Article(s): Self- and Peer-Assessment Online - 0 views
-
The instructor must explain expectations clearly to them before they begin.
-
kmolitor on 14 Apr 19I think this is such an important piece of peer assessment. Students need to understand what they are doing and providing a model of it can certainly help.
-
tmolitor on 23 Apr 19I couldn't agree more. It is so important that everything is laid out clearly for the students before beginning anything.
-
mschutjer on 27 Apr 19I too agree. This is a process and getting middle school students to do this constructively can be challenging.
-
-
Students can also benefit from using rubrics or checklists to guide their assessments
-
develop trust by forming them into small groups early in the semester and having them work in the same groups throughout the term
-
Trust is such an important piece to giving peer feedback. Putting these groups together early and working on building those relationships prior to assessing will help the students give honest and constructive feedback.
-
Sometimes I wonder at what age students will begin to take this seriously, and not just go through the motions.
-
- ...77 more annotations...
-
In addition, students' motivation to learn increases when they have self-defined, and therefore relevant, learning goals.
-
Portfolio assessment emphasizes evaluation of students' progress, processes, and performance over time.
-
Using portfolios with students is great. Students have the opportunity to see their progress over time and can make adjustments as needed. I think adding a place where they can look at their goals in their portfolio would be beneficial too.
-
Think this is something I am going to try next year in classes is to have students build an online portfolio for each of my power standards to show mastery
-
-
-
Represent a student's progress over time
-
• Students will have a tendency to award everyone the same mark.
-
This is certainly a problem I run into with peer and group evals during projects. Students give everyone a 5/A in every category when it is patently false. Anyone have any solutions to solving that issue?
-
I have always had the same struggle. Feedback from each other just wasn't helpful most of the time.
-
-
provide quality feedback that can help students develop their writing and critical thinking skills.
-
In terms of very high level education he may be correct, but when talking about materials we work with he is both right and wrong. I think it is important to remember that we are also learning from our students as well, and they may the a voice that is different, but fits the tone/time/assignment better than what we traditionally expect.
-
The prompts also impact the feedback. If students are given extremely vague prompts, they won't be able to give accurate or usable feedback. However, if the prompts are aligned and geared to a student level, then the feedback will be more usable.
-
-
MOOCs that are not for credit
-
own expectations.
-
.
-
include establishing their own assessment criteria through consultation with teaching staff
-
Address improvement, effort, and achievement
-
When learners have experience in learning and navigating within a networked setting [if the review is completed in an open and online setting].
-
These students reported that their ability to self-assess depended on knowing what the teacher expected
-
Rather than assessing whether the student learned from the assignment or not, this method seems geared to identifying any ‘slackers’ or those who sit on the side lines through the entire project, with minimal contributions.
-
One way to begin the process of introducing students to self-assessment is to create student-teacher contracts. Contracts are written agreements between students and instructors, which commonly involve determining the number and type of assignments that are required for particular grades
-
I like how this focuses on the student. Having some ownership and feedback from the instructor can be powerful. Plus contracts are relevant in the real world.
-
While I understand the premise, I struggle with classroom contracts. They are frivolous...they really mean nothing. It downplays real contracts which have implications.
-
-
Emphasize what students can do rather than what they cannot do
-
Group work can be more successful when students are involved in developing the assessment process.
-
What a great way to involve the students and see what criteria is important to them. They would become more active in the learning process and better results should follow.
-
No kidding! Think of all the time teachers spend outlining the essential criteria. We can put some of this in the students court, especially is it helps the success of teaching some soft skills, working as a team.
-
-
More often, however, students spoke of the tension between their own and the teacher’s expectations. … Over and over again, students rejected their own judgments of their work in favor of guessing how their teacher or professor would grade it.”
-
How it works – each group member completes an evaluation on his or her team members which is then submitted to the instructor. The instructor usually takes the average of the peer evaluations, and shares this grade with each team member which serves as the student’s grade in the peer evaluation portion.
-
Forcing’ the individual student to assess their own behaviour, as opposed to others is more constructive – it supports the aim of developing collaboration skills, along with the knowledge component.
-
I agree. Most students are critical of their own work. They will be honest and upfront. The thing to be careful about is to make sure they explain themselves and not just give a grade. Self reflection is the highest form of accountability.
-
I think there is a lot of power in metacognition. Giving people the space to think about their thinking and evelaute their own choices...can lead to a lot of growth.
-
-
To help students develop realistic, short-term, attainable goals, instructors can use a framework like SMART goals outline shown in the popup window
-
Students do not learn to monitor or assess their learning on their own; they need to be taught strategies for self monitoring and self assessment.
-
The idea of students assessing and monitoring their own learning will be something totally new for most students. They will need help from teachers and some time to learn this process.
-
I agree. Assessing and monitoring learning only happens when students are explicitily taught the skills. Often it may have to be done many times and situations before students do it on their own.
-
This is an interesting topic and something I haven't tried with my students. I think as you both brought up would need some practice but agree it would be a powerful tool for self assessment
-
-
The student participates in the selection of portfolio content, the development of guidelines for selection, and the definition of criteria for judging merit
-
The instructor provides a sample writing or speaking assignment. As a group, students determine what should be assessed and how criteria for successful completion of the communication task should be defined.
-
Represent a student's range of performance in reading, writing, speaking, and listening as well as cultural understanding
-
peer or in a small group
-
peer pressure
-
This is a very real issue. Students can feel pressure to elevate a friends grade out of a sense of loyalty.
-
I see this as being less of a problem with students who don't visit campus at all. They may not know many peers.
-
Ali - Good point! This is a benefit of online courses vs. face to face. Most LMS's have a integrated tool that allows for peer assessment as well.
-
-
similar skill level
-
very clear and explicit.
-
This is my preferred approach
-
deliberate thought about what they are learning and how they are learning it.
-
Again, I think self-assessment is key. As we move towards SBG, I have built in self-assessing on almost everyone on of my rubrics in order to see where a student thinks they are v where I think they are.
-
I love the idea of self assessment and once students grab onto it I know they see its effects as well.
-
-
Students individually assess each other's contribution using a predetermined list of criteria. Grading is based on a predetermined process, but most commonly it is an average of the marks awarded by members of the group.
-
I always struggle with peer grading. I feel as if the students are never "hard" enough on other students the way that I would be when I am grading as a teacher. With that said, I think that if you build in norms and go over things as a class so they can see how you would do it, it may help.
-
I dont think I would use this exclusively but think peer evaluation is a good measuring stick of both the grader and gradee's understanding of the material
-
-
introduce students to the concepts and elements of assessment against specified criteria in the first weeks of class
-
I think this is key for class and for students to be able to see what they are being assessed in. What is the secret? Don't we as educators want our students to do well? I have been in the process of making posters for each of my classes and units that I hang up when we start a new unit. These posters have the standards, main ideas, and key assessment strategies.
-
I think all too often we are so concerned with "covering the material" that we don't take the time to front load a unit (or the school year). If we want our students to be successful and feel good about their learning, we need to make sure students know what is required from the very beginning.
-
-
self-assessment as an opportunity for students to reflect on their own work
-
Wow, I couldn't agree more. I don't want students to grade themselves because they won't grade themselves the same way that I will. However, I would direct them to self assess and use the same rubric the way that I would in order to build on the ideas that I am looking for and how they can better themselves.
-
-
I have mixed feelings about peer evaluations, leaning towards not using peer reviews as part of the assessment strategy. I wonder if the concept of peer evaluation is exclusive to higher education institutions
-
-
-
Perhaps if I spent more time doing this, I would have had more success with student self and peer edits. It's interesting, though, that my daughters felt the same way about peer editing in their HS classes. They always felt they lacked any helpful input. In fact, they felt peers were marking things they completely disagreed with. I just don't know how to make peer editing of upper level writing better.
-
-
-
There is strong support in constructivist theories for the peer review which is grounded in student-centered learning where students learn as much from the review process itself as from the final grade on an assignment.
-
hough at the conclusion of their research they determined that students involved in peer review perform better academically than peers graded only by their instructors
-
Learners have a developed set of communication skills.
-
Use a Rubric
-
Such self assessment encourages students to become independent learners and can increase their motivation.
-
Students may be reluctant to make judgements regarding their peers.
-
students assess their own contribution
-
Is there any risk of privacy laws when allowing peer assessment? I don't share the grade of one student with any other student. Would peer assessment violate this? If it does, self-assessment would be a better option.
-
Interesting question never thought of it that way......would be interesting to look at research
-
-
it requires a specific set of learning conditions to be present in order for it to work as intended.
-
the learner will benefit far more by completing a self evaluation
-
it helps them control the classroom better by reinforcing their power and expertise,
-
Or is it because it allows them to know whether or not students are getting the material? Yes, some teachers are power hungry and on constant power trips with grades, but if we aren't readily and regularly assessing and providing feedback, how do we know for ourselves whether or not students are learning?
-
-
Every time I did get a comment, no peer ever wrote more than three sentences. And why should they? Comments were anonymous so the hardest part of the evaluative obligation lacked adequate incentive and accountabilit
-
Using different online tools such as Turnitin.com allows students to remain anonymous to peers but teachers can see who reviewed whom and what kind of feedback they left. This could provide more incentive to provide better quality feedback. If students know teachers will look back through what they wrote, then they might be more conscientious about it.
-
-
Students that fell into this group were physically and cognitively lazy, not contributing to the process as required. This phenomenon was referenced in several other research studies within the paper.
-
help reduce the ‘free rider’ problem
-
4) When learners are mature, self-directed and motivated.
-
They also recommend that teachers share expectations for assignments and define quality. Showing students examples of effective and ineffective pieces of work can help to make those definitions real and relevant.
-
This especially important when it is linked with the findings in paragraph five. Student need this information.
-
I agree. This aligns nicely with what was said in the previous article..."Why and When Peer Grading is Effective for Online Learning"...It can also be very effective in small, closed online classes where students are at similar skill level and receive instruction and guidance in how to grade within the process.
-
This also ties in closely with our lesson on modeling. For many students it helps them to understand what a teacher is looking for and what "great work" looks like. Likewise, it is also helpful to show students examples of work that doesn't meet the requirements.
-
-
3 main grading strategie
-
hen students are involved in developing the assessment process.
-
strive for a more advanced and deeper understanding of the subject matter, skills and processes
-
passive learner to active leaner
-
inst if students ‘gang up’ against one group member
-
Self evaluation has a risk of being perceived as a process of presenting inflated grades and being unreliable
-
Encourages student involvement and responsibility.
-
Students may have little exposure to different forms of assessment and so may lack the necessary skills and judgements to effectively manage self and peer assessments
-
Students must feel comfortable and trust one another in order to provide honest and constructive feedback.
-
here may also be a perception amongst students that the academic is ‘shirking’ their responsibilities by having students undertaking peer assessments.
-
We have had this perception with Blended and Flipped learning with some of our students and parents. We quickly learned that educating the stakeholders is important.
-
You're absolutely right! Students and parents alike feel that it is the teacher's job to deliver the content and the teacher's job to assess student work. Helping both parties understand the WHY is so important!
-
-
practice session
-
Modeling and practicing feedback is critical. Otherwise it is very easy for people to provide very surface level feedback that doesn't give the learner much to go on in regards to improving. The learner gets frustrated because the information isn't usefule and the person providing the feedback because they don't see any changes.
-
-
When operating successfully can reduce a lecturer's marking load.
-
It can also be very effective in small, closed online classes where students are at similar skill level and receive instruction and guidance in how to grade within the process.
-
rubric not only helps the facilitator score the assignment but it and can greatly increase the quality and effort put into assignments by giving students a clear expectations with knowledge that must be demonstrated.
-
informs the teacher about students' thoughts on their progress,
-
Allow for assessment of process and product
-
be aware of their learning
-
goal of learning more
-
I feel we need to change our culture from that of earning good grades to one of learning. We will spend our whole lives learning, unlearning, and relearning. To be successful at anything we need to learn the skill of self-assessment - am I doing what I need to be doing? The world is ever-changing and we need to figure out how to make it (and ourselves) better. We can help young people do this by helping them learn to self-assess in school.
-
-
assessing their progress towards those goals
-
We have talked about using a portfolio to conduct student-led conferences with parents and teachers. Our current PT conference protocol is out-dated in this day of emails and online gradebooks. I think it would be awesome for students to choose student work that shows their progress toward course goals.
-
-
the lack of necessary skills
-
Is this a valid concern? How can my struggling students provide feedback to peers if they lack the necessary skills? How can a struggling writer give useful feedback to a peer who is a better writer?-- Just playing devil's advocate ;) Still a good question to think about in order to justify the use of peer assessment.
-
-
One of the ways in which students internalize the characteristics of quality work is by evaluating the work of their peers.
-
Goal setting is essential because students can evaluate their progress more clearly when they have targets against which to measure their performance.
-
Portfolios are purposeful, organized, systematic collections of student work that tell the story of a student's efforts, progress, and achievement in specific areas.
-
Engage students in establishing ongoing learning goals