OPEN AND CLOSED - 30 views
shared by monde3297 on 16 Jun 14
- No Cached
Dvora Marina Brodsky, Kevin Stranack, Elke Lackner, Diane Vahab, Kaitie Warren, ilanab, ibudule, haileyhjw, tlsohn, ekw1993, kenlitt, daniellew31, franhuang, noveltynotion, ben_weir_, w_kwai, Balthas Seibold, itsmedianelee, azhar_ka, ukanjilal, Alexandra Finch , monde3297, Ana Muñoz de Rivera , christofhar, Ignoramus OKMOOC, Rosa Munoz-Luna, tazzain, and villamater liked it
-
Kevin Stranack on 16 Jun 14An alternative perspective on "openness".
- ...9 more comments...
-
dudeec on 31 Oct 14Beware of "openwash". Whenever a term becomes so popular, it is important to clarify the definition and scope of the author/speaker/presenter.
-
ibudule on 01 Nov 14An alternative opinion on openness, I agree. Openness may evoke different feelings to people who have the "closed" experience. It may be also people's disbelief in the buzz-words and buzz-trends which come and go.
-
Ana Muñoz de Rivera on 03 Nov 14I agree with the danger of Openness. Not everything should have open access. What happens with the pages that show people how to make guns or bombs? I think certain pages should not only be dismissed but also closed.
-
itsmedianelee on 07 Nov 14This is interesting. Technology is changing so fast! Already implications about 3D printing is in the news!!
-
ilanab on 07 Nov 14So true ibudule. Is 'openness' to become another catch-prase and trend as 'green', 'robust debate', 'politically correct' terms for almost anything? The deeper significance of the concept can be undermined by it becoming the last trendy issue which is applied to almost anything and everything.
-
azhar_ka on 19 Nov 14So true, not everything should be open, but it is getting hard in our world, where everyone addicted to technologies. Technological dependence is becoming a huge issue. For example, leaked Snapchat images are all over the internet, and 50% of users are teen in the age of 13 to 17 years old. And nowadays, most of pics aren't images of dogs, cats or weekend dinner, they are images of naked people. If its open, then there is no privacy.
-
ekw1993 on 19 Nov 14I actually remember reading this article last year. It's quite frightening how these new methods of production have the potential to do a great deal of harm. Personally, I believe such "openness" can lead to subversion but that the benefits outweigh the risks.
-
Balthas Seibold on 05 Dec 14Morozov is right to bash "openwashing". But he is wrong in his Statement on "open-source". He writes "While Popper's openness is primarily about politics and a free flow of ideas, open-source is about cooperation, innovation and Efficiency" - well if we look at the core and origin of "open source", we have to look at "free Software" and its definition given by the "Inventor" of "free and open source Software", Richard Stallman. And we will see, that Stallman has a robust and transparent agenda of "free flow of ideas", very liberal, very Popper-like. So "free Software" is the wrong example for open-washing, because it came from "freedom" first. For more, see https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
-
monde3297 on 10 Dec 14The jury is still out there and only time will tell.
-
monde3297 on 10 Dec 14The argument will be with us for a very long time. I think this is based on the side of the fence that one is sitting on. It is just like a case of what came first a chicken or an egg. The fact is Open has place to occupy in our learning space. The jury is still out there.
-
ukanjilal on 12 Dec 14Thanks for sharing this well presented write up. Big question put forth is are we really getting the outcomes expected from the open society. Open vs. quality is a big issue. At times restricting access helps a great deal.