Vitamin D status and ill health: a systematic review : The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology - 0 views
-
Nathan Goodyear on 09 Dec 13Another ill conceived conclusion by the authors. IF you are going to study something, know everything about it. They authors make a major statement about vitamin D, yet they seem to understand a basic understanding of vitamin dosing. The authors stated that dosing 2,000 IU of vitamin D in those with levels < 50 provided no benefit. That is of course correct, because 2,000 IU daily won't hold any levels stable, let alone increase levels to 70-80 where they need to be. The authors of this study are stuck in the traditional RDC thinking here. What is interesting is that low vitamin D was associated with CVD, MS, dyslipidemia, inflammation, glucose dysmetabolism, infections, mood disorders, decline in cognition, impaired physical functioning, and all-cause mortality, But, vitamin D supplementation is only good for bones. The authors of this study make a mockery of medicine.