Skip to main content

Home/ ETC677 Spring 2009/ Group items tagged evaluation

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Tonya Butler

Evaluation Group 6 - 5 views

I was a member of group 6 and I thought that we were able to come together to produce a good paper. It took some time for us to get to together and figure things out, but once we did, we seems to ...

ETC677 group6 Treatisepaper

started by Tonya Butler on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Renee Marshall

Group 1 Evaluation - 5 views

Score: 5 Fantastic paper. It was very thorough and very interesting. You used several different resources & references. The paper flowed very well, you all write well together!!

started by Renee Marshall on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Renee Marshall

Group 5 Evaluation - 4 views

Score: 5 Very well written paper. You cited several different references. I liked how you titled each section. I also love the quote that starts off your paper!!

started by Renee Marshall on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Renee Marshall

Group 6 Evaluation - 6 views

Score: 5 Excellent paper. Very well thought out and great information. Your paper really flowed. You used several different references and covered a variety of issues.

started by Renee Marshall on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
scott pfister

Scott's G4 Evaluation - 11 views

ETC677 spring2009 nau treatise evaluation

started by scott pfister on 13 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Eval group 6 - 16 views

Chih, Yes, I do agree that oral discussions are very challenging in online environments. I was thinking about how oral discussions within group members make it easier to accomplish group project...

ETC677 group6 Treatisepaper

Beth Hoffert

Group 6 Evaluation - 2 views

I gave them a 5. The paper was very well done and was not just the book. The group worked well together to make the paper not only give the information, but also expand on that information.

started by Beth Hoffert on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Tim McCann

Tim's Evaluation of Team 4 - 5 views

Paper was well organized and addressed the topic well. The information was well presented and it did a great job explaining various tools available to the learner and teacher. However, there was...

started by Tim McCann on 21 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Treatise Peer Evaluation - 2009 Spring ETC677 - 0 views

    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Team 1 4: Powerful argument that was somewhat well articulated but could have been a bit more organized. Feedback: This is a review of the paper our own group created. Due to the "pieced together" format in which it was created, I still feel that it lacks a direct powerful argument which conveys an overriding message to the reader. However, the paper does cover the essential elements and addresses the required questions in each of the sections. It is well organized in an APA formatted style with appropriate headers which guide the reader throughout the text. The paper also provides several additional referenced sources to strengthen the arguments throughout. I think the paper is well organized. We probably could have focused more on a powerful argument for online learning.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      If you would like to respond to someone's comments on the paper, you can intitiate a threaded discussion like of discussions, like the one here.
Jeanette Layton

group 2 treastie paper - 44 views

5 Powerful argument that was well articulated and organized. 4 Powerful argument that was somewhat well articulated but could have been a bit more organized. 3 Good argument, but could have been b...

ETC677 group2

Mary Jones

Evaluation Group 2 - Mary Jones - 5 views

started by Mary Jones on 18 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Max Atwell

Evaluation Group 1 Treaties - 15 views

ETC677 group1 nau spring2009

started by Max Atwell on 16 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Tracy Botts

Evaluation Group 5 - 4 views

started by Tracy Botts on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Max Atwell

Evaluation Group 3 Treaties - 6 views

ETC677 group3 nau spring2009

started by Max Atwell on 16 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Max Atwell

Evaluation Group 6 Treaties - 5 views

ETC677 group6 nau spring2009

started by Max Atwell on 16 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Beth Hoffert

Group 2 Evaluation - 5 views

started by Beth Hoffert on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Beth Hoffert

Group 1 Evaluation - 6 views

started by Beth Hoffert on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Beth Hoffert

Group 5 Evaluation - 3 views

started by Beth Hoffert on 19 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
Tim McCann

Tim's Evaluation of our own (group 5 paper) - 3 views

started by Tim McCann on 21 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
‹ Previous 21 - 40 of 44 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page