Group items tagged

"This article reports on the development of a short questionnaire to measure work engagement-a positive work-related state of fulfillment that is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption. Data were collected in 10 different countries (N = 14,521), and results indicated that the original 17-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) can be shortened to 9 items (UWES-9). The factorial validity of the UWES-9 was demonstrated using confirmatory factor analyses, and the three scale scores have good internal consistency and test-retest reliability"

strengthfinder

For the first time, TalentSmart unveils its step-by-step program for increasing emotional intelligence via 66 proven strategies that teach: self-awareness self-management social awareness relationship management The book also includes access to the enhanced online edition of the world′s most popular EQ test-the Emotional Intelligence Appraisal-that pinpoints the strategies that will increase your emotional intelligence the most and tests your EQ a second time to measure your progress.

Defining and measuring participative web and user-created content; divers of; types of; economic and social impacts; opportunities and challenges for users/business/polcy

"Use this self-assessment tool-based on the Organizational Profile section in the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence-to measure your organization against others that have taken the challenge. "

"To measure your skill level and see how Crucial Confrontations can best serve your needs, candidly review the following statements. Check "Yes" if they apply to you. Check "No" if they do not. The following questions explore how you typically respond when you're in the middle of a stressful situation."

Learning is a latent construct - we cannot observe or explain it directly. Many theories have been forwarded to explain what occurs during learning. The resources in this section provide a brief introduction to this area and are organised as such:

" The key to great bucket filling is individualization. Each person has unique preferences for receiving recognition and praise. For bucket filling to be meaningful to the recipient, it must be personalized and specific to what that person needs. Use the Gallup Recognition Interview to find out what fills the buckets of your friends, family members, and colleagues. (PDF)Gallup Recognition Interview Every time you fill a bucket, you're setting something in motion. How much bucket filling do you do compared to others? Do you have low impact, some impact, or high impact on your environment? Consider printing the Positive Impact Test statements, and use them as your guide for improvement. (PDF)Positive Impact Test statements Think about your most recent interactions. Were they more positive or more negative? Did you give someone a compliment, or did you choose to make a negative comment instead? Once you become aware of your positive-to-negative interaction ratio, you can consciously begin to reduce and eliminate bucket dipping from your life. Keep track with the Interaction Scorecard. (PDF)Interaction Scorecard How Full Is Your Bucket? > Purchase How Full Is Your Bucket? How Full Is Your Bucket? For Kids New from Tom Rath and Mary Reckmeyer "

UPenn

list of software for social network analysis

"Quality Matters (QM) is a faculty-centered, peer review process that is designed to certify the quality of online and blended courses. QM is a leader in quality assurance for online education and has received national recognition for its peer-based approach and continuous improvement in online education and student learning."

Bereiter and Scardamalia (1996) argue that there is a difference between learning and knowledge building. Learning is activity directed towards improving personal knowledge. Knowledge building is trying to improve knowledge itself by considering ideas in regard to their strengths, weaknesses, applications, limitations, and potential for further development. Both learning and knowledge building are needed in schools. This paper traces the development of both in a Grade 5/6 classroom studying physical science. Knowledge transforming discourse is central to knowledge building because it is the means through which knowledge is formed, criticized, and amended (Scardamalia, Bereiter & Lamon, 1994). In this knowledge building classroom, the capacity for transformative discourse was afforded by Knowledge Forum® and classroom processes. Our paper deals with how this class engaged in the process of articulating and changing their learning goals as they reflected on and evaluated their class' knowledge building progress. Our sources of data come from discourse in the Knowledge Forum® database and videotapes of classroom discussion. A second set of analyses designed to capture students' activity in the database used data from the Analytic Toolkit, a suite of tools designed to track each student's use of Knowledge Forum. A third set of measures came from a pretest and post-test of students' knowledge of physical science. Our results showed that students who engaged in knowledge building discourse around central features of physical science also improved their learning.