Purpose The purpose of this guide is to offer suggestions for Federal agencies for successfully using their employee survey results in planning and implementing positive organizational change.
The purpose of this guide is to offer suggestions for Federal agencies for successfully using their employee survey results in planning and implementing positive organizational change.
design of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL)
environments
Participation in progressive inquiry is facilitated by asking a user who is preparing a discussion message to
categorize the message by choosing a "category of inquiry scaffold" (e.g., Problem, Working theory,
Summary) corresponding to the PI-Model (based on the practices of Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1993). These scaffolds
are designed to encourage students to engage in expert-like processing of knowledge; they help to move beyond
simple question-answer discussion and elicit practices of progressive inquiry.
ther important aspect of inquiry, and a critical condition of developing conceptual
understanding, is generation of one’s own working theories — one’s conjectures, hypotheses,
theories or interpretations — for the phenomena being investigated (Carey & Smith, 1995; Perkins,
Crismond, Simmons, & Under, 1995; Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1993).
Through evaluating whether and how well the working theories explain the chosen problems, the learning community
seeks to assess strengths and the weaknesses of different explanations and identify contradictory explanations,
gaps of knowledge, and limitations of the power of intuitive explanation
Progressive discourse occurs, for instance, in the sciences demonstarting both
accumulation and deepening of knowledge.
Each question opened one knowledge-buiding
thread, e.g., "How does the new information and communication technology support development of
students’ expertise in different contexts?" or "What kind of new pedagogical problems
may emerge in networked learning environments?"
Specific problems addressed included the following: 1) What is the nature of KB messages
produced by the participants? 2) How does the KB represent the model of progressive inquiry? 3) How
did the students used the scaffolds provided by the FLE-Tools?
During the
nine-week course the students posted 125 messages.
The postings to the database KB Module constitute the data analyzed in this study. The database
material was analyzed with qualitative and quantitative methods in order to evaluate the process of
knowledge advancement. The methods applied to analyzing the date aim at providing a richer view on
the content and the progression of the discussion (see Chi, 1997).
ded to elicit in-depth inquiry
The following
categories of inquiry scaffolds were also used to analyze how the students categorized their
messages: Problem, Working theory, Deepening knowledge, Comment, Metacomment, and Summary (Help has
been left out of the analysis because it was not used by the students)
To analyze the reliability of segmentation, an independent coder
classified approximately 15 percent of the messages. The inter-coder reliability was .91, indicating
that the reliability of segmentation was satisfactory.
each segment or idea was classified according to five principal
"idea categories" identified in the coding process: Problem, Working theory,
Scientific explanation, Metacomment, and Quote of another student’s idea. All of the
propositions fitted in these five categories of ideas, which were regarded to be mutually exclusive.
database was
considered to show remarkable connectedness (Hewitt, 1996).
FLE-Tools environment was
used in a pilot course to facilitate progressive inquiry in university education
The
students were asked to categorize their posting to the database by using a set of cognitive
scaffolds. However, the content analysis indicated that the students' productions often did not
correspond with the scaffold they chose. The students showed a bias for selecting a Category of
Inquiry
A thematic analysis of the discussion
suggested that a tutor's "just-in-time" participation could have significantly changed this pattern,
judging from the evaluations and reflections of the students.
First, although the
students were introduced the PI-Mode
Second, it is
possible that it is not natural for the students to partition their posting in a way that
corresponds to the given scaffolds; the students wrote rather long entries (often half a page) in
which they set up as well as explained their problems.
examination of the database
indicated that there was a substantial knowledge-management problem.
only the KB module was tested.
model of progressive inquiry
the students apparently need strong
community support that would induce them to participate and guide them in doing so
Surpassing
ourselves. An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL
The design of a web-based, networked learning environment, Future Learning Environment Tools (FLE-Tools) embodies a model of progressive inquiry. In this paper, we introduce the progressive inquiry model and describe how different modules FLE-Tools are designed to facilitate participation in this kind of inquiry. Results of a pilot experiment of using FLE-Tools in higher education are presented. The study was based on an analysis of 125 messages posted by thirteen university students to the FLE-Tools database. The results indicated that the course provided positive evidence for an integration of progressive inquiry and online discussion. The pedagogical and design challenges with which we are currently struggling are discussed: the problems of creating a learning community for students collaborating at distance or managing large number of entries in FLE's database.
Social development can be summarily described as the process of organizing human energies and activities at higher levels to achieve greater results. Development increases the utilization of human potential.
"This article reports on the development of a short questionnaire to measure work engagement-a positive work-related state of fulfillment that is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption. Data were collected in 10 different countries (N = 14,521), and results indicated that the original 17-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) can be shortened to 9 items (UWES-9). The factorial validity of the UWES-9 was demonstrated using confirmatory factor analyses, and the three scale scores have good internal consistency and test-retest reliability"
"A Parent's Guide to 21st-Century Learning
Discover the tools and techniques today's teachers and classrooms are using to prepare students for tomorrow -- and how you can get involved.
More Resources:
How to Strengthen Parent Involvement and Communication
A Teacher's Guide to Generation X Parents
Facebook Group for Parents
blue cover with students
Six Tips for Brain-Based Learning
By understanding how the brain works, educators are better equipped to help K-12 students with everything from focusing attention to increasing retention.
More Resources:
Neuro Myths: Separating Fact and Fiction in Brain-Based Learning
Brain-Based Learning: Resource Roundup
Big Thinker: Neurologist Judy Willis on the Science of Learning
Yellow cover with students
Ten Tips for Classroom Management
Learn how to improve student engagement and build a positive climate for learning and discipline for grades K-12.
More Resources:
How to Develop Positive Classroom Management
Classroom-Management Video Tips for Teachers
Positive Discipline Strategies Yield Quick Results
Purple cover with faces framed in circles
Top Ten Tips for Teaching with New Media
Whether you're new to teaching or a classroom veteran, this resource-packed collection of 10 new media tips provides fresh ideas and easy-to-use tools to engage your students and make learning more collaborative. (Updated: 6/14/11)
More Resources:
Twittering, Not Frittering: Professional Development in 140 Characters
Google for Educators: The Best Features for Busy Teachers
Social Media in Education: The Power of Facebook
Blue 2010 cover with faces framed in circles
Summer Rejuvenation Guide
Whether it's reading a good book or starting a new hobby, this resource-packed guide highlights ten fun ways to spend your summer. (Updated: 5/24/11)
More Resources:
Teacher-Tested Travel Grants
Creating a Summer Reading Network
How to Create a Professional Learning Community
Orange c
The Teaching Perspectives Inventory can help you collect your thoughts and summarize your ideas about teaching. It can be useful in examining your own teaching as well as helping clarify the teaching views of other people.
The TPI is quick to complete - it usually takes no more than 10-15 minutes to answer all the questions and to automatically score your results. You may also choose to print out your profile sheet to help you visualize and interpret your scores.
Wiki - Expectancy Theory proposes that a person will decide to behave or act in a certain way because they are motivated to select a specific behavior over other behaviors due to what they expect the result of that selected behavior will be.[1] In essence, the motivation of the behavior selection is determined by the desirability of the outcome. However, at the core of the theory is the cognitive process of how an individual processes the different motivational elements. This is done before making the ultimate choice. The outcome is not the sole determining factor in making the decision of how to behave.
What the StrengthsFinder test instead purports to reveal are not your strengths, per se, but the dominant underlying talents that play a key role — along with the ingredients of skills and knowledge — in forming your core personal and professional strengths.
Strengths are what companies are looking for in professional-level candidates. Not just Talent. Not just Skills. Not just a college degree or a smattering of relevant Knowledge. Strengths are the things that actually produce profitable results and get things accomplished for the company, which is why employers are being so annoyingly picky and subjecting job applicants to so many levels of scrutiny these days
The Purpose of a Literature Review is to do one or more of the following..
Ground your problem in the content of those who have struggled with the problem or issue in the past.
Describe how your approach will be similar or different from what what has been tried in similar settings in the past.
Suggest new ways of a solving a problem by combining or contrasting past approaches.
Describe a conflict that you are going to explore by trying one or more strategies.
Establish the need for your research.
Don't be worried if you find someone has already done your study. This is a valuable resource. It will give you clues as to what you might or might not find. It is very useful--your study will be different, because you are in a different setting, so don't worry. Replication is an important part of science.
You are welcome to use this form and the spreadsheet as a template and modify it for your own purposes.
WHEN TO PARAPHASE AND WHEN TO QUOTE....
When should you use a quote and how should you reference the work of others? You use a direct quote ONLY for one of these three reasons...
ARTFUL WORDS The text is so wonderfully written that no matter how hard you try to put it in your own words something critical is lost. You cannot paraphrase it. Use the quote and be sure to include the author, publication date and page number.FROM THE EXPERT -The importance is not the words but the fact that a certain person said them. For example, a politician might make a statement that has meaning because of WHO said it. The words might be less then poetic but the reason for the quote is to ties the words to the author. Again you need to indicate the source and if it is cited in an article from another source the correct way to list it is. (Bush, 2004 cited in Steward, 2004, p35). CONCEPTS AS PROPERTY The quote contains a phase or concept that you want to tie to a person. For example "communities of practices" (Lave and Wenger, 1991) But beware of writing in the words of others because you are afraid to interpret a the text. This is a common mistake in graduate student writing. You have a right to make sense of the writing. And with a citation you can paraphrase the results of the study using some of the words that are in the study. Don't be afraid to put it in your own words.
Now there are a number of ways to cite the person --Suppose you want to quote Riel for the phrase/idea --"Technology is shared minds made visible"...here are four different ways of doing this.
Bereiter and Scardamalia (1996) argue that there is a difference between learning and knowledge building. Learning is activity directed towards improving personal knowledge. Knowledge building is trying to improve knowledge itself by considering ideas in regard to their strengths, weaknesses, applications, limitations, and potential for further development. Both learning and knowledge building are needed in schools. This paper traces the development of both in a Grade 5/6 classroom studying physical science.
Knowledge transforming discourse is central to knowledge building because it is the means through which knowledge is formed, criticized, and amended (Scardamalia, Bereiter & Lamon, 1994). In this knowledge building classroom, the capacity for transformative discourse was afforded by Knowledge Forum® and classroom processes. Our paper deals with how this class engaged in the process of articulating and changing their learning goals as they reflected on and evaluated their class' knowledge building progress. Our sources of data come from discourse in the Knowledge Forum® database and videotapes of classroom discussion. A second set of analyses designed to capture students' activity in the database used data from the Analytic Toolkit, a suite of tools designed to track each student's use of Knowledge Forum. A third set of measures came from a pretest and post-test of students' knowledge of physical science. Our results showed that students who engaged in knowledge building discourse around central features of physical science also improved their learning.
Today's marketplace is fueled by knowledge. Yet organizing systematically to leverage knowledge remains a challenge. Leading companies have discovered that technology is not enough, and that cultivating communities of practice is the keystone of an effective knowledge strategy.Communities of practice come together around common interests and expertise- whether they consist of first-line managers or customer service representatives, neurosurgeons or software programmers, city managers or home-improvement amateurs.
Background: Social Learning is the utilization of Social Networks and Social Technology for specific organizational learning outcomes. This survey was designed in our LAB to take a quick pulse of learning colleagues around the globe on current implementations and plans for Social Learning. Elliott Masie comments are indicated in BLUE below each question: 1.