Group Evaluations by NWahid - 6 views

• 
  #1 Nasreen Wahid on 19 Apr 09

   

  It appears that we are only allowed a certain number of forum posts and some groups papers are no longer available, so I will put all of my evaluations in one post.
  
  Group 3
  Our group was able to put together a strong argument based on the textbook, but supported by reliable external resources. The paper was organized appropriately with headings that made each section clear. Although the paper was well organized with strong resources, I felt that we could have included more informational support for each section.
  Score: 4.5
  
  Group 4
  Very well written paper which has good transitions and flows nicely. This paper was more of a review/summary of the textbook and needed outside resources to strengthen the argument.
  Score: 3.5
  
  Group 5
  This paper is extremely well written but I have to admit that I struggled with the sheer length of the paper. The paper was double the length of what was required in the assignment. I initially thought that this was due to extensive outside research, but see that they relied heavily on the textbook for information. While the paper was in-depth and informative I feel that the length got in the way of the message that they were trying to convey.
  Score: 4
  
  Group 6
  This is a well written paper with a lot of personal touch that made it more enjoyable to read. The group covered most of the information on online learning in a well organized paper with useful headings. It seemed the section on "Instructional and Learning Strategies" was not as well organized as the rest of the paper and it was not clear what learning strategies they were focusing on and what those strategies were.
  Score: 4.5

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">It appears that we are only allowed a certain number of forum posts and some groups papers are no longer available, so I will put all of my evaluations in one post. <br /> <br /> Group 3 <br /> Our group was able to put together a strong argument based on the textbook, but supported by reliable external resources. The paper was organized appropriately with headings that made each section clear. Although the paper was well organized with strong resources, I felt that we could have included more informational support for each section. <br /> Score: 4.5 <br /> <br /> Group 4 <br /> Very well written paper which has good transitions and flows nicely. This paper was more of a review/summary of the textbook and needed outside resources to strengthen the argument. <br /> Score: 3.5 <br /> <br /> Group 5 <br /> This paper is extremely well written but I have to admit that I struggled with the sheer length of the paper. The paper was double the length of what was required in the assignment. I initially thought that this was due to extensive outside research, but see that they relied heavily on the textbook for information. While the paper was in-depth and informative I feel that the length got in the way of the message that they were trying to convey. <br /> Score: 4 <br /> <br /> Group 6 <br /> This is a well written paper with a lot of personal touch that made it more enjoyable to read. The group covered most of the information on online learning in a well organized paper with useful headings. It seemed the section on "Instructional and Learning Strategies" was not as well organized as the rest of the paper and it was not clear what learning strategies they were focusing on and what those strategies were. <br /> Score: 4.5</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top