Group items tagged

This is very important in both a traditional and online class. The instructor needs to be specific on the course outcomes and expectations. Students need to know what the course will cover and how the student will be asked to show learning.

I find this very interesting. I realize not all web based technology provides a safe learning environment for my students buy of all the discussions I have had over the past year about students and technology, not once did I think I might need to deal with any type of behavior problems or managing conflict in my online course.

I can understand how it would take a teacher to be more organized when students are choosing their own way to present material. The teacher in a traditional setting would have all of the students use the same method or material for learning, where now each student can have a different way to learn the material and present it. The teacher would have to have some knowledge of the different types of ways students could use to learn and present.

Agreed, I think that teachers would have to look for more characteristics of presentations rather than a specific set of measurable criteria. You could try to set up a rubric based on criteria, but I still think teachers would need to be open should a student show up and do something that meets learning standards yet defies the confines of a rubric.

I think this is where teaches shut down. Teachers think that Flipped learning or Personalized learning is less work, in reality it is a lot more work. It'd be easier to keep track of 20-30 kids on exactly the same path.

When students have a choice, it does make them feel like they are a part of their learning and not just having someone else tell them what they are to learn and how they are going to go about learning the material. It gives them a reason to do the lesson and feel powerful in doing it.

Yes. Not just for kids. When I'm not micromanaged and feel that my support system supports my learning and interests, I am much more inclined to be engaged, productive, satisfied, etc.

We experienced that in our Personalized Professional Development this year. We were able to select an area of interest, learn about it, then present what we learned. We had very positive feedback and pretty motivated on PD days!

When I have students talking too much during class or "goofing around", I have had them choose who is going to move. Like the article says, it is less stressful for me and the students usually end up apologizing and gaining control of their situation. Again, they feel they are a part of it and are taking ownership instead of someone telling them exactly what to do.

You would just have to create a rubric that would cover all of the ways students could produce a final project. The rubric would have to focus on the learning targets not what the project looks like. I would assume students would be presenting this work.

What happens if a student does not work on the project? If the project takes a long period of time and they wasted too much time then They may not have time to finish it. I understand how student's might fail and that is part of learning. Middle School students need some time management help when keeping on track. It would be difficult to totally let go.

I think this is where my hold up would be on a project. It's hard for me to see my students fail. Especially when the student is actively trying to succeed. Failure is a part of real life but I think I'd try to do too much of the work for the student so ensure success.

I'm with you guys here. Real life has deadlines ... and consequences for not meeting those deadlines. Personal(ized) learning requires a total growth mindset from both the student and the teacher. I'm not sure I'm there yet. Can't relinquish that control totally. I've tried blending my instruction and that's not going the best. Turning them loose completely scares me.

Must students do enjoy the learning more if they have some choice. Some of the math class would have to be the same, but students would like choice where available. Or you could have students think how they might use a certain skill in their real lives.

Interesting idea, I would love to see a video of this in action. The teacher must have taught conflict resolution skills. Many students do not have the skills to complete this task. Maybe with the help of a peer mentor, on their own would be difficult depending on the age of the students.

This is a cool idea. I would also like to know more about how this works in class. I think putting the uncomfortableness on the students might help improve the behavior more quickly.

I keep seeing "individual needs" and its variants, but no one seems to be able to define it or give specific examples. Is it just "deficiencies in basic educational content and/or skills"? And preferences ... are we still talking supplemental or the entirety of a class/curriculum? I am probably wrong, but I keep getting the impression Personalized Learning keeps getting put up on this pedestal because of its potential when done well, but not too many proponents seem willing to comment on the pitfalls beyond "well, you need everyone on board" and "it will take time to get used to it" and other ancillary notions.

It isn't? Everything we've been looking at indicates computers and tablets and the like are essential to do this (except for the million-dollar grade school classrooms that have a dozen "dive into whatever you want to do" stations). I would love to hear more about how technology is not the focus of enabling student-centered learning.

But is it, though? How much longer before college application essays go by the wayside? The author seems to be saying this with all the enthusiasm of a weary teacher saying "we should still teach how to balance check books." Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of essays and articles and papers and theses, but I've also sat through Teacher Workshops in which experts told us only English classes should be doing papers, since students should basically learn the skill and do more enjoyable things in other classes. Sort of like this article here. But, if it's a "skill" only for one class, and a class fewer and fewer are taking in college or 'needing" after school years, why are we saying it is still important?

I don't want to have a Jim from The Office eye-brow raising moment here, but it's difficult not to. This sounds all great, especially the "rewind" until mastery notion, but are students so capable of handling video lectures they will truly utilize them correctly? I still fear the temptation to treat computer-driven learning as less real than in-person/in-community learning. And I don't say that to be the Keeper of the Lecture Stronghold. Everything on the computer/Internet is designed to be fast, flashy, shallow ... why would they consider school stuff less so? Sure, the "good students" will, but they would regardless of the medium, wouldn't they? If this continues, is there a need for us to even be teachers? Why not just put all our courses on pre-packaged flashdrives and download sites and implement a pay-by-the-class access fee? Have we taken the notion of "teaching ourselves out of a job" in the wrong direction?

So is this an "English" class? It's all been so vague, it's been hard to tell except for a few notions about reading a story above. The generalities have been wholly unhelpful. Where are the specifics? Instead of saying "I use videos to create meaningful experiences and Web sites to beget actionable feedback opportunities," I would have rather read about actual tools and programs and in-class activities. Does anyone outside of the English/Research world find this practical?

This is exactly what I'm talking about above. What does this even mean?

How is this better? I'm not saying I'm opposed to effecting "real change," but as with so much of this article, the heart of the issue is either implied or missing. How has the change of format demonstrated an improvement in the general abilities of students to demonstrate research/writing skills?

And again, this is just ambiguous enough to sound good, but what does it mean? Busy work is still busy work regardless if students are "engaged" or bored. By "assignments that let me do my best work" are we talking "I can do things I'm already good at"? I fear that is an area of Personalized Learning many students will exploit (for lack of a better term). If they are given the opportunity to do things they already like or are good at, why would they ever challenge themselves to do anything else, learn anything else, risk anything else? Are we prepared for Speech Classes in which students do Screencasts or Prezzis all semester long and never stand up in front of an audience and look people in the eyes? Is that the "genuine learning" PL and technology are giving the next generation of politicians, lawyers, doctors, teachers, diplomats, and the rest? (This is where you tell me how far afield I am. I would genuinely be glad for some alleviation.)

What is the Iowa Core calling these?

What plan is provided for improvement with the Iowa Assessments?

I would like to see an efficient, real-world model of such a system.

I would love to see our inservices allow for time to have such reflections on our assessments and allow us to redirect our planning. How much more would we see student growth if we not only reflected and redirected but also shared our observations with colleagues who also have the students (cross-curricular and at the next level) to have growth be specific and continual rather than a 9 month experiment that restarts from Ground Zero the following year!

Yes! There's so much research that values reflection, and yet it's something that one almost feels "guilty" doing on contract time.

This shows how important it is to set your learning targets and then make sure your assessment gives you the information that you are seeking in regards to those targets.

Without proper training, I'm sure this happens all too often. Teachers often teach and test based on their own experiences and not based on best-practices.

If you can't determine an assessment to match your learning target, could it be that your learning target needs revision?

I couldn't agree with you more! Some teachers refuse to open up to the latest in best practice, assuming that '36' years of teaching for example, has given them enough info to have 'all' the answers. And if the assessment is too difficult to create to match the target, why yes, revise the target. It seems we need to think outside the box, and to remind ourselves to keep updated and in touch with the world.

I think many times, the catch here is the gradebook. Many stakeholders(parents, students, administrators, etc.) have very rigid expectations for grading and equate assessment and grading. Teachers don't know how to manage both effectively, and tend to default to the needs of the gradebook for survival.

Ah.......the gradebook. I believe you have hit the nail on the head, Deb.

I have found it useful for another person to look at the assessment. Especially someone in a different curriculum area.

That sounds like a good idea. Why, specifically, do you use someone from a different curriculum area? I can think of some ideas, but I don't know if they are the ones you are considering.

So.. if my rubric says " requires deep thought" and I define or give examples of deep thought would that be better. I am struggling with the use of those words in my rubric- my participants have had not difficulty with the words, I just feel it isn't as specific as maybe I should make it....

What is the definition of 'deep'?

Connection to rubrics in my group during the first week-are the phrases strong and promote further progress in their learning?

I like the phrase "using phrases from a rubric." I think I'll borrow this idea and phrasing!