Scott's G3 Treatise Evaluation - 12 views

• 
  #1 scott pfister on 13 Apr 09

   

  I give this paper a 5.
  I believe this treatise paper was well organized, and well written. The argument appears to be well articulated. The group cited research beyond the textbook and did an adequate job of explaining how the research is related to online learning.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">I give this paper a 5. <br /> I believe this treatise paper was well organized, and well written. The argument appears to be well articulated. The group cited research beyond the textbook and did an adequate job of explaining how the research is related to online learning.</div>

  ...

  Cancel
• 
  #3 scott pfister on 15 Apr 09

   

  Chih-Hsiung Tu wrote:
  > Scott,
  >
  > Could you be more specific why this paper is well organized?
  >
  > Chih
  
  The section headings were concise and well-supported in the content of the paper. The content of the paper was easily read and flowed well. The group cited research that appeared to extend beyond the research incorporated by the book's authors. I did feel they could have used more sources, however, I do not believe this was detrimental to the overall quality of the paper.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Chih-Hsiung Tu wrote: <br /> > Scott, <br /> > <br /> > Could you be more specific why this paper is well organized? <br /> > <br /> > Chih <br /> <br /> The section headings were concise and well-supported in the content of the paper. The content of the paper was easily read and flowed well. The group cited research that appeared to extend beyond the research incorporated by the book's authors. I did feel they could have used more sources, however, I do not believe this was detrimental to the overall quality of the paper.</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top