Evaluation Group 6 - 5 views
I was a member of group 6 and I thought that we were able to come together to produce a good paper. It took some time for us to get to together and figure things out, but once we did, we seems to ...
I was a member of group 6 and I thought that we were able to come together to produce a good paper. It took some time for us to get to together and figure things out, but once we did, we seems to ...
Group 3, I thought you did a great job on your paper. I like the way you broke up each section and gave a summary of each. It was thorough and very detailed. I believe that it followed APA forma...
Group 4 Evaluation: 4 Group Members: Tracy Botts, Renee Marshall Group 4 provided a strong argument for online learning. They very effectively tied information together and gave a good overview of...
Group 3 Evaluation: 5 Group Members: Melissa Carroll, Marta Herrera, Nasreen Wahid Group 3 provided us with a very engaging introduction that set the tone for the paper. There is al a very strong ...
Group 2 Evaluation: 4 Group Members: MJ Hall, Jeanette Layton, Beth Summerhill Group 2 tied together the three sections of the paper together in a seamless manner. They thoroughly defined online l...
Group 1 Evaluation: 4.5 Group Members: Marilyn Robinson, Scott Pfister, Suzanne Sallee Group 1's introduction provided a basis for the entire paper and guided the reader through what they should e...
Grade 5: Overall, good arguments. This paper was organized very well. The APA format was followed. All topics were discussed in detail. This paper also discussed major aspects of online learnin...
Grade 4.5 Loved the first sentence, it was a great way to get started, good argument for constructivist learning. The history also added to the paper and definitely created a stronger argument in ...
Grade: 4 I thought the argument was presented well. I had a good description on what online learning is and understood what tools make online learning effective; however I think other resources ...
Grade: 5 I thought we did a good job organizing our argument and had relevant resources to back it up. We described online learning and the elements that make up online learning. We followed th...
Chih-Hsiung Tu wrote: > Scott, > > Could you be more specific why this paper is well organized? > > Chih The section headings were concise and well-supported in the content of the paper. The c...
I give this paper a 5. I feel this treatise paper was well organized, well written and the argument was well articulated. The group cited research beyond the textbook and did a good job of explaini...
Scott, Excellent justifications! I encourage to put more thoughts to Vygotsky's theory since his socio-cultural leaning theory aligns to new web 2.0 learning environment well. Chih
Section I "If you tell me, I will listen. If you show me, I will see. But if you let me experience, I will learn." The means by which humans experience knowledge has evolved exponentially since th...
Chih, Yes, I do agree that oral discussions are very challenging in online environments. I was thinking about how oral discussions within group members make it easier to accomplish group project...
It appears that we are only allowed a certain number of forum posts and some groups papers are no longer available, so I will put all of my evaluations in one post. Group 3 Our group was able to ...
I think we did a good job at organizing and explaining what we wanted to about Online Learning. We also followed APA guidelines, and used multiple outside of class resources to help back up our pap...
I think you did a really good job considering there are only two in your group. I think your paper could have been a bit more organized and had a bit more resources, but otherwise you had a great a...