Group items tagged

Librarian monitors Twitter during class session and suggests resources, provides links

-Librarian as monitor and librarian as embedded resource *librarian monitors classroom discussion in real time, and suggests links/resources as necessary *allows students to get another layer of information besides real-time classroom discussion *augmented reality, library-style? Information layers over what is occurring in real-time *librarian is not participating, but instead providing additional info as conversations and discussions present themselves *allows at least one person to dig deeper, and give more in-depth examination to questions/ideas posed *embed librarians into conversations from afar (book discussions, etc?) and augment what is discussed

If conversations happen over SMNs, a librarian can chime in with stats, info, and relevant links *how to avoid being creepy or stalkerish?

Mashable Social Media on questions and answers on Twitter

-13% ask/give product recommendations/advice -67% of people with more than 100 followers ask more questions *because of familiarity with services? ease of use? -the more followers you have, the more likely your questions will be answered -66% of Qs asked have commercial intent

-part of the social concept of Twitter is the re-tweeting, or reposting of others' tweets *this is how information spreads, or knowledge becomes viral (information diffusion) *displayed as: RT @ username "copied message" -56.7% of retweets have URLs in them while only 19.0% of regular tweets have URLs. *example of info diffusion.. content creation spreads across a network, creates links -retweets on a large scale take not just content but context *not just what you tweet, but who you tweet it to (followers) -"findings suggest that microblogging can be tailored to facilitate informal communication between colleagues in organizations" *libraries can tweet info to patrons? links, database promotions, etc -real-time concept of Twitter disseminates info faster (but... more accurately?) *much of Twitter is personal sharing/overshare? -URLs and hashtags help retweetability, as does age of account and number of followers/ees, but number of tweets does not affect potential for retweeting *libraries can establish accounts, and not worry about constant tweeting to get retweeted

Sept 2011: 78% have Internet at home, 61% have broadband at home; 83% of all adults have mobile devices and 73% of adult cell owners use text messaging at least occasionally; 35% own smartphones; 64% of cell phone users send photos or videos and 55% access social networking sites; 60% of cell phone users who are on Twitter use the cell phone to access Twitter. "New media are the new neighborhood." 48% of those active in groups say group has a social networking page on site such as Facebook; 42% say group uses text messaging; 30% say group has own blog; 16% say group uses Twitter.

*the new neighborhood is online. How to maintain relationships there? What is the library's role? "Sentry? Evaluator?" *each social network has its own etiquette, thus its own way of bridging and maintaining "social capital" *with the explosion of "creators and niches", how to remain relevant and visible? *if in the "information ecosystem" we are all alone together, then how do libraries fit? Lurking in the background, or always a friendly presence just around the corner? *technology allows the time to better-connected with groups... less effort to maintain social capital

as advances in technology increase, so does the importance of social networks in everyday lives. "Together we are more alone than ever" means that as we can carry our networks with us, and latent or weak connections become more important.

Social media statistics in infographic format

-FB is top social networking site in 119 out of 134 countries *ubiquity of FB cannot be denied -FB, Youtube and Wikipedia are the 3 top online brands online *all three are user-generated content driven! -Over half of all Twitter users post each day -How people utilize social networks: FB users want community and news; Twitter users want news; Myspace users want games and entertainment; Digg users have mixed interests -The most dominant age group using social media is 35-44 years old (avg age of FB user is 38, Twitter: 39, Myspace: 31, Youtube: 20-35) -daily use of social media networks vary according to networks and needs

Tool for measuring social media "influence" on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

*does this matter for libraries? If users are basing decisions off it, then yes! -"Klout helps you understand your influence and how to leverage it. Benchmark your success, understand who you influence, and discover who to trust in the topics you care about." *another analytics tool

The average user has 229 friends and is 38 years old; 52% visit Facebook daily (36% daily for Twitter, 7% for Myspace, 6% for Linkedin); In an average day, 26% like another user's content, 22% comment on another users' posts or status, 20% comment on a photo, 15% update their own status

^We both uploaded the same article about 2 hours apart :)

50 social media & Internet stats compiled by Ad Age.  Some examples: Twenty percent of searches on Google each day have never been searched for before; Nearly every large charity and university in America is on Facebook. Less than 60% of the Fortune 500 are.  Facebook, Twitter and YouTube are now considered cornerstones of most social-media strategies in larger companies.

-stickiness vs persistence: "the probability of adoption based on one or more exposures vs the relative extent to which repeated exposures to a hashtag continue to have significant marginal effects" -"complex contagion": a principle from sociology, which posits that repeated exposures to an idea are particularly crucial when the idea is in some way controversial/contentious" -how does information spread? And why do some info streams allow the dissemination of info more easily than others? -political/controversial hashtags have more stickiness -Twitter created idioms either stick or die out quickly *even if they stick, they wither with time and exposure unless they enter into the popular lexicon, crossing the barrier

College students and cellphones; 94% text every day, 73% call every day. 57% in survey use smartphones, 97% of smartphone users use them for social networking - 95% of those do Facebook, 47% Twitter - infographic by HackCollege on Mashable.com

smartphones and the pervasiveness on connectivity allow the "network" to be mobile *enormous potential for libraries to connect with patrons at their point of need

Eye tracking studies on old and new Facebook, MySpace and Twitter profiles reveal the differences in how they are viewed.

*profile pic still among the first couple of things noticed (cover pic not as attention-grabbing as one would think) *first couple of wall posts still top eye candy *almost everyone looked at pics, basic info and the first few wall posts *ads not noticed by many *info on lower right hand side is less noticed *in Twitter, tweets still king *each media has different tracking stats, proving people negotiate each media separately, even if its unconscious

-1. Strategy: measure objectives and potential for insight *Google Analytics *know what your organization has and needs before making social media plans -2. Define success: metrics or goal to achieve *what is a successful campaign/media effort? -3. Identify resources, training and potential obstacles *who can help? What might impede progress? How can these things be avoided/surmounted? -4. Identify tools based on these needs *what exists to help with this? -PR is not a transaction but a relationship. *SMNs help people connect with each other. SMNs can also help brands connect with potential users. -people act and share differently on various social media (FB vs Twitter vs other platforms)

-average FB user age has increased from 33 to 38 in 2 years *result of SMNs becoming more commonly used among the wider population -26% of people "like" content each day... 15% update status each day *libraries need to take into account stats like this when judging the efficacy of SMN posting -only 8% of FB friends are family, 12% extended family *the majority of FB friends are weak or latent links *SMNs encourage the maintenance of these weaker links by making it easy to stay in contact with people -56% of people update status 1x/week; 15% 1x/day 53% comment on someone's post 1x/week; 22% comment 1x/day *libraries need to shoot for the 1x/week people -52% of people use FB daily 36% of people use Twitter daily 6% of people use LinkedIn daily

p.6 the social networking site Facebook moved from a relative non-factor to near ubiquity in large libraries: for libraries serving communities of at least 500,000 people, the ratio of those with a Facebook presence jumped from barely one in ten in 2008 (11%) to 4 out of 5 (80%) in 2010.

-regular library web presence has plateaued, but social media presence is growing exponentially -"the social networking site Facebook moved from a relative non-factor to near ubiquity in large libraries" (2007 to 2011) -discussions have moved from social media to mobile apps *but why?? users access social media using mobile apps too! (shouldn't be an either/or) -"Revisiting the observational data from the first iteration of the study, researchers found that libraries identified as Early Adopters in 2008 saw significantly greater increases in visits and circulation between 2003 and 2008 than their peers who had not been as active in the adoption of these technologies. Regression analysis suggests that, even when controlling for staff and collection expenditures, adoption of web technologies is a predictor of these increases." *if you build it, they will visit!! -although Web 2.0 has brought new changes into the mix, the reality of the library's mission has not overly changed -libraries mostly use RSS feeds and blogs to convey info to patrons *one way information, doesn't reflect a desire to engage patrons -most literature published about Web 2.0 identifies the potential, not the actual *correlate social media presence to visits? -FB, Twitter and Flickr are the most popular social media sites for libraries

From slides: Teen online activities: 94% do research for school, 81% research entertainment (movies, sports stars, TV shows, music), 57% watched videos, 55% research universities and schools, 48% bought something. Mentioned activities: fan fiction, teen remixed videos, rate the teacher, ebooks / texting, photo-taking and sharing, homework help. Typical number of texts per day: mean 112. median 50 (teen texters). 8% of teens 12-17 on Twitter.

-reading as a "social contact sport" *how to make the library meme-worthy for teens -94% of students do research for assignments online (steer them to the library how? Create events around exam time? Market the library's databases and librarians ready to assist, etc. Invest in YA eBooks that can be downloaded to devices -teens share, remix and blog more than then average population -avg teen sends 112 text/day *library SMS services can target teens -teens owning smartphones: 35% *mobile apps, games, video, SMS... all ways to target YA audience for libraries *teens are more likely to cross disciplines in research and writing... nothing is merely itself anymore, everything can be, and is connected to more

-"An interdisciplinary approach that brings together views and expertise from sociology, urban studies, interaction design, and related disciplines will assist with efforts to facilitate urban neighborhood community building, social inclusion, public consultation and debate, fair access to local information and services, urban sustainability, and healthier local economies." (66) *this interdisciplinary approach can work for libraries too! -""portfolio of sociability"" (67) *collection of virtual tools that help to establish and maintain connections (both close, weak and latent) -"The Internet has not substituted but supplemented off-line interaction with online interaction...the Internet as well as mobile communication devices such as mobile phones, laptops, and personal digital assistants (PDA) allow people to maintain social ties in different ways by taking advantage of new features." (67) *people use these devices to strengthen already existing ties, not create new ones, mostly -"Wellman argues that, while people become more accustomed with the features these tools offer, the nature of the social ties that people establish and maintain changes from "door-to-door" and "place-to-place" relationships to "person-to-person" and "role-to-role" relationships. He creates a holistic theoretical framework that builds on the dual nature in the interplay between community and the individual. He describes the emerging qualities of this behavior as networked individualism." (67) *as location becomes less important, networks become more important. People are less attracted to that which is in their geographical area, and more inclined to seek out like-minded people in similar areas of interest

-"The act of reappropriation (e.g., from the professional use of a pager to the social use of SMS) implies that there are opportunities to design and develop purpose-built systems from the ground up, which, instead of merely trying to make ends meet, take the unique requirements into account of the social- and place-based context in which they are used. (67) *tech can be re-purposed to market and develop community ties *people used to have to deal with geographical restrictions, and created social networks from geography, not interest or desire. This led, for some people, to an atrophying of interests, due to lack of community. SNSs allow people to find other people with shared interests, and develop them. Libraries can assist in shared communities over SNSs by providing links and resources to a variety of information. -"Place and proximity continue to matter in every socioeconomic context, because there are no Internet applications that can completely substitute real-time, co-located, face-to-face interaction" (68) *engage them online, bring them into the library proper *neighborhood ties still matter, but now they are place-independent. While proximity matters for some interactions, the majority of social ties can be maintained independently of physical location

-In the absence of a common enemy, a shared purpose or a pre-existing village-like atmosphere, are there other reasons and motivations for social encounters to occur and for the formation of residential networks in urban neighborhoods? (72) *the idea of urban tribes, still loosely held together by geography but now also united by common interest (people can find each other in large cities) -"The findings of these sociological studies provide essential insights for a new design methodology that can guide the successful development of interactive systems and devices that can stimulate local interaction and animate urban neighborhoods." (73) *bring people to libraries! (even if they just visit online at an eBranch) *in order to be effective, people must participate in the design and implementation of the project. They have to have a voice. *no more one-way channels of broadcasting, there has to be communication and an exchange of ideas between institution and people in order to foster that sense of community *where the author talks about the size, growth and critical mass of the perceived system, he is talking about FB (refers to it as an "urban tribe incubator")

Search engine optimization & social media - Bing uses Facebook Likes as a ranking signal; Google is working on using +1 for ranking; Tweets help Google index content faster; 1 in 5 social media messages includes a link to content

**written before the rise of the SNSs -"It has been hailed by two U.S. presidents as the ultimate weapon in the battle against totalitarianism and tyranny, and credited by Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan with creating a "new economy." (574) *foreshadowing the Arab Spring w/ Twitter... and SNSs participation of the overthrow of govts -quote by Manasian on p 574 (the Internet will change every aspect of our lives...) -digital divide is a concern, and it only gets worse -"Several scholars have contended that Internet communication is an impoverished and sterile form of social exchange compared to traditional face-to-face interactions, and will therefore produce negative outcomes (loneliness and depression) for its users as well as weaken neighborhood and community ties" (575) -"Others believe that the Internet affords a new and different avenue of social interaction that enables groups and relationships to form that otherwise would not be able to, thereby increasing and enhancing social connectivity" (575) -"First, each new technological advance in communications of the past 200 years-the telegraph, telephone, radio, motion pictures, television, and most recently the Internet-was met with concerns about its potential to weaken community ties" (Katz et al. 2001, p. 406) (576) *there are always concerns about the decline of the community, which are never fully realized

-"CMC (computer-mediated communication): viewed by some as an impoverished communication experience, with the reduction of available social cues resulting in a greater sense or feeling of anonymity *SNSs reduce the anonymity by creating online communities, and giving people cues by which to negotiate and validate truths and options