Skip to main content

Home/ ETC677 Spring 2009/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Marta Herrera

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Marta Herrera

Marta Herrera

Eval group 6 - 16 views

ETC677 group6 Treatisepaper
  • Marta Herrera
     
    Grade: 5

    I like the way oral presentations were discussed in the paper. Oral discussions are a big part of online learning as well. I also like how negative aspects of online learning were added such as the advantages/disadvantages of syc. and asych. Communication, and the feeling of alienation in online courses. I did notice a difference in font size towards the end, but overall..great paper.
  • Marta Herrera
     
    Chih,

    Yes, I do agree that oral discussions are very challenging in online environments. I was thinking about how oral discussions within group members make it easier to accomplish group projects and group meetings as opposed to live chats, or through threaded discussions, or emails.

    Marta


    Chih-Hsiung Tu wrote:
    > Marta,
    >
    > Thanks for the evaluations!
    >
    > You mentioned: "Oral discussions are a big part of online learning as well."
    >
    > I wonder why "oral" presentation is important to online learning. Oral presentation is challenging to deliver in online environment.
    >
    > Chih
Beth Summerhill

Eval group 3 - 16 views

ETC677 Group3 Treatisepaper
started by Beth Summerhill on 14 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
  • Marta Herrera
     
    Grade: 5

    I thought we did a good job organizing our argument and had relevant resources to back it up. We described online learning and the elements that make up online learning. We followed the APA guidelines, and organized out paper with headings and subheadings.

    MJ Hall wrote:
    > Grade: 5
    >
    > This paper was really well organized. It was very insightful and had good evidence to back up their arguments. It also follows the APA format really well.
    >
    > Beth Summerhill wrote:
    > > Grade: 5
    > > I feel your group did a great job on your paper. Your paper was well thought out and well put together. If someone who didn't know what online learning contained or Web 2.0 tools and read your paper they would know by the end of your paper what it takes and what is incorporated with an online learning environment. I feel your group did a great deal of research and provided a good number of references and resources. Good job group 3!
Beth Summerhill

Eval group 5 - 12 views

ETC677 Group5 Treatisepaper
started by Beth Summerhill on 14 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
  • Marta Herrera
     
    Grade: 5

    Very well written treatise! I was hooked with the introductory quote you added. I thought you added a lot of information about online learning. It was clear and too the point. I particularly liked the section on stakeholders and how strong instructors are needed. I do think the second section needed more outside resources .


    MJ Hall wrote:
    > Grade 5:
    >
    > This paper had very powerful arguments. It was a well organized paper that followed the APA format. However, some of the organization did not match throughout the paper. This paper was very insightful.
    >
    > Beth Summerhill wrote:
    > > Grade: 5
    > >
    > > I think your group did a great job on your paper. I really like how you included some history in your paper, it made the reader compare and contrast technology and education then and now, great special touch! I think your paper had some really good quotes included and great resources. Also, reading your paper made the reader feel at ease and it was like you were reading the readers mind, you would mention a term related to technology but included the definition for the reader nice touch to throw in you never know the technological knowledge of your reader. Your group did a great job!
Beth Summerhill

Eval group 4 - 18 views

ETC677 group4 Treatisepaper
started by Beth Summerhill on 14 Apr 09 no follow-up yet
  • Marta Herrera
     
    Grade: 4

    I thought the argument was presented well. I had a good description on what online learning is and understood what tools make online learning effective; however I think other resources could have been used to support your argument.


    MJ Hall wrote:
    > Grade 4:
    >
    > This paper has a good argument with really good points. However, the paper could have been more organized in the sense that it could have separated the parts of the paper. The paper just seemed to run together. Also, there was only one resource to back up their arguments.
    >
    > Beth Summerhill wrote:
    > > Grade: 5
    > > For only having two people in your group I think your group did a great job. I really like your great description of the different situations that might cause adult learners to seek a degree other than a face to face class. All of your reasons and description of online learners were great. I also like how you talked about the different types of learning environments especially how you brought in creativity, that is a key point and what inspires a lot of adult learners to participate in an online learning environment is that it brings out the learners creativity.
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page