MK 473 Fall 2013

Top e-commerce trends

This article discusses Staples incorporation of interactive kiosks and digital signage into their stores to help be more efficient with their square footage. They are trying to give customers "access to endless aisle shopping and ordering capabilities." Do you think shoppers will be disappointed by the limited amount of options on hand or will the ability to order more items in-store outweigh the limited selection?

The digital kiosk idea can be great, but only if it works effectively. In my experience, I tried using Targets kiosks that they started using to pull up a registry for a wedding. However, the system wouldn't allow me access to the registry, and even after an employee tried helping me, we both just kind of gave up. This is just one example how technology if used improperly can do more to hinder a consumer's experience than help.

I am not sure how I feel about Staples new plan to offer a limited selection in-store. If this is more for small items that there are many types of -- it is helpful and takes away the frustration of searching for a specific item among many alike items -- but why would we go into the store when we can just order it online? Going off Lina -- sometimes the reason people go into stores is to get the item there and then . . . this makes me think will ordering it in store be more of a hassle than a convenience? I think it will be interesting to see how consumers react to this new shopping experience. . I think it is a good way to incorporate online and in-store shopping but I think that this may just drive consumers to shop online and stray away from going into the store.

White paper: Designing an Effective Omnichannel In-store Experience: 5 Key Considerations

This article discusses how Whole Foods is trying to position itself as a go-to grocery store. Do you think this is a good move for Whole Foods? Do you think their position as a organic and higher end health only grocery is a better position for them?

I think loyal customers will recognize that the brand is capitalizing on helping a community grow. I think it will help the brand because it's consumers are interested in helping the community and creating sustainable environments.

I think this article is very interesting because I had the same thoughts when learning that Whole Foods was expanding into these new areas. Since Whole Foods is considered a high-end grocery store, it really made me question what its marketing strategy actually is and if they are making the right decision by entering into these markets. I truly think this will be a challenge for Whole Foods because they are dealing with a market that is not truly its target market, but if they succeed I think this will strengthen Whole Foods' brand more than any other grocer.

This is another article that outlines how companies target consumers by obtaining information about there interests. Many people feel that a lot of these methods of gaining information are invasive or otherwise unsettling. How do you feel about information being gathered about your consumer behavior? Do you feel that they are going too far?

This article was really interesting, creepy, and yet educational all at the same time! I'm not surprised at all that companies are using these algorithms to track our movements. Yes, nothing is safe in this world and how can anybody trust anything?! But at the same time, we as consumers need to be aware of these insecurities because you never know who has access to the Wifi connections or internet access. All of this psychological analysis is used to increase sales. Maybe they didn't want this particular example to get out that the same type of technology is used in tracking terrorists, but we should understand as potential marketers that this is just to generate sales. And because of programs such as these, we may be introduced to brands and products that could change our lives for the better.

The ad targeting is very interesting- I have definitely noticed the targeted marketing durning this project. After searching Vera Bradley for my in class project all of my advertisements on Facebook and other searches are all Vera Bradley products!

This article discusses how apparel retailer Onward Reserve refines its e-mail targeting process in order to maximize brand exposure and increase consumer interaction. Do you think that e-mail targeting will remain relevant in the coming years and be an effective strategy? What other methods do you see retailers using to target particular markets and segments?

This is a clever idea. Not necessarily try to sell a product in every email, but more keep the consumer engaged as to what is going on the company. I believe this will help cut back on the number of customer getting annoyed by all the emails sent out by certain companies always trying to sell something.. I believe this method should be adapted by more companies.

I think that e-mail targeting will not remain a relevant strategy. I am already overwhelmed and overlook e-mails from companies. But, if there is an innovative e-mail or heading then my interest will be met. It depends on the content and how many times I receive e-mails whether or not I open it up.

I think the article is right to a certain extent, but the example of Abercrombie is a bit extreme. Obviously, every company tries to target a specific group of consumers but does that necessarily always have to imply that its marketing strategies are discriminatory? Shouldn't a company have the right to target a certain consumer base in order to ensure a profit? Or does the seeking for profit not justify any type of discrimination no matter how small?

This article focuses on three brands who have shunned specific consumer segments. Abercrombie and Fitch, Cristal and Burberry all have experienced issues in their process of market segmentation with offending specific consumers. Is offending specific consumers an inevitable consequence that all companies/brands will have to face? Not all brands can succeed with a one size fits all type of mentality, so how and when is it alright to completely exclude consumer segments? The types of people hired at these stores go through a specific process that is also discriminatory. For example, at A&F it is commonplace for only thin and attractive individuals to be hired on. Do we have a problem with this? How would we feel if we had the opposite type of individuals assisting us?

I agree with a lot of the previous comments. While I do not think it is right for brands such we Abercrombie to expressively shun people from their stores because they are not the right size or shape or do not have the right look, I think it's acceptable for stores to segment in terms of their "target customer." Whether or not to factor in different body types or "pretty people" is a controversial question. When I worked at Hollister in high school, it was apparent that they searched for attractive people by the way they sifted through customers that came into the store, or the way they approached people in the mall. While I understand the need to segment a market and have a target customer, I do not think the people that work at these stores or the customers that shop there should all be the same.

This article discuses the future of retailing for AT&T specifically for brick-and-mortar locations. Their new store design will offer highly personalized services, solutions - not transactions, and emotionally engaging experiences.

I like the idea of the reps having tablets and their not being a counter between the customer and the rep. It would feel so much more friendly. I kind of want to go to the store next time I'm up that way. I think it is a good idea.

Great article! My article is also discussing omni-channel retailing and I really do think this is where retail is heading and think it is going to greatly improve overall customer experience!

This article details the struggle that luxury retail stores are having with providing a "personal customer experience." Because the products are so high end, they are expecting that aspect to talk for itself; however, customers are wanting a more personalized experience than what these stores are giving them. What do you guys think about this? And also how do you feel about the technology aspect they talk about in the end?

I believe that if I am going to spend a lot of money on an item, I should get treated with high end customer service.This is a reason why a lot of top brands have personal shoppers, because they know their target customer is willing to spend a lot of money for high quality goods. It is also important for high end retailers to display the value of their goods through the value of their store, even if it means dishing out a lot of money for renovations. Burberry is on the right track with integrating technology into a store that would not normally have this kind of technology. This technology gets the customer more involved in their shopping experience instead of just browsing around the store.

These luxury brands will not die. They may not be making the revenue they desire but they will not disappear. My mother for example has more of these items them I care to know. It is people like her that will keep this industry from disappearing. However with the economy it will be difficult to find new customers. But yes making the customer experience more personable will continue to bring the already loyal customers coming back. I do believe those five things they are going to change will help. But it will not necessarily bring in new customers.

I agree with the article, that loyalty programs are not working. In my own experience there are only TWO kinds of loylty programs that are working somehow. Firstly, a loyalty program that is introduced by a brand/shop/store that I am already loyal with, e.g. the favourite coffee shop, or the closest supermarket. In those shops a loyalty program might even lead customers to buy more and appreciate it. Secondly, what I think is also working are loyalty programs introduced by a pool of shops. E.g. in Germany we had PayBack for a long time, which was a joint loyalty program that gave you points in almost any major retailer in Germany, so it was used by a lot of people. Noone wants to have 10 or 15 loyalty program plastic cards in their wallet, though...

I believe one of the largest reasons why loyalty is such an obstacle in today's markets is primarily due to fast paced, innovative society that we live in now. Consumers are becoming so oriented to 'the next big thing' that it is increasingly difficult for businesses to keep up with this rapid changing of trends, especially considering the small window a product has before it is one-upped.

I thought this was interesting to read as I myself have several loyalty cards to various places. I never put much thought into it, but after this article it really emphasizes the fact that I. Not really loyal to the brand as much as e transactional benefits. Given an alternate and similar option at a better price I would probably jump ship from those I support now to something different. It may not create the sincere loyalty, but it has worked in keeping me to returning to certain places for the transactional benefits, so it doesn't seem like a total failure.

Green Mountain Coffee is opening a Keurig Store to hopefully get to know more about their customers and offer on site demos, special promotions, new product offerings, and unique accessories for the Keurig to customers

This is an interesting strategy for Keurig. Like Lindsey mentioned, it'll be interesting to see how this effects the companies over all sales. Although the venture will provide fantastic PR, the question is whether he gains will outweigh the costs. I agree with Lindsey again though, it is likely that a majority if the visitors will be non-existing customers, of whom will leave with a positive experience and thus opt to buy a Keurig machine of their own. It will also be interesting to see the "accessories" that will be available for sale. These products would appeal to the existing customers, but would also highlight their need to "update" their Keurig models and thus consume more of the brands products. It would be great to see Keurig develop their "eco-friendly" line a bit further. It consists of k-cups that are recycle friendly. Ufortunately these products are quite a bit more expensive, a problem Keurig is already facing; making products more available to a larger demographic.

This article was fascinating to me! This is another example of how companies who used to be primarily product only or even online only want customer feedback and input. I think the idea is great - to let people use the machine to see how it works and how it can work in their everyday lives. But the location 14 miles outside Boston is a little far away I feel. I hope it is successful - already the outside looks sleek, classy, and expensive and I think the design alone with get people into the door to explore the concept. Since their goal isn't to sell, sell, sell but rather to experience and learn from consumers, I think it will work. But I do agree in this still tight economy, going to your local Walmart or Bed, Bath, and Beyond to buy the same coffee pods is realistic.

This article has great content about how marketers can master the consumer decision process. The article was written about a year ago, but the information is still very relevant and provides helpful tips on how to be most effective in this area as a marketer.

I would have to agree with Megan on this point. There is a statistic somewhere that identifies the average amount of time a person spends actually observing an ad, and in that tiny time frame, there is no way you could pull away all the information many ads are trying to convey. This is why there is a great push these days towards image messaging as opposed to textual advertisements

Although this article is titled, "Forget Engagement, Customers want Simplicity" I think this article provides an excellent response: http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerdooley/2012/07/03/ikea-effect/ Although it was written a little over a year ago, I think it makes a pressing point. Simplicity is good, but too much of it and you will push the consumer away. There is a fine line between obligating the customer to be overly involved in the decision making process, but we need to remember to leverage their spending power. Consumers feel confident about their purchased because THEY chose to purchase it, not because it was pushed into their faces. Marketers need to remember the value the customer receives from the invested interest in the product. Although simplicity is an efficient and beneficial advantage, it limits personal investment into a product which intern negatively affects the value it holds in the consumers mind.

Effective simplicity to capitalize on consumer behavior: Although specialized grocers like Whole Foods provide limited product options to appear "simple" and avoid overwhelming consumers, does the lack of familiar items available intimidate the consumer and alter their decision making process?

A FUNNY look at Whole Foods - please be advised that the author is a stand up comic!

This article discusses why consumers typically jump on impulse buys. Being knowledgeable of these triggers will make the buyer more aware in the future.

I think this article perfectly describes a lot of purchases made on black Friday. I have made a lot of purchasing decisions on this list. This is exactly how stores draw people into their stores by offering a huge sale but only for a limited time. Or for online shopping stores sometimes offer free shipping for a limited time in order to create impulse purchases.

I totally agree with Emily. After working the last three Black Fridays at Express, it's amazing to see how impulsive customers are when buying items. I am definitely one of those people as well, especially in a huge sale environment. You ask yourself "will it ever be this price again?" And if the answer is no, I will probably buy it.

I like the "show room" idea. That could really boom.

I agree Lina this has a chance really take off

The description of the millenials are dead on, now I wonder what marketers will do with this information moving forward.

I actually read this story the other day and really enjoyed it. I was wondering if this would end up on Diigo. Like Sarah said, who knew the millennials were 7% larger than the baby-boomer generation. It is a huge market to target along with a lot of potential - it will be very interesting to see the many different ways marketers target and cater to millennials in the future.

It'll be interesting to see how accurately this article describes market growth as influenced by the millennials. As an entrepurener, I personal found this article to be helpful as a guide for my next interest; home ownership. It seems like the next few years could provide ample opportunity to capitalize on the growth in the housing market that is soon to come. Although the ,market is lagging right now, this is the time to buy in, when costs are low, then capitalize and lease properties once the population begins to seek homes away from mom and dad. the question is, what other industries will be influenced by this flux in the market? The article mentioned the growth of sales that will be seen in construction stores like Home Depot etc. but what about variables that are dependent of those organizations? Will the price of various resources increase? for example, wood, concrete, marble etc. Also, what will be done demographically to account for this oncoming flux in living styles? Business will need to capitalize on the innovations in living patterns that are going to develop from this flux-mainly locations. Where will these people move from? More importantly, what lifestyles are they moving to?

How limited offers can make consumers perceive products as better than they actually are.

I really liked this article because I was able to find aspects where I can really relate. One thing that came to mind is durning Christmas/winter months, Hershey's releases candy cane peppermint kisses. I have associated these with only that time and I'll buy more of them specifically because I know they won't be here long. I don't feel like this is something we as consumers need to learnt o say no to. I think it is merely a marketing ploy that works well. For those from Indiana, or other similar states in terms of seasonal changes, I feel like we are all somewhat trained with this mentality due to our seasonal changes. Towards the end of Winter we can't wait for Spring and so on. I ink it would be interesting to see did there is any difference related to this scarcity concept among people from Indiana for example versus Florida. I think it would make sense that people in Indiana may buy more of something associated with winter during that time due to the temperatures we experience versus Florida who would still have that winter spirit, but not the weather to further encourage it. It could have no effect, but I think it's interesting to think about.