Group items tagged

I know I personally like to get any of my shopping done early that I can merely to avoid the holiday traffic and craziness that happens. At the same time, I always tend to end up with coupons or even small gift cards when I do shopping that are only valid within that 'prime' holiday shopping season. So, I think those type of programs really work because I always end up coming back to use them even though I had intentions of not shopping during that time. I also think it is interesting to look at retailers offering holiday type sales earlier and earlier in the year. I wonder what the limit will be as each retailer tries to trump the other. I also really like the extended return policy. That is EXTREMELY useful and could definitely be part of a deciding factor for me on who I shop with given that I could get similar products at each place.

I think for stores and shoppers can benefit from this model. Stores can increase their revenue but shoppers can shop early and have a way to afford a better holiday. It also encourages shoppers to come into the store more frequently and earlier in the season. It will be interesting to see if other stores adopt this model. I surprised Walmart does not have this as an option for some of their larger items.

Like Krista I wonder what the limit will be.. just keeps getting pushed back further and further. I know at J.Crew we just started implementing "holiday return policy". More than anything I think that offering such a guarantee offers a level of comfort to the customer. It makes them feel more confident about the purchase and more likely to buy it. I like the aspect of honoring online prices with store prices - very important.

I agree with Lina comment. The extended return policy is a ploy to get consumers in the store, make a purchase and know they have time to return it if they desire. Comfort, ease, and satisfaction for and of the customer will drive business.

I can't stand the thought of shopping really early for Christmas. Some of the things this article talked about really shocked me. The part about Walmart rolling out it's holiday shopping in August is not something I would find appealing. I think that takes the Christmas spirit out of Christmas completely. It's always a tradition with my mom to shop in November and December when it is acceptable to think about Christmas! I completely get the idea of budgeting, buying a few gifts here and there, but starting shopping in August? Not for me.

I think that Finish Line is going to benefit highly from being able to do mobile transactions, especially during the holiday season. This will be able to help them eliminating lines and making for a better overall customer experience. I think it may take some consumers a while to become accustomed to, but overall I feel like that is where technology is bringing us in the retail world and it can only help the customer experience.

It is clear that more retailers are moving towards mobile POS systems, and it is interesting to imagine stores without cash registers. Nonetheless, most consumers can't stand the idea of sitting in line when all they want to do is pay once they've chosen the item or items they want. And not only are there problems with long lines, but there are also problems with not being able to find someone to help you when you need it. I think retailers switching to the mobile POS system is an advantage because they can interact more with the customers, while having the ability of being a portable checkout. The convenience of the mobile POS system allows the sales rep to converse and inform the customer of the product they are looking at, and shortens the decision to buy time since the sales rep can swipe the customers card immediately once the customer decides to buy.

I think this is a genius idea. I hate going into finish line and waiting in line for ages because of how crowded the place always is. Giving the attendance the ability to do mobile transactions with decrease the clutter of people in the stores who can get in and out quickly and make the experience much more enjoyable!

I can see why Finish Line is moving in this direction because a lot of the retail industry is following suit. I think the combination of technology and good customer service is a great thing to have in the retail industry but only if the customer service is solid as well. I am a little skeptical about Finish Line doing this only because when I go into tennis shoe stores which is what Finish Line's main product is, I like to talk to someone with a lot of knowledge on the product. I like getting an expert's opinion on running shoes because they are all made so differently.

I feel like the next logical step for finish line would be to offer an array of customization options on a mobile application due to the trend in which people like to individualize their shoes. Prior to this, you would have to buy a personalized product directly from the manufacturer based on the options that they allowed, and were often times much costlier than they might have been otherwise. By acting as a third party on behalf of this order, Finish Line not only provides a channel to its consumers for these customization options, but gives manufacturers more exposure to this application than they had prior. Its a win-win.

I agree, it is important to be innovative and develop more ways of approaching the customer. However, in the end it is also important to be distinctive in other disciplines like direct customer service or outstanding product quality and design. When I went into a Finish Line store the first time in my life yesterday, I didnt really see much differences in products or design in comparison to European Stores or Foot Locker.

I grew up riding horses- so naturally I didn't enjoy this article- but like Lina said above, I think it is important to recgonize how one brand image can really effect the whole industry. Because Tesco made this big error other brands are hearing the effects of their mistake- and I bet Chipolte is benifiting from it based on there new ad!

Wow! This is some really cool technology, and it sounds like it would make life convenient- but I can't help but wonder about the security of the system and how easy it would be for someone to hack into your paypal account and risk you losing everything. Also, it wasn't explained very well how stores monitor this, can you just walk out with our product in the grocery store or how does that work? It seems like although this would increase efficiency of the shopping experience there may be some pretty big issues to iron out as well.

All of the things that continue to evolve with technology just blows my mind! This PayPal Beacon does seem really great, efficient, and very convenient but I do have some of the same concerns that Megan pointed out. So when you go up to confirm, do they check to see what you have to make sure everything is accounted for? I think this does have great potential and would make the check out process much easier, I would just want to know a little bit more about this system.

Megan and Sarah nailed my same concerns. Seems like there are some loose ends that need to be cleared up but interesting concept overall. I like the idea that I could be greeted by my name when I walk into a store. I think this could help marketers learn a lot about their customers and what people buy when they come into a store. For example, it would be great if a sales employee could see when and what were the last items a customer purchased. That way the sales associate can direct the customer to products they like. PayPal Beacon could help out immensely!

WOW, what an invention. How perfect would this be for running errands in the most efficient way possible? There would practically be no line or no waiting. I had the same thoughts going through my mind about making sure products are accounted for, but with a product like this I feel like the experts would cover that. My concern is towards what stores will actually catch on and implement this new device. Will it primarily be retail/clothing stores, or could it be incorporated into Target, or Macy's? The PayPay Beacon seems to offer a lot in terms of convenience and I am interested to see who will catch on.

I think that this positioning strategy is a great move for Whole Foods -- especially if they are successful. It seems more and more consumers value companies that have a positive impact on society and Whole Foods is doing just that.

Personally, I think this is great! Though the new Whole Foods in Detroit may not be in the best location or have the best reputation, I do think it is very important for everyone to have access to healthy food. I do believe this is a good move for Whole Foods and could have a very positive/successful outcome.

This article is really interesting because I was thinking the same thoughts about Whole Foods marketing strategy by establishing new stores in these areas. Since Whole Foods is thought of as a high-end grocery store, it is intriguing that they even want to expand into these low-income areas. I think this will definitely be a challenge for Whole Foods, but if they ultimately have success I think it will further strengthen Whole Foods' brand more so than any other grocer.

The article is totally right! I worked for a year at a gas station next to my studies and we had these 'puy 9 coffees, get the 10th for free' cards, which we wanted to hand out to all taxi drivers, to make them visit our gas station frequently. Every second driver refused to take a card, when I offered them, because of the huge amount of other loyalty cards in its wallet (as Raphael already pointed out). Furthermore, I saw that we also have those cards for drinks at the HRC Store and I never took one, because I simply consider the drinks as too expensive to buy a dozen of them, just to get one for free!

This is a great article! It's very similar to a costco card or a sam's club membership. The only way a loyalty card like this would work is if the company had prices that beat juggernauts such as walmart or target. Most people on campus do have costco cards, so whether it's the Costco food or the ability to buy literally almost anything at the store, Costco seems to have found the solution.

Apple makes a difference because they have made us brand advocates. However, after learning about the scandals going on - I double take. Can the brand we love do such terrible things? Makes me rethink the integrity of the company. The brand does seduce you but on the other hand I think that Apple is facing some merchandising management problems. There used to be buzz about new releases, but I heard a rumor that another phone will be released shortly? In my opinion they are loosing their merchandising management touch by releasing so many products consecutively. Apple is starting to lose its "make a difference" feel. How can Apple make a difference when there isn't even a difference in their products anymore.

I agree with Lina, Apple has gained a large following of loyal consumers, but there continue to be releases of their "new" iPhones and what not, but there is relatively few differences between the products. I was unaware of the scandals that Apple is a part of, and it makes me wonder if more people become knowledgeable about the situation will that reduce their customer loyalty and deter people from joining the Apple craze.

Anyone else getting a website error when they try to read the article?

Wow, what a surprising twist in an a very insightful article! I had no idea Target acquired this much data on its consumers. To be frank it almost worries me a little bit how closely one is monitored by retailers. But as Lina said Target took better steps in randomizing coupons, which makes me feel a little better. This was a great contribution to the class Camille thanks! Megan, Try this link http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/how-target-figured-out-a-teen-girl-was-pregnant-before-her-father-did/ it's a very similar article to the one Camille posted!

To piggyback off Megan, I also find this very interesting because about three weeks ago, something very similar happened with my friends and I in Chicago. We spent the entire day downtown and spent our money on the train ride, taxis, food, and a Ferris Wheel ride instead of purchasing items on Michigan Ave. I think all of us would agree that going to Navy Pier, touring Trump Tower, riding the Ferris Wheel, taking pictures at the bean, etc. made that "overall experience" more than buying "stuff." Also, I think DIY projects are becoming more and more popular. For example, before coming to school, I went into a little boutique close to home and found a few things I liked, but instead of buying them there, I purchased the supplies needed to make them myself. Though they did not look exactly like they had in the store, they were much less expensive and more special to me. So overall, I think people are starting to craft and do more DIY projects instead of buying items at a store.

This was very interesting to read about because it is so true. There are a ton of people, my friends included, that prefer to online shop than buy things in a store. I am more of an in-store shopper; however, I do shop online occasionally. The most interesting part of the article to me was about whether or not our generation was becoming more or less "material-focused." While we do tend to be buying more online, I think this generation is just as material, if not more, than any other. Because we have the option to buy online, it gives us easier access to purchasing items: not only can we buy in-store, but we can also buy online. This, in my opinion, give us the a greater chance of materiality.

I think the topic that this article is centered around is really easy for our generation to relate to, especially for me. I can't tell you how many times I go to H&M, Nordstrom, or any other retail store just to "check out what they have." I would say there's an even 50/50 chance that I will walk out with something or not. I think the most true idea in Peterson's article is "almost anything they [millennials] want can be found and bought online, when and where they want it." I think this is so true of this generation because if we can't find something we want online, that item that we wanted is pretty much scrapped because we cannot look at it from our own homes. Making everything as most convenient as possible for consumers, in my opinion, is the the primary goals for retail stores and this article definitely discusses that aspect.

I agree with Megan and Sarah. Last semester in Prof King's class we discussed JCPenny's plan to become more of an "experience" for shoppers. I am not quite sure if JCPenny was able to execute this plan, but it seems as though it would work for millennials. Even the History of US Retailing predicts that "specialty operations that bring selection and a high- quality customer service and shopping experience" will survive and prosper. Megan and Sarah went for the enjoyment of friends and the city. That is exactly what our generation and millennials want. What we want is an experience, to be a part of something. I think that if retailers understand how to do this then they will have more customers. On top of this, the article says that the millennials are becoming more "frugal" therefore retailers need to make more of an effort to prove that a store is worth a millennial's money. Just a quick thought - don't know if any clothing companies do this or not (probably) but if an online store let a customer create a lookalike avatar - same height, weight, ect. Now the online shopper can dress themselves on the computer (kind of creepy to think about but hey! An experience nonetheless). I think ideas like that which add an experience would spark millennials' interest.

Great article Lina!! I am sure that this is a strategy commonly used by retailers, but it is NOT one that should be used by JCP. This company is already in a lot of hot water and financial trouble as it is, it would be a safer bet to play it safe than to have their tactics exposed and eliminate the already shrinking customer-base that J.C. Penny has.

Of course, keep in mind, price anchoring has been standard practice in business for a long time. Not only do we see this in the retail industry, but also in other industries like healthcare, higher education, and auto sales. This is just the nature of capitalism; it;s a political economy that aims to maximize profits at minimal cost. The reasoning behind price anchoring is that original prices are the starting point for negotiations. Although this perspective is a useful tool for businesses trying to make an easy profit off of customers who think they're saving money, it is nonetheless insulting to those customers who have little to no leverage or agency to negotiate prices. The average consumer does not realize that this type of pricing occurs because most hold tight to the belief that businesses always have their best interest at heart; little do they know that businesses are interested in one thing and one thing only- the bottom line. So, although price anchoring may not be a GOOD strategy (because it not only insults the customer by taking advantage of them, but also strips them of their ability to make informed decisions) it is a strategy that works for all intended purposes. The reason it works is because everybody would like to hear that they have saved money. I see this anytime I go shopping with my mom; if there is a sale she's sure to be there because, to her at least, "any sale is a good sale."

Wow--I didn't know the millenials were 7% larger than the baby-boomer generation, but I would agree with Lina on this one in that how they described the millenials is pretty spot on. Even going as far as the car companies predicting the types of vehicles we will buy in the future, I do think they are overall pretty accurate in these predictions.

I think this article is really great. I was interested to see that Zappos let the call center spend 10 hours with a customer. What were they doing for that long? Also, the article mentions Twitter activity sky-rocketing, and I find this interesting to see these companies utilizing different social media platforms to reach their customers.

There is something to be said when (by the time you are finished reading this article) you are smiling from ear to ear! I was so incredibly touched by these retailer's stories of impecable customer service - especially the Ritz-Carlton with Joshie the Teddy Bear being able to explore the hotel's pool, front desk, golf cart, and getting his own Ritz-Carlton ID badge before being returned to it's owner. When a company (any company or retailer) goes out of their way to make a customer's day and keep them as a loyal/return shopper, there is nothing more special and important. Just by reading these stories, I am going to tell people about the company. Word-of-mouth marketing is the best form....and here I haven't even been an actual customer or purchased from them! Really, really neat to read how associates go above and beyond. The sad thing is that we just don't hear enough of these stories any more - it's almost like they come "once in a blue moon" when shouldn't they be happening every day? Food for thought as we go into our own customer service roles in the future!

Like has been mentioned in the previous comments, this article was a real eye opener. The lengths that these companies go to in order to provide spectacular service to their customers is remarkable. These companies are making a name for themselves and this service is helping to increase their brand reputation. People will be drawn in by the experience they can receive.

My brain makes me wonder how the company would react if an opposite reaction is given. Take the last one with the tiger bread really looking like giraffe bread, what if another child looked at that and was so unhappy that he can't eat awesome tiger bread anymore and has to eat stupid giraffe bread, and he sent in letters asking or begging to see tiger bread return. There is always a risk that it pleases one customer and displeases another. I can see going above and beyond like giving the grandmother clam chowder even on the off days and staying on the line for 10 hours but the "bottom up change" listed seems whimsical and pointless expect to have the story known and gain recognition. When I look at it that way, maybe a little too cynically because I am taking away the little girls giraffe bread, it seems like if you change your product for one person then why would the other customers expect any less. I think that good responses should be things you can replicate for every customer not just one or two over the top cases. I want my Tiger Bread back....