Skip to main content

Home/ MALT/ Group items tagged process

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Matt LeClair

The Immunity to Change™ Personal Development Process | Developmental Observer - 0 views

developmentalobserver.blog.com/...itc-overview

immunity personal development developmental change process development theory constructive-development theory goals personal observer research motivation

shared by Matt LeClair on 28 Feb 12 - No Cached
  • Matt LeClair on 28 Feb 12
     
    Changing one's behavior is one thing; it's keeping it changed that's often the real challenge, particularly when it's something we "know" we have to do. Using principles of Constructive-Developmental Theory, Robert Kegan and Lisa Lahey developed a personal development process that allows individuals and teams to overcome their "immunities to change" and achieve the personal goals that are most important to them. The heart of this immunity to change™ process is constructing a four-column "change map" that not only outlines your personal development goal but also reveals the hidden commitments that have been getting in the way of you achieving your goal.
Matt LeClair

Quality Matters Program | - 0 views

www.qmprogram.org

education online learning technology assessment evaluation elearning qualitymatters metrics rubric measurement Professional development peer review

shared by Matt LeClair on 06 Feb 12 - No Cached
  • Quality Matters (QM) is a faculty-centered, peer review process that is designed to certify the quality of online and blended courses.
  • Quality Matters (QM) is a faculty-centered, peer review process that is designed to certify the quality of online and blended courses.
  • Quality Matters (QM) is a faculty-centered, peer review process that is designed to certify the quality of online and blended courses.
  • Matt LeClair on 06 Feb 12
     
    "Quality Matters (QM) is a faculty-centered, peer review process that is designed to certify the quality of online and blended courses. QM is a leader in quality assurance for online education and has received national recognition for its peer-based approach and continuous improvement in online education and student learning."
Matt LeClair

The World Cafe - 0 views

www.theworldcafe.com/about.html

learning reports tools sharing social strategy collaboration employee research assessment ideas

shared by Matt LeClair on 19 Mar 12 - No Cached
  • Matt LeClair on 19 Mar 12
     
    "Using seven design principles and a simple method, the World Café is a powerful social technology for engaging people in conversations that matter, offering an effective antidote to the fast-paced fragmentation and lack of connection in today's world. Based on the understanding that conversation is the core process that drives personal, business, and organizational life, the World Café is more than a method, a process, or technique - it's a way of thinking and being together sourced in a philosophy of conversational leadership."
Matt LeClair

Expectancy Theory - 0 views

en.wikipedia.org/...Expectancy_theory

Expectancy theory outcome motivation behavior research

shared by Matt LeClair on 14 Oct 11 - No Cached
  • Matt LeClair on 14 Oct 11
     
    Wiki - Expectancy Theory proposes that a person will decide to behave or act in a certain way because they are motivated to select a specific behavior over other behaviors due to what they expect the result of that selected behavior will be.[1] In essence, the motivation of the behavior selection is determined by the desirability of the outcome. However, at the core of the theory is the cognitive process of how an individual processes the different motivational elements. This is done before making the ultimate choice. The outcome is not the sole determining factor in making the decision of how to behave.
Matt LeClair

World Without Walls: Learning Well with Others: How to teach when learning is everywhere. - 0 views

www.edutopia.org/age-technology-will-richardson

collaborate technology learning school explore network community trust

shared by Matt LeClair on 27 Oct 11 - Cached
  • Our ability to learn whatever we want, whenever we want, from whomever we want is rendering the linear, age-grouped, teacher-guided curriculum less and less relevant.
  • Experts are at our fingertips,
  • Content and information are everywhere, not just in textbooks.
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • And the work we create and publish is assessed by the value it brings to the people who read it, reply to it, and remix it.
  • Much of what our students learn from us is unlearned once they leave us; paper is not the best way to share our work, facts and truths are constantly changing, and working together is becoming the norm, not the exception.
  • It's about solving problems together and sharing the knowledge we've gained with wide audiences.
  • Inherent in the collaborative process is a new way of thinking about teaching and learning
  • As connectors, we provide the chance for kids to get better at learning from one another.
  • In fact, we need to rely on trusted members of our personal networks to help sift through the sea of stuff, locating and sharing with us the most relevant, interesting, useful bits.
  • That means that as teachers, we must begin to model our own editorial skills
  • Collaboration in these times requires our students to be able to seek out and connect with learning partners, in the process perhaps navigating cultures, time zones, and technologies.
  • they come into contact with: Who is this person? What are her passions? What are her credentials? What can I learn from her?
  • As Clay Shirky writes in Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, "Knowingly sharing your work with others is the simplest way to take advantage of the new social tools."
  • Fortunately, social tools like wikis, blogs, and social-bookmarking sites make working with others across time and space easier than it's ever been. They are indeed "weapons of mass collaboration," as author Donald Tapscott calls them.
  • The Collaboration Age comes with challenges that often cause concern and fear. How do we manage our digital footprints, or our identities, in a world where we are a Google search away from both partners and predators?
  • What are the ethics of co-creation when the nuances of copyright and intellectual property become grayer each day? When connecting and publishing are so easy, and so much of what we see is amateurish and inane, how do we ensure that what we create with others is of high quality?
  • I believe that is what educators must do now. We must engage with these new technologies and their potential to expand our own understanding and methods in this vastly different landscape.
  • And we must be able to model those shifts for our students and counsel them effectively when they run across problems with these tools.
  • Matt LeClair on 27 Oct 11
     
    World Without Walls: Learning Well with Others How to teach when learning is everywhere. By Will Richardson Facebook 16 Twitter 25 Share 136 Email Four teachers from High Tech High. Bringing Their A-Game: Humanities teacher Spencer Pforsich, digital arts/sound production teacher Margaret Noble, humanities teacher Leily Abbassi, and math/science teacher Marc Shulman make lessons come alive on the High Tech campuses in San Diego. Credit: David Julian Earlier this year, as I was listening to a presentation by an eleven-year-old community volunteer and blogger named Laura Stockman about the service projects she carries out in her hometown outside Buffalo, New York, an audience member asked where she got her ideas for her good work. Her response blew me away. "I ask my readers," she said. I doubt anyone in the room could have guessed that answer. But if you look at the Clustrmap on Laura's blog, Twenty Five Days to Make a Difference, you'll see that Stockman's readers -- each represented by a little red dot -- come from all over the world. 1 She has a network of connections, people from almost every continent and country, who share their own stories of service or volunteer to assist Stockman in her work. She's sharing and learning and collaborating in ways that were unheard of just a few years ago. Welcome to the Collaboration Age, where even the youngest among us are on the Web, tapping into what are without question some of the most transformative connecting technologies the world has ever seen. These tools are allowing us not only to mine the wisdom and experiences of the more than one billion people now online but also to connect with them to further our understanding of the global experience and do good work together. These tools are fast changing, decidedly social, and rich with powerful learning opportunities for us all, if we can figure out how to leverage their potential. For e
Matt LeClair

Gallup_Building a Team With Talent - 0 views

gmj.gallup.com/...building-team-talent.aspx

resources research survey relationship working values design employee manager motivation personality intelligence talent team

shared by Matt LeClair on 09 May 12 - No Cached
  • Team members who understand one another's abilities not only trust one another, they can easily distinguish the areas in which their time and talents are most effectively applied from those better left in the hands of teammates. It's easy to see how this improves the team's efficiency.
  • we described how the dialogue between individuals with different dominant strengths improves the quality of the decision-making process
  • A good manager will take the time to deconstruct the daily operation of his or her team, identifying where it bogs down and where it over-accelerates.
  • ...17 more annotations...
  • Those insights can then be used as a basis for dialogue within the team, allowing each member to better understand his or her ideal role relative to the other team members
  • ensure that the team operates as more than the sum of its parts
  • best strategies for building a highly effective, strengths-based team?
  • With your group, determine what "team" means to each of you.
  • Do they share a common goal? A common set of measures that determine success? Are collective achievements possible -- or is this really an assortment of individuals working independently with separate measurement and goals?
  • Even when individuals do much of the team's work independently, team members can still share in the responsibilities associated with building a great place to work. Think about using the Gallup Q12 items as a common focus for better partnership and teaming.
  • f the group is working with common measurements and a shared goal, however, investing some time and thought in strengths-based team building will pay off.
  • A shared goal must be shared in both vision and execution.
  • diversity or similarity of the descriptions. How are your viewpoints alike? In what ways do you see different aspects or issues in the challenge or opportunity?
  • You might start by listing the common functions you feel your team must allocate in order to operate smoothly.
  • Ask team members to consciously consider: "Who am I, and what do I contribute?"
  • t the ideal role is unique for each.
  • Once you've allocated functions, ask the person whose name is next to each individual function to "own" that aspect of the team's operation.
  • ber that consistency and practice are the keys.
  • Make this a regular part of your team's work -- to consider not only the issues, problems or challenges, but also the ways you work together in solving or achieving them.
  • Now that you have the functions or process, consider each person'
  • Ask each person to share two of his strengths, and identify two areas within the process that are a "best fit" for him
  • Matt LeClair on 09 May 12
     
    strengthfinder
Matt LeClair

Progressive inquiry with a networked learning environment the FLE-Tools - 0 views

fle.uiah.fi/...hanni_CSCL99.html

learning tools resources education actionresearch social collaborative technology environment research inquiry FLE tool

shared by Matt LeClair on 02 Jun 12 - No Cached
  • progressive inquiry model
  • , Future Learning Environment Tools (FLE-Tools
  • analysis of 125 messages
  • ...24 more annotations...
  • design of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments
  • Participation in progressive inquiry is facilitated by asking a user who is preparing a discussion message to categorize the message by choosing a "category of inquiry scaffold" (e.g., Problem, Working theory, Summary) corresponding to the PI-Model (based on the practices of Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1993). These scaffolds are designed to encourage students to engage in expert-like processing of knowledge; they help to move beyond simple question-answer discussion and elicit practices of progressive inquiry.
  • ther important aspect of inquiry, and a critical condition of developing conceptual understanding, is generation of one’s own working theories — one’s conjectures, hypotheses, theories or interpretations — for the phenomena being investigated (Carey & Smith, 1995; Perkins, Crismond, Simmons, & Under, 1995; Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1993).
  • Through evaluating whether and how well the working theories explain the chosen problems, the learning community seeks to assess strengths and the weaknesses of different explanations and identify contradictory explanations, gaps of knowledge, and limitations of the power of intuitive explanation
  • Progressive discourse occurs, for instance, in the sciences demonstarting both accumulation and deepening of knowledge.
  • Each question opened one knowledge-buiding thread, e.g., "How does the new information and communication technology support development of students’ expertise in different contexts?" or "What kind of new pedagogical problems may emerge in networked learning environments?"
  • Specific problems addressed included the following: 1) What is the nature of KB messages produced by the participants? 2) How does the KB represent the model of progressive inquiry? 3) How did the students used the scaffolds provided by the FLE-Tools?
  • During the nine-week course the students posted 125 messages.
  • The postings to the database KB Module constitute the data analyzed in this study. The database material was analyzed with qualitative and quantitative methods in order to evaluate the process of knowledge advancement. The methods applied to analyzing the date aim at providing a richer view on the content and the progression of the discussion (see Chi, 1997).
  • ded to elicit in-depth inquiry
  • The following categories of inquiry scaffolds were also used to analyze how the students categorized their messages: Problem, Working theory, Deepening knowledge, Comment, Metacomment, and Summary (Help has been left out of the analysis because it was not used by the students)
  • To analyze the reliability of segmentation, an independent coder classified approximately 15 percent of the messages. The inter-coder reliability was .91, indicating that the reliability of segmentation was satisfactory.
  • each segment or idea was classified according to five principal "idea categories" identified in the coding process: Problem, Working theory, Scientific explanation, Metacomment, and Quote of another student’s idea. All of the propositions fitted in these five categories of ideas, which were regarded to be mutually exclusive.
  • database was considered to show remarkable connectedness (Hewitt, 1996).
  • FLE-Tools environment was used in a pilot course to facilitate progressive inquiry in university education
  • The students were asked to categorize their posting to the database by using a set of cognitive scaffolds. However, the content analysis indicated that the students' productions often did not correspond with the scaffold they chose. The students showed a bias for selecting a Category of Inquiry
  • A thematic analysis of the discussion suggested that a tutor's "just-in-time" participation could have significantly changed this pattern, judging from the evaluations and reflections of the students.
  • First, although the students were introduced the PI-Mode
  • Second, it is possible that it is not natural for the students to partition their posting in a way that corresponds to the given scaffolds; the students wrote rather long entries (often half a page) in which they set up as well as explained their problems.
  • examination of the database indicated that there was a substantial knowledge-management problem.
  • only the KB module was tested.
  • model of progressive inquiry
  • the students apparently need strong community support that would induce them to participate and guide them in doing so
  • Surpassing ourselves. An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL
  • Matt LeClair on 02 Jun 12
     
    The design of a web-based, networked learning environment, Future Learning Environment Tools (FLE-Tools) embodies a model of progressive inquiry. In this paper, we introduce the progressive inquiry model and describe how different modules FLE-Tools are designed to facilitate participation in this kind of inquiry. Results of a pilot experiment of using FLE-Tools in higher education are presented. The study was based on an analysis of 125 messages posted by thirteen university students to the FLE-Tools database. The results indicated that the course provided positive evidence for an integration of progressive inquiry and online discussion. The pedagogical and design challenges with which we are currently struggling are discussed: the problems of creating a learning community for students collaborating at distance or managing large number of entries in FLE's database.
Matt LeClair

InspireLearningForAll - 0 views

www.inspiringlearningforall.gov.uk/...policymaps.html

research methods guidelines resources best practices templates research survey Learning Organization learning style quiz learning presentation template presentation presentation template learning team build

shared by Matt LeClair on 02 Apr 13 - No Cached
  • Matt LeClair on 02 Apr 13
     
    " What makes a learning organisation (Word, 43kb) This document explores the characteristics of a learning organisation Find out what your learning style is (Word, 52kb) An activity you could do with your staff or users to discover their preferred learning styles Defining learning: outline for a training session (Word, 52kb) This training session is designed to be used with groups of up to 15 staff, working with a facilitator to help them explore the broad definition of learning adopted by Inspiring Learning. The session should run for up to 1.5 hours. Building a learning team (Word, 58kb) A document to support you to build a learning team. It identifies that a balance needs to be struck between achieving a task and providing opportunities to reflect on the process itself to promote individual and collective learning within your organisation."
Matt LeClair

Qualitative evaluation for program improvement - 0 views

www.scu.edu.au/...qualeval.html

Action research evaluation improvement program learning qualitative participative web action research

shared by Matt LeClair on 10 Jan 12 - Cached
  • Matt LeClair on 10 Jan 12
     
    "evaluation process in the general style of action research illustrates some points about qualitative research and evaluation"
Matt LeClair

Mapping Learning and the Growth of Knowledge in a Knowledge Building Community - 0 views

ikit.org/mapping.html

knowledge knowledge forum LEARNING classroom sch

shared by Matt LeClair on 14 Oct 11 - Cached
  • Matt LeClair on 14 Oct 11
     
    Bereiter and Scardamalia (1996) argue that there is a difference between learning and knowledge building. Learning is activity directed towards improving personal knowledge. Knowledge building is trying to improve knowledge itself by considering ideas in regard to their strengths, weaknesses, applications, limitations, and potential for further development. Both learning and knowledge building are needed in schools. This paper traces the development of both in a Grade 5/6 classroom studying physical science. Knowledge transforming discourse is central to knowledge building because it is the means through which knowledge is formed, criticized, and amended (Scardamalia, Bereiter & Lamon, 1994). In this knowledge building classroom, the capacity for transformative discourse was afforded by Knowledge Forum® and classroom processes. Our paper deals with how this class engaged in the process of articulating and changing their learning goals as they reflected on and evaluated their class' knowledge building progress. Our sources of data come from discourse in the Knowledge Forum® database and videotapes of classroom discussion. A second set of analyses designed to capture students' activity in the database used data from the Analytic Toolkit, a suite of tools designed to track each student's use of Knowledge Forum. A third set of measures came from a pretest and post-test of students' knowledge of physical science. Our results showed that students who engaged in knowledge building discourse around central features of physical science also improved their learning.
Matt LeClair

Social Development Theory - 0 views

www.icpd.org/...SocialDevTheory.htm

social development theory development results research

shared by Matt LeClair on 25 Oct 11 - Cached
  • Matt LeClair on 25 Oct 11
     
    Social development can be summarily described as the process of organizing human energies and activities at higher levels to achieve greater results. Development increases the utilization of human potential.
Matt LeClair

QUALITATIVE FORMS OF ART EDUCATION RESEARCH - 0 views

www.public.asu.edu/...qualformsarted.htm

qualitative research learning tools methodology questions inquiry ethnography survey mapping

shared by Matt LeClair on 20 Mar 12 - Cached
  • Ethnography is an inquiry process carried out by a person from a point of view based on experience and knowledge of prior research. Anthropologists try to understand the significance or meaning of an experience from the participants' views. Some researchers also use the term ethnography to refer to all techniques used in fieldwork, not a single method; for example Stuhr (1986).
  • Following are some suggestions for collecting data. Start by writing first impressions, making a space map, called a sociogram, which requires following participant interactions and recording field notes to include dates and times, and dialogues and gestures among participants.
  • Following are some suggestions for collecting data. Start by writing first impressions, making a space map, called a sociogram, which requires following participant interactions and recording field notes to include dates and times, and dialogues and gestures among participants.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • Following are some suggestions for collecting data. Start by writing first impressions, making a space map, called a sociogram, which requires following participant interactions and recording field notes to include dates and times, and dialogues and gestures among participants.
  • Following are some suggestions for collecting data. Start by writing first impressions, making a space map, called a sociogram, which requires following participant interactions and recording field notes to include dates and times, and dialogues and gestures among participants.
  • Following are some suggestions for collecting data. Start by writing first impressions, making a space map, called a sociogram, which requires following participant interactions and recording field notes to include dates and times, and dialogues and gestures among participants.
  • ollowing are some suggestions for collecting data. Start by writing first impressions, making a space map, called a sociogram, which requires following participant interactions and recording field notes to include dates and times, and dialogues and gestures among participan
  • ollowing are some suggestions for collecting data. Start by writing first impressions, making a space map, called a sociogram, which requires following participant interactions and recording field notes to include dates and times, and dialogues and gestures among participan
  • onduct a sociocultural profile
  • onduct a sociocultural profile
  • onduct a sociocultural profile
  • onduct a sociocultural profile
  • onduct a sociocultural profile
  • onduct a sociocultural profile
  • Matt LeClair on 20 Mar 12
     
    "The purpose of this chapter is to 1) discuss the nature of qualitative inquiry, 2) explore different kinds of qualitative inquiry, 3) explain the role of interpretation, 4) present various participant observation stances, 5) offer ways of gaining access and achieving reciprocity, 6) review stages of qualitative research, 7) suggest practical procedures related to research methods as well as research writing, 8) present sociocultural problems, and 9) give future alternatives for qualitative research. Specifically, stages of qualitative research to be described are data collection, content analysis, and comparative analysis. Practical suggestions for analysis will include such examples as computer programming, icon and color coding of concepts, focus groups and key informants, and spread sheets for comparative and cross-site analysis"
Matt LeClair

Maslows Hierarchy and Employee Engagement - 0 views

www.managementstudyguide.com/hy-and-employee-engagement.htm

tools references action research engagement employee hierarchy data research

shared by Matt LeClair on 22 Jun 12 - No Cached
  • How to tap the potential of employees who are not actively engaged or are disengaged? Yes, the management studies conducted over last few years have revealed that only 11 percent of the total employee strength is actively engagement and feels a strong commitment towards their work and workplace. The rest 89 percent of the employees are either not actively engaged or disengaged. This means that the organisations are able to tap the potential of only 11 percent employees. Encouraging the rest of the workforce is still a big challenge for them.
  • Biological and Physiological Needs: These are basic human needs including food, water and shelter. Organisations can buy them lunch, offer gift cards and give time off for necessary day-to-day tasks. It not only makes their life easier but also gives them a chance to retain with the organisation. Safety Needs: Safety needs include good shelter, protection, safety, security, law and order and stability. Once human beings have enough for food, water and shelter, they want to live a comfortable and safe life. Again the mantra of keeping them with the organisation is to pay. Pay for food and loan them an amount to build their own home or buy a vehicle. Organisations can also support their children education. Belonging Needs: It is a basic human need that they always want to be associated with something. They want to belong and to be belonged. The managers can establish friendly relationships with their subordinates so that they feel that they are an important asset of the organisation and they add value to it. Including them in decision making process or any other sensitive issue springing up within the workplace is a good idea. Also involve them in improvement teams where they really can contribute something substantial. Self Esteem: According to Maslow’s Hierarchy model, the fourth stage of one’s life is to attain a status in the society as well as in professional life. Besides this, a sense of achievement and recognition of their efforts play a vital role. Organisations which are successful in recognising the efforts of employees and reward them for their performance and contribution are able to retain their talent. Issuing newsletters recognising their contribution or giving a think you card or awarding them with a trophy can serve the purpose. Self Actualisation: It is the last stage in the Maslow’s Hierarchy model that is about growth and fulfilment in personal and professional life. By this time, individuals are well settled in life and are able to contribute through their work experiences. It is the time when organisations can make them feel empowered by giving them leadership authority, autonomy to take decisions and training opportunities. Employee engagement is a science as well as an art. It takes into account all tangible and intangible factors related to human life directly or indirectly.
  • Matt LeClair on 22 Jun 12
     
    How to tap the potential of employees who are not actively engaged or are disengaged? Yes, the management studies conducted over last few years have revealed that only 11 percent of the total employee strength is actively engagement and feels a strong commitment towards their work and workplace. The rest 89 percent of the employees are either not actively engaged or disengaged. This means that the organisations are able to tap the potential of only 11 percent employees. Encouraging the rest of the workforce is still a big challenge for them.
Michelle Green

Interfacing about User Experiences, Part Two: "Disney" » Altia Blog - 0 views

www.altia.com/...er-experiences-part-two-disney

user experiences disney interactions

shared by Michelle Green on 11 Jan 12 - No Cached
  • ‘Because Disney WANTS us to interact with you. Enjoy your day!!’ How counter to the normal business process this was! Most corporations create interfaces to maximize self-reliance and, therein, decrease labor costs. Labor, especially domestic labor, is exponentially more expensive than even a graphical, animated sign. Disney, however, prioritized the user’s experience by DECREASING the efficiency of the user interface.
  • they have made a concerted effort to consider use cases and mold them to their advantage.
Matt LeClair

WORDPRESS GOD: 300+ Tools for Running Your WordPress Blog - 0 views

mashable.com/...or-running-your-wordpress-blog

wordpress plugins blog resources plugin blogging tools list

shared by Matt LeClair on 06 Jan 12 - Cached
  • eStats – Full featured statistics including referrers and popular pages
  • FireStats – Full featured statistics including referrers and popular pages.
  • FireStats – Full featured statistics including referrers and popular pages.
  • ...21 more annotations...
  • FireStats – Full featured statistics including referrers and popular pages.
  • ics including referrers and popular pages.
  • ics including referrers and popular pages.
  • FireStats – Full featured statistics including referrers and popular pages.
  • FireStats – Full featured statistics including referrers and popular pages.
  • FireStats – Full featured statistics including referrers and popular pages.
  • WP-Post Ratings – Allows readers to rate your posts.
  • nline Ajax Page – Displays a snippet of a post and then allows the reader to click a button to load the full entry without going to another page.
  • Tagboard Widget – Adds an auto-updating tagboard to your site that displays new messages as they are posted.
  • wp-chunk – Truncates long URLs in comments to prevent them from stretching the page.
  • WP-Most Commented Posts – Displays the posts with the most comments in the sidebar.
  • Simple CoComments – Tracks the conversation across blogs.
  • Comment Karma – Digg-style voting on comments.
  • Google Analyticator – Inserts Google Analytics code on every WordPress page.
  • Leprakhauns Word Count – Adds a Java powered word counter to your editing page.
  • Simple Tagging – Simplifies the tagging process to drop down menus and includes the ability import from your current tagging plugins.
  • Playing Music Del.icio.us MP3 Player – Makes links to MP3s in your posts playable and easily postable to del.icio.us. Audio Player – Inserts a simple MP3 player into your posts that plays uploaded audio files. XSFP Player – Flash player that allows you to embed music on your blog via http.
  • WP OnlineCounter – This plugin counts the number of readers currently online, highest number of visitors at the same time, and the total count of visitors.
  • mpress – Display number of users, posts, pages, comments, categories, words, and more on your blog.
  • Limit the size of main page posts – Set the number of words you want each of your main page posts to contain so that if they exceed that limit, a link is provided to a page with the complete post.
  • Phoogle – Add Google Maps with markers you choose to any of your posts.
Matt LeClair

http://www.actionresearch.net/writings/jack/arplanner.htm - 0 views

www.actionresearch.net/...arplanner.htm

resource research action research teaching model learning circle evaluation cycle questions cycle actionresearch Lit Review writings students

shared by Matt LeClair on 04 Jan 12 - No Cached
  • expression and communication of these values is essential in any valid explanation of your educational influence in your own learning and in the learning of others.  I am thinking here of values such as freedom, justice, care, love, compassion, respect and knowledge-creation
  • three assumptions
  • 'How do I improve what I am doing?'  in  your professional practice.
  • ...20 more annotations...
  • onversations between pairs of practitioner-researchers in which we take some 4 minutes each to outline our contexts, what really matters to us, and what we would like to improve
  • motivating you to improve your practice it often helps in the development of realistic action pla
  • After the initial conversation on values and context in relation to your desire to improve practices that relate to helping students, yourself and/or colleagues to improve their learning, I believe that you may find the following action planning process most useful.
  • 'How do I improve what I am doing?'
  • tions, ideas and actions that can distinguish an action reflection cycle: 1) What do I want to improve? What is my concern? Why am I concerned? 2) Imagining possibilities and choosing one of them to act on in an action plan 3) As I am acting what data will I collect to enable me to judge my educational influence in my professional context as I answer my question?  4) Evaluating the influence of the actions in terms of values and understandings. 5) Modifying concerns, ideas and actions in the light of evaluations.
  • Making public a validated explanation of educational influences
  • 7) As I evaluate the educational influences of my actions in my own learning and the learning of other, who might be willing to help me to strengthen the validity of my explanation of my learning about my influence with responses to questions such as: i)               Is my explanation as comprehensible as it could be? ii)             Could I improve the evidential basis of my claims to know what I am doing? iii)            Does my explanation include an awareness of historical and cultural influences in what I am doing and draw on the most advanced social theories of the day? iv)            Am I showing that I am committed to the values that I claim to be living by?
  • nhancing professionalism with TASC (Thinking Actively in a Social Context)
  • .  In producing a valid explanation for our educational influences in the learning of others I believe it to be necessary for the other's explanation of their own learning to be included in our explanation. 
  • ecognises the creativity of the other in engaging with ideas
  • I believe that Sally's writings make an original contribution to educational knowledge whilst showing that she has found useful some of my own ideas  in making this contribution.
  • Educational Enquiry (EE), Research Methods in Education (RME), Understanding Learners and Learning (ULL) and Gifts and Talents in Education (G & T) you can access these at: http://www.actionresearch.net/writings/mastermod.shtml .
  • To see the criteria used in assessing these units click on this link for the MACriteria.
  • virtual learning space for this CPD project go to http://www.spanglefish.com/livingvaluesimprovingpracticecooperatively/ . You can also read Walton's (2011 a&b) ideas on developing a collaborative inquiry.
  • In an inclusional way of being and knowing an individual recognises that they exist in a relational dynamic of space and boundaries. Hence one of the tasks of the practitioner-researcher is to express and communicate this relational dynamic in explanations of educational influence.
  • An example here would be the use of Foucault's (1977) ideas on Power/Knowledge to understand the relationships between the Truth of Power and the Power of Truth in the workplace when seeking academic legitimation for new living standards of judgment.
  • Appendix 1 Action Planner
  • You can access this curriculum at http://www.actionresearch.net/writings/bishops/bish99.pdf
  • How do we contribute to an educational knowledge base
  • Hymer, B. (2007) How do I understand and communicate my values and beliefs in my work as an educator in the field of giftedness?
  • Matt LeClair on 04 Jan 12
     
    "Action Planning In Improving Practice And Generating Educational Knowledge In Creating Your Living Educational Theory"
Matt LeClair

7 Things You Should Know About Agile Development | EDUCAUSE - 0 views

www.educause.edu/...219166

development educause project management principles approach agile process

shared by Matt LeClair on 27 Feb 12 - No Cached
  • Matt LeClair on 27 Feb 12
     
    "7 Things You Should Know About Agile Development"
Matt LeClair

An Outline of Integral Learning - 0 views

www.sacsa.sa.edu.au/...k22b.html

thinking style learning teaching

shared by Matt LeClair on 20 Sep 11 - No Cached
  • Human learning is deepened and amplified by integration our multiple ways of knowing. Teach to ENGAGE and INTEGRATE all modes of processing regardless of personal thinking style.
Matt LeClair

Knowledge Requirements Planning Model - 0 views

books.google.com/books

game knowledge planning isd process culture

shared by Matt LeClair on 15 Oct 11 - No Cached
  • Matt LeClair on 15 Oct 11
     
    Excerpt from Games, Gadgets, and Gizmo's book
1 - 20 of 21 Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page