Skip to main content

Home/ ETC677 Spring 2009/ Group items tagged evaluation

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Beth Summerhill

Group 3 Treatise Paper - 35 views

Group three, Here is my evaluation for your group's treastie paper, good job. Team Evaluated Team 3 Rubrics Powerful argument that was well articulated and organized. Powerful argument that was s...

etc677 treatise

Chih-Hsiung Tu

Evaluation Group 1 - 12 views

Tonya, Thanks for your evaluations! You indicated: "I liked how they included an appendix at the end and thought that it added to the paper. " Could be be more specific on the addenpix? Thanks!...

ETC677 group1 Treatisepaper

Suzanne Sallee

Suzanne's Treatise Evaluation Group 4 - 9 views

Group 4 Evaluation: 4 Group Members: Tracy Botts, Renee Marshall Group 4 provided a strong argument for online learning. They very effectively tied information together and gave a good overview of...

etc677 treatise evaluation group4

started by Suzanne Sallee on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Suzanne Sallee

Suzanne's Treatise Evaluation Group 3 - 3 views

Group 3 Evaluation: 5 Group Members: Melissa Carroll, Marta Herrera, Nasreen Wahid Group 3 provided us with a very engaging introduction that set the tone for the paper. There is al a very strong ...

etc677 treatise evaluation group3

started by Suzanne Sallee on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Suzanne Sallee

Suzanne's Treatise Evaluation Group 2 - 3 views

Group 2 Evaluation: 4 Group Members: MJ Hall, Jeanette Layton, Beth Summerhill Group 2 tied together the three sections of the paper together in a seamless manner. They thoroughly defined online l...

etc677 treatise evaluation group2

started by Suzanne Sallee on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Suzanne Sallee

Suzanne's Treatise Evaluations Groups 1 - 2 views

Group 1 Evaluation: 4.5 Group Members: Marilyn Robinson, Scott Pfister, Suzanne Sallee Group 1's introduction provided a basis for the entire paper and guided the reader through what they should e...

etc677 treatise evaluation group1

started by Suzanne Sallee on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Nasreen Wahid

Group Evaluations by NWahid - 6 views

It appears that we are only allowed a certain number of forum posts and some groups papers are no longer available, so I will put all of my evaluations in one post. Group 3 Our group was able to ...

etc677 evaluation treatise

started by Nasreen Wahid on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Tonya Butler

Evaluation Group 3 - 3 views

Group 3, I thought you did a great job on your paper. I like the way you broke up each section and gave a summary of each. It was thorough and very detailed. I believe that it followed APA forma...

ETC677 Group3 Treatisepaper

started by Tonya Butler on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Scott's G3 Treatise Evaluation - 12 views

Chih-Hsiung Tu wrote: > Scott, > > Could you be more specific why this paper is well organized? > > Chih The section headings were concise and well-supported in the content of the paper. The c...

ETC677 spring2009 nau evaluation treatise

scott pfister

Scott's G2 Treatise Evaluation - 10 views

I give this paper a 5. I feel this treatise paper was well organized, well written and the argument was well articulated. The group cited research beyond the textbook and did a good job of explaini...

ETC677 spring2009 nau evaluation group2

started by scott pfister on 13 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Scott's G1 Treatise Evaluation - 18 views

Scott, Excellent justifications! I encourage to put more thoughts to Vygotsky's theory since his socio-cultural leaning theory aligns to new web 2.0 learning environment well. Chih

etc677 spring2009 nau group1 evaluation

Tim McCann

Group 6 Evaluation by Tim - 2 views

Nice job evaluating and overcoming the challenges of online learning as faced by both the students and instructors. You also seemed to concentrate your research on the collegiate setting. This al...

started by Tim McCann on 21 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Treatise Word cloud - ETC677 Group 1 Spring 2009 - 0 views

    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Thanks for the Wordle art! Based on this visual components, tools appear to be an important componenets in yoru paper. Please justify what the tools are and why they are critical?
  •  
    Online distributed learning utilizes a wide variety of tools to affect student learning. A CMS organizes the course. Learners use web browsers to research information and communications tools such as e-mail or discussion boards. Tools such as word processing and spreadsheets are used to display data and share what we have learned in written form. Newer Web 2.0 tools allow learners to collaborate and share information and ideas in ways that have never been done before.
  • ...3 more comments...
  •  
    Suzanne, Thanks for the explanations! So there are many tools available to support our distributed learning. Many of them have similar functions. Who should determine what tools should be used for what functions? Chih
  •  
    I think instructors and evaluators should be the determinators of which tools should be used for a specific course. If new tools come online as the course develops which will create more versatility with certain functions of a course then they should be incorporated, maybe as a beta test to see if they actually do work and benefit the course. I do think that overwhelming students at any level with too many tools may actually deter the advancement of the course. While new tools need to be evaluated in real world situations a balance may need to be considered. Tools need to be used by real students to decide on the affectiveness but they should not create confusion among students as they are typically under quite a bit of pressure as it is.
  •  
    Scott, That is a great thought! I think the real challenging is we are learning what need to learn. We have dream ideas about teaching and learning; however, we have reality. Similar discussion came from one of panel discussion at AECT conference. Researchers feel real word and authentic community and activities are effective for learning. However, one semester long instruction does not facilitate such environment at all. Not long enough. Researchers argued what educators did for real world, authentice, collaborative community were not truly effective because students and teachers are under time and grade pressures.
  •  
    Scott, Great comments about needing to test the tools prior to utilizing them within a course. Sounds like this could be made into a course itself - Web 2.0 Tools 101! Assignments could be for students to use, test, and evaluate the tools for their effectiveness, reliability, and ease of use.
  •  
    I have now see and participated in using online tools and I can say that it s 1. definitely enhances social learning - so many more perspectives to include that make us smarter. 2. It also engages the learner and encourges more exploration. 3. Being required to use the tools keeps us up to speed with r the rapid change, introduction, and use of new tools. .
Mary Jones

Evaluation Group 6 - Mary Jones - 9 views

The "hook" discussed in education is always important to capture your audience and I think the illustration and explanation in the beginning of this paper were great. Painting pictures for your au...

started by Mary Jones on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Mary Jones

Evaluation Group 6 - 5 views

The "hook" discussed in education is always important to capture your audience and I think the illustration and explanation in the beginning of this paper were great. Painting pictures for your au...

started by Mary Jones on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Mary Jones

Evaluation Group 3- Mary Jones - 6 views

Again, I have noticed papers that have a nice, smooth word flow. This is great to allow the reader to feel as if the writers are knowledgeable of the content. This paper did provide useful, infor...

started by Mary Jones on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Mary Jones

Evaluation Group 1 by Mary Jones - 6 views

Hello Group 1, 5 (FIVEEEEE!!!!) From the beginning of the paper, I was immediately informed of the topics,arguments,etc. From reading the introduction alone, I knew that this paper would flow qui...

started by Mary Jones on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Tracy Botts

Evaluation Group 6 - 6 views

This paper get a score of 5. Was clear and well thought out, ideas went smoothly from one to the next, and good resources to support the argument.

started by Tracy Botts on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Tracy Botts

Evaluation Group 1 - 4 views

This paper gets a score of 5. Good argument that is well organized. It gives a good definition of online learning as well as evidence in learning theory and how individuals learn. It gives good sup...

started by Tracy Botts on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Max Atwell

Evaluation Group 2 Treaties - 6 views

Group 2 has created an effective treaties paper. I appreciate that they provided an abstract. They made excellent use of resources and incorporated them into their arguments very well. They follo...

ETC677 group2 nau spring2009

started by Max Atwell on 16 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
1 - 20 of 44 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page