

So, the count and the presence are wrong.

Please: is it only the one tag
&
that is inconsistent?

---

Postscript

Also at http://www.diigo.com/cloud/Bekay00 the tag
&
is present with a count of
6

> is bug

There are various bugs, some of which must take priority.

Is this particular bug preventing you from working?

Please, can you link to a screen shot of the issue? Thanks.

> und nobody there to help you.

Diigo users, Diigo Community are contributing to this topic.

Diigo team occasionally reassure Diigo Community that they do read topics.

Subject: Old "FURL tags" still in tag cloud, although no bookmark is tagged with it

Subject: change of one tag to two tags

> the opposite problem : I wanted to batch add a tag.
> So in the tag editor I changed one tag to two tags, but
> they stayed stuck together as one tag.
>
> This problem seem to have been resolved

Which tag editor? http://www.diigo.com/cloud/ycc2106?sort=1 ?

Messaging preferences

> "Sorry, you are not allowed to send message to this user."
> Where can you set that options ?

https://secure.diigo.com/setting | Messaging Settings

Private group visibility

> Why are the private groups listed in the repository
> but not on the profile page of the owner?

A group with content that is private can be listed publicly.

If you seek and find a group, you'll find the name of the owner.

(I can see all groups that I administer, but I don't expect other people to seek that information. Other people's initial focus is the group.)

> I can't see if the groups it has been added to

For that, use management view in your library.

> I created a list, and I now find out it should have been a group...
> How could I batch add them to a group?

1. check the box to select all items in the list

2. Revise tags…

3. add a suitable tag

4. in your library, search for that tag

5. copy the bookmarks to the group.

> can you get all the items in a group entered into a list at once?

That's not a feature.

What would you do with a list that can not be done within a group?

(I realise that the feature set of a list is different from the set of a group. A use case, an example will help.)

Bear in mind, groups may have hundreds of items. Lists are better when they're not too long.

> using digolet on a computer thats not mine and
> when i get to my computer i would like to trfr them all to a list.

When you get to your computer, you can use the Diigo group in the same way.

> http://www.diigo.com/user/arnoxmp/c02kry

includes one public bookmark that is tagged dns

> (http://www.diigo.com/user/arnoxmp/dns+c02kry) yields an empty result.

http://www.diigo.com/user/arnoxmp/c02kry%20AND%20dns works.

> assume this is a bug in Diigo

An issue with syntax, so I have removed the 'bug' tag from this topic.

Regards
Graham

> In My Library

Use the three-way switch. Switch to the right.

Management view shows the groups and lists associated with each bookmark.

This topic seems to be a duplicate. Please enable e-mail notification for
http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/1098987 (2009-11-22).

Thanks.

Diigo service interop with microblog services

I'm less interested in Twitter (microblogging),
more interested in OpenMicroBlogging and the surrounding goodness.

Recommended reading:

http://ostatus.org/
http://status.net/2010/03/07/understanding-ostatus

> need to be able to edit my twitter posts

> in Chrome

and previously,

>> I use Firefox (latest update) on Windows Vista.

so I guess that this is Chrome on Vista.

For Chrome, I'd recommend the bookmarklet to post to Identi.ca and configure your Identi.ca to connect (cross-post) to Twitter.

Rather than squeezing things into a bookmark dialogue that's already too large for some displays,

Suggestions

1. make Diigo Meta more user friendly (improve the layout of its components)

2. make microblogging an option within the Meta interface.

http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/1100651#3

>> Tweeting WITHOUT Diigo Toolbar

> We are working on tweeting through sever side.

> Let us know your thought about this feature.

> twitter publishing button

= a microblogging button

> in the bookmark dialogue window.

You can have a microblogging button without the Diigo bookmark dialogue, did you try the bookmarklet mentioned in http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/1100651#8 ?

> delete bookmarks while there are showing in Sidebar View

Please enable e-mail notification for a previous topic on the subject,
http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/994821 (2009-10-12)

> edit the bookmark while under lists

This feature was added to Diigo a while ago, I can't remember when.

> condense the view

Maybe have a three way-switch, similar to the one that presents in your library. Switching to the right for the view that best suited to management.

> Is this a bug or a (undesirable) feature?

I think it's undesirable; tags are too easily lost (overwritten).

Loss of data is never acceptable, and it's more frustrating when there is no undo.

The problem was noted a few months ago, http://groups.diigo.com/Diigo_HQ/forum/topic/group-view-of-annotations-excludes-annotations-that-are-public-8588#3

More recently (March 2009) I repeated the suggestion that for group content (topics), removal/edition of tags must be disallowed: http://www.diigo.com/05ikk

Suggestion

When a person copies (shares) a group a bookmark that is already within the group:

* service should default to add (append) not overwrite tags.

Comparing behaviour in my library with behaviour in groups

As the default is visibly improved in pro edit (management) view for my library, when revising tags for selected (checked/ticked) bookmarks, so I assume that it will be possible to change the server-side default for 'group conflicts'.

Cross referencing
http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/tag/956964+986916+999099

> we get the system default for annotations set to "private"
> and have to recheck it manually, each time
> when we want to make a public annotation.

Nowadays, it's the opposite. Not good for privacy.

We really need a server-side setting that's effective for users of Diigolet.

Cross-reference
Diigo service should allow obscurity/privacy by default for Diigolet, Post to Diigo and other scripts.

> a roundup of all group suggestion

http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/tag/group%20suggestion%20NOT%20resolved lists group suggestions that are not resolved. (Using tags.)