Skip to main content

Home/ ORG 2.0/ Group items tagged collaboration

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Enrique Rubio Royo

Value Networks and the true nature of collaboration - 0 views

www.valuenetworksandcollaboration.com/home.html

value_creation value_networks creacion_de_valor personas creativecommons ebook eaprendiz redes_sociales

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 13 May 11 - No Cached
  • Value Networks  and the true nature of collaboration
  • Work life is completely changing as social networking and collaboration platforms allow a more human-centric way of organizing work.
  • Yet work design tools, structures, processes, and systems
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • are not evolving as rapidly
  • and in many cases
  • are simply inadequate to support the new flexible and networked ways of working.
  • Value Networks and the true nature of collaboration meets this challenge head on with a systemic, human-network approach to managing business operations and ecosystems.
  • Creative Commons license
  • Enrique Rubio Royo on 13 May 11
     
    Work life is completely changing as social networking and collaboration platforms allow a more human-centric way of organizing work. Yet work design tools, structures, processes, and systems are not evolving as rapidly, and in many cases are simply inadequate to support the new flexible and networked ways of working. Value Networks and the true nature of collaboration meets this challenge head on with a systemic, human-network approach to managing business operations and ecosystems.
Enrique Rubio Royo

5 Stages of Workplace Learning - Social Media In Learning - 0 views

janeknight.typepad.com/...ges-of-workplace-learning.html

collaboration workplace_learning jane_hart eaprende org2.0

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 08 May 10 - Cached
  • how we believe a collaboration platform will replace the LMS  as the core (learning) system in use in organistions
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 08 May 10
       
      En paralelo debe existir perfil 'eAprendiz' y responsables que lo promuevan en la ORG, para llegar al aprendizaje en el puesto de trabajo. El eAprendiz asume claramente el 'mindset' asociado a 'workflow learning', quien lo debe asumir, pues, es la dirección )directivos y ORGs 2.0). eAprendiz,
  • change from focusing exclusively on centrally diirecting and managing formal learning (aka training) in a LMS to supporting and enabling a collaborative approach to learning and working across the enterprise.
  • The difference between Stages 1-4 and Stage 5 is actually NOT just about a change in tools but a change in mindset.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • the key mindset changes that will move organisations
  • recognising that working=learning; learning=working
  • understanding that informal learning needs to be enabled, supported and encouraged - but not designed or managed "letting go", so that there is a move from learner control to learner autonomy realising that autonomous, independent and inter-dependent, self-directed learners are essential  in an agile organisation
  • we, at ITA, believe that in this fast-changing, complex world, this is the place that organisations need to be.
  • Enrique Rubio Royo on 08 May 10
     
    del eAprendiz y la ORG 2.0
Enrique Rubio Royo

Harold Jarche » A framework for social learning in the enterprise - 0 views

www.jarche.com/...ial-learning-in-the-enterprise

jarche learning social framework sociallearning enterprise how-to

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 28 Sep 10 - Cached
  • The social learning revolution has only just begun. Corporations that understand the value of knowledge sharing, teamwork, informal learning and joint problem solving are investing heavily in collaboration technology and are reaping the early rewards.
  • Why is social learning important for today’s enterprise?
  • All organizational value is created by teams and networks.
  • ...42 more annotations...
  • Social learning is how groups work and share knowledge to become better practitioners. Organizations should focus on enabling practitioners to produce results by supporting learning through social networks
  • Wirearchies inherently require trust, and trusted relationships are powerful allies in getting things done in organizations
  • Communications without trust are just noise
  • Think and act at a macro level (what to do) and leave the micro (how to do it) to each worker or team
  • there are five types of learning that should be supported by the organization
  • Implementing social learning
  • ASL – Accidental & Serendipitous Learning: from Stocks to Flow
  • Learning is conversation and online conversations are an essential component of online learning
  • Online communication can be divided into Stocks (information that is archived and organized for reference and retrieval) and Flows (timely and engaging conversations between people, including voice or written communications). Blogs allow flow and micro-blogs, like Twitter, enable great flow due to the constraint of 140 characters
  • Stock on the Internet is everywhere and the challenge is to make sense of it through flows of conversation. It is no longer enough to have the book, manual or information, but one must be able to use it in changing contexts
  • Because of this connectivity, the Web is an environment more suited to just-in-time learning than the outdated course model
  • We are working and learning in networks and the only thing a network can do is share
  • PDL – Personal Directed Learning: from Clockwork & Predictable to Complexity & Surprising
  • the orientation of learning is shifting from past (efficiency, best practice) to future (creative response, innovation)
  • Work competencies will still need to be developed through practice and appropriate feedback (what training does well) but that practice will have to be directly relevant to the individual or group (group training is an area of immense potential growth)
  • Developing emergent practices, a necessity when there are no best practices in our changing work environments, requires constant personal directed learning.
  • In complex environments it no longer works to sit back and see what will happen. By the time we realize what’s happening, it will be too late to take action.
  • GDL – Group Directed Learning: from Worker Centric to Team Centric
  • the real work in organizations is done by groups
  • Organizing our own learning is necessary for creative work.
  • Developing social learning practices, like keeping a work journal, may be an effort at first but later it’s just part of the work process. Bloggers have learned how powerful a learning medium they have only after blogging for an extended period.
  • IOL – Intra-Organizational Learning: from Subject Matter Experts to Subject Matter Networks
  • Subject Matter Networks as a new way of finding organizational knowledge. Instead of looking for subject matter experts from which to design training, we should extend knowledge gathering to the entire network of subject-matter expertise.
  • Good networks make for effective organizations.
  • Networked communities are better structures in dealing with complexity,
  • can help facilitate fast feedback loops without hierarchical intervention
  • Collaborative groups are better at making decisions and getting things done.
  • the emerging knowledge-intensive and creative workplace has these attributes
  • FSL – Formal Structured Learning: from Curriculum to Competency
  • There remains a need for training in the networked workplace but it must move away from a content delivery approach.
  • With work and learning merging in the network, groups need to find ways that support each member’s learning, while engaged in tasks and projects
  • Think of it as social ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation) for the complex workplace.
  • Our workplaces are becoming interconnected
  • Reaction times and feedback loops have to get faster and more effective
  • We need to know who to ask for advice right now but that requires a level of trust and trusted relationships take time to nurture
  • Therefore, we need to share more of our work experiences in order to grow those trusted networks
  • Knowledge workers today need to connect with others to co-solve problems. Sharing tacit knowledge through conversations is an essential component of knowledge work. Social media enable adaptation, and the development of emergent practices, through conversations.
  • This is social learning and it is critical for networked organizational effectiveness
  • The manner in which we prepare people for work is based on the Taylorist perspective that there is only one way to do a job and that the person doing the work needs to conform to job requirements
  • Individual training for job preparation requires a stable work environment, a luxury no one has any more.
  • owever, when you look at the modern organization, it is moving to a model of constant change
  • A collective, social learning approach, on the other hand, takes the perspective that learning and work happen as groups and how the group is connected (the network) is more important than any individual node within it.
Enrique Rubio Royo

Learnlets » Formalizing informal learning? - 0 views

blog.learnlets.com/?p=1462

elearner eaprende aprender_en_red learning aprendizaje_informal workplace_learning

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 30 Mar 10 - Cached
  • The Entreprise Collaborative has a new question, asking whether we can formalize informal learning.  I have to say, I don’t get the question.  That is, I understand what they’re asking, and like the response they give, but I really think it’s the wrong question. To me, it’s not about formalizing informal learning so much as explicitly supporting it versus ignoring it. 
  • To me, it is more a matter of providing infrastructure to support informal learning, and facilitating informal learning as well.
  • When I talk about providing infrastructure, I’m talking about putting in place tools that can be used for informal learning. 
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • One is optimizing the tool use, and the other is facilitating the associated skills
  • the facilitation of that informal learning.  I see two roles.
  • The second role is to develop individual ability to use the tools for learning, both independently and socially.  To repeat a regular refrain, don’t assume the ability of learners to be effective self- and social-learners.  There are specific meta-cognitive skills that should be made explicit, promoted, and supported.
  • In the process of facilitating, you may find opportunities to add value by taking some information and formalizing it
Enrique Rubio Royo

Brightidea, Inc. Products - WebStorm - 0 views

www.brightidea.com/webstorm.bix

webstorm products open_innovation einnova genea gestion_de_ideas redes_sociales_corporativas open_innovation_socialnetwork

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 24 May 10 - Cached
  • WebStorm to gather and manage ideas from unlimited numbers of employees or customers
  • Are You Leveraging Employee & Customer Feedback?
  • Long-term success in any competitive marketplace demands constant innovation. Lasting innovation requires a steady flow of new ideas. The effectiveness of a company’s innovation efforts is measured by how well promising ideas are selected, nurtured, and transformed into tangible products and services. 
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • WebStorm
  • is an Idea Collection and Ranking Portal that facilitates the innovation process by allowing organizations to: Collect ideas and feedback from employees about new work processes, cost cutting and new product / service ideas. Solicit feedback & suggestions from customers about product features, new products, marketing and more. Run open innovation contests and competitions - open to the public or existing users.
  • Corporate "Social Networks" for Innovation & Idea Management
  • Businesses have only recently started to realize the potential that Web 2.0 technologies present to the workplace.
  • Incorporating the social networking paradigm in a business environment has many benefits: Increases participation by orders of magnitude over traditional methods. Drastically shortens timeframes of idea collection and evaluation. Promotes collaboration on the creation and refinement of new ideas. Fosters a sense of shared involvement in customers and employees. No end-user training is required.
  • Senior leaders of all types of corporations are pointing to innovation as being critical to the growth and survival of their firms. Yet all too often, internal processes for fostering innovation are lacking.
  • open innovation social network
  • a powerful tool for accessing the creativity and experience of your customers and employees. It can be configured for internal company use or opened up to customers and partners.
  • include: Idea Collection User Voting and Commenting Real-Time Duplicate Checker Microsoft Office Integration Video Uploads (automatic conversion to Flash Video) Single Sign-On (enhanced support for SAML 1.1) Configurable Micro-Site (landing page with company branding) Dashboard reports User Profiles Blogging Capability
  • WebStorm can be configured as the front-end interface to Brightidea’s Platform. Platform is a comprehensive suite of tools used to manage ideas from conception to reality, with modules for research collaboration, cost estimation and revenue forecasting, and more.
  • Enrique Rubio Royo on 24 May 10
     
    Long-term success in any competitive marketplace demands constant innovation. Lasting innovation requires a steady flow of new ideas. The effectiveness of a company's innovation efforts is measured by how well promising ideas are selected, nurtured, and transformed into tangible products and services
Enrique Rubio Royo

The Content Economy: Why traditional intranets fail today's knowledge workers - 0 views

www.thecontenteconomy.com/...tail-of-information-needs.html

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 14 Oct 11 - Cached
  • inputs and outputs of knowledge work – which is information and knowledge – vary from time to time, from situation to situation
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 14 Oct 11
       
      K siempre bajo contexto
  • Knowledge work is also less structured and the structure of knowledge work typically emerges as the work proceeds.
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 14 Oct 11
       
      actividades o interacciones tácitas (complejas)
  • In a knowledge-intensive business environment,
  • ...56 more annotations...
  • very hard or even impossible to anticipate in advance what information is needed
  • You simply cannot know what information will be relevant before the moment you need it.
  • We also need to have immediate access to anyone who might possess the knowledge and information we need but which is not captured
  • often because it is hard to capture or simply does not allow itself to be captured (tacit knowledge) and exchanged.
  • There’s a long tail of information needs that still needs to be served
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 15 Oct 11
       
      Asumimos que tenemos necesidades de INFO relativas a una larga cola de permanentemente cambiante y virtualmente ilimitada cantidad de INFO . La parte izqda. de la fig. hace referencia a la INFO que necesitamos en las tradicionales actividades transaccionales o procedimentales, y las transformacionales. Se trata de una INFO predecible, de uso frecuente y reutilizable. Situación que nos permite definir, diseñar y producir el tipo y estructura de INFO, así como la INFO requerida antes de que la actividad sea llevada a cabo.
  • Long Tail power graph
  • In the left end of the power graph we have
  • for transformational and transactional activities
  • This information does not change very often and thus can be quite easily reused
  • for commonly performed activities
  • the information needs are predictable
  • This allows us to define, design and produce the type and structure of the information as well as the actual information before the next time the information need arises (the activity is performed).
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 15 Oct 11
       
      Estas son las características que definen los SSII tradicionales, orientados a CONTENIDOS (base de procedimientos + otros recursos digitales).
  • Knowledge work is often a completely different story
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 15 Oct 11
       
      Cuando hablamos de Kwork es otra cosa. La iNFO requerida para activiodades de Kwork, probablemente la encontraremos en la larga cola (parte plana de la figura). Allí se encuentran recursos de INFO usados con muy poca frecuenciaa o incluso que nunca hemos usado con antelación. La INFO que necesitamos varaia de una situación a otra, de un instante a otro (siempre bajo contexto). La INFO varía, así como el tipo y estructura de lso recursos de INFO (hiperfragmentación de la INFO y el K). Ello hace que virtualmente sea imposible definir una INFO reusable con antelación a ser necesitada. La impredictibilidad de la naturaleza del Kwork es la razón por la que necesitamos dar a los K workers acceso a tooda la INFO que existe y que puede ser relevante. Puesto que no sabemos qué puede ser relevante hasta que surja la necesidad ('just in time'), no podemos depositar INFO relevanteen una pila o repositorio. Necesitamos también, proporcionarles con las herramientas adecuadas (proceso PKM) a los K workers. Nuevo Ecosistema de INFO Organizacional (p.e. modelo ECCO Suricata), distinto a los SSII tradicionales orientados exclusivamente a INFO y a recolilar toda la INFO por adelantado.
  • the information needed for a knowledge work activity is likely to be found in the long tail
  • used infrequently or maybe even once
  • impossible to define a reusable information resource in advance before it is needed
  • The unpredictable nature of knowledge work
  • is why we need to give knowledge workers access to all information that exists and that might be relevant
  • We also need to provide them with tools
  • to serve the knowledge workers’ information needs
  • Traditional intranets are not designed for knowledge work
  • changing role of intranets in knowledge-intensive businesses
  • These intranets need to provide flexible access to both information and people
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 14 Oct 11
       
      Modelo Suricata- Ecosistema Complejo de Conocimiento Organizacional (ECCO)
  • The intranet needs to be turned into an “information broker platform” where information is freely and easily created, aggregated, shared, found and discovered at minimal effort.
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 15 Oct 11
       
      Necesidad de rediseñar la intranet tradicional en las ORGs intensivas en INFO y K: la intranet debe transformarse en una plataforma 'broker' de INFO, donde la INFO es libre y fácilmente creada, agregada, localizada y descuberta con el menor esfuerzo, pero sobre todo debe faciltar la COMPARTICIÓN y COLABORACIÓN. Sin embargo, la mayoría de las intranetstratan de ayudar a las personas que llevan a cabo actividades predefinibles y repetitivas (plataformas 'push'), pero son totalmente disfuncionales para el K work. No es una coincidencia, pues, que las intranets jueguen un papel marginal en el trabajo diario. La INFO que los Kworkers necesitan no puede conocerse por adelantado y por lo tanto atendida por la intranet tradicional. Será crítico que los K workers tenga acceso a toda la INFO disponible, qde modo que cubra las necesidades de INFO altamente variables, extensivas e impredecibles de los K workers.
  • Such an intranet gives everybody access to all information which is available and make room for virtually infinite amounts of information.
  • However, most of today’s intranets primarily consist of
  • They aim to serve people who perform predefined and repeatable tasks
  • push platforms
  • but they are quite dysfunctional for knowledge work
  • intranet plays a marginal role in their daily work
  • It’s not a coincidence that
  • The information that knowledge workers need can often not be anticipated and served by a push-based intranet
  • It is also critical that they have access to ALL information that is available
  • intranet that needs to serve the highly varying, extensive and unpredictable information needs of knowledge workers.
  • To conclude
  • push-based production model
  • assumes that all information resources on the intranet must be produced in advance
  • Knowledge workers need a social intranet
  • social intranet
  • paradigm change
  • is not just about adding a layer of social collaboration tools
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 15 Oct 11
       
      Los K workers necesitan una intranet SOCIAL (cambio de paradigma). No se trata de simplemente añadir una capa de herramientas de colaboración social; se trata de una plataforma que combina la pòtencia de l modelo 'push' con la del 'pull' para suminstrar a cualquiera que participe y contribuya con una 'empresa expandida' con la INFO, K y conecxiones que ellos necesitan para tomar las decisiones correctas y actuar para alcanzar plenamente sus objetivos. Debe equipar a cada Kworker con las herramientas que le permitan participar, contribuir, descubrir, conectar, crear (APRENDER), para compartir y coolaborar 'entre iguales'. La intranet social es una plataforma 'pull' con mecanismos para atraer de manera automática INFO y PERSONAS relevantes a cada cuál, que permitan superar la 'sobreabundancia de INFO' , mediante los oprtunos 'RADARES' y 'FILTROS', así como herramientas para la 'CURACIÓN de CONTENIDOS' alrededor de 'tópicos' concretos. La intranet social, también debe contemplar la adquisicion de INFO y PERSONAS relevantes mediante 'SERENDIPIA' (por casualidad). Necesitamos implícita y explícitamente compartir lo que hacemos y conocemos con otras personas en nuestras redes, con personas que compartan nuestros intereses. "La larga cola de iNFO soporta el núcleo del actual modelo de negocio intensivo en K: el trabajo del conocimiento ( K work).
  • it is a platform that combines the powers of push with the powers of pull to supply anyone who participates and contributes within an extended enterprise with the information, knowledge and connections they need to make the right decisions and act to fulfill their objectives
  • It equips everyone with the tools that allows them to participate, contribute, attract, discover, find and connect with each other to exchange information and knowledge and/or collaborate
  • enabling employee-to-employee information exchange.
  • A social intranet must necessarily be designed for information abundance.
  • "more is more" paradigm
  • the social intranet is a pull platform with mechanisms for automatically attracting relevant information and people to you
  • sensation commonly called information overload
  • the problem is not the amount of information but rather that the filters
  • We need to get the filters in place
  • The social intranet also has an important part to play when it comes to supporting serendipity
  • We must have ways that “automagically” attract useful information and connections to us
  • We just need to implicitly and explicitly share what do and know to other people in our networks, to people who share our interests, or to people who happen to pass us by at any other kind of cross-road.
  • push-based production mode
  • the long tail of information supports the core of a knowledge-intensive modern business: the knowledge work.
  • Knowledge work is about
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 15 Oct 11
       
      ORGs cada vez mas intensivas en K. Kwork relativo a actividades tácitas(p.e. resolución de problemas, investigación y trabajo creativo, interacción y comunicación con otras personas, etc). Por naturaleza, es menos predecible y repetible que el tradicional trabajo industrial. Las entradas y salidas (INFO/K) siempre bajo contexto, y cambiantes. Kwork menos estructurado y la estructura del Kwork emerge tal como se desenvuelve el trabajo. En un entorno intensivo en K, muy dificil o casi imñposible anticipar por adelantado que INFO vamos a necesitar. No podemos saber qué INFO va a ser relevante en el momento que la requiramos. Necesitamos poder acceder de manera inmediata a cualquiera que pueda poseer el K e INFO que necesitamos, pero el cuál -k- es dificil de captuirar e intercambiar (K tácito).
Enrique Rubio Royo

Jane's Pick of the Day: 30 ways to use social media to work smarter #some4job - 0 views

janeknight.typepad.com/...30-ways.html

jane hart workplace_learning socialmedia how-to org2.0 plwe ple eprofesional

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 01 Oct 10 - No Cached
  • "Working smarter is the key to sustainability and continuous improvement. Knowledge work and learning to work smarter are becoming indistinguishable. The accelerating rate of change in business forces everyone in every organization to make a choice: learn while you work or become obsolete."
  • This resource looks at 30 ways to use social media to find things out on the Social Web keep up to date with new content on the Social Web build a trusted network of colleagues communicate with your colleagues share resources, ideas and experiences with your colleagues collaborate with your colleagues improve your personal and team productivity
Enrique Rubio Royo

Open Atrium - 0 views

openatrium.com

opensource drupal development intranet genea open pfc collaboration projectmanagement gestion_de_proyectos cms

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Apr 10 - Cached
  • Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Apr 10
     
    Intranet open source basada en apache, php, mysql y drupal.
Enrique Rubio Royo

Creating Value from Social Learning - 0 views

www.entreprisecollaborative.com/...ing-value-from-social-learning

value aprendizaje_social social-learning value_creation creacion_de_valor ecosistema_aprendizaje contexto elearner genea

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 07 Apr 10 - Cached
  • Social learning — namely, the use of social media in the workplace to foster learning, collaboration, networking, knowledge sharing, and communications — has taken on a kind of religious fervor among learning practitioners during the past couple years. 
  • And not without good reason: It often creates more powerful and enduring learning experiences; it helps people establish and leverage social connections to accelerate the distribution and sharing of experiences, content and guidance; and it allows learners to be more productive, learn faster and work smarter.
  • Value Creation from social learning is more likely to take place when the business context and the learning ecosystem are “optimal.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • The Business Context: What sort of influencers in the business context will encourage and help maintain an optimal learning ecosystem?
  • The (Learning) Ecosystem: What sort of influencers in the learning ecosystem will create an effective social learning system?
  • Value Creation: What sort of value creation comes from an optimal business context and learning ecosystem?
  • How “healthy” is your business context and learning ecosystem ? Is social learning creating value in your organization ? Would you like to assess the influencers of social learning and determine how to create more value?
  • a diagnostic tool
  • The diagnostic tool kit has two parts.  The first part is an online survey that captures information about the business context.  Each organization participating in the study is required to complete one business context survey.  The second part is an online survey for employees. 
  • All responses are anonymous and results are not traceable back to individuals.
  • Enrique Rubio Royo on 07 Apr 10
     
    Contexto óptimo de negocio + ecosistema de aprendizaje óptimo = creación de valor
Enrique Rubio Royo

IBM - Cultivating organizational creativity in an age of complexity: A companion study ... - 0 views

www-935.ibm.com/...organizational-creativity.html

complejidad creatividad liderazgo org2.0 ibm estudio

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Oct 11 - No Cached
  • who embrace the dynamic tension between creative disruption and operational efficiency can create new models of extraordinary value.
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Oct 11
       
      Alcanzar el balance (entendido como una tensión dinámica entre dos polos) entre la creación disruptiva y la eficiencia operacional.
  • Why are some organizations consistently good at innovating and/or adapting while others seem to be blindsided by change? Is it because of their disciplined innovation process or the knowledge and skills of their people?
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Oct 11
       
      ¿Cuál es la razón por la que algunas ORGs son consistentemente buenas innovando y adaptándose, mientras que otras parecen sorprenderse por el cambio?, ¿es debido a su disciplinado proceso de innovación o al K y habilidades de sus personas?, ó es su determinación a construir una cultura donde la asunción d eretosno solo se estimula, sino que se espera?
  • is it their determination to build a culture where challenging assumptions is not only encouraged, but expected? Our IBM Creative Leadership Study found that leaders
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • What, specifically, enables leading-edge organizations to capitalize on the inherent complexity in today's environment and catalyze innovation within their business models, products and services?
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Oct 11
       
      Qué es lo que específicamente permiote a las ORGs de vanguardia capitalizar la complejidad inherente del entorno actual y cataloizar la innovación en sus modelos de negocio, productos y servicios?
  • According to the IBM 2010 Global CEO Study
  • the ability to embody creative leadership is among the most important attributes for capitalizing on complexity.
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Oct 11
       
      La capacidad para incorporar liderazgo creativo como una de los mas importantes atributos para capitalizar la complejidad.
  • developing future leaders
  • fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing.
  • increasingly interconnected world
  • three imperatives to accelerate the development of creative capital:
  • . Organizations will need to act upon
  • Creative leadership in action
  • enables a wide range of product, process and business model innovations
  • Uncover the key capabilities of the creative organization
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Oct 11
       
      1.- Descubrir las capacidades clave de la ORG creativa. Facultar (empoderar) la capacidad de la ORG para entender cómo el mundo se comporta. Exponer a las personas que ven oportunidades donde otros no las ven y un mapa de lo que se encuentra. Conectar las ideas y las personas de maneras novedosas. Intentar muchas y variadas ideas . Inspirar la creencia de que la acción es posible. Mantener la disciplina para hacer las cosas.
  • Unlock and catalyze the creative capabilities of leaders
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Oct 11
       
      2.- Desbloquear e impulsar las capacidades creativas de los líderes - Crear alto impacto, aprendizaje experimental vinculado a problemas reales de negocio. Desarrollar modelos inspiradores que demuestren logros y el liderazgo con poder. Dar rienda suelta a equipos pequeños y diversos para perseguir ideas audaces en respuesta a los desafíos. Crear estructuras de trabajo e incentivos alineados con la motivación intrínseca. Promover una cultura de visión inspiradora basada en la autenticidad e impulsado por la confianza.
  • Unleash and scale organizational creativity
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 17 Oct 11
       
      3.- Dar rienda suelta y escalar la creatividad de la organización - Compartir información para visión colectiva. Aprovechar las redes experiencia global. Ampliar la gestión y de los repertorios estilo de comunicación. Crear grupos Ad hoc de esos objetivos comunes compartidos. Influir en el comportamiento colectivo a través de analíticas en tiempo real.
Enrique Rubio Royo

Complexity Science in Human Terms: A Relational Model of Business - 0 views

www.harvest-associates.com/...human.html

SCAs ACS ORG2.0 complejidad howto business2.0

shared by Enrique Rubio Royo on 23 Oct 11 - No Cached
  • It�s amazing how far we have been able to take the linear model for understanding the world, both in science and in business. But in the new connected economy, the limitations of the mechanistic model are becoming starkly apparent and
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 24 Oct 11
       
      Es increíble lo lejos que hemos podido llevar el modelo lineal para entender el mundo, tanto en la ciencia como en los negocios. Pero en la nueva economía conectada, las limitaciones del modelo mecanicista y la necesidad de una nueva forma de pensar, son cada vez mas evidentes.
  • Changing Landscapes
  • Enter Complexity Science
  • ...297 more annotations...
  • The science is still in its infancy
  • The realization that much of the world dances to nonlinear tunes has given birth to the new science of complexity, whose midwife was the power of modern computation which for the first time allows complex processes to be studied
  • complex adaptive system
  • The avenue most relevant to understanding organizational dynamics within companies and the web of economic activity among them is the study of
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 23 Oct 11
       
      La vía más relevante para la comprensión de la dinámica organizacional en las empresas y la actividad económica web es el estudio de los sistemas adaptativos complejos
  • complex adaptive systems are composed of a diversity of agents that interact with each other, mutually affect each other, and in so doing generate novel behavior for the system as a whole
  • But the pattern of behavior we see in these systems is not constant
  • the system is constantly adapting to the conditions around it. Over time, the system evolves through ceaseless adaptation
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 23 Oct 11
       
      el sistema se adapta constantemente a las condiciones que le rodean. Con el tiempo, el sistema evoluciona a través de la adaptación incesante
  • Complexity scientists are learning about these dynamics of complex systems principally through computer models, but also through observation of the natural world
  • Complex adaptive systems are
  • ecosystems
  • business organizations are also complex adaptive systems
  • fundamental processes and characteristics of complex adaptive system
  • by understanding the characteristics of complex adaptive systems in general, we can find a way to understand and work with the deep nature, that is, the fundamental processes, of organizations
  • constant innovation
  • constantly adapting
  • continual evolution
  • if they are to survive
  • companies in a fast-changing business environment need to be able to produce
  • Thus if companies are to work with change optimally, they are better able to do so if they understand their organizations as complex adaptive systems and the processes that underline these systems.
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 23 Oct 11
       
      Así, si las empresas pretenden trabajar de forma óptima en un entorno cambiante, estarán mejor capacitados para hacerlo si comprenden sus organizaciones como sistemas complejos adaptativos , así como los procesos que caracterizan dischos sistemas.
  • requires a different mind
  • complex and largely unpredictabl
  • Because the dynamics of complex adaptive systems are
  • more organic than mechanistic
  • Managers and executives cannot control their organizations to the degree that the mechanistic perspective implies; but they can influence where their company is going, and how it evolves
  • understanding that businesses are like living organisms
  • and tend to fluctuate between different states
  • zone of creative adaptability
  • from static to chaotic, with the edge of chaos, or the
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 23 Oct 11
       
      Niveles de complejidad
  • a chaotic state
  • a static state
  • and the zone of creative adaptability,
  • the place to be when innovation is necessary.
  • complex adaptive systems are
  • dynamic
  • diversity
  • with abundant connections
  • something new will emerge
  • will build towards a critical mass from which
  • small changes can have a big effect
  • multiple experimentation on small scales
  • which means that
  • is the most productive way and offers the greatest potential for creating big changes in an organization
  • the rules of the business game have changed. Indeed, the game itself has changed.
  • A Naturalistic Study of Business as Complex Adaptive Systems
  • a naturalistic study, which involved interviewing people
  • We were interested in companies that were following principles from the new science of complexity in running their business
  • using complexity principles
  • We found these organizations mostly by word of mouth.
  • Companies whose management is guided by principles of complexity science are
  • organizationally flat
  • diversity
  • promote
  • open and plentiful communication
  • these properties enhance a system�s capacity for adaptability
  • The companies we chose for our study therefore shared the properties of being organizationally flat and having rich, open communication
  • But we had no idea what our study would find in the realm o
  • organizational dynamics, of management style, and people�s work experience.
  • Relationships: A New Bottom Line
  • In a nonlinear, dynamic world, everything exists only in relationship to everything else, and the interactions among agents in the system lead to complex, unpredictable outcomes.
  • In a linear world, things may exist independently of each other, and when they interact, they do so in simple, predictable ways.
  • agents interact, and when they have a mutual affect on one another something novel emerges
  • Anything that enhances these interactions will enhance
  • the potential creativity and adaptability of the system
  • agents as people
  • mutuality
  • relationships that are grounded in a sense of
  • We know from complexity science that
  • interactions and connections among agents of a system are the source of novelty, creativity, and adaptability
  • relationships are the organizing principle in businesses as complex adaptive systems.
  • In this way
  • the power of relationships
  • positive relationships
  • positive relationships
  • e weak
  • poor flow of information, limiting feedback loops and thus adaptability
  • a more robust, adaptive system.
  • Open and prolific communication
  • context of genuine care
  • task of caring for their employees seriously, and this manifested itself as people caring about their work, caring for fellow workers, caring for the organization and its shared purpose, caring about their community
  • the power of caring and connected relationships for creating constructive change
  • we are talking about genuine relationships based a sense of care and connection.
  • By attending to the quality of relationships,
  • the non-linear processes of the organization
  • a new way of working
  • by self-organizing around the most immediate problems
  • people�s desire to contribute and their need to belong
  • accommodating people more in terms of their interests and skills.
  • people felt more personally fulfilled
  • "a potential in everyone to get excited about what they do at work."
  • it was the strength of these caring and connected relationships that provided
  • an ethical foundation and continuity for people during difficult times of flux, unpredictability, and change
  • it was the strength of these caring and connected relationships that provided
  • A Community of Care and Connection
  • complex adaptive systems generate emergent, creative order and adapt to changes in their environment, through simple interactions among their agents
  • what kind of culture emerges
  • has everything to do with
  • in business, how we interact and the kind of relationships we form has everything to do with
  • the emergence of creativity, productivity, and innovation in the workplace.
  • In turn
  • a feedback loop
  • Similarly in business,
  • the culture that emerges in a company will influence people�s behavior
  • There is a constant interplay between people�s behavior and the emergent culture, a dynamic feedback loop.
  • a sense of community, guided by shared values and a shared purpose, helped the organization to be more adaptable
  • People said that when they felt part of a community they were more willing to be flexible and adapt, which in turn, made their organizations more flexible and adaptable
  • organizational dynamics
  • levels of relationships that created a web of interdependence
  • interdependence
  • levels of relationships
  • a web of
  • relationships between individuals
  • among and within teams
  • with other companies
  • relationship to the natural environment.
  • within and outside the organization.
  • the source of creativity and adaptability
  • , to the CEO who embodied the organization�s purpose and values
  • in business
  • a new theory of business
  • the quality of these relationships
  • as a means towards business success
  • a new understanding of what organizations are and how they work, informed by the science of complexity
  • A relational view of business
  • we are an ecosystem of different relationships."
  • Business is bigger than your own organization..
  • a linear structure of hierarchy and bureaucracy, which impedes agility and flexibility,
  • Most organizations
  • The most effective way to change a linear structure to a nonlinear process is
  • to attend to the nonlinear world of relationships
  • Feedback loops
  • relationships need to feed into those loops
  • the root of organizational problems is often "abysmal relationships
  • it was strong, positive relationships that maintained his global organization at a high level of a creativity and adaptability.
  • design for working with nonlinear processes
  • effort to deliberately change the hierarchy and structure
  • from which a new structure could and did emerge
  • in a spirit of mutuality and experimentation,
  • a new way of working emerged and the organizations evolved from there
  • Each company had its own distinct way of working with nonlinear processes
  • Companies have to find their own way by working organically with their people, their collaborators, and their competitots; that is, working with where they are, rather than imposing plans of where you might want them to be.
  • Complexity and a human-centered approach to management
  • management practice guided by complexity science will focus on
  • relationships that leads to a very human orientation of the workplace
  • human-centered approaches in management
  • For more than half a century, there has been a constant battle between human-oriented management and scientific, or mechanistic, management, with the latter prevailing.
  • But it is only now, and for the first time, that there is a science behind the human-oriented approach
  • With complexity science, we have a human-oriented management practice emerging from science, a novelty.
  • Peter Seng
  • notes that the prevailing mechanistic model of business encourages managers to see people as machines, not as people
  • knowledge-based economy
  • when people are treated as replaceable parts, as objects to control, are taught to be compliant, are used as fuel for the existing system�inevitably the organization will be fraught with frustration, anger, and isolation, which ultimately is detrimental to the business.
  • managers focus exclusively on producing goods and services and forget that the organization is a community of human beings
  • if people are treated as machines, not as people, they are unlikely to give loyalty and trust and they will not give of their best.
  • "When an organization loses its shared vision and principles, its sense of community, it is already in a process of decay and dissolution even though it may linger with the outward appearance of success for some time
  • The companies we worked with, that engaged their organizations as complex adaptive systems, whether consciously or intuitively, were al
  • very successful in traditional bottom line terms, not despite being human-oriented, but rather
  • Management guided by the principles of complexity science
  • therefore
  • constitutes a style that is very human oriented in that it recognizes that relationships are the bottom line of business, and that creativity, culture, and productivity emerge from these interactions
  • And when those interactions are more connected and caring than not,
  • a sense of community emerges
  • increasing an organization�s potential adaptability.
  • A human-centered approach to management is not new
  • What is new is that the science of complexity gives a scientific foundation for a human-oriented management approach;
  • that is, it gives an explanation of why a human oriented management practice is successful, and a rationale for why to take this approach.
  • The complexity-guided style of management is hard to do,
  • especially for managers who seek safety in a command-and-control practice
  • It is hard even for those who embrace its principles
  • because the everyday urgency of business can make time spent interacting and nurturing relationships seem like a waste of time,
  • it requires strong interpersonal skills, and constant vigilance of one�s own behavior and the behavior of others
  • Emerging Patterns in Management Behavior
  • complex patterns are typically generated from a few simple rules of behavior for the individual agents in the system
  • There was for a long time the belief in science that complex order in the world was generated by complex processes.
  • Contrary to this belief, however, complexity scientists have discovered that
  • We saw common behaviors for sustaining constructive relationships within the organization
  • which generated
  • a different way of working and being
  • We saw particular ways of thinking and behaving
  • that cultivated conditions for a more adaptable system, from which a collective sense of connection and care emerged.
  • We call these
  • different ways of being in the workplace
  • paradoxical leadership
  • a way of leading change
  • emergent teams
  • relational practice
  • a way of working together that keeps organizations on the edge; and
  • a way of developing trust and loyalty through rich connections.
  • Paradoxical leadership
  • From a complexity perspective, paradoxes are not problematic
  • Instead paradoxes are indicative of being on the edge; paradoxes create a tension from which creative solutions emerge
  • All the leaders had come from a command and control tradition
  • They had come to recognize that they had limited control; that they depended and needed others to achieve their aims; and that they didn�t, nor should or could, have all the answers
  • This perspective expanded their style of leadership, rather than replaced it.
  • They didn�t manage people
  • They acted more as cultivators than managers.
  • Instead leaders cultivated conditions to increase positive connections in their organizations, and in their economic web, from which nonlinear results could emerge.
  • four common behaviors
  • that guided their leadership style and how they related others:
  • Allow
  • Accessible
  • Attuned
  • allowed things to unfold, allowed mistakes, and open experimentation
  • They gave a strong direction in terms of purpose and values, and then allowed people to find their own solutions according to these guidelines.
  • physically accessible to the people in the organization, to customers, to partners
  • Being accessible helped these leaders to have a finger on the pulse of the organization
  • Leaders were simultaneously aware of the organization as a whole and as a living organism--at the macro level, but also attuned to the interactive level; that is, the micro level of connections and disconnections within the organization.
  • Emergent Teams
  • emergent teams are self-organizing, self-selected, and self-governing
  • Rather than teams being imposed on workers
  • Emergent teams are a democratic approach to problem solving and opportunity seeking
  • People organize around tasks rather than positions
  • The manager�s task shifts from managing people to cultivating conditions for teams to emerge by
  • 2, cultivating an information-rich context,
  • 1, cultivating group relationships,
  • 3, cultivating connections
  • The emergent teams themselves had three characteristics
  • The purpose of emergent teams are primarily experimental
  • Relational Practice
  • Relational practice strives towards creating positive and rich connections that lends itself to
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 24 Oct 11
       
      Prácticas relacionales (de socialización) se esfuerzan hacia la creación de relaciones positivas y profusas que se prestan a fomentar la confianza y un sentido de comunidad. Hay cuatro formas de comportamiento en relación con los demás, pequeños gestos, que marcan una gran diferencia en el desarrollo de relaciones afectuosas y de conectividad.
  • building trust and a sense of community
  • Be authentic
    • Enrique Rubio Royo
      Enrique Rubio Royo on 24 Oct 11
       
      4 comportamientos en las relaciones con los demás que marcan una gran diferrencia a la hora de crear relaciones afectuosas: 1.- Ser auténtico- ser uno mismo es mas eficiente en el trabajo y cuesta menos, para uno mismo, llevarlo a la práctica 2.- Reconocer los méritos de los demás- apreciar a las personas por lo que son y por lo que hacen, enriquece las conexiones y el sentido de pertenencia. El reconocimiento a lo que hacen los demás, promueve lalealtad y el compromiso 3.- Rendir cuentas- desplaza la cultura de culpas/víctimas, y cuando las personas asumen su responsabilidad, puede facilitar la solución de situaciones difíciles y complejas 4.- Ser atento- tener u profundo y genuino interés hacia los demás, conociendo sus historias, y reconocinedo el valor d eescuchar, ayuda a crear sistemas robustos y bien informados
  • Acknowledge others
  • Be accountable
  • Be attentive
  • There were four ways of behaving in relationship to others
  • being authentic makes for greater efficiency at work�it takes less time and energy to be yourself. It is also a practice
  • appreciating people for who they are as well as what they do
  • , enriches connections and a sense of belonging. Acknowledging others promotes loyalty and commitment
  • being recognized as people by managers.
  • moves the culture out of a blame/victim cycle
  • when people take responsibility for themselves, it can simplify difficult and complex issues
  • Many aspects of these management practices
  • are already alive and well in organizations
  • a way of working with organizations as complex adaptive systems that is relationship- and human-centered
  • What we have done is
  • identify an intellectual framework for all these aspects of behavior collectively
  • into a coherent whole based on a scientific understanding of the dynamics of business organizations
  • the science of complexity
  • a scientific understanding of the deep nature of business organizations
  • It is not just tha
  • but rather,
  • the science shows us, that certain behaviors engage the dynamics of complex adaptive systems in a positive way
  • to contribute to the collective purpose of an organization
  • Complexity science validates a focus on human relationships
  • and in a sense, turns things inside out
  • interpersonal skills
  • What was once regarded as "soft,"
  • is actually "hard."
  • What was once regarded as a distraction and not work, that is cultivating relationships, is the nexus of business success.
  • the emergent understanding of our organizations as complex adaptive systems in human terms
  • new business environment
  • to bring complexity to the business world,
  • In the connected economy of the twenty-first century, management cannot afford to try to succeed with management methods that were developed in a different age and for a different type of business environment
  • complexity-guided management
  • doesn�t just toss out traditional mechanistic management models, but rather encompasses and expands them
  • the principles of complexity science add to a deeper understanding of the dynamics of business organizations
  • however, we would argue that
  • the experience of working with organizations as complex adaptive systems has advanced the science in a way, too; that is, in the human dimension.
  • Science, by tradition anyway, needs to be analytical
  • which is why scientists often choose to work with simple systems
  • computer simulation models
  • such as, in the complexity realm
  • Human social systems
  • including the business environment
  • are far more complex than computer models
  • seeing organizations through new eyes
  • The science
  • intuition
  • But management no longer need constantly to seek the validation of the science for each new way we might fee
  • through
  • is right to work with organizations as complex adaptive systems
  • We cannot describe organizational behavior with the rigor that complexity scientists
  • But we can now claim to have a deeper sense of organizations
  • as complex adaptive system
  • Organizations have found, and are finding
  • new ways of working with nonlinear processes
  • that have led to bottom line success
  • twenty-first century
  • we are experiencing unprecedented structural shifts in our economy brought about by the revolutions in computation and communication technologies
  • the connected economy-
  • A new kind of economy is emerging
  • a shift that rivals the onset of the Industrial Revolution
  • Where once companies felt themselves to be the master�s of their own destiny,
  • in a connected economy, companies find themselves as interdependent players
  • The change is not only real, but it is also accelerating, driven by rapid technological innovation, the globalization of business, and, not the least of it, the arrival of the Internet
  • the new domain of Internet commerce
  • Consequently, business leaders are preoccupied with change itself�how to generate it, how to respond to it, how to avoid being overcome by it.
  • During these changing times
  • leaders and managers are finding
  • many of their background assumptions and time-honored business models inadequate
  • Tayloresque mechanistic model of their world,
  • linear thinking, control, and predictability
  • Where managers once operated with a
  • they now find themselves struggling with something more
  • nonlinear, where limited control and a restricted ability to predict
  • are the order of the day
  • Consequently, many managers and executive professionals are
1 - 13 of 13
Showing 20▼ items per page