Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

This simple circuit can detect the invisible fields of voltage which surround all electrified objects

The current through a photodiode is directly proportional to the light intensity

The photodiode and phototransistor can be both photovoltaic (generators of potential difference) and photoconductive (modifiers of an electric current), depending on the application.

A reverse-biased photodiode operates in what is called photoconductive mode, since the conduction of the semiconductor junction varies with the illuminating light intensity.  If the reverse-biased voltage is relatively large (i.e. several volts) the reverse-biased photodiode will have a very fast response time (much faster than an LDR) and is suitable for detecting light signals that vary down to a time scale of a fraction of a microsecond.

Reverse bias induces only little current (known as saturation or back current) along its direction. But a more important effect of reverse bias is widening of the depletion layer (therefore expanding the reaction volume) and strengthening the photocurrent. Circuits based on this effect are more sensitive to light than ones based on the photovoltaic effect and also tend to have lower capacitance, which improves the speed of their time response. On the other hand, the photovoltaic mode tends to exhibit less electronic noise.

Photodiodes can be used under either zero bias (photovoltaic mode) or reverse bias (photoconductive mode)

This book provides far more detail on the hardware aspects of robot building than any other I have seen to date and is worth picking up.

"Intermediate Robot Building" offers the kind of real-world knowledge that only an experienced robot builder can offer--the kind of knowledge beginners usually have to learn through mistakes. In this book, you'll learn the value of a robot heartbeat and the purpose of the wavy lines in photocells.

The motor is driven in either the forward or reverse direction, but will swap polarity if the motor encounters too sudden or great of a load

By just tying a neuron's bias resistor to Vcc, rather than to ground, you can make a "regular logic" (active high) Nv:

putting diodes and other resistors in parallel to give different charge vs. discharge rates

>

One essential difference is that the Nv responds immediately to an input, and sends the output for a time duration -- the delay occurs AFTER the output is sent. The Nu responds to an input after a delay and sends the output continuously -- the delay occurs BEFORE the output is sent.

"on" first, then a delay, then "off"

delay, then "on", stays "on"

1381s are CMOS voltage-controlled triggers -- these "gate" a source until the voltage is above some "trip" limit, at which point it is allowed onto a third pin

We use them as 3- or 5-volt triggers

This chip is often considered the heart of Nv net technology

In many ways, both the 74*240 and 74*245 are equally handy for BEAM use; both have 20 pins, and so the main difference that most folks will care about is that one inverts drive inputs, while the other doesn't. Out of curiousity, I decided to torture test the two chips to see how they compared under load.

It is powered with two 3.3F Goldcaps. They can be charged in a few seconds. When they are charged, MAXIBUg gets "afraid" of light, and wanders of to go to play "in the dark". After a while, about 20 seconds (depending on the current used by the two motors ), the power has dropped, and it wants to "eat". It gets light attracted, and will turn and go to the light. When it gets there, it will recharge and still will be atrackted to the light until it reaches a trigger voltage , at which it gets "afraid"of the light again. This will go on all day until someone turns off the lightsource. While doing all this it also will backup when bumping into something.

Because of the "on-off" output of the first schmitt trigger, the inputs for the LDRs will switch. That's why it gets light atracted -light afraid. This also means that you cannot use IR diodes (like SHF205). You have to use LDRs !

These bots are powered by a Gold Cap and for a period of about one minute they move, always looking for the brightest lightspot, so in fact they will even follow a lightsource.

All these bots are powered by a 3,3F Gold Cap ( F= farad). You can charge them with a regulated power supply

the two 5 mm red LED's it is capable of following a light source.

I wanted to share an adaptation of the Schead v4, that I have been experimenting with. It is (for lack of a better term) a Master/Slave Schmitt Comparitor Head (M/S SC-H). With the addition of a 74 AC 240 or two (as motor drivers) and a pair of motors, you can put together an interesting little light seeking, wheeled robot with peripheral vision.

As long as the light reaching the photo-bridge of the Master SC-H is balanced, then the Slave SC-H acts as a regular, lone SC-H would. So, if one of the slave photo-diodes detects more light then the other, the inverter that controls the motor on that side changes states and is now the same as the inverter of the Master SC-H tied to the same motor. This turns that motor off and the robot will pivot around the stopped wheel toward the greater light source until the light on each sensors is balanced and the motor again begins to turn.

I am also using SCar to continue experimenting with Stacking separate Sensor/Behavior circuits onto a robot. I will post more as progress is made.

Droidmakr (Cliff Boerema) came up with an interesting idea for a light-tracking head with a form of peripheral vision. As often happens, the circuit turned into something different -- a photopopper:

All done with a single 74HC14 (the '240 being a motor driver).

I tried the same setup with the 74*240 (with an extra inverter per motor) and 7404, but the 74HC14 seems to work best.

This adapted photodiode is not as sensitive as large area types so C2 may need to be reduced to 0.01uF while the value of R2 and R3 can be increased by a factor of 10.

Two leaded phototransistors can also be used but may require extra shielding to reduce light current in the bridge to acceptable levels

basic photopopper functions plus reverse -- all on a single chip

This is the 3 capacitor method.  I used this one in all my RC cars and many of the RC toys that I have taken apart use this method.

One of the easiest and most overlooked technique that can be done to lower motor noise is the twist your motor and motor power wires.  This in affect forces the magnetic fields to cancel each other out.

By placing a metal shield between your motors and radio can do wonders.  Also keep in mind that some metals shield better than others.   Carbon Steel shields several hundred times better than aluminum.  Dont use this shielding as a conductor or you may compound the problem.