HyperLinkedDIS

Facebook statistics in infographic format

-Avg user has 130 friends. -people can interact w/ over 900 million objects on FB (people, pages, events, games, etc) *how to make the library stand out? -Avg user connected to 80 pages, groups or events -20 million apps are installed each day on FB *apps for librry use potentially? Help leverage social capital? -350 million active users are using mobile apps to access FB *integrate library's mobile presence + widgets + FB? -Out of the Top 10 FB pages, 6: musicians, 1: product, 1: service, 1: game, 1: TV show *users gravitate toward celebrities, people they recognize/admire. How can libraries leverage this tendency toward human interaction? Maybe a human face to the library? -Out of Top 10 apps, 5 are FB mobile sites or markup languages for FB. The other 5 are games. *potential for library interactivity? -Top 10 Brands no FB are all immediately recognizable, and have distinctive marketing campaigns

Social media statistics in infographic format

-FB is top social networking site in 119 out of 134 countries *ubiquity of FB cannot be denied -FB, Youtube and Wikipedia are the 3 top online brands online *all three are user-generated content driven! -Over half of all Twitter users post each day -How people utilize social networks: FB users want community and news; Twitter users want news; Myspace users want games and entertainment; Digg users have mixed interests -The most dominant age group using social media is 35-44 years old (avg age of FB user is 38, Twitter: 39, Myspace: 31, Youtube: 20-35) -daily use of social media networks vary according to networks and needs

Nov 15, 2010 from slides: 93% of teens 12-17 are using Internet, 79% of adults 18 and over. 66% of homes have broadband; 70% of urban & suburban homes, but only 50% of rural homes. 2/3 of online adults and 3/4 of online teens are content creators. 50% of adults customize digital info flows (RSS feeds, etc.) Less likely to have broadband: high school education or less, senior citizen, rural resident, disabled, Arican-american. 85% of adults own cell phones. 2/3 of adults and 3/4 of teens use the cloud. 34% of Americans used Internet on a cell. 21% of American adults are not online. 1/3 of Americans used library computers in 2009: 40% seeking jobs/careers, 42% used it for education (homework, classes, degree prep) and 37% for health/wellness research on disease, diet, nutrition, doctors. "Those with a chronic disease are especially likely to reach out for support online." "Social media bridges generational gaps and provides a shared space for interaction."

*does use of Broadband correlate to use of social networks? (i.e. type and frequency?) *w/ the advent of wide-spread broadband availability, the consumers become the creators *as people can access anytime and anywhere, how does the library remain relevant in the online world? How to be sure the wide variety of library's population is represented in the online experience? *diverse networks more segmented and layered *social media can bridge generation gaps between seniors and younger users

-part of the social concept of Twitter is the re-tweeting, or reposting of others' tweets *this is how information spreads, or knowledge becomes viral (information diffusion) *displayed as: RT @ username "copied message" -56.7% of retweets have URLs in them while only 19.0% of regular tweets have URLs. *example of info diffusion.. content creation spreads across a network, creates links -retweets on a large scale take not just content but context *not just what you tweet, but who you tweet it to (followers) -"findings suggest that microblogging can be tailored to facilitate informal communication between colleagues in organizations" *libraries can tweet info to patrons? links, database promotions, etc -real-time concept of Twitter disseminates info faster (but... more accurately?) *much of Twitter is personal sharing/overshare? -URLs and hashtags help retweetability, as does age of account and number of followers/ees, but number of tweets does not affect potential for retweeting *libraries can establish accounts, and not worry about constant tweeting to get retweeted

From slides: Teen online activities: 94% do research for school, 81% research entertainment (movies, sports stars, TV shows, music), 57% watched videos, 55% research universities and schools, 48% bought something. Mentioned activities: fan fiction, teen remixed videos, rate the teacher, ebooks / texting, photo-taking and sharing, homework help. Typical number of texts per day: mean 112. median 50 (teen texters). 8% of teens 12-17 on Twitter.

-reading as a "social contact sport" *how to make the library meme-worthy for teens -94% of students do research for assignments online (steer them to the library how? Create events around exam time? Market the library's databases and librarians ready to assist, etc. Invest in YA eBooks that can be downloaded to devices -teens share, remix and blog more than then average population -avg teen sends 112 text/day *library SMS services can target teens -teens owning smartphones: 35% *mobile apps, games, video, SMS... all ways to target YA audience for libraries *teens are more likely to cross disciplines in research and writing... nothing is merely itself anymore, everything can be, and is connected to more

Phone interviews in May 2011 with 2,277 adult internet users ages 18 and older p.2 65% of online adults use social networking sites; p3 Of young adult women ages 18-29 who are online, 89% use social networking sites, 69% on an average day. Highest usage skews toward female and younger, but no significant differences in usage by race, household income, geography and education level.

-in 2005, 8% of adults used SNSs, now the figure is at 65% -most users rate their SNS experiences as positive *great from a social capital standpoint, as they are more likely to keep accounts active, and pursue weak links in newsfeed -"Young adult women ages 18-29 are the power users of social networking", 89% have accts and 69% access them daily *target young adult women with ads on FB, maybe? use GIS data to appeal to interests of that group, and explain what the library can do for them -more adults are using social networks (driving the avg age of the user up considerably from the imagined age) -"As of May 2011, over eight in ten internet users ages 18-29 use social networking sites (83%), compared with seven in ten 30-49 year-olds (70%), half of 50-64 year-olds (51%), and a third of those age 65 and older (33%)." Positive Negative Neutral Notable (top ten) (top ten) (top ten) (mentioned only once) Good Boring Okay Nosey Fun Confusing Fine Omnipresent Great Frustrating Adequate Hog Wash Interesting Time-consuming Family Glitches Convenient Overwhelming Rarely Vulnerable Excellent Addictive All Right Crowded Easy Annoying Communication Stalking Awesome Addicting Seldom Influence Informative Mediocre Facebook Conformity Useful Overrated Infrequent Befuddled *how to work on changing those negative and neutral to positive associations... how to work the library in as a positive association? Infrequent users can be prompted via opt-in participation to log on and complete activities, post. Process needs to be secure, and easy to use for those who are frustrated with the SNS, etc. Address these concerns and you can generate stron

p.31 Of 366 university undergrads surveyed in 2008, 92.3% used Facebook and 41.3% MySpace, only 21 students used neither; 74.9% were willing to 'friend' the library; 79.2% were willing to receive announcements & communications from library via FB/MySpace

*students willingness to "friend" the library indicates the potential for weak links exist (presently latent) *how can libraries provide value-added services with social media? People use social networks for short info searches and queries. Libraries can be useful in this respect, particularly if people have already indicated a willingness to include them in their network.

Why people check in to services like foursquare and gowalla - meetups,, tracking, personal diary, 

*people like the aspect of games, and its easy when combined with locational awareness *if you are going somewhere anyway, why not get points/credit? It's the competition aspect -some use it as a way to track habits... personal diary... business tracker

Librarian monitors Twitter during class session and suggests resources, provides links

-Librarian as monitor and librarian as embedded resource *librarian monitors classroom discussion in real time, and suggests links/resources as necessary *allows students to get another layer of information besides real-time classroom discussion *augmented reality, library-style? Information layers over what is occurring in real-time *librarian is not participating, but instead providing additional info as conversations and discussions present themselves *allows at least one person to dig deeper, and give more in-depth examination to questions/ideas posed *embed librarians into conversations from afar (book discussions, etc?) and augment what is discussed

If conversations happen over SMNs, a librarian can chime in with stats, info, and relevant links *how to avoid being creepy or stalkerish?

Tool for measuring social media "influence" on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

*does this matter for libraries? If users are basing decisions off it, then yes! -"Klout helps you understand your influence and how to leverage it. Benchmark your success, understand who you influence, and discover who to trust in the topics you care about." *another analytics tool

Economic and Statistics Administration:  68 percent of households used broadband Internet access service; almost one third are not accessing broadband at home.  Rural, low income minorities' access lagged behind other groups.

Search engine optimization & social media - Bing uses Facebook Likes as a ranking signal; Google is working on using +1 for ranking; Tweets help Google index content faster; 1 in 5 social media messages includes a link to content

**before SNSs -p348. possible uses on Internet to form social bonds *suppositions answered in many ways by the rise of the SNSs -p349 results of the HomeNet study showed Internet interrupted social relationships. However, there are a number of arguments against that occurrence -p377 Internet can both help and hinder people, depending in large part on existing personality characteristics -p377 People allow online and offline worlds to overlap *particularly with the rise of the SNSs

-average FB user age has increased from 33 to 38 in 2 years *result of SMNs becoming more commonly used among the wider population -26% of people "like" content each day... 15% update status each day *libraries need to take into account stats like this when judging the efficacy of SMN posting -only 8% of FB friends are family, 12% extended family *the majority of FB friends are weak or latent links *SMNs encourage the maintenance of these weaker links by making it easy to stay in contact with people -56% of people update status 1x/week; 15% 1x/day 53% comment on someone's post 1x/week; 22% comment 1x/day *libraries need to shoot for the 1x/week people -52% of people use FB daily 36% of people use Twitter daily 6% of people use LinkedIn daily

Eye tracking studies on old and new Facebook, MySpace and Twitter profiles reveal the differences in how they are viewed.

*profile pic still among the first couple of things noticed (cover pic not as attention-grabbing as one would think) *first couple of wall posts still top eye candy *almost everyone looked at pics, basic info and the first few wall posts *ads not noticed by many *info on lower right hand side is less noticed *in Twitter, tweets still king *each media has different tracking stats, proving people negotiate each media separately, even if its unconscious

SMS text messaging services in libraries

Google Voice by far the most popular option for libraries. Its features allow email, text and phone reference all frmo one account, at multiple access points. However: http://www.textalibrarian.com/mobileref/why-we-dont-use-the-google-voice-as-an-sms-gateway-its-illegal/ (violates Google Terms of Service, technically) but: http://www.slideshare.net/chadmairn/using-text-messaging-to-enhance-library-services

Eye tracker study of where people tend to look on a Facebook profile (results highlight importance of profile pictures, job title, and thumbnails of friends)

-Profile pics matter *for libraries its about establishing and maintaining a brand *recognition is key, from the profile pic to the thumbnail -LinkedIn is all about the job title *makes sense given the professional emphasis of LinkedIn -friends matter *be careful about who libraries friend, as it goes a long way to establishing social media bona fides (businesses vs gov't orgs, other libraries, brands, etc) -content on top is most important *libraries need to continually update, refresh and monitor their social media pages *spam, obscene or offensive posts need to be removed quickly -SNSs condition people to peruse and evaluate in different methods per each SNS -even though pics are bigger on some SNSs than others, eye movement remains the same -shows that each SNS has its own way of conveying info to users, even when users might not be aware of it -Youtube thumbnails garnered as much attention as the larger pic -Klout scores to the side, with more info got more attention than the larger Klout score number **what all of these means is even unconsciously, people negotiate SNSs differently

p.6 the social networking site Facebook moved from a relative non-factor to near ubiquity in large libraries: for libraries serving communities of at least 500,000 people, the ratio of those with a Facebook presence jumped from barely one in ten in 2008 (11%) to 4 out of 5 (80%) in 2010.

-regular library web presence has plateaued, but social media presence is growing exponentially -"the social networking site Facebook moved from a relative non-factor to near ubiquity in large libraries" (2007 to 2011) -discussions have moved from social media to mobile apps *but why?? users access social media using mobile apps too! (shouldn't be an either/or) -"Revisiting the observational data from the first iteration of the study, researchers found that libraries identified as Early Adopters in 2008 saw significantly greater increases in visits and circulation between 2003 and 2008 than their peers who had not been as active in the adoption of these technologies. Regression analysis suggests that, even when controlling for staff and collection expenditures, adoption of web technologies is a predictor of these increases." *if you build it, they will visit!! -although Web 2.0 has brought new changes into the mix, the reality of the library's mission has not overly changed -libraries mostly use RSS feeds and blogs to convey info to patrons *one way information, doesn't reflect a desire to engage patrons -most literature published about Web 2.0 identifies the potential, not the actual *correlate social media presence to visits? -FB, Twitter and Flickr are the most popular social media sites for libraries

p.403 SMS reference early adopters: Curtin University of Technology in Western Australia & Southeastern Louisiana University, USA. p.404 unless you are quite concise, librarians may need to learn some texting abbreviations. It is possible to send the response in multiple messages (known as spanning); however, our librarians try very hard to fit a reply into one.It is made very clear that SMS reference should be used for short simple factual questions.

-text messaging popular among younger users, perhaps a way to keep users involved with the library? -text message reference can relieve some of the barriers to reference (embarrassment, language, location) *social media reference can do the same!

Social media in the workplace - 2/3 of college students ask about social media policies during job interviews; 56% will not accept a job that bans social media/or will circumvent the policy; 1/3 prioritize social media freedom, device flexibility and mobility over salary; 4/5 of college students want to choose the device for their jobs; 71% of college students believe corporate devices should be used for social media & personal use; 69% of workers in 2011 believed it was unnecessary to be in an office