Group 3 evaluation from Tim - 3 views
This group is for ETC677 students enrolled in spring 2009 to conduct Treatise paper peer evaluations.
Your conclusion underscores the somewhat compelling argument you made for the role of the instructor in the body of the treatise which was failrly well organized. I would have like to have seen mor...
I felt a real sense of powerful advocacy for the learner in this tretaise. However the organization and grammar were distractions for me. I can see you put a lot of thought into it. I was also ver...
In evaluating my own group's work I have to say that the paper came out very organized and unified, if a bit long. We intended to make a case for the important connectiion between pedagogy and the ...
Group 2 Evaluation: 4 Group Members: MJ Hall, Jeanette Layton, Beth Summerhill Group 2 tied together the three sections of the paper together in a seamless manner. They thoroughly defined online l...
Group 1 Evaluation: 4.5 Group Members: Marilyn Robinson, Scott Pfister, Suzanne Sallee Group 1's introduction provided a basis for the entire paper and guided the reader through what they should e...
Score: 5 Fantastic paper. It was very thorough and very interesting. You used several different resources & references. The paper flowed very well, you all write well together!!
Grade 5: Overall, good arguments. This paper was organized very well. The APA format was followed. All topics were discussed in detail. This paper also discussed major aspects of online learnin...
Grade 4.5 Loved the first sentence, it was a great way to get started, good argument for constructivist learning. The history also added to the paper and definitely created a stronger argument in ...
Grade: 4 I thought the argument was presented well. I had a good description on what online learning is and understood what tools make online learning effective; however I think other resources ...
Grade: 5 I thought we did a good job organizing our argument and had relevant resources to back it up. We described online learning and the elements that make up online learning. We followed th...
Chih-Hsiung Tu wrote: > Scott, > > Could you be more specific why this paper is well organized? > > Chih The section headings were concise and well-supported in the content of the paper. The c...
I give this paper a 5. I feel this treatise paper was well organized, well written and the argument was well articulated. The group cited research beyond the textbook and did a good job of explaini...
Scott, Excellent justifications! I encourage to put more thoughts to Vygotsky's theory since his socio-cultural leaning theory aligns to new web 2.0 learning environment well. Chih
Section I "If you tell me, I will listen. If you show me, I will see. But if you let me experience, I will learn." The means by which humans experience knowledge has evolved exponentially since th...