Group items tagged

I think this article is really great. I was interested to see that Zappos let the call center spend 10 hours with a customer. What were they doing for that long? Also, the article mentions Twitter activity sky-rocketing, and I find this interesting to see these companies utilizing different social media platforms to reach their customers.

There is something to be said when (by the time you are finished reading this article) you are smiling from ear to ear! I was so incredibly touched by these retailer's stories of impecable customer service - especially the Ritz-Carlton with Joshie the Teddy Bear being able to explore the hotel's pool, front desk, golf cart, and getting his own Ritz-Carlton ID badge before being returned to it's owner. When a company (any company or retailer) goes out of their way to make a customer's day and keep them as a loyal/return shopper, there is nothing more special and important. Just by reading these stories, I am going to tell people about the company. Word-of-mouth marketing is the best form....and here I haven't even been an actual customer or purchased from them! Really, really neat to read how associates go above and beyond. The sad thing is that we just don't hear enough of these stories any more - it's almost like they come "once in a blue moon" when shouldn't they be happening every day? Food for thought as we go into our own customer service roles in the future!

Like has been mentioned in the previous comments, this article was a real eye opener. The lengths that these companies go to in order to provide spectacular service to their customers is remarkable. These companies are making a name for themselves and this service is helping to increase their brand reputation. People will be drawn in by the experience they can receive.

My brain makes me wonder how the company would react if an opposite reaction is given. Take the last one with the tiger bread really looking like giraffe bread, what if another child looked at that and was so unhappy that he can't eat awesome tiger bread anymore and has to eat stupid giraffe bread, and he sent in letters asking or begging to see tiger bread return. There is always a risk that it pleases one customer and displeases another. I can see going above and beyond like giving the grandmother clam chowder even on the off days and staying on the line for 10 hours but the "bottom up change" listed seems whimsical and pointless expect to have the story known and gain recognition. When I look at it that way, maybe a little too cynically because I am taking away the little girls giraffe bread, it seems like if you change your product for one person then why would the other customers expect any less. I think that good responses should be things you can replicate for every customer not just one or two over the top cases. I want my Tiger Bread back....

I agree with Petro's thoughts that JCPenney needs to listen to the customers. Apple is a different "breed" in a way because we as consumers don't know what we want in technology until we see it - I would have never been able to think I wanted a device such as the iPod or iPad until it was introduced. Now, I can't envision my life without them! JCPenney's "suburban house-wife consumers" need practical and versatile items. JCPenney's St. John's Bay brand was a $1 billion brand and they need to capitalize on their strengths - not completely take it out. They need to insert new and exciting items such as Joe Fresh but keep the elements that make their company successful...and carefully change "the right 20%." Have you all shopped the new brands at JCPenney and/or did you like the older/familiar brands we know and associate with the company?

I agree with Kara, JCPenny does need to listen to what the customers want -- not what they think the customers want. There was a great point made in the article that they had gotten rid of St.Johns Bay apparel line, which is a line some of their customers were loyal and kept coming back to JCP. This article is a great example as Prof King said "the right 20% change." Unfortunately, in recent years JCP has seemed to change the wrong 20% rather than the right 20% which is why they were doing so poorly. I do not think that Ron Johnson took into account that JCP is a completely different industry over Apple. I think when changing a brand a lot of factors come in to play and as stated in the article to target toward current customers and/or new ones is a decision the company has to make.

Well put ladies. As Kara mentioned, Apple is a one of a kind company... for now at least. Until specialized firms like Apple can successfully replicate the ability to predict market demand, it is unnecessary to take such risks, as JCPenny did with the removal of core brands, to boost sales. Although it is encouraged for firms to think outside the box in todays modern world, in order to grasp the attention of consumers along side multiple other stimulants, it is essential that firms do so in a cautious manner. This is a perfect example of the importance of "the right 20% change". Although it is unfortunate that JCPenny had to endure this experience, it has developed a significant message/ take away for the rest of the industry to learn from. It will take a lot for JCP to revitalize its image with lost customers, but I feel their history of strong customer service and attractive product lines will encourage benefit of the doubt in consumers minds. It is great that they are trying to reach new consumer markets, but JCP must not forget about those who got them to where they are today. They need to nourish previous relationships, while continuing to cultivate seeds within the upcoming consumers(younger families, young adults) to stretch their loyalty to JCP into the future.

I think all four of you nailed it! The last sentence of that article states "this will involve a lot of listening," and that is exactly what JCP needs to do. They need to listen to their most important voice, the consumer -- what do they want, not "what JCP thinks the consumer should want." Overall, as we have learned, you must start with the customer and build from there--this is what JCP needs to do to start moving in the right direction.

This was an interesting article that clearly showed that marketing plans are not one size fits all. What works for one company may not work for another, and JCP is an excellent example of a company that needed to do more research on their customers before implementing a plan. I was very surprised how little they did to look into what the customers were looking for. The troubles JCP is now experience is a warning to other companies to take a closer look at the consumer when creating new marketing strategies.

I always expect a personalized customer service in a high end store. The store should make me feel important/special in order to create value. I also think that whether you are a VIP member or someone who stops in occasionally, it is important to treat the customers the same way. Burberry took a neat approach by incorporating the technology into their stores. (Although the store is huge for the amount of clothes actually offered.) It's a great start and I also think that technology that recognizes repeat customers would be highly effective in this environment. However I also agree when the article says "so what" to technology. These stores still heavily rely on the interaction amongst employees and customers so there is no way that technology can completely take over these high end stores.

I think that Finish Line is going to benefit highly from being able to do mobile transactions, especially during the holiday season. This will be able to help them eliminating lines and making for a better overall customer experience. I think it may take some consumers a while to become accustomed to, but overall I feel like that is where technology is bringing us in the retail world and it can only help the customer experience.

It is clear that more retailers are moving towards mobile POS systems, and it is interesting to imagine stores without cash registers. Nonetheless, most consumers can't stand the idea of sitting in line when all they want to do is pay once they've chosen the item or items they want. And not only are there problems with long lines, but there are also problems with not being able to find someone to help you when you need it. I think retailers switching to the mobile POS system is an advantage because they can interact more with the customers, while having the ability of being a portable checkout. The convenience of the mobile POS system allows the sales rep to converse and inform the customer of the product they are looking at, and shortens the decision to buy time since the sales rep can swipe the customers card immediately once the customer decides to buy.

I think this is a genius idea. I hate going into finish line and waiting in line for ages because of how crowded the place always is. Giving the attendance the ability to do mobile transactions with decrease the clutter of people in the stores who can get in and out quickly and make the experience much more enjoyable!

I can see why Finish Line is moving in this direction because a lot of the retail industry is following suit. I think the combination of technology and good customer service is a great thing to have in the retail industry but only if the customer service is solid as well. I am a little skeptical about Finish Line doing this only because when I go into tennis shoe stores which is what Finish Line's main product is, I like to talk to someone with a lot of knowledge on the product. I like getting an expert's opinion on running shoes because they are all made so differently.

I feel like the next logical step for finish line would be to offer an array of customization options on a mobile application due to the trend in which people like to individualize their shoes. Prior to this, you would have to buy a personalized product directly from the manufacturer based on the options that they allowed, and were often times much costlier than they might have been otherwise. By acting as a third party on behalf of this order, Finish Line not only provides a channel to its consumers for these customization options, but gives manufacturers more exposure to this application than they had prior. Its a win-win.

I agree, it is important to be innovative and develop more ways of approaching the customer. However, in the end it is also important to be distinctive in other disciplines like direct customer service or outstanding product quality and design. When I went into a Finish Line store the first time in my life yesterday, I didnt really see much differences in products or design in comparison to European Stores or Foot Locker.

This validities my the presentation that I did in class last week stating that the omni-channel retailing approach is where the retail industry is heading... Great article....

I agree with AT&T's stance on store layout and in-store customer service since this was the aspect of Phone retailing that was missing most of the time. At least that is my experience from Germany and the Netherlands. I think there is a huge potential for this model in other markets then the US as well.

I 100% agree with Paige -- this article shows the importance of e-commerce and omni-channel retailing has for companies. Although Finish Line lost $3M at thier first attempt of the use of e-commerece they did not let that get them down and are continuing their efforts. I think that use of iPads in the store will improve customer service as well as operations as a whole. The idea of employees being able to tell me weather if they what I want in stock right away puts them at an advantage the worst is when you wait minutes just to find out the store does is currently out of that size of style. I think the use of iPads will also increase sales -- especially if you can order it and have it shipped for free right there and then. As long as the new system has no hiccups it will be great for Finish Line and will greatly benefit them on multiple stand points.

To piggyback off Megan, I also find this very interesting because about three weeks ago, something very similar happened with my friends and I in Chicago. We spent the entire day downtown and spent our money on the train ride, taxis, food, and a Ferris Wheel ride instead of purchasing items on Michigan Ave. I think all of us would agree that going to Navy Pier, touring Trump Tower, riding the Ferris Wheel, taking pictures at the bean, etc. made that "overall experience" more than buying "stuff." Also, I think DIY projects are becoming more and more popular. For example, before coming to school, I went into a little boutique close to home and found a few things I liked, but instead of buying them there, I purchased the supplies needed to make them myself. Though they did not look exactly like they had in the store, they were much less expensive and more special to me. So overall, I think people are starting to craft and do more DIY projects instead of buying items at a store.

This was very interesting to read about because it is so true. There are a ton of people, my friends included, that prefer to online shop than buy things in a store. I am more of an in-store shopper; however, I do shop online occasionally. The most interesting part of the article to me was about whether or not our generation was becoming more or less "material-focused." While we do tend to be buying more online, I think this generation is just as material, if not more, than any other. Because we have the option to buy online, it gives us easier access to purchasing items: not only can we buy in-store, but we can also buy online. This, in my opinion, give us the a greater chance of materiality.

I think the topic that this article is centered around is really easy for our generation to relate to, especially for me. I can't tell you how many times I go to H&M, Nordstrom, or any other retail store just to "check out what they have." I would say there's an even 50/50 chance that I will walk out with something or not. I think the most true idea in Peterson's article is "almost anything they [millennials] want can be found and bought online, when and where they want it." I think this is so true of this generation because if we can't find something we want online, that item that we wanted is pretty much scrapped because we cannot look at it from our own homes. Making everything as most convenient as possible for consumers, in my opinion, is the the primary goals for retail stores and this article definitely discusses that aspect.

I agree with Megan and Sarah. Last semester in Prof King's class we discussed JCPenny's plan to become more of an "experience" for shoppers. I am not quite sure if JCPenny was able to execute this plan, but it seems as though it would work for millennials. Even the History of US Retailing predicts that "specialty operations that bring selection and a high- quality customer service and shopping experience" will survive and prosper. Megan and Sarah went for the enjoyment of friends and the city. That is exactly what our generation and millennials want. What we want is an experience, to be a part of something. I think that if retailers understand how to do this then they will have more customers. On top of this, the article says that the millennials are becoming more "frugal" therefore retailers need to make more of an effort to prove that a store is worth a millennial's money. Just a quick thought - don't know if any clothing companies do this or not (probably) but if an online store let a customer create a lookalike avatar - same height, weight, ect. Now the online shopper can dress themselves on the computer (kind of creepy to think about but hey! An experience nonetheless). I think ideas like that which add an experience would spark millennials' interest.

It is good to see that Finish Line is bouncing back from recent hiccups due to their e-commerce. Thirteen percent is a huge increase and showing that Finish Line has been able to come up with better tactics such as their relationship with Macy's and growing their specialty running group.

After visiting the Finish Line, it is easy to see why they have increased Net Income. The store is a lot more modern with tablets and fancy lighting. They are playing on the experience factor we have mentioned in class. By changing the layout, they have sustained and continue to grow their brand image which I believe have led them to an increase in Net Income.

This trend follows the Millenial's "on the go" mentality. The unplanned location seems to be catching on and the people are attracted because of the quality of food. The food trucks are able to offer a relationship with costumers considering the chief is most likely running the cashier. There seems to be a perception that the food is more fresh than restaurants and food trucks are picking up on trends by offering organic options. The experience is more personal interaction which is what Millenials want.

I agree with Lina, it is all about the experience, and the food trucks can provide this. They are able to provide great service to their customers and provide more options on trending food such as organics. I am interested to see if there will just be more food trucks in large cities like Indy and Chicago or if they will start appearing in cities that are more medium sized cities. They are projecting a large increase in revenues and I am interested to see how they will able to achieve this.

Good topic! Also in Germany, food trucks are becoming bigger and bigger. The ability to cover several areas and thus markets, is a high advantage. However it is also hard to maintain a working customer relationship. In Germany a lot of them have fixed dates at which they are at certain predetermined places, so customers can literaly chase them. I think by doing so, they lose a big fraction of their competitive advantage again, because in the end they do depend on fixed locations. However, if they don't do it, they can only count on spontaneous purchases. It is a trade off!

Yes, I am really curious about the next years and how far this whole e-commerce trend goes. Especially in Asian countries like Japan or Korea, where technique is always an important topic and Omnichannel shopping is also on the rise. It would be interesting to see whether they are going to surpass the US and western countries at some point or whether they stick to their traditional way of shopping.