Skip to main content

Home/ MK 473 Fall 2013/ Group items tagged confidence

Rss Feed Group items tagged

anonymous

Marketers Have it Wrong: Forget Engagement, Customers Want Simplicity - 3 views

  •  
    This article has great content about how marketers can master the consumer decision process. The article was written about a year ago, but the information is still very relevant and provides helpful tips on how to be most effective in this area as a marketer.
  • ...4 more comments...
  •  
    Making it easier on us will make it easier on the companies. I still wonder how companies can implement this in the retail industries. Turbo tax was a good example but I am curious as to how you can make it easier in retail because retail stores may offer same types of clothing but completely different prices, quality, styles. Can't really think of anything off the top of my head, but may be a good discussion question.
  •  
    Interesting article! As I was reading it, I was thinking to myself about what I would want more, engagement or simplicity--and I do have to agree with them that simplicity would make things easier. In the last paragraph, the author states, "don't you think it's time to stop overwhelming consumers with marketing information and cut through the clutter?" I do think some marketing information is beneficial, but as a consumer, it would be nice to "cut through the clutter" and have things stated or marketed more simply.
  •  
    I think simplicity comes into play especially with the way we view advertisements. If a company conveys a message simply and concisely with out me having to really pay attention or sort through more information I think I am more likely to buy it. Also simple images have more of a design appeal and I think our generation is more focused on aesthetics and the way things look and feel- and simplicity plays a large role in that.
  •  
    I agree with Lina this is a tactic that would be hard to apply with clothing retailers, but it would be useful for electronic and appliance retailers. I was just on the Best Buy website, and for each product there was a whole page of information about its capabilities and features. They gave the option to compare products which helped to "cut the clutter". This was similar to Turbo Tax; there were options to choose four different products for a side by side comparison that gave a breakdown of the difference for the features and capabilities in just a few words. Best Buy is utilizing this simplistic tactic, and I personally love it!
  •  
    I would have to agree with Megan on this point. There is a statistic somewhere that identifies the average amount of time a person spends actually observing an ad, and in that tiny time frame, there is no way you could pull away all the information many ads are trying to convey. This is why there is a great push these days towards image messaging as opposed to textual advertisements
  •  
    Although this article is titled, "Forget Engagement, Customers want Simplicity" I think this article provides an excellent response: http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerdooley/2012/07/03/ikea-effect/ Although it was written a little over a year ago, I think it makes a pressing point. Simplicity is good, but too much of it and you will push the consumer away. There is a fine line between obligating the customer to be overly involved in the decision making process, but we need to remember to leverage their spending power. Consumers feel confident about their purchased because THEY chose to purchase it, not because it was pushed into their faces. Marketers need to remember the value the customer receives from the invested interest in the product. Although simplicity is an efficient and beneficial advantage, it limits personal investment into a product which intern negatively affects the value it holds in the consumers mind.
Sarah Wesp

Holiday 2013: For Once Early Shoppers Get A Deal - Forbes - 5 views

  •  
    This article explains ways retailers such as Toys-R-Us and K-Mart are using layaway, return policies, and reward programs to get consumers into their stores to ultimately make transactions. Can you think of other retailers who are implementing these types of incentives? Have any of you ever put something on layaway? Do you think these incentives/programs are beneficial for retailers?
  • ...5 more comments...
  •  
    I know I personally like to get any of my shopping done early that I can merely to avoid the holiday traffic and craziness that happens. At the same time, I always tend to end up with coupons or even small gift cards when I do shopping that are only valid within that 'prime' holiday shopping season. So, I think those type of programs really work because I always end up coming back to use them even though I had intentions of not shopping during that time. I also think it is interesting to look at retailers offering holiday type sales earlier and earlier in the year. I wonder what the limit will be as each retailer tries to trump the other. I also really like the extended return policy. That is EXTREMELY useful and could definitely be part of a deciding factor for me on who I shop with given that I could get similar products at each place.
  •  
    I think for stores and shoppers can benefit from this model. Stores can increase their revenue but shoppers can shop early and have a way to afford a better holiday. It also encourages shoppers to come into the store more frequently and earlier in the season. It will be interesting to see if other stores adopt this model. I surprised Walmart does not have this as an option for some of their larger items.
  •  
    Like Krista I wonder what the limit will be.. just keeps getting pushed back further and further. I know at J.Crew we just started implementing "holiday return policy". More than anything I think that offering such a guarantee offers a level of comfort to the customer. It makes them feel more confident about the purchase and more likely to buy it. I like the aspect of honoring online prices with store prices - very important.
  •  
    I agree with Lina comment. The extended return policy is a ploy to get consumers in the store, make a purchase and know they have time to return it if they desire. Comfort, ease, and satisfaction for and of the customer will drive business.
  •  
    I can't stand the thought of shopping really early for Christmas. Some of the things this article talked about really shocked me. The part about Walmart rolling out it's holiday shopping in August is not something I would find appealing. I think that takes the Christmas spirit out of Christmas completely. It's always a tradition with my mom to shop in November and December when it is acceptable to think about Christmas! I completely get the idea of budgeting, buying a few gifts here and there, but starting shopping in August? Not for me.
  •  
    I actually really like this idea of offering deals to get people in the store early, it reduces the revenues lost with huge black friday price cuts by offering a more relaxed approach. It also would help the company make sure they don't run out of stock of a certain item. Having more customers in the store before the heavy Christmas shopping starts gives them a view on what will be popular and will help them forecast better and make sure they don't have missed sales opportunities.
  •  
    I think extending the return policy is good because it allows for someone to use the products as gift for Christmas. I don't know what I think about having sales earlier. If they keep doing this, soon sales for Christmas are going to be six months out of the year then it's going to be all year; I mean how long is too long?
Lina Goens

Fashion Startup Everlane Tests New Price Points With Luxury Totes - 6 views

  •  
    This article describes the luxury bag price points.  Everlane chose to use a pricing strategy of around $400 compared to bags $1000 in this category. They can offer these prices by "cutting out middle men like retailers, operation on modest budgets..". However, the big issue is convincing its customers that the quality is still there. Everlane also mentions they will not do discounts because of the customer sensitivity. 
  • ...6 more comments...
  •  
    It will be very interesting to see if this pricing strategy is successful. If Everlane can promote to and convince consumers ad to HOW their bags are affordable i.e. cutting out the middle men. Consumers must believe that they are getting the same quality compared to $1000 bags. Not offering discounts is one of the major keys to getting this to work. I do love a good deal but if a bag was already significantly priced lower plus discounts I would begin to question the brand. Im convinced but will consumers be?
  •  
    I think the best part about this article is when it states, "Everlane's big challenge will be convincing shoppers that they're getting a good deal by purchasing bags that would retail between $1,000 and $1,500 for a fraction of the price." They are right by saying that consumers have no idea how much retailers mark up a simple t-shirt let alone a purse/handbag. Many women show "status" by carrying high-end handbags by Louis Vuitton, Marc Jacobs, Coach, etc. Like the article said, these handbags can run upwards $1000 to $1500! Interested to see how their handbags will sell, I really like them!
  •  
    The idea is really great, but I do worry about how they are going to advertise this to consumers to convince them of this great idea as well. If they can devise a plan to convince the consumers, then I think Everlane could be very successful. Though I am a huge fan of discounts, even if a $1000 bag were 50% off, I'd still be paying more than the $400 bag from Everlane. That being said, if they can convince consumers that the quality is still there, then I do think this pricing strategy could work.
  •  
    This is a really interesting pricing strategy for a brand that is interested in conveying quality. The brands that come with status are known for quality but women are also attracted to the altruistic aspects that women get from carrying a name brand bag with a designer name on it. I think that if this strategy is to be successful then they need to build their name in the market by growing their popularity and quality through consumer testing and testimony. They need to get their bags to have that status before they can expect to be in the same market as the other designer brands.
  •  
    I have seen the same pricing strategy before. A Dutch firm called Suitsupply sells high quality suits (also produced in Italy or Portugal btw) for medium prices (between $300 and 700$), even including in-store tailoring. They just started about 10 years ago but are now expanding all over the world. I visited their Chicago penthouse store last month and it looks really great. They also achieve those low prices by cutting out the middleman of the supply chain. The thing is that they rely almost only on mouth-to-mouth marketing and endorsements such as one of the WSJ that ranked a standard Suitsupply suit even above a $2000 Armani suit. What I want to say with this is that both Everlane and Suitsupply might have found a new way of price marketing that propells them in front of many of their competitors.
  •  
    I think Megan has a good point, if the brand doesn't have a status then why would people believe or want to buy it? When a brand has a status it gives it an association with quality, high cost, and etc. The status and association is what I think draws consumers in to purchase the various brands that are of the designer level. The brand needs to establish itself as a brand of quality a before they can expect consumers to believe they are offering them a deal on this bag that is comparable to the quality of a designer, well known brand.
  •  
    I personally believe that Everlane's strategies are not only a fantastic approach at growing their consumer base, confidence and improving their brand image, but will also allow them to gradually squeeze in to compete with the handbag 'titans' - if you will. By eliminating excess costs and utilizing a penetration pricing method, not only will they be able to target a larger market that can afford their products, but they will also be displaying that they can compete with the other big name brands on the basis of quality alone.
  •  
    I think the bags Everlane is selling at reasonable prices for this quality will pay off for them. I see this as a JCPenney type idea under Ron Johnson: selling items at good quality without sales or discounts. That way people will understand how Everlane is trying to give the customer the savings by cutting out the middle man/retailers to give customers the savings. If money grew on trees and I wasn't a broke college student, I would LOVE to buy one of those bags. To know it could sell at an upscale retailer for close to half the price with similar quality is great for the customer's piece of mind!
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page