Group items tagged

Sight Care | Official Site sightcare-co.com · by Sight Care Sight Care Only $49/Bottle Limited Time Offer! Sight Care Special Deal + Special 67% Discount Save $600 + 180 Days Money Back Guarantee #1.The Sight Care vision supplement is a dietary supplement for helping you improve your vision and brain health. Sight Care eye supplements are formulated to provide a synergistic blend of vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and other bioactive compounds that are essential for maintaining healthy vision Regular Price: 147/per bottle Only for: $49/per bottle What Is Sight Care? This powerful vision support supplement is made with a unique blend of natural ingredients and plant extracts that work together synergistically to deliver numerous benefits for your brain and eye health. With Sight Care, you can expect to experience increased energy levels, improved eyesight, and an overall revitalized sense of well-being. Taking care of your vision health is not just about seeing clearly; it's also about maintaining your overall brain health. As we age, our vision deteriorates, and our eyes and brain can experience a decline in function, but there are steps you can take to support your visual and cognitive health. Regular eye exams are crucial for detecting and treating vision problems early on, and making healthy choices such as eating a nutritious diet and exercising regularly can also help. However, with busy schedules, it can be difficult to find the time to devote to a healthy lifestyle. This is where the Sight Care supplement comes in. It's designed to support both vision and brain health with its blend of natural ingredients that have been shown to promote healthy vision and cognitive function You must not compromise your eye health for momentary exhilaration. If you are glued to digital screens day and night, you must take measures to prevent eye diseases like age-related macular degeneration. The SightCare vision supplement has been made using 100% natura

read to see how pharmaceutical monies control research and "expert opinion".  Expert opinion is open to the highest bidder.  Scientific research is become adulterated to say the least.

Great interview with Dr. Andrew Wakefield regarding science, vaccinations, and paradigms, and scientific revolutions

review of 24 studies, some well designed and others not, lead to conclusion:  "We conclude that there is no scientific evidence that HCG is effective in the treatment of obesity; it does not bring about weight-loss of fat-redistribution, nor does it reduce hunger or induce a feeling of well-being."

there is no scientific evidence that HCG is effective in the treatment of obesity; it does not bring about weight-loss of fat-redistribution, nor does it reduce hunger or induce a feeling of well-being.

Scientific American article from 2013 highlights the link between head trauma and pituitary dysfunction.  

recent study proves the scientific validity of sex hormone evaluation via saliva.  Most labs today use ELIZA.  The new future will be mass spectroscopy.

Thorough discussion of the scientific knowledge on bisphenol A and its hormonal and receptor effects.

This letter to the editor points out how much of "reported science" today is merely propaganda to push $$. This letter points out, scientifically, many of the flawed assumptions and problems with the Gardisil vaccine. Science is about data and evidence. The data and evidence on Gardisil is suspect at best.

This study, a review of 16 articles, found little scientific support for the "blood type" diet.  This is why I have not made this recommendation to our clients--no real data to support this diet.   One question, is what was the eligibility criteria for inclusion of the studies.  Only one out of the 16 was selected.  Inclusion/exclusion criteria in these studies can brian bias.

Adjuvants in vaccines are dangerous.  ASIA and macrophages myofasciitis are implicated in the damage caused by adjuvants, of which aluminum is the most widely known.  I love what the author says here: "safe assessments for vaccines have often not included appropriate toxicity studies because vaccines have not been viewed as inherently toxic".  This is not political but scientific.

No benefit to memory for post menopause women with estradiol therapy.  This study looked at early and late menopause estrogen therapy.  The study also found no harm.  Only abstract available here.  These studies would do more scientific benefit if they would follow hormone levels.  This study did not touch on dementia; other studies have shown benefit from estrogen therapy  in preventing dementia in women.

with holding Testosterone therapy in men after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer is not supported in the scientific literature.

again, this study is of horses.  However, this industry ($$), is not going to invest in testing that is not scientifically reliable.  Salivary testing is validated.

This is a summary of just some of the evidence that disputes BCBS saliva policy. The important notes are this is just SOME (much more is available) and that these articles PREDATE the author date of the policy. With BCBS, it is not about scientific evidence, it is just they don't want to pay for saliva testing. That is ok, just be honest about it.

review of the literature and scientific evidence finds high dose IV vitamin C to be beneficial in burn patients. Additionally, glucose testing (not serum) should be considered inaccurate for upto 36 hours following IV.

knowledge of progesterone and its metabolites are important in the use of hormones.  As the authors concluded here: "natural steroids should not be disparaged...an update on endocrinological knowledge and experience is rather mandatory for gynecologists".  There in lies the problem.  The IOM has shown that the average physician practices at a level of 17 years behind the current scientific knowledge and the environment created by medical governing bodies discourages questions, so as to protect the system.

Paxil is estrogen receptor agonist.  What is interesting about this is that the FDA just approved this as a non-hormonal way to reduce hot flashes--but it is paxil under a different name.  It is non-hormonal--yeah right.  The organization making the approval doesn't know what they are doing at worse, or like the IOM stated are not up with the latest scientific knowledge.

new study out of the Lancet labels Flouride as neurotoxicant, along with lead, methyl mercury, PCBs, arsenic, toluene and others.   This is not a political issue and needs to be reviewed scientifically.  These toxicants impair neurodevelopment and may be one reason for the rapidly rising conditions associated: i.e. ADD, ADHD, autism...

Great review of the scientific evidence of Aluminum in microglial activation and immunoexcitotoxicity and neurodegeneration of the brain.