Skip to main content

Home/ ETC677 Spring 2009/ Eval group 5
Beth Summerhill

Eval group 5 - 12 views

ETC677 Group5 Treatisepaper

started by Beth Summerhill on 14 Apr 09
  • MJ Hall
     
    Grade 5:

    This paper had very powerful arguments. It was a well organized paper that followed the APA format. However, some of the organization did not match throughout the paper. This paper was very insightful.

    Beth Summerhill wrote:
    > Grade: 5
    >
    > I think your group did a great job on your paper. I really like how you included some history in your paper, it made the reader compare and contrast technology and education then and now, great special touch! I think your paper had some really good quotes included and great resources. Also, reading your paper made the reader feel at ease and it was like you were reading the readers mind, you would mention a term related to technology but included the definition for the reader nice touch to throw in you never know the technological knowledge of your reader. Your group did a great job!
  • Marta Herrera
     
    Grade: 5

    Very well written treatise! I was hooked with the introductory quote you added. I thought you added a lot of information about online learning. It was clear and too the point. I particularly liked the section on stakeholders and how strong instructors are needed. I do think the second section needed more outside resources .


    MJ Hall wrote:
    > Grade 5:
    >
    > This paper had very powerful arguments. It was a well organized paper that followed the APA format. However, some of the organization did not match throughout the paper. This paper was very insightful.
    >
    > Beth Summerhill wrote:
    > > Grade: 5
    > >
    > > I think your group did a great job on your paper. I really like how you included some history in your paper, it made the reader compare and contrast technology and education then and now, great special touch! I think your paper had some really good quotes included and great resources. Also, reading your paper made the reader feel at ease and it was like you were reading the readers mind, you would mention a term related to technology but included the definition for the reader nice touch to throw in you never know the technological knowledge of your reader. Your group did a great job!
  • Jeanette Layton
     
    Grade 4.5
    Loved the first sentence, it was a great way to get started, good argument for constructivist learning. The history also added to the paper and definitely created a stronger argument in the end. The only criticism I have is a formating thing, the last section used headings throughout but the rest of the paper did not, this created a small feeling of disconnect for me, I think that utilizing heading would have helped threader throughout the paper. Good Job.

To Top

Start a New Topic » « Back to the ETC677 Spring 2009 group