Group items tagged

As soon as you shift from “one-to-one” to “one-to-world,” it changes the focus of staff development from technical training to understanding how to design assignments that are more empowering—and engage students in a learning community with 24-hour support.

learning how to manage the transition from a learning ecology where paper is the dominant technology for storing and retrieving information, to a world that is all digital, all the time.

Leaders must be given the training to: Craft a clear vision of connecting all students to the world’s learning resources. Model the actions and behaviors they wish to see in their schools. Support the design of an ongoing and embedded staff development program that focuses on pedagogy as much as technology. Move in to the role of systems analyst to ensure that digital literacy is aligned with standards. Ensure that technology is seen not as another initiative, but as integral to curriculum.

In a one-to-world approach, the critical question is not, “What technology should we buy?” The more important questions revolve around the design of the culture of teaching and learning.

t’s essential to craft a vision that giving every student a digital device must lead to achievements beyond what we can accomplish with paper.

Our obsession with content mastery and Skinner's behavioral theory of learning are slowly but surely giving way to an interest in personalization and differentiation.

While it is understandable that our early use of technology was mainly an adaptation of Gutenberg-online and a teaching-machine mentality of what learning is all about, we now have both the pedagogical rationale and technological capability to use the many dimensions of student characteristics that clearly and unequivocally result in higher engagement, enjoyment, and enthusiasm for learning.

no longer in the bottom 5 percent

incredibly freeing

I’m a better teacher

The levels of engagement were much better in the first year under the block schedule, while in the second year the ratings were the same as under the traditional schedule.

Students reported “thinking hard about ideas” and “having indepth discussion” significantly more often under block schedules.

his may also be supported by Bexell (1998) who found teachers on block schedules using teaching strategies requiring more interaction than teachers on a traditional schedule

It would seem that the small amount of change in the way teachers teach after switching to a block schedule would be disappointing to block scheduling advocates

Important questions hover over these findings. What is an effective amount of teacher lecture? Or group work? Or individual work?

One thing that is missing from the observation instrument used in this study is any judgment about the quality of a lecture, quality and depth of a discussion, or the complexity of group or individual work

Instructor Bio and Contact Information

A Calendar

Learning Objectives and Expectations

Media

An Introductory Discussion