Memedia

Australia and Canada got up early to be at the front of the line, and both expressed concerns about the Chinese government's human rights record. The UK and other European governments expressed concern later on. But voices of praise for the Chinese government's human rights record predominated. Overall, the session was considered a victory for the Chinese government's position that it is on the right track when it comes to respecting the rights of its people. Where was the U.S. delegation in this line? U.S. diplomats made no attempt to stand in this line. Much to the outrage of human rights groups, the Obama administration chose to merely sit on the sidelines and quietly take notes.

Thirteen years ago in Beijing, you spoke eloquently about the duty of all governments to respect the fundamental human rights of women and men. Respect for human rights, you said, means “not taking citizens away from their loved ones and jailing them, mistreating them, or denying them their freedom or dignity because of the peaceful expression of their ideas and opinions.” In recent years, however, human rights concerns have been pushed progressively further to the margins of the U.S.-China relationship. The Chinese government’s growing financial, diplomatic, and military strength, coupled with its hostility to reforms that challenge the Chinese Communist Party’s grip on power, make China a difficult country in which to effect change. But the advancement of human rights in, and with, China is arguably more central to U.S. interests than ever before. Press censorship in China makes it possible for toxic food and public health crises to spread globally. Suppression of dissent removes internal checks against environmental damage that has global impact. Abuses of low-wage labor implicate international firms operating inside China and compromise goods that come into the United States. The government’s control of mass media and the internet allow it to stoke nationalist anger against the United States in moments of crisis. The export from China of internet-censoring technologies and its provision of unconditional aid to repressive regimes increases the United States' burdens in fighting censorship and human rights crises worldwide. As much as the Chinese government appears to resist outside pressure to improve its record, experience suggests that it does respond to such pressure.

　　老实说，在今年春晚推波助澜之前，我对“屁精”这个词是没有什么概念的——不是没听说过这个词汇，只是从来没有遇到说这个词的人。我一直以为，人以群分，物以类聚：例如我肯定骂不出“操XX”这样肮脏污秽的国骂，可是赵本山会不会说出来，我就不知道了………

　　同样的例子，儒林外史中还有这样一段：“鲍文卿道：“我方才远远看见你,只疑惑是那一位翰林、科、道老爷错走到我这里来吃茶，原来就是你这老屁精！”当下坐了吃茶。”

    据说，春晚的编剧都是国内文化界的高手大腕，对春晚的节目也是层层审查、严格把关。但是，纵观历年的春晚小品，却发现大多数都是以撒谎欺骗为包袱，甚至很多都是歌颂所谓善意的谎言，最后的结果是因撒谎欺骗而达到目的，而撒谎者则被赋予高大高尚的英雄形象。 

    以上是在没有查资料的情况下，凭大脑的记忆随便想了几个春晚小品，便能找出这么多以撒谎欺骗为主线的故事。而且没有一个小品对这种现象进行丝毫的抨击，全部都是正面褒扬。难道这就是我们的主旋律吗？这就是我们的核心价值观吗？看来撒谎欺骗已经融入他们的骨髓了，认为这是天经地义、理所当然的，于是不以为耻、反以为荣。

联合国人权理事会提出100多条要求中国改善人权纪录建议。中国拒绝了包括废除死刑、增加媒体自由等建议。

人权组织指出，中国接受的一些建议令人发笑。例如斯里兰卡要求中国与全世界分享如何把一个强有力的中央政府与区域民族自治相结合的经验；津巴布韦认为北京当局应该增强它在世界各地的传媒影响，因为北京的政策目前被严重误解。

人权组织表示，中国拒绝接受这些基本人权，显示其没打算改善人权状况。中国的立场现已白纸黑字的记录在联合国，这就是让中国向联合国人权理事会汇报的重大意义。

“首先我们要明确新闻采访工作是有效实现人民群众获取知情权的职务行为，因此，新闻记者证只发新闻机构的专职采编人员。我们所说的新闻机构包括新闻类报社，新闻性期刊出版单位，通讯社，广播电台，电视台，新闻电影制片厂等。其中，新闻性报纸、期刊由新闻出版总署认定；广播、电视新闻机构由国家广电总局认定。”

目前，新版记者证已由国内人民币印刷企业完成印制，证件封皮由原来的蓝色改为咖啡色，封面烫有银色的国徽和“新闻记者证”的中英文，封底烫有银色的新闻出版总署英文简称“GAPP”和“新闻记者证”的英文“PRESS CARD”。　　据了解，新版记者证和人民币一样，每本都有一个流水数字编号，确保每本新闻记者证都是惟一的；新版记者证同时使用了与人民币相同技术的安全线水印纸，水印图案是“GAPP”，安全线由相互连接的“PRESS CARD”组成，在紫光灯照射下会发出红色荧光底纹和红色荧光纤维；新版记者证还使用了凹版印刷、光折射幻彩油墨等十多种人民币防伪技术，大大增加了防伪难度。

当初，央视大裤衩歪在那里嘲弄着百姓，央视副楼耸立在一旁镇压着舆论。现在却只有空荡荡的大裤衩独自静坐，没有了鸡鸡，好似一个寂寞的太监了。莫非他造大楼的时候，竟没有想到楼是终究要烧掉的么？

Twitter Fast Growing Beyond Its Messaging Roots