2009 Spring ETC677 Home - 2009 Spring ETC677 - 0 views
-
-
Chih-Hsiung Tu on 10 Jan 09If you do not see the discussion questions, click the triangel to expand the navigation menu.
-
-
-
Group three, Here is my evaluation for your group's treastie paper, good job. Team Evaluated Team 3 Rubrics Powerful argument that was well articulated and organized. Powerful argument that was s...
5 Powerful argument that was well articulated and organized. 4 Powerful argument that was somewhat well articulated but could have been a bit more organized. 3 Good argument, but could have been b...
Tonya, Thanks for your evaluations! You indicated: "I liked how they included an appendix at the end and thought that it added to the paper. " Could be be more specific on the addenpix? Thanks!...
This overall was a good paper. It had good points and a great deal of personal knowledge. I think it could have been organized a bit better (transitions) and it could have had more resources to bac...
Group 2 has created an effective treaties paper. I appreciate that they provided an abstract. They made excellent use of resources and incorporated them into their arguments very well. They follo...
I was a member of group 6 and I thought that we were able to come together to produce a good paper. It took some time for us to get to together and figure things out, but once we did, we seems to ...
Group 3, I thought you did a great job on your paper. I like the way you broke up each section and gave a summary of each. It was thorough and very detailed. I believe that it followed APA forma...