Evaluation Group 1 by Mary Jones - 6 views

• 
  #1 Mary Jones on 18 Apr 09

   

  Hello Group 1,
  
  5 (FIVEEEEE!!!!)
  
  From the beginning of the paper, I was immediately informed of the topics,arguments,etc. From reading the introduction alone, I knew that this paper would flow quite well. I was always taught in English to provide a point,illustration, and explanation. You have supported your paper with numerous sources besides the textbook, which shows that you have provided in-depth knowledge based on more than one perspective. You have provided illustrations of the usage technology, highlighting the various tools of use and level of knowledge needed to utilize these tools. Each paragraph supported your topics and they transitioned with ease. This paper was written with a concrete knowledge of the topic, which allows for the reader to not feel confused, but well able to follow the "path" of the paper very well. Sentence structure and word usage were not too technical or mediocre. Although formatting may have been off here, Im sure it was correct in its original format. I honestly feel that this paper deserves a five because of the detail of the topic, sentence structure, word flow, and sources used to provide an in depth perspective. Thanks!
  
  Mary Jones

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Hello Group 1, <br /> <br /> 5 (FIVEEEEE!!!!) <br /> <br /> From the beginning of the paper, I was immediately informed of the topics,arguments,etc. From reading the introduction alone, I knew that this paper would flow quite well. I was always taught in English to provide a point,illustration, and explanation. You have supported your paper with numerous sources besides the textbook, which shows that you have provided in-depth knowledge based on more than one perspective. You have provided illustrations of the usage technology, highlighting the various tools of use and level of knowledge needed to utilize these tools. Each paragraph supported your topics and they transitioned with ease. This paper was written with a concrete knowledge of the topic, which allows for the reader to not feel confused, but well able to follow the "path" of the paper very well. Sentence structure and word usage were not too technical or mediocre. Although formatting may have been off here, Im sure it was correct in its original format. I honestly feel that this paper deserves a five because of the detail of the topic, sentence structure, word flow, and sources used to provide an in depth perspective. Thanks! <br /> <br /> Mary Jones</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top