Group 3 Treatise Paper - 35 views
Group three, Here is my evaluation for your group's treastie paper, good job. Team Evaluated Team 3 Rubrics Powerful argument that was well articulated and organized. Powerful argument that was s...
This group is for ETC677 students enrolled in spring 2009 to conduct Treatise paper peer evaluations.
Group three, Here is my evaluation for your group's treastie paper, good job. Team Evaluated Team 3 Rubrics Powerful argument that was well articulated and organized. Powerful argument that was s...
I think we did a good job at organizing and explaining what we wanted to about Online Learning. We also followed APA guidelines, and used multiple outside of class resources to help back up our pap...
I think you did a really good job considering there are only two in your group. I think your paper could have been a bit more organized and had a bit more resources, but otherwise you had a great a...
This paper had a good use of APA and organization. The quote in the beginning really got you interested in seeing where the paper went. Grade 5
This overall was a good paper. It had good points and a great deal of personal knowledge. I think it could have been organized a bit better (transitions) and it could have had more resources to bac...
This paper get a score of 5. Was clear and well thought out, ideas went smoothly from one to the next, and good resources to support the argument.
This paper gets a score of 5. Good argument that is well organized. It gives a good definition of online learning as well as evidence in learning theory and how individuals learn. It gives good sup...
I was a member of group 6 and I thought that we were able to come together to produce a good paper. It took some time for us to get to together and figure things out, but once we did, we seems to ...
Group 3, I thought you did a great job on your paper. I like the way you broke up each section and gave a summary of each. It was thorough and very detailed. I believe that it followed APA forma...
Group 4 Evaluation: 4 Group Members: Tracy Botts, Renee Marshall Group 4 provided a strong argument for online learning. They very effectively tied information together and gave a good overview of...
Group 3 Evaluation: 5 Group Members: Melissa Carroll, Marta Herrera, Nasreen Wahid Group 3 provided us with a very engaging introduction that set the tone for the paper. There is al a very strong ...
It appears that we are only allowed a certain number of forum posts and some groups papers are no longer available, so I will put all of my evaluations in one post. Group 3 Our group was able to ...
I gave them a 5. The paper was very well done and was not just the book. The group worked well together to make the paper not only give the information, but also expand on that information.
Paper was well organized and addressed the topic well. The information was well presented and it did a great job explaining various tools available to the learner and teacher. However, there was...
Nice job evaluating and overcoming the challenges of online learning as faced by both the students and instructors. You also seemed to concentrate your research on the collegiate setting. This al...