Group items tagged

I think this article is a great example of how important it is for companies to be continually evolving and strengthening their brands. I currently work for Kairos Zero, which is an online marketing consulting company, and their main objective in helping their clients is specifically defining the target market. Once the target market is clearly defined for any company, they can use analytics to better analyze their main customers, how they behave, and what they are looking to experience with your product or service. In the case of this article, JC Penny was unable to evolve and develop new strategies for existing or new customers because their target market was not clearly defined, and JC Jenny's overall focus was not based on what the customer truly wanted. This directly affected their bottom line over the course of two years. Unfortunate for JC Penny, but demonstrates how important it is to cater to the customer and provide that "experience" that they are looking for.

As everyone has stated, JC Penney is in hot water because they have lost sight of what the main focus should be: the customer. Without focusing on the customer, how do they expect to keep them coming back? The main aspect of customer loyalty is keeping customers satisfied in order to make them want to be a continuous customer. Because JC Penney is making decisions based on what they think customers want without doing any market research to back up these decisions, it is apparent that their customer loyalty, which in turn, affects their sales is dwindling rapidly. One aspect of the article that I could relate to was when the author talked about using test brands to see customer's responses to the brand. While working at my part time job at Express clothing, we would always be sent one or two items that we didn't have and would use them as "test items" to see if customers would be interested in buying the item. If the items were purchased, we let the manufacturer know and they would determine whether they would send us the item to sell. If not, we would not sell the items in our store. I think using a test brand is a great idea for JC Penney to try. By using a select few items from different brands, they can see what is successful and what is not and plan accordingly.

When I saw the changes JCPenney made in person, I thought it made their company look a little bit cheaper. While it was nice to see low prices, I still liked the more "department store" feeling with cash registers in every department rather than just in the front of the store. I agree with Kara about how Apple is its own "breed" because Apple is constantly innovating their products to be more user friendly to their customers and they are constantly listening to their customers, not to mention their top of the line customer service. It is also a lot easier to listen to your consumers when you have one specialized product such as Apple with electronics. JCP sells a wider variety of things from clothing, to luggage, to home goods, to shoes. With that being said, I believe it is a lot more important for them to listen to your customers because they have a wider variety of target customers.

This article lists some retailers that have been exceptional in their customer service. As I will be talking about Pre-purchase customer service, you can focus on that while reading what the firms are doing. How has your experience been with each of them?

Good article! I heard about the tire-Nordstrom story and it really brought in a lot of publicity for the company. Interesting to see that those extreme customer services do not get too much abused by clients and still pay off . However I think it always depends on the company size. A small shop with excellent customer service always runs in danger of spending too much money and not getting enough word of mouth.

The customer service these companies provide to customers is amazing. These are some of the reasons that they are successful and stand out to consumers. I agree with Angelo that I am surprised people do not take advantage of these companies. I always respect companies and prefer to go to ones with better customer service in the end.

This article details the struggle that luxury retail stores are having with providing a "personal customer experience." Because the products are so high end, they are expecting that aspect to talk for itself; however, customers are wanting a more personalized experience than what these stores are giving them. What do you guys think about this? And also how do you feel about the technology aspect they talk about in the end?

I believe that if I am going to spend a lot of money on an item, I should get treated with high end customer service.This is a reason why a lot of top brands have personal shoppers, because they know their target customer is willing to spend a lot of money for high quality goods. It is also important for high end retailers to display the value of their goods through the value of their store, even if it means dishing out a lot of money for renovations. Burberry is on the right track with integrating technology into a store that would not normally have this kind of technology. This technology gets the customer more involved in their shopping experience instead of just browsing around the store.

These luxury brands will not die. They may not be making the revenue they desire but they will not disappear. My mother for example has more of these items them I care to know. It is people like her that will keep this industry from disappearing. However with the economy it will be difficult to find new customers. But yes making the customer experience more personable will continue to bring the already loyal customers coming back. I do believe those five things they are going to change will help. But it will not necessarily bring in new customers.

Finish Line is has jumped on the trend that I think will ultimately be a benefit them, mobile check out. It takes the hassle of lines out of shopping, and like I commented on a different post, the less time you spend in line the more time you spend looking around the store. More time shopping will equal more products purchased.

I agree with Brock. Nike has their own customization, I think now its time for the store to start doing that. I think this would improve sales because when I got my shoes I went to Nike's site so I could customize the shoes to how I wanted since it was only like $10 more to have them exactly how I wanted them.

This is really cool what they are doing! I'm curious as to if they had a issue with lines in their stores or if they are working on simply improving customer service.

JCP failed to convince customers to buy at "everyday prices" so they decided to bring sales back. To do this, they marked up prices then marked them down however people ended up paying more than the "everyday prices" and there is evidence that proves it.

Very interesting article. It seems that JCP has changed their pricing strategy multiple times this year -- I think this strategy could possibly cause JCP to loose more customers. Marking up and down is a good strategy but not when existing customers know what specific items cost -- the worst is that JCP put higher price tags on top of low ones (as a customer I would just be offend and that alone would drive me to shop else where). I think JCP has driven customers to think they are getting ripped off rather than getting good prices and leading them to believe they are getting a bargain. I think it is a very common strategy used by retailers and I am not bothered by it but when I become fully aware of it -- that is a problem.

It makes me sad to think that companies are "tricking" us to get our business. I understand from a "marketing mindset" and psychological perspective that companies get us to think we are getting such a great deal when prices are slashed. Just like the article also mentioned, Kohls may do this too. They always make a conscience effort to circle (in red pen) the amount of money you saved today on our shopping trip. But that number fluctuates so much based on when there is Kohl's cash, 15-20% off mobile coupons, etc. They always make you think you got an amazing deal, when next week it could be even better...or worse.

I like it! I want to be recognized, greeted, and assisted if I need to be. I can see where some people may feel uncomfortable but employees should be trained when to know when a person wants more help or to be left alone.

I find this kind of stuff extremely interesting. I honestly like that stores can track me like this because this means that they are more likely to send coupons and deals my way for the things I want to buy. I also think this is a great way for stores to get the perfect layout of their store by seeing where certain demographics walk around.

This is significant because it has implications beyond just marketing to consumers. The question is, how far should we trespass into citizens (aka customers) rights in order to improve the customers experience? This isnt JUST another marketing ploy, it's an experiment in eroding consumer privacy... and it's working. Marketers realize how little consumers are informed of their own behavior and by association they realize lengths to which they can go. But as privacy erodes, what do we really gain? Sure, it's great they can send us coupons and build our customer profile, but did companies consult the consumer and get consent to do this? Is this data collection all passively done because companies know the taboo behind privacy issues? What does this type of intrusion open up in the future? I think this is seen as simply "the way things are" because we are all desensitized to businesses (and governments) violating the privacy of information. I would like to point out that historically when masses of people in power simply accept things the way they are that's when really really bad things happen (slavery, child labor, exploitation, etc). Passive accumulation of this information seems to me complicit with those who actively accumulate this information- they're both invasions. We must critically think about how allowing such invasions actually works to shape the physical and mental landscapes of our lives, are we actually prepared to deal with the consequences? So, while it may seem like this is just another marketing ploy, we instead should see this as actually another breach of private information which will continue to shape consumer behavior.

Green Mountain Coffee is opening a Keurig Store to hopefully get to know more about their customers and offer on site demos, special promotions, new product offerings, and unique accessories for the Keurig to customers

This is an interesting strategy for Keurig. Like Lindsey mentioned, it'll be interesting to see how this effects the companies over all sales. Although the venture will provide fantastic PR, the question is whether he gains will outweigh the costs. I agree with Lindsey again though, it is likely that a majority if the visitors will be non-existing customers, of whom will leave with a positive experience and thus opt to buy a Keurig machine of their own. It will also be interesting to see the "accessories" that will be available for sale. These products would appeal to the existing customers, but would also highlight their need to "update" their Keurig models and thus consume more of the brands products. It would be great to see Keurig develop their "eco-friendly" line a bit further. It consists of k-cups that are recycle friendly. Ufortunately these products are quite a bit more expensive, a problem Keurig is already facing; making products more available to a larger demographic.

This article was fascinating to me! This is another example of how companies who used to be primarily product only or even online only want customer feedback and input. I think the idea is great - to let people use the machine to see how it works and how it can work in their everyday lives. But the location 14 miles outside Boston is a little far away I feel. I hope it is successful - already the outside looks sleek, classy, and expensive and I think the design alone with get people into the door to explore the concept. Since their goal isn't to sell, sell, sell but rather to experience and learn from consumers, I think it will work. But I do agree in this still tight economy, going to your local Walmart or Bed, Bath, and Beyond to buy the same coffee pods is realistic.

This article focuses on how retailers use pop-up shops to gain customers attention that allows retailers to tell the story of a brand to drive customer awareness and brand perception.

I agree with Krista. As a customer, I want to see the product so this is a great idea for brands that don't have that physical store to interact with. I won't buy something if I can't see it. I have to know it is really worth it. That is why I don't ever do online shopping except for school books.

I like the idea of pop-up stores because it helps a store be more versatile and makes the store be more mobile, while still having a brick and mortar store. I even read an article recently on employee relations and there was a company that had a pop-up Tiffany's store at one of their events where the entire employee base had a chance to browse through the pop-up store and got free giveaways complimentary of the company. Doing events like this get people into the store and browsing even if it is only for a company event.

I think the article is right to a certain extent, but the example of Abercrombie is a bit extreme. Obviously, every company tries to target a specific group of consumers but does that necessarily always have to imply that its marketing strategies are discriminatory? Shouldn't a company have the right to target a certain consumer base in order to ensure a profit? Or does the seeking for profit not justify any type of discrimination no matter how small?

This article focuses on three brands who have shunned specific consumer segments. Abercrombie and Fitch, Cristal and Burberry all have experienced issues in their process of market segmentation with offending specific consumers. Is offending specific consumers an inevitable consequence that all companies/brands will have to face? Not all brands can succeed with a one size fits all type of mentality, so how and when is it alright to completely exclude consumer segments? The types of people hired at these stores go through a specific process that is also discriminatory. For example, at A&F it is commonplace for only thin and attractive individuals to be hired on. Do we have a problem with this? How would we feel if we had the opposite type of individuals assisting us?

I agree with a lot of the previous comments. While I do not think it is right for brands such we Abercrombie to expressively shun people from their stores because they are not the right size or shape or do not have the right look, I think it's acceptable for stores to segment in terms of their "target customer." Whether or not to factor in different body types or "pretty people" is a controversial question. When I worked at Hollister in high school, it was apparent that they searched for attractive people by the way they sifted through customers that came into the store, or the way they approached people in the mall. While I understand the need to segment a market and have a target customer, I do not think the people that work at these stores or the customers that shop there should all be the same.

I feel this new technology integration is a great aspect for Finish Line to incorporate into their stores. The mobile kiosks they explained will really benefit customers since it's hard for a shoe/apparel store to have every color, in every size, and every style needed - especially when there are so many different variations available. Shoes are almost more critical than clothing when a customer wants the "touch, feel, try-on" aspect. Every shoe looks, feels, and fits differently. So if customers are able to see the style and try on a similar size to know what they specifically need, I think mobile devices and kiosks will greatly benefit customers and add value to the overall Finish Line shopping experience so they can get exactly the shoe they want and not have to settle for what's in-stock. I was also excited to read in the "Keeping Pace in Omnichannel Race" article, about the Finish Line "sections" coming to Macy's stores. When I go to Macy's, I usually shop for dressy shoes or everyday styles and steer away from running/tennis shoes because I feel I need a little more guidance for a shoe that will support my foot in such physical exercise. So now that Macy's will have a section under the Finish Line name that supports active shoe purchases is something I'm very anxious to take a look at when the integration is complete! It's great to have such established and successful companies such as Eli Lilly and Finish Line headquartered in Indianapolis!

What a great target market! Never thought that by targeting mothers that they would continue to shop at the same location they bought bottles from. Crazy to think how companies can know so much about someone! Poor father.. but I think Target moved in the right direction by making the coupons more random and less direct. This is definitely something to take into consideration when I, or anyone else for that matter, finds marketing jobs. Great article! Loved the insight.

What a great article. I had no idea the amount of data acquired about its customers. Like Lina and Kyle said it is a good idea to send customers a wide variety of coupons versus more direct coupons, which makes me feel a little less creeped out that target knows so much information about us. It is an interesting look on how companies acquire data to bring customers in and transform them into loyal target customers .. especially interesting to see that mothers are targets main target!

Target is one of those stores where I walk in needing one or two things and leave with five or six items I had no intention on buying. This article really shows how innovations in marketing research can boost sales immensely. I agree with Lina, Kyle and Sarah in that it is good that the coupons are more random so Target does not scare their customers away. I am interested to see what Target does their research on next because they have had such great success with the moms to be.

This article discusses not only the importance of having proper store layout within the retail industry, but also effective ways in which to employ displays and signage for optimum performance. Can you think of any retailers that have an effective use of store layouts or displays? Can you think of any examples that poorly utilize these attributes?

It's so interesting to think about how all these things in the article play into the store experience. We as customers do not really think about it when we are in the store, but seeing some of the aspects the authors talk about as being important, it is apparent we subconsciously notice. While working at Express, we used point of purchase displays and also a ton of promotion and sales signs. It's cool to see how much impact these little things have on how much customers will buy, etc.

For example, Fossil has a SALE sign outside of the store that generates customers to come into the store. It is an effective way for people to be drawn, and once they are in, the sale is located in the back. That way the customer has to walk through the entire store before seeing markdown items. The layout will describe the ease of walking through the store for customers and how organized they are which I believe are important to focus on.

This is an article that gives advice on tactics that businesses should implement in order to create a positive follow up experience with customers after a purchase has been made. After reading the article can you think of any retailers that you have noticed that use any of these tactics particularly well or poorly?

These different ways to follow-up with a customer are fantastic. After delivering the goods, giving ongoing customer support is crucial to keeping the customer in your fanbase and to keep purchasing products from your company. The different ways to utilize an ancient tool (email) just goes to show that no matter how old a marketing tool is, it can still be effective.

I think a follow up is good and keeping a presence but it should have boundaries. I get the Xbox newsletter which gives new content and games added and also contests. It keeps its name running in my head and that makes me feel more involved. If I had an e reader though, I don't think I would like follow up e-mails about support, AN e-mail would be fine just to make sure the customer is used to the product and to outline the support they offer so I have something to refer to, anything past that, besides some news on new devices they are offering, would just seem annoying to me. If it is something available for them to seek out then my mind changes though. Using social media to "build the tribe" seems like a good idea as long as it is there to be sought out not pushed upon their customers in on-going e-mails.

This article describes the luxury bag price points.  Everlane chose to use a pricing strategy of around $400 compared to bags $1000 in this category. They can offer these prices by "cutting out middle men like retailers, operation on modest budgets..". However, the big issue is convincing its customers that the quality is still there. Everlane also mentions they will not do discounts because of the customer sensitivity. 

I personally believe that Everlane's strategies are not only a fantastic approach at growing their consumer base, confidence and improving their brand image, but will also allow them to gradually squeeze in to compete with the handbag 'titans' - if you will. By eliminating excess costs and utilizing a penetration pricing method, not only will they be able to target a larger market that can afford their products, but they will also be displaying that they can compete with the other big name brands on the basis of quality alone.

I think the bags Everlane is selling at reasonable prices for this quality will pay off for them. I see this as a JCPenney type idea under Ron Johnson: selling items at good quality without sales or discounts. That way people will understand how Everlane is trying to give the customer the savings by cutting out the middle man/retailers to give customers the savings. If money grew on trees and I wasn't a broke college student, I would LOVE to buy one of those bags. To know it could sell at an upscale retailer for close to half the price with similar quality is great for the customer's piece of mind!

This was really interesting to read especially because my friends and I just spent the afternoon roaming around Mass Ave and not one of us made a purchase. We decided to spend the day at the City Market and then walk around downtown. I think that in relation to this article our generation is becoming for concerned with experience as opposed to purchases. While none of my friends made purchases in stores downtown, were were willing to pay the gas and food prices ect. in order to contribute to our overall experience downtown.

This article made me really think about my purchasing habits, and what I value when deciding whether or not to make a purchase. What really stuck out to me in this article was the idea that the millennial generation might be becoming more frugal. With the heavy focus on online shopping, I think it provides customers with more options. You have the ability to go to a store find something,not purchase it, but still have the experience the "shopping" experience. If you saw something while looking that you want, there is the option to go online to seek out better deals with other companies for the same product. So the millennial generation may be more frugal in the sense that there are many ways of obtaining the items they want, but they utilize the internet to seek out better prices.

I agree with Megan, Sarah and Lina. I view shopping more as a social experience than anything else. It is very rare that I ever go shopping by myself because I enjoy having someone there with me when I am trying clothes on and walking around etc. With that being said, after a day of shopping or being in a shopping environment I do not base whether I had a good day or a bad day based on how many items I purchased but whether I had a good experience shopping. Whether that be based on the people I was with, or if my food was good or bad or if there was good or bad customer service at the stores I was at. I also personally think there is a completely different experience shopping for clothes in a store vs. shopping for other retail items (electronics, jewelry, appliances, books etc.) in a store. A lot of people (myself included) like to try on clothes to see how they fit and how they look on so I enjoy shopping for clothes in-store. However, when it comes to other items that do not need to be personally fitted to me, I enjoy online shopping just for the pure convenience.

Please read before Tuesday - outstanding operating results for Macy's!

I think the numbers are very impressive, but I am wondering what percentage of Macy's increased earnings are from existing customers or new customers? I think this is an important area to pay attention to, especially when forecasting the next quarter's earnings because Macy's needs this information to determine if its earnings will continue to increase, or if a burst of new customers in the prior quarter ignited the increased earnings.

I agree with Paige. Macy's need to figure out if these are loyal or new customers. But I wouldn't look at it in a way as to if their next quarter will be higher. I would want this information to know whether my win back or new customer marketing campaign is working, and then fix the other one. That way I then can guarantee the next quarter will be another gain.

This article discusses why consumers typically jump on impulse buys. Being knowledgeable of these triggers will make the buyer more aware in the future.

I think this article perfectly describes a lot of purchases made on black Friday. I have made a lot of purchasing decisions on this list. This is exactly how stores draw people into their stores by offering a huge sale but only for a limited time. Or for online shopping stores sometimes offer free shipping for a limited time in order to create impulse purchases.

I totally agree with Emily. After working the last three Black Fridays at Express, it's amazing to see how impulsive customers are when buying items. I am definitely one of those people as well, especially in a huge sale environment. You ask yourself "will it ever be this price again?" And if the answer is no, I will probably buy it.

This article discuses the future of retailing for AT&T specifically for brick-and-mortar locations. Their new store design will offer highly personalized services, solutions - not transactions, and emotionally engaging experiences.

I like the idea of the reps having tablets and their not being a counter between the customer and the rep. It would feel so much more friendly. I kind of want to go to the store next time I'm up that way. I think it is a good idea.

Great article! My article is also discussing omni-channel retailing and I really do think this is where retail is heading and think it is going to greatly improve overall customer experience!

The articles summarizes the most recent trends in e-commerce by giving advice to online retailers about what they should be aware of in 2013.

The page layout definitely has strong influence.. A company's website is becoming most important.. For most this is how a person gets their first impression on the business. The more tech savvy the business becomes the better likelihood for success in my opinion.

The number one must have is definitely mobile optimization. I actually tried buying something off my phone today while I was in the car. This creates for convenience for consumers because smart phones and tablets and other mobile devices are so popular right now. Free shipping is also extremely important especially for goods that weigh a lot or that would normally be a lot of money to ship.

I like how Finish Line addressed the issue when being asked about it. They did not put down the omni-channeling idea after their first attempt failed, but rather expressed the importance of it and the importance of doing it right. I think it made them seem very professional and very customer-focused. I think the employees using iPads is a great idea for Finish Line. It would be very helpful for customers to know right away whether they had their size in the back rather than having to wait for the employee to check and then return and find the customer. While the hiccup with the system may have cost them, I think the general idea is a great one, as long as it is executed properly.

I have to agree with Sarah and Paige, failure isn't about falling it's about staying down. It is easy to see that Finish Line won't stay down and are eager to try again. For a shoe company which doesn't have a lot to separate itself from its competition, the desire to do better and offer new services is an important aspect to keep them as a top competitor in the market.

Agreeing with Sarah and Paige, I think Finish Line was very professional in the way they handled the "hiccup." It is clear that not everything can work smoothly 100% of the time, but I think they are doing a great job bouncing back from that. Also, going along with what they have already stated, I think the iPads really are going to improve the customer service because I know when I'm shopping for tennis shoes and they have to go back and look and then they get stopped by someone else and other people ask questions on their way to look, it can take a while so I think costumers will really appreciate the employees being able to let them know if they have what they want right at that moment. I think this will be very beneficial for the company!