MK 473 Fall 2013

Special section devoted to profiling the top 100 retailers in the U.S. (p. s4 - s15)

The "HOT" 100 retailers (Special section p. s4 - s19)

I think this article is a great example of how important it is for companies to be continually evolving and strengthening their brands. I currently work for Kairos Zero, which is an online marketing consulting company, and their main objective in helping their clients is specifically defining the target market. Once the target market is clearly defined for any company, they can use analytics to better analyze their main customers, how they behave, and what they are looking to experience with your product or service. In the case of this article, JC Penny was unable to evolve and develop new strategies for existing or new customers because their target market was not clearly defined, and JC Jenny's overall focus was not based on what the customer truly wanted. This directly affected their bottom line over the course of two years. Unfortunate for JC Penny, but demonstrates how important it is to cater to the customer and provide that "experience" that they are looking for.

As everyone has stated, JC Penney is in hot water because they have lost sight of what the main focus should be: the customer. Without focusing on the customer, how do they expect to keep them coming back? The main aspect of customer loyalty is keeping customers satisfied in order to make them want to be a continuous customer. Because JC Penney is making decisions based on what they think customers want without doing any market research to back up these decisions, it is apparent that their customer loyalty, which in turn, affects their sales is dwindling rapidly. One aspect of the article that I could relate to was when the author talked about using test brands to see customer's responses to the brand. While working at my part time job at Express clothing, we would always be sent one or two items that we didn't have and would use them as "test items" to see if customers would be interested in buying the item. If the items were purchased, we let the manufacturer know and they would determine whether they would send us the item to sell. If not, we would not sell the items in our store. I think using a test brand is a great idea for JC Penney to try. By using a select few items from different brands, they can see what is successful and what is not and plan accordingly.

When I saw the changes JCPenney made in person, I thought it made their company look a little bit cheaper. While it was nice to see low prices, I still liked the more "department store" feeling with cash registers in every department rather than just in the front of the store. I agree with Kara about how Apple is its own "breed" because Apple is constantly innovating their products to be more user friendly to their customers and they are constantly listening to their customers, not to mention their top of the line customer service. It is also a lot easier to listen to your consumers when you have one specialized product such as Apple with electronics. JCP sells a wider variety of things from clothing, to luggage, to home goods, to shoes. With that being said, I believe it is a lot more important for them to listen to your customers because they have a wider variety of target customers.

What a great target market! Never thought that by targeting mothers that they would continue to shop at the same location they bought bottles from. Crazy to think how companies can know so much about someone! Poor father.. but I think Target moved in the right direction by making the coupons more random and less direct. This is definitely something to take into consideration when I, or anyone else for that matter, finds marketing jobs. Great article! Loved the insight.

What a great article. I had no idea the amount of data acquired about its customers. Like Lina and Kyle said it is a good idea to send customers a wide variety of coupons versus more direct coupons, which makes me feel a little less creeped out that target knows so much information about us. It is an interesting look on how companies acquire data to bring customers in and transform them into loyal target customers .. especially interesting to see that mothers are targets main target!

Target is one of those stores where I walk in needing one or two things and leave with five or six items I had no intention on buying. This article really shows how innovations in marketing research can boost sales immensely. I agree with Lina, Kyle and Sarah in that it is good that the coupons are more random so Target does not scare their customers away. I am interested to see what Target does their research on next because they have had such great success with the moms to be.

With many companies using controversial marketing campaigns, this article focuses on a company that does it well and why it works!

I agree with Lina, Walmart did make the right decision. As a society we are becoming more health conscious and companies will need to adapt to these changes. On the other hand there should not be so much blame towards CocoCola and as Lina said if we want it we go and buy it. As long as CocaCola maintains their original drinks along with adding healthier options will create a better image for them as a brand and offer options to more health conscious individuals.

Great article Kyle! I loved Coca-Cola's add campaign. Although it doesn't completely address the issue of their product being one of the highest contributors to the countries health epidemic, they are promoting the ways in which they're helping people make a healthier choice. It may not be the most ethical choice for a company, but they are certainly not digging them selves into a hole any deeper. I feel like Coca-Cola is dealing with the issues at hand in a very proactive manner, which positively reflects through their strong brand image and customer loyalty.

Not only is this a great way to reach a greater target market but also bring to light the culture of hispanics to those who aren't familiar with it. I wonder how many more will be built and if there could be "too much of a good thing", but it seems to be doing well for now. It seems to be implying and mostly Mexican traditions so it would be interesting to go and see what other cultures are incorporated.

I lived in Mexico for an extended period of time when I was in high school and the hispanic culture thrives around the "plaza culture". In Mexico, being together and out of the house is part of their culture- walking at night, dancing, or just hanging out in the plaza is where most of their social life occurs. Cities and towns are build around their plazas. In the United States we do not maintain this aspect, our plaza would be comparable to sitting on our couch watching TV after work- where instead they go out into the community. Altering the setup and store hours encourages and brings the Hispanics back to their roots but also can provide the neighbor hood with some education in diversity and really great foods and products that they may not have been aware of before.

Not only is it a great way for the Hispanic population to connect and revisit their roots like others had said, but what a great way for people from different backgrounds/cultures to have the opportunity to shop at a Hispanic market without having to travel out of the country. I think this is wonderful!

I like it! I want to be recognized, greeted, and assisted if I need to be. I can see where some people may feel uncomfortable but employees should be trained when to know when a person wants more help or to be left alone.

I find this kind of stuff extremely interesting. I honestly like that stores can track me like this because this means that they are more likely to send coupons and deals my way for the things I want to buy. I also think this is a great way for stores to get the perfect layout of their store by seeing where certain demographics walk around.

This is significant because it has implications beyond just marketing to consumers. The question is, how far should we trespass into citizens (aka customers) rights in order to improve the customers experience? This isnt JUST another marketing ploy, it's an experiment in eroding consumer privacy... and it's working. Marketers realize how little consumers are informed of their own behavior and by association they realize lengths to which they can go. But as privacy erodes, what do we really gain? Sure, it's great they can send us coupons and build our customer profile, but did companies consult the consumer and get consent to do this? Is this data collection all passively done because companies know the taboo behind privacy issues? What does this type of intrusion open up in the future? I think this is seen as simply "the way things are" because we are all desensitized to businesses (and governments) violating the privacy of information. I would like to point out that historically when masses of people in power simply accept things the way they are that's when really really bad things happen (slavery, child labor, exploitation, etc). Passive accumulation of this information seems to me complicit with those who actively accumulate this information- they're both invasions. We must critically think about how allowing such invasions actually works to shape the physical and mental landscapes of our lives, are we actually prepared to deal with the consequences? So, while it may seem like this is just another marketing ploy, we instead should see this as actually another breach of private information which will continue to shape consumer behavior.

The newest Chipotle ad. A phenomenal example of Chipotles ability to highlight the unethical practices occurring within factory farming. It challenges the viewer to question the foods they eat and the corporations they support.

This commercial really makes you think as the consumer about the products you consume that are "farm fresh" without even giving it a second thought. It also brings up the idea that by eating at restaurants that use products that are from "factory farms" or by purchasing such products, then you are supporting their efforts in a way. This commercial makes you think twice, and it will have a lot of people thinking of Chipotle the next time they want Mexican on the go!

This article discuses the future of retailing for AT&T specifically for brick-and-mortar locations. Their new store design will offer highly personalized services, solutions - not transactions, and emotionally engaging experiences.

I like the idea of the reps having tablets and their not being a counter between the customer and the rep. It would feel so much more friendly. I kind of want to go to the store next time I'm up that way. I think it is a good idea.

Great article! My article is also discussing omni-channel retailing and I really do think this is where retail is heading and think it is going to greatly improve overall customer experience!

This article details the struggle that luxury retail stores are having with providing a "personal customer experience." Because the products are so high end, they are expecting that aspect to talk for itself; however, customers are wanting a more personalized experience than what these stores are giving them. What do you guys think about this? And also how do you feel about the technology aspect they talk about in the end?

I believe that if I am going to spend a lot of money on an item, I should get treated with high end customer service.This is a reason why a lot of top brands have personal shoppers, because they know their target customer is willing to spend a lot of money for high quality goods. It is also important for high end retailers to display the value of their goods through the value of their store, even if it means dishing out a lot of money for renovations. Burberry is on the right track with integrating technology into a store that would not normally have this kind of technology. This technology gets the customer more involved in their shopping experience instead of just browsing around the store.

These luxury brands will not die. They may not be making the revenue they desire but they will not disappear. My mother for example has more of these items them I care to know. It is people like her that will keep this industry from disappearing. However with the economy it will be difficult to find new customers. But yes making the customer experience more personable will continue to bring the already loyal customers coming back. I do believe those five things they are going to change will help. But it will not necessarily bring in new customers.

Effective simplicity to capitalize on consumer behavior: Although specialized grocers like Whole Foods provide limited product options to appear "simple" and avoid overwhelming consumers, does the lack of familiar items available intimidate the consumer and alter their decision making process?

A FUNNY look at Whole Foods - please be advised that the author is a stand up comic!

Green Mountain Coffee is opening a Keurig Store to hopefully get to know more about their customers and offer on site demos, special promotions, new product offerings, and unique accessories for the Keurig to customers

This is an interesting strategy for Keurig. Like Lindsey mentioned, it'll be interesting to see how this effects the companies over all sales. Although the venture will provide fantastic PR, the question is whether he gains will outweigh the costs. I agree with Lindsey again though, it is likely that a majority if the visitors will be non-existing customers, of whom will leave with a positive experience and thus opt to buy a Keurig machine of their own. It will also be interesting to see the "accessories" that will be available for sale. These products would appeal to the existing customers, but would also highlight their need to "update" their Keurig models and thus consume more of the brands products. It would be great to see Keurig develop their "eco-friendly" line a bit further. It consists of k-cups that are recycle friendly. Ufortunately these products are quite a bit more expensive, a problem Keurig is already facing; making products more available to a larger demographic.

This article was fascinating to me! This is another example of how companies who used to be primarily product only or even online only want customer feedback and input. I think the idea is great - to let people use the machine to see how it works and how it can work in their everyday lives. But the location 14 miles outside Boston is a little far away I feel. I hope it is successful - already the outside looks sleek, classy, and expensive and I think the design alone with get people into the door to explore the concept. Since their goal isn't to sell, sell, sell but rather to experience and learn from consumers, I think it will work. But I do agree in this still tight economy, going to your local Walmart or Bed, Bath, and Beyond to buy the same coffee pods is realistic.

I agree with the article, that loyalty programs are not working. In my own experience there are only TWO kinds of loylty programs that are working somehow. Firstly, a loyalty program that is introduced by a brand/shop/store that I am already loyal with, e.g. the favourite coffee shop, or the closest supermarket. In those shops a loyalty program might even lead customers to buy more and appreciate it. Secondly, what I think is also working are loyalty programs introduced by a pool of shops. E.g. in Germany we had PayBack for a long time, which was a joint loyalty program that gave you points in almost any major retailer in Germany, so it was used by a lot of people. Noone wants to have 10 or 15 loyalty program plastic cards in their wallet, though...

I believe one of the largest reasons why loyalty is such an obstacle in today's markets is primarily due to fast paced, innovative society that we live in now. Consumers are becoming so oriented to 'the next big thing' that it is increasingly difficult for businesses to keep up with this rapid changing of trends, especially considering the small window a product has before it is one-upped.

I thought this was interesting to read as I myself have several loyalty cards to various places. I never put much thought into it, but after this article it really emphasizes the fact that I. Not really loyal to the brand as much as e transactional benefits. Given an alternate and similar option at a better price I would probably jump ship from those I support now to something different. It may not create the sincere loyalty, but it has worked in keeping me to returning to certain places for the transactional benefits, so it doesn't seem like a total failure.

This article discusses how Whole Foods is trying to position itself as a go-to grocery store. Do you think this is a good move for Whole Foods? Do you think their position as a organic and higher end health only grocery is a better position for them?

I think loyal customers will recognize that the brand is capitalizing on helping a community grow. I think it will help the brand because it's consumers are interested in helping the community and creating sustainable environments.

I think this article is very interesting because I had the same thoughts when learning that Whole Foods was expanding into these new areas. Since Whole Foods is considered a high-end grocery store, it really made me question what its marketing strategy actually is and if they are making the right decision by entering into these markets. I truly think this will be a challenge for Whole Foods because they are dealing with a market that is not truly its target market, but if they succeed I think this will strengthen Whole Foods' brand more than any other grocer.

I think the article is right to a certain extent, but the example of Abercrombie is a bit extreme. Obviously, every company tries to target a specific group of consumers but does that necessarily always have to imply that its marketing strategies are discriminatory? Shouldn't a company have the right to target a certain consumer base in order to ensure a profit? Or does the seeking for profit not justify any type of discrimination no matter how small?

This article focuses on three brands who have shunned specific consumer segments. Abercrombie and Fitch, Cristal and Burberry all have experienced issues in their process of market segmentation with offending specific consumers. Is offending specific consumers an inevitable consequence that all companies/brands will have to face? Not all brands can succeed with a one size fits all type of mentality, so how and when is it alright to completely exclude consumer segments? The types of people hired at these stores go through a specific process that is also discriminatory. For example, at A&F it is commonplace for only thin and attractive individuals to be hired on. Do we have a problem with this? How would we feel if we had the opposite type of individuals assisting us?

I agree with a lot of the previous comments. While I do not think it is right for brands such we Abercrombie to expressively shun people from their stores because they are not the right size or shape or do not have the right look, I think it's acceptable for stores to segment in terms of their "target customer." Whether or not to factor in different body types or "pretty people" is a controversial question. When I worked at Hollister in high school, it was apparent that they searched for attractive people by the way they sifted through customers that came into the store, or the way they approached people in the mall. While I understand the need to segment a market and have a target customer, I do not think the people that work at these stores or the customers that shop there should all be the same.

This article discusses how apparel retailer Onward Reserve refines its e-mail targeting process in order to maximize brand exposure and increase consumer interaction. Do you think that e-mail targeting will remain relevant in the coming years and be an effective strategy? What other methods do you see retailers using to target particular markets and segments?

This is a clever idea. Not necessarily try to sell a product in every email, but more keep the consumer engaged as to what is going on the company. I believe this will help cut back on the number of customer getting annoyed by all the emails sent out by certain companies always trying to sell something.. I believe this method should be adapted by more companies.

I think that e-mail targeting will not remain a relevant strategy. I am already overwhelmed and overlook e-mails from companies. But, if there is an innovative e-mail or heading then my interest will be met. It depends on the content and how many times I receive e-mails whether or not I open it up.

How limited offers can make consumers perceive products as better than they actually are.

I really liked this article because I was able to find aspects where I can really relate. One thing that came to mind is durning Christmas/winter months, Hershey's releases candy cane peppermint kisses. I have associated these with only that time and I'll buy more of them specifically because I know they won't be here long. I don't feel like this is something we as consumers need to learnt o say no to. I think it is merely a marketing ploy that works well. For those from Indiana, or other similar states in terms of seasonal changes, I feel like we are all somewhat trained with this mentality due to our seasonal changes. Towards the end of Winter we can't wait for Spring and so on. I ink it would be interesting to see did there is any difference related to this scarcity concept among people from Indiana for example versus Florida. I think it would make sense that people in Indiana may buy more of something associated with winter during that time due to the temperatures we experience versus Florida who would still have that winter spirit, but not the weather to further encourage it. It could have no effect, but I think it's interesting to think about.

Be sure to watch the video in this article on how this AR app is going to work.

I think this is an amazing concept! Now not only have they made online shopping more fun and interactive but it is also a much more efficient way of shopping for the right piece of furniture. You no longer have to worry about taking measurements or samples to make sure the furniture matches up with the room. Instead, you can virtually place the chosen piece right in the room with accurate measurements and design and see how it looks before even buying it!

This app seems super exciting. I love rearranging and decorating my own room and this app allows for people to physically see an idea on a screen that was originally just a vision. It is great to see how more and more companies are integrating omni-channel retailing to improve the customer experience whether it be online, in store, and mobile.