trid to
New item has been created. View it here
Public Writing Assignment #1 - 80 views
Discussion: Your rhetorical life - 53 views
First draft of Torture paper - 55 views
Draft - 29 views
Project 2 - Research Plan/Abstract - 24 views
More like these? - 21 views
First Draft - 23 views
Project one 1st Draft - 19 views
Here is my first essay draft - 18 views
First Draft - 16 views
my first essay draft - 13 views
Draft one - 6 views
13More
Natassia Watson - 0 views
-
-
Meghan Winn on 04 Nov 08tried*
-
-
further they called their oppnents past actions into question.
-
Even though McCain used more logos in his speech, he blundered in advocating the establishment of MFI, which would be another governmental agency even though he says that “We don't need a dozen federal agencies doing the job badly”.
- ...2 more annotations...
-
Obama seemed to deliver a better message in that he didn’t contradict himself, constantly kept his audience engaged on topics that are of interest to them.
-
-
You didn't really have an opening or closing paragraph. I couldn't really tell if you even used 2 written messages and 2 visual or just one of each.
-
You used some quotes throughout your essay but didn't ever cite where they came from.
-
You also did not discuss the structure of their messages, their intended audiences or how comfortable they are in either form of communication (written of oral).
-
The second paragraph is a good analyzation of their rhetorical strategies. It is also good that you stated what their messages focused on because since you didn't give a works cited page and used different media than the suggested ones I wasn't really aware of what your chosen messages were about.
-
You did a good job with your point of view. You didn't address the reader as 'you'.
-
36More
Shekenah WhitneyProject2 - 0 views
-
While both Obama and McCain use ethos, pathos, and logos in their speeches and/or media presentations one candidate uses them more effectively than the other.
-
opens his speech with a personal anecdote about how war affected
-
goes on the say,
- ...11 more annotations...
-
the main characteristic that he used was in using
-
and or
-
rhetoric
-
in this speech
-
terroists
-
statements mean that
-
a man that
-
and Iraqi
-
This is a hinderence because his argument
-
Obama also used logos throughout his argument such as
-
-
Your last paragraph introduces new topics and issues that you had not previously discussed. I can't tell if it is supposed to be your closing or not because if so it doesn't really support the rest of the paper.
-
-
you did a good job using the correct point of view and you used a lot of good details
-
The organization of your paper was very good. It helped your ideas be easily understood and also helped the flow of the paper.
-
54More
With the Presidential electio... - 0 views
-
-
Through their methods of doing this
-
we can
- ...24 more annotations...
-
Everyone
-
and a s
-
very good
-
McCain’s campaign is fairly well fleshed out, as it has its bases in Bush’s platform
-
uses logos
-
address
-
one war.
-
allows him to
-
worse and Iraq.
-
It is interesting to note that in his visual rhetoric McCain tends to avoid approaches on Logos, instead focusing on pathos, while in his written rhetoric, such as this article, he does the opposite
-
Obama is a very good public speaker
-
ones do.
-
s transition — despite
-
Obama uses Logos in both his visual and written rhetoric, and does so quite masterfully
-
to me
-
Obama does not seem to focus very much on pathos, but he uses logos so well that it isn’t really necessary
-
Obama is
-
t we ca
-
nature, speaking
-
I find
-
and quite
-
Obama is
-
coming, and coming soon
19More
Oral rhetoric vs. Written rhe... - 0 views
-
disagree with
-
Some resources that support these claims are “Images in Words: Presidential Rhetoric, Charisma, and Greatness” by Cynthia G. Emrich, Holly H. Brower, Jack M. Feldman and Howard Garland, “Survival of the Fittest: Rhetoric during the Course of an Election Campaign” by Jennifer Jerit, “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses” by Edward F. McQuarrie and David Glen Mick, “Support of Content and Rhetorical Processes of Writing: Effects on the Writing Process and the Written Product” by Kirsten R. Butcher and Walter Kintsch and, “The Rhetoric Institute: Notes and Comments” by Patricia Sullivan.
-
these kinds of tactics are successful because “appeals that are high in emotional content will survive longer than other types of arguments.”
- ...6 more annotations...
-
Jerit illuminates, “arguments that cause citizens to feel angry might inspire them to mobilize for or against a particular candidate.”
-
Able minded Barrack Obama’s oral speech seems to be more successful than John McCain’s oral speech in their attempts to achieve persuasion.
-
“Presidents who engaged in more image-based rhetoric in their inaugural addresses were rated higher in charisma.” They say, “Followers cannot act on messages they do not hear… people who are vivid, whether in appearance, manner or speech are more salient, and hence attract more attention than those who are not.”
-
In his oral speech
-
The use of ethos pathos and logos were used by Barack Obama and John McCain in written and oral speeches they gave.
50More
Amanda Flores - 0 views
-
responsible
-
For the candidate who wins
-
holds the office of head of state
- ...22 more annotations...
-
He was the son of divorced parents. He lived with his mother in the beginning of his life, and then moved in with his grandparents for the rest.
-
So you can pick the best candidate for the job, you must compare each one.
-
I am going to look at a speech and essay from both John McCain and Barack Obama.
-
Both McCain and Obama did a speech
-
The rhetoric used here was ethos.
-
talks
-
tells the people why what he plans to do is better.
-
He wrote this is show that
-
He uses actually numbers.
-
he does use a lot of logic.
-
By comparing all the speeches and essays rhetorically of both McCain and Obama, you could decide on a winner.
-
I have only compared one of each on the candidates.
-
you must examine and analyze the rhetorical strategies used by each candidate.
-
(Dictionary.com)
-
He is the one who has to make all decisions for the American people.
-
s may
-
directly or indirectly
-
about how he knows how hard the war is on everyone, but knows we need to finish it and not back out so we don’t hurt us in the end.
-
uch a personal feel to it. He was looking at the crowd the whole time,
-
tates many facts
-
Since he has fought in a war
-
So by figuring out which politician makes the most convincing statements,
36More
Project 2 rough draft - 0 views
-
Works Cited
-
-
My floating sticky notes aren't working again, so here is my conventions critique: Conventions- The only thing I noticed was a small amount of spelling errors and that the in text MLA citations are missing. Otherwise, good job. Especially on the works cited and annotated bibliography.
-
Make sure if you use MLA works cited, that you use MLA paper sourcing as well. And usually you need an extra space between sources in MLA works cited, it also makes it a lot easier to read the sources.
-
-
different
-
He also,
- ...12 more annotations...
-
throught he
-
Also, he appeals to the veryday people with comments like that on his website that say, “I’m asking you to believe, not just in my ability to bring about real change in Washington… I’m asking you to believe in yours.”
-
Also, there is John McCain who has been around the presidential election process before. He has ran for President before and did not make it past primary elections. He was a part of the U.S. House of Represenatives for Arizona in 1982, and was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1986. He is someone who has been around the hustle and bustle of the Washington lifestyle. He is someone who, it would be thought, would be ready for the highest position in our country. His platform has included helping out our economy and ensuring our national security. He wants to get health care costs down to a price that is reasonable for all people. One thing that McCain differs from Obama on is the issue of Iraq. McCain believes we need to assist Iraq in becoming a prosperous country on its own, before we can back out and leave them alone.
-
McCain’s written rhetoric can be seen on his website where he describes how he plans to change our country. His main ideas and what he stands for are clear to see there. It says “Country First: Reform, Prosperity, Peace.”
-
This paragraph is very short. It's a good point, but I think you can go into it further. You could do this by possibly giving another example.
-
This paragraph's length makes it one of the weaker points of the essay. It starts off with a good transition, but there is no evidence to support that what he stands for on issues.
-
-
Each candidate uses rhetoric to appeal to their potential voters. They both use Pathos to appeal to their audiences. They appeal to the middle class by promising a change in the way they have lived their lives, by lowering taxes and getting more affordable healthcare. Obama appeals to the minorities saying that it is their time to take a stand and get out and vote, telling them that they can make a difference. Ethos is a big part of politics, because if we have no confidence in what they have stood for in the past how can we back them now. A person’s reputation is key in politics, especially in the Presidential election. This is the time when scandals become forefront, because each party is trying to discredit the other. If we aren’t confident in the person how can we be confident in the policies. Logos is used, although I’m not sure always effectively. Politicians use logic to appeal to people saying how things in our country are now and how they believe they can change them in the future. For instance, logically if we are in a state of economic crisis we want someone who plans to change that for the better.
-
I see where you're going with this paragraph, but I'm not sure if it's effective. I think that you need to explain individually in the paragraphs exactly what is an example of pathos, what is an example of ethos, and so on. Otherwise, I think it would be hard for people, especially people who don't completely understand rhetoric, to be able to figure out what is an example of which one.
-
Organization-Your organization was good and clear. With the exception of the conclusion, I wouldn't change anything.
-
Your organization between candidates is good, but I would probably discuss the rhetoric each candidate uses within the paragraphs in which you discuss the candidates. It would help the paper flow a little better and possibly help improve your transitions between candidates even stronger.
-
And I agree with Angela, you should most definitely have evidence to backup what rhetoric method each uses. Also there are very little references in this paper to sources, which you definitely need to make sure you use. This is a really good paper and I would hate to see you lose points due to possible plagarism. Even when you paraphrase you need to cite your source.
-
-
-
adamentaly
-
different
-
Election
-
There has been much debate about the candidates for this year’s election.
-
bama’s Written rhetoric is clear in
-
1) Written doesn't need to be capitlized. 2) This paragraph seems like it stops short. It feels there should be more depth to it. One example is easily to manipulate into saying that "well that's just a one time thing, he did this some other time." The more examples you have, the stronger your argument will be. =)
-
-
McCain uses visual rhetoric in his speeches and debates as well. H