The Art of Memory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For the general topic known as "Ars memoriae" or "the Art of Memory", see Art of memory.
The Art of Memory
Author(s)
Frances A. Yates
Country
United Kingdom
Language
English
Publisher
Routledge and Kegan Paul
Publication date
1966
Media type
Print (book)
Pages
400
ISBN
0-226-95001-8
OCLC Number
42905743
Preceded by
Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition
The Art of Memory is a 1966 non-fiction book by British historian Frances A. Yates. The book follows the history of mnemonic systems from the classical period of Simonides of Ceos in Ancient Greece to the Renaissance era of Giordano Bruno, ending with Gottfried Leibniz and the early emergence of the scientific method in the 17th century.
See also [edit]
Method of loci
John Crowley
Art of Memory
2More
Education Week: Does NCLB Promote Monolingualism? - 5 views
-
By requiring all students to demonstrate what they have "learned" in multiple subject areas through standardized tests written in English, and by reducing resources for helping students become multilingual, the U.S. continues to build a wall between our nation and the global community.
-
For our children's sake, we can't keep promoting the illusion that Americans are so superior to the rest of the world that we can or should insist that our way (language, culture, politics) is the best or only way. Within the context of our current standardized testing culture, common standards reinforce the fallacy that all children *should* learn (and are able to learn) the same things - and to the same level of performance - at a particular age.
10More
How Listening and Sharing Help Shape Collaborative Learning Experiences | MindShift | K... - 30 views
ww2.kqed.org/...aborative-learning-experiences
language-pedagogy Language-Learning-English collaboration
shared by Xiaojing Kou on 12 Sep 16
- No Cached
-
In school, getting people to share can be difficult. Learners may be diffident, or they may not have good strategies for sharing. Children often do not know how to offer constructive criticism or build on an idea. It can be helpful to give templates for sharing, such as two likes and a wish, where the “wish” is a constructive criticism or a building idea.
-
But more often than not, it is because one or more of five ingredients is missing: joint attention, listening, sharing, coordinating, and perspective taking.
- ...7 more annotations...
-
Using a common visual anchor (e.g., a common diagram) can help people maintain joint visual attention.
-
Many college students dislike group projects. Some of this is naïve egoism and an unwillingness to compromise
-
primary reason for collaborating is that people bring different ideas to the table. The first four ingredients—joint attention, listening, sharing, and coordinating—support the exchange of information. The fifth ingredient is understanding why people are offering the information they do. This often goes beyond what speakers can possibly show and say (see Chapter S). People need to understand the point of view behind what others are saying, so they can interpret it more fully. This requires perspective taking. This is where important learning takes place, because learners can gain a new way to think about matters. It can also help differentiate and clarify one’s own ideas. A conflict of opinions can enhance learning (Johnson & Johnson, 2009).
-
An interesting study on perspective taking (Kulkarni, Cambre, Kotturi, Bernstein, & Klemmer, 2015) occurred in a massive open online course (MOOC) with global participation. In their online discussions, learners were encouraged to review lecture content by relating it to their local context. The researchers placed people into low- or high-diversity groups based on the spread of geographic regions among participants. Students in the most geographically diverse discussion groups saw the highest learning gains, presumably because they had the opportunity to consider more different perspectives than geographically uniform groups did
66More
Annotating the Model Content Frameworks for ELA/Literacy by PARCC - 9 views
-
-
- ...54 more annotations...
-
upper grades, content-area teachers are encouraged to consider how best to implement informational reading across the disciplines
-
-
-
present their analyses in writing and speaking
-
all students need access to a wide range of materials on a variety of topics and genres
-
students improve both their reading comprehension and their writing skills when writing in response to texts.
-
notes, summaries, learning logs, writing to learn tasks, or even a response to a short text selection or an open-ended question.[9]
-
hese responses can vary in length based on the questions asked and tasks performed, from answering brief questions to crafting multiparagraph responses in upper grades.
-
narrative story and narrative description
-
generate writing pieces in response to teacher-provided prompts and to their own prompts
-
For reading and writing in each module
-
Graham, S., and M. A. Hebert. 2010. Writing to Read: Evidence for How Writing Can Improve Reading. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report. Washington, D.C.: Alliance for Excellent Education.
1More
Center on Instruction - 74 views
-
Welcome to the Center on Instruction, your gateway to a cutting-edge collection of scientifically based research and information on K-12 instruction in reading, math, science, special education, and English language learning. Part of the Comprehensive Center network, the Center on Instruction is one of five content centers serving as resources for the 16 regional U.S.
9More
Weblogg-ed - 2 views
-
no better place for my children to watch that speech (or any other, for that matter) than in a place where ideas are encouraged, where critical thinking about those ideas is a natural part of the conversation, and where appropriate response and debate can flourish. Where the adults in the room lead my kids to dig deeper, to validate facts, and consider the many levels of context in which every speech and every debate takes place. Where the discussion around it is such that it lays to rest the concern that many seem to have about this particular speech in general, that in some way the President will be able to “indoctrinate” our kids into some socialist mindset. If schools are the fully functioning learning communities that we hope they are, they should be the place where our kids learn to make sense of ideas, not to fear them. That, however, is not the message we are sending.
-
Isn't it ironic that the very things that we fought for and received via the US Constitution, Civil Rights, etc. are the very things that students are today losing? As an American History teacher I talk about the past, present, and future and show my students how things have/have not changed throughout time. I begin the year by reading the "True Story of the 3 Little Pigs," and talk about J.S. Mill and his challenge to others to question. Is society truly against the educating of its students to have an open-mind, ask questions, and look at many perspectives?
-
-
In the midst of all of the “uproar” over the President’s planned speech to school kids on Tuesday, I keep thinking about what all of this says about schools, about what they are for, and about the perception that a lot of people in this country have of them.
-
My English Language Learners were very positive about the speech and couldn't understand all the uproar. Aren't we teaching in government funded schools? Well my young adults liked the message of responsibilty. I have also taught the true story of the 3 little pigs but my ELLs weren/t really familiar with the original version. It helped with point of view from the orignal version.
-
- ...1 more annotation...
64More
RTI Talks | RTI for Gifted Students - 9 views
-
learning contracts with the student focused on work that takes the students interests in to account may be helpful.
- ...59 more annotations...
-
From a parent's perspective (and sometimes from the child's), this can seem like we are "de-gifted" the child.
-
The most important thing is that you have the "data" that shows what the student needs and that you are matching this with an appropriate service.
-
A major shift with RTI is that there is less emphasis on the "label" and more on the provision of appropriate service.
-
Ideas for differentiating reading for young children can also be found at: http://www.k8accesscenter.org/training_resources/readingdifferentiation.asp http://www.appomattox.k12.va.us/acps/attachments/6_6_12_dan_mulligan_handout.pdf
-
, with high-end differentiation and expectations, we are able to support the development of potential in all students.
-
This body-of-evidence can be used to support the nomination process and formal identification when appropriate.
-
likely to be of particular benefit for culturally and linguistically diverse, economically disadvantaged, and twice exceptional youngsters who are currently underrepresented within gifted education.
-
If we provide enrichment activities for our advanced students, won't that just increase the acheivement gap?
-
One is focusing on remediation, however the second approach focuses on the nurturing of potential through creating expectations for excellence that permeate Tier 1 with extended opportunities for enrichment for all children who need them at Tier 2. With the focus on excellence, the rising tide will help all students reach their potential. This is the goal of education.
-
make sure that the screener is directly related to the curriculum that you are using and that it has a high enough ceiling to allow advance learners to show what they know.
-
recognizing that students who are above grade level, or advanced in their academics, also need support to thrive
-
This includes learning about differentiated instruction within Tier 1and creating additional opportunities for enhancements and enrichments within Tier 2.
-
This often means that the district views the school as a “high-needs” school and does feel that many children would qualify for gifted education services (thus no teacher allocation is warranted). If this is the case, then this is a problematic view as it perpetuates the myth that some groups of children are not likely to be “gifted”.
-
These five differentiation strategies are as follows: Curriculum Compacting (pre-assessment of learners to see what they know) The use of Tiered Assignments that address: Mastery, Enrichment, and Challenge Tiered Learning Centers that allow children to further explore skills and concepts Independent and Small group learning contracts that allow students to follow area of interest Questioning for Higher Level thinking to stretch the minds of each child.
-
first proposed as a way to help us better identify students who continue to need additional support in spite of having appropriate instructional opportunities to learn.
-
children with complex sets of strengths and needs require a comprehensive evaluation that includes multiple types, sources, and time periods to create the most accurate and complete understanding of their educational needs.
-
use the same icon to represent how we address the increasing intensity of academic and behavioral needs for all learners.
-
Differentiated instruction is part of a strength-based approach to Tier 1, providing enriched and challenging learning opportunities for all students. However, a comprehensive RTI approach for gifted learners will also need strong Tier 2 and 3 supports and services.
-
Tracking, or the fixed stratification of children into learning levels based on limited data (placing children in fixed learning groups based on a single reading score), is the opposite of RTI.
-
additional learning opportunities that both challenge the learner and address high interest learning topics.