Educational Leadership:Teaching for the 21st Century:21st Century Skills: The Challenge... - 119 views
-
the skills students need in the 21st century are not new.
-
Critical thinking and problem solving, for example, have been components of human progress throughout history
-
What's actually new is the extent to which changes in our economy and the world mean that collective and individual success depends on having such skills
- ...27 more annotations...
-
Many reform efforts, from reducing class size to improving reading instruction, have devolved into fads or been implemented with weak fidelity to their core intent. The 21st century skills movement faces the same risk.
-
some of the rhetoric we have heard surrounding this movement suggests that with so much new knowledge being created, content no longer matters; that ways of knowing information are now much more important than information itself. Such notions contradict what we know about teaching and learning and raise concerns that the 21st century skills movement will end up being a weak intervention for the very students—low-income students and students of color—who most need powerful schools as a matter of social equity.
-
First, educators and policymakers must ensure that the instructional program is complete and that content is not shortchanged for an ephemeral pursuit of skills
-
Second, states, school districts, and schools need to revamp how they think about human capital in education—in particular how teachers are trained
-
inally, we need new assessments that can accurately measure richer learning and more complex tasks
-
Skills and knowledge are not separate, however, but intertwined.
-
In some cases, knowledge helps us recognize the underlying structure of a problem.
-
At other times, we know that we have a particular thinking skill, but domain knowledge is necessary if we are to use it.
-
if skills are independent of content, we could reasonably conclude that we can develop these skills through the use of any content. For example, if students can learn how to think critically about science in the context of any scientific material, a teacher should select content that will engage students (for instance, the chemistry of candy), even if that content is not central to the field. But all content is not equally important to mathematics, or to science, or to literature. To think critically, students need the knowledge that is central to the domain.
-
The importance of content in the development of thinking creates several challenges
-
first is the temptation to emphasize advanced, conceptual thinking too early in training
-
Another curricular challenge is that we don't yet know how to teach self-direction, collaboration, creativity, and innovation the way we know how to teach long division.
-
But experience is not the same thing as practice. Experience means only that you use a skill; practice means that you try to improve by noticing what you are doing wrong and formulating strategies to do better. Practice also requires feedback, usually from someone more skilled than you are.
-
We must plan to teach skills in the context of particular content knowledge and to treat both as equally important.
-
education leaders must be realistic about which skills are teachable. If we deem that such skills as collaboration and self-direction are essential, we should launch a concerted effort to study how they can be taught effectively rather than blithely assume that mandating their teaching will result in students learning them.
-
teachers don't use them.
-
Even when class sizes are reduced, teachers do not change their teaching strategies or use these student-centered method
-
these methods pose classroom management problems for teachers.
-
These methods also demand that teachers be knowledgeable about a broad range of topics and are prepared to make in-the-moment decisions as the lesson plan progresses.
-
constant juggling act
-
greater collaboration among teachers.
-
But where will schools find the release time for such collaboration?
-
professional development is a massive undertaking.
-
Unfortunately, there is a widespread belief that teachers already know how to do this if only we could unleash them from today's stifling standards and accountability metrics. This notion romanticizes student-centered methods, underestimates the challenge of implementing such methods, and ignores the lack of capacity in the field today.
-
The first challenge is the cost.
-
measures that encourage greater creativity, show how students arrived at answers, and even allow for collaboration.
-
When students first encounter new ideas, their knowledge is shallow and their understanding is bound to specific examples. They need exposure to varied examples before their understanding of a concept becomes more abstract and they can successfully apply that understanding to novel situations.
