Skip to main content

Home/ ETC677 Spring 2009/ Scott's G3 Treatise Evaluation
scott pfister

Scott's G3 Treatise Evaluation - 12 views

ETC677 spring2009 nau evaluation treatise

started by scott pfister on 13 Apr 09
  • scott pfister
     
    I give this paper a 5.
    I believe this treatise paper was well organized, and well written. The argument appears to be well articulated. The group cited research beyond the textbook and did an adequate job of explaining how the research is related to online learning.
  • scott pfister
     
    Chih-Hsiung Tu wrote:
    > Scott,
    >
    > Could you be more specific why this paper is well organized?
    >
    > Chih

    The section headings were concise and well-supported in the content of the paper. The content of the paper was easily read and flowed well. The group cited research that appeared to extend beyond the research incorporated by the book's authors. I did feel they could have used more sources, however, I do not believe this was detrimental to the overall quality of the paper.

To Top

Start a New Topic » « Back to the ETC677 Spring 2009 group