Skip to main content

Home/ ETC677 Spring 2009/ Group items tagged nau

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Jeanette Layton

group 2 treastie paper - 44 views

5 Powerful argument that was well articulated and organized. 4 Powerful argument that was somewhat well articulated but could have been a bit more organized. 3 Good argument, but could have been b...

ETC677 group2

Max Atwell

Evaluation Group 1 Treaties - 15 views

ETC677 group1 nau spring2009

started by Max Atwell on 16 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Max Atwell

Evaluation Group 2 Treaties - 6 views

Group 2 has created an effective treaties paper. I appreciate that they provided an abstract. They made excellent use of resources and incorporated them into their arguments very well. They follo...

ETC677 group2 nau spring2009

started by Max Atwell on 16 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Max Atwell

Evaluation Group 3 Treaties - 6 views

ETC677 group3 nau spring2009

started by Max Atwell on 16 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Max Atwell

Evaluation Group 6 Treaties - 5 views

ETC677 group6 nau spring2009

started by Max Atwell on 16 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
scott pfister

Scott's G4 Evaluation - 11 views

ETC677 spring2009 nau treatise evaluation

started by scott pfister on 13 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Scott's G3 Treatise Evaluation - 12 views

Chih-Hsiung Tu wrote: > Scott, > > Could you be more specific why this paper is well organized? > > Chih The section headings were concise and well-supported in the content of the paper. The c...

ETC677 spring2009 nau evaluation treatise

scott pfister

Scott's G2 Treatise Evaluation - 10 views

I give this paper a 5. I feel this treatise paper was well organized, well written and the argument was well articulated. The group cited research beyond the textbook and did a good job of explaini...

ETC677 spring2009 nau evaluation group2

started by scott pfister on 13 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Scott's G1 Treatise Evaluation - 18 views

Scott, Excellent justifications! I encourage to put more thoughts to Vygotsky's theory since his socio-cultural leaning theory aligns to new web 2.0 learning environment well. Chih

etc677 spring2009 nau group1 evaluation

Chih-Hsiung Tu

Wordle Art - ETC677 Group 4 Spring 2009 - 0 views

    • Renee Marshall
       
      I referred to distributed learning as distance learning simply because I live in small town hours from Flagstaff & NAU. I feel because I am here and not there, it is "distant" to me. Also, because I am probably older than a lot of others in this program...when I started out here in Havasu taking my first non f2f classes, they were considered "distance learning" classes. I guess the name just kind of stick in my head!!! It is on-line learning, I do need to change some of the old terms I still carry around with me!!!!
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Renee, Thanks for the response and explinations! You are correct that frequenly people refer distributed learning as distance learning. IN fact, it is not necessary. Ditributed leanring can be delivered in FTF instructions as well. I think it is more important that we need to understand distance learning embrace distributed learning becaused of effective technology has capacity to facilitate distributed leanring instructions. With effective distributed learning instructions and technology, students are physicially separated by distance may feel closer to the course, the instructor, and the classmates.
  •  
    Yes, I agree that using all the distributed learning tools that we may "feel" closer. I feel closer more than ever this semester because of Facebook. I can now put a "face" to all my classmates!!! that is really nice to do. In some of my previous classes, when we worked in groups, sometimes each group memeber would attach a picture of themselves through the course e-mail...this was kind of the same, but having a casual place outside of the CMS is very, very nice!!! Renee
1 - 10 of 10
Showing 20 items per page