Group items tagged

I think the article is right to a certain extent, but the example of Abercrombie is a bit extreme. Obviously, every company tries to target a specific group of consumers but does that necessarily always have to imply that its marketing strategies are discriminatory? Shouldn't a company have the right to target a certain consumer base in order to ensure a profit? Or does the seeking for profit not justify any type of discrimination no matter how small?

This article focuses on three brands who have shunned specific consumer segments. Abercrombie and Fitch, Cristal and Burberry all have experienced issues in their process of market segmentation with offending specific consumers. Is offending specific consumers an inevitable consequence that all companies/brands will have to face? Not all brands can succeed with a one size fits all type of mentality, so how and when is it alright to completely exclude consumer segments? The types of people hired at these stores go through a specific process that is also discriminatory. For example, at A&F it is commonplace for only thin and attractive individuals to be hired on. Do we have a problem with this? How would we feel if we had the opposite type of individuals assisting us?

I agree with a lot of the previous comments. While I do not think it is right for brands such we Abercrombie to expressively shun people from their stores because they are not the right size or shape or do not have the right look, I think it's acceptable for stores to segment in terms of their "target customer." Whether or not to factor in different body types or "pretty people" is a controversial question. When I worked at Hollister in high school, it was apparent that they searched for attractive people by the way they sifted through customers that came into the store, or the way they approached people in the mall. While I understand the need to segment a market and have a target customer, I do not think the people that work at these stores or the customers that shop there should all be the same.

This article discusses how Whole Foods is trying to position itself as a go-to grocery store. Do you think this is a good move for Whole Foods? Do you think their position as a organic and higher end health only grocery is a better position for them?

I think loyal customers will recognize that the brand is capitalizing on helping a community grow. I think it will help the brand because it's consumers are interested in helping the community and creating sustainable environments.

I think this article is very interesting because I had the same thoughts when learning that Whole Foods was expanding into these new areas. Since Whole Foods is considered a high-end grocery store, it really made me question what its marketing strategy actually is and if they are making the right decision by entering into these markets. I truly think this will be a challenge for Whole Foods because they are dealing with a market that is not truly its target market, but if they succeed I think this will strengthen Whole Foods' brand more than any other grocer.

This article details the struggle that luxury retail stores are having with providing a "personal customer experience." Because the products are so high end, they are expecting that aspect to talk for itself; however, customers are wanting a more personalized experience than what these stores are giving them. What do you guys think about this? And also how do you feel about the technology aspect they talk about in the end?

I believe that if I am going to spend a lot of money on an item, I should get treated with high end customer service.This is a reason why a lot of top brands have personal shoppers, because they know their target customer is willing to spend a lot of money for high quality goods. It is also important for high end retailers to display the value of their goods through the value of their store, even if it means dishing out a lot of money for renovations. Burberry is on the right track with integrating technology into a store that would not normally have this kind of technology. This technology gets the customer more involved in their shopping experience instead of just browsing around the store.

These luxury brands will not die. They may not be making the revenue they desire but they will not disappear. My mother for example has more of these items them I care to know. It is people like her that will keep this industry from disappearing. However with the economy it will be difficult to find new customers. But yes making the customer experience more personable will continue to bring the already loyal customers coming back. I do believe those five things they are going to change will help. But it will not necessarily bring in new customers.

This article discusses how apparel retailer Onward Reserve refines its e-mail targeting process in order to maximize brand exposure and increase consumer interaction. Do you think that e-mail targeting will remain relevant in the coming years and be an effective strategy? What other methods do you see retailers using to target particular markets and segments?

This is a clever idea. Not necessarily try to sell a product in every email, but more keep the consumer engaged as to what is going on the company. I believe this will help cut back on the number of customer getting annoyed by all the emails sent out by certain companies always trying to sell something.. I believe this method should be adapted by more companies.

I think that e-mail targeting will not remain a relevant strategy. I am already overwhelmed and overlook e-mails from companies. But, if there is an innovative e-mail or heading then my interest will be met. It depends on the content and how many times I receive e-mails whether or not I open it up.