Skip to main content

Home/ WSU Virology/ Group items tagged replication

Rss Feed Group items tagged

sdahlseng10

Replication-competent Lentivirus Analysis of Clinical Grade Vector Products - 0 views

  •  
    Supplementary Article to Lesch et al. (2011); journal club 1: This article helps us understand the dangers of attenuated lentiviruses used for gene therapy and other clinical applications. It also details a method for screening newly synthesized lentiviruses for replication competency.
apopp10

Norovirus Translation Requires an Interaction between the C Terminus of the Genome-link... - 75 views

shared by apopp10 on 12 Sep 14 - No Cached
  • Importantly, however, despite the interaction between the norovirus VPg protein and eIF4E, it appears to be dispensable for MNV translation initiation, at least in vitro
    • ameliaobert
       
      I find it interesting that the MNV is depensable if incorporated in vitro. Im curious as to why this could be.
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      They are saying the VPg-eIF4E interaction is dispensable in vitro, not the virus itself.
  • Mass spectrometry was used to identify proteins present within the samples with a minimum of 2 unique peptides and >90% identification probability
    • laceemarie
       
      I'm confused as to how exactly mass spectrometry was used in this experiment. If the proteins are already separated by molecular weight after the SDS-PAGE, what precisely are they looking for when running a mass spec? It article says, ".... a minimum of 2 unique peptides and >90% identification probability," but this doesn't mean much to me. I understand the identification part because based on the way the molecule splits after being shot with ions, you can get a basic idea of the structure of the molecule. My question with the 2 unique peptides is that each amino acid has a different molecular weight right? So if the proteins were all the same except at the 2 unique peptides, the mass spec would show a different mass to charge ratio for each protein with the varying peptides correct? Would the charge of the amino acids in the peptide have anything to do with the charge portion of the mass to charge ratio? I hope this question came out okay. 
    • abachman12
       
      I also found this confusing. I understand what your saying and it makes your question makes sense to me. I think that the charge of the amino acids in the peptide would have something to do with the charge portion of the mass to charge ration.
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      I'll address this in class. In the meantime, check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peptide_mass_fingerprinting
  • inability to culture many members of the virus family in immortalized cells.
    • slgoogin8981
       
      What are the other options to culture these viruses?
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      This is the subject of intense study. See ref 18.
  • ...34 more annotations...
  • The mutation F123A ablated the ability of VPg to co-purify eIF4G, eIF4A, and PABP but did not affect the ability of NTAP-MNV VPg to co-purify eIF4E (Fig. 5), suggesting that the eIF4E and eIF4G binding regions on VPg are distinct
    • ameliaobert
       
      If F123A mutation is observed through data analysis (co-purification) that the eIF4E and eIF4G are distinct, so differ from each other. Then, why does the data suggest that the direct interacts of VPg with eIF4G determines the eIF4F binding capacity from the data obtained? As well as how do these purification datas are able to determine if the binding capacities for the virus VPg proteins are direct interactions?
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      As written, your question is unclear. Please rewrite it.
  • These data would suggest that the direct interaction of VPg with eIF4G largely determines the eIF4F binding capacity of the norovirus VPg protein.
  • some of which function directly in translation initiation, whereas others may contribute to the regulation of host cell translation by virus infection.
    • ameliaobert
       
      So here, they are saying that the initiation factors, some directly interact with the viruses translation to mRNA, whereas the other initiation factors present in teh virus contribute there translation factors specifically to when the host cells get involved with the virus translation factors? Basically specifically encoding for specific initiation translation factors based on the area of translation (i.e. from the virus or from the host cell)?
  • using the number of unique peptides identified for each protein (Table 1) as a semiquantitative indirect measure of protein abundance in the purified complex, it was also apparent that eIF4G was enriched in the complex with respect to the other proteins isolated.
    • becky214
       
      I was confused by what they are suggesting with this data. Is it true that elF4G is a binding partner, or is it just suggested?
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      Suggested. What evidence do you think would be conclusive?
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      BTW, is that a golden eagle in your picture?
  • we attempted
  • to identify
  • components of the complex that interacted with VPg directly and contribute to viral translation
    • slgoogin8981
       
      Is this the same as saying, they were looking for promoters?
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      No. Promoters are involved with transcription. In this paper they are looking for eIF's (of translation) that interact with VPg.
  • Independent observations indicate that eIF4G phosphorylation is stimulated during norovirus replication in cell culture and that this phosphorylated form of eIF4G is associated with MNV VPg in infected cells (29). The impact and functional relevance of initiation factor phosphorylation on the norovirus life cycle is currently under study.
    • becky214
       
      Maybe it is possible that this phosphorylation helps initiate and enhance translation.
    • alexridesducati
       
      It seems in order for this virus to replicate effectively, it has to bind several different ways, at least, just to initiate protein synthesis. Is there any way to synthesize a molecule that can target any of these proteins for degradation or at least something that can inhibit the binding site (similar to a neutralizing antibody :) . It seems that if you nip this right at the bud, that its possible to shut this virus down for the most part, except for the fact that in vitro, elF4E can be dispensed for translation initiation. Makes me wonder what the key differences are between an in vitro and in vivo environment that allows this to happen.
  • high affinity interaction
    • smolizon11
       
      Im confused to as what high affinity means?
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      High affinity would mean a tighter interaction between two molecules. The high affinity nature of the VPg-eIF4G interaction is suggested by the fact that eIF4G is carried through the TAP procedure, and that it persists despite washing with 1M salt.
  • Noroviruses, members of the Caliciviridae family of small positive-strand RNA viruses, are a major cause of acute gastroenteritis
    • smolizon11
       
      Its really interesting to be able to put a virus with being the cause of certain diseases. Even when talking about the disease in a "non-medical" setting its almost as if you have "higher hand" at the information about it. Makes for fun and interesting conversation with other people besides virology students.
  • As these proteins were not identified in both experimental systems and the focus of this study was to determine the role of canonical initiation factors in VPg-dependent translation, these additional host cell proteins factors were not examined in more detail.
    • Sean Hogan
       
          Is it possible that any of these are binding far upstream or downstream from the IF complex yet still affect affinity of complex compoenets such as with the eIF4E interaction with VPg protein in vitro?
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      Yes.
  • recombinant MNV was performed by infecting baby hamster kidney cells with fowlpox virus expressing T7 RNA polymerase followed by transfection of MNV cDNA expression constructs as described previously
    • slgoogin8981
       
      Was the fowlpox used just for the purpose of its polymerase? What is cDNA?
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      cDNA stands for complementary DNA. Technically, that would mean the DNA strand that is complementary in sequence to the RNA. In practice, after the first cDNA strand is synthesized (typically using an RNA template and reverse transcriptase), the second strand is synthesized with a DNA polymerase as well. This double-stranded cDNA can then be cloned in a plasmid, which is then introduced into cells via transfection as done by the Goodfellow group. The fowlpox encoding RNA polymerase from T7 phage (this RNA pol is not error prone and highly specific for the T7 transcription start site) is used for two things: the T7 RNA polymerase drives transcription of the MNV RNA from the plasmid containing the cDNA; AND it also promotes capping of the MNV genome/transcript, which promotes translation of MNV proteins. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3471295/, Fig. 4.
    • slgoogin8981
       
      Thank you for the link! I am very unskilled with the lab results and procedures done in lab. I appreciate the guidance and opportunity to learn. I have only had three biology labs: 241, 242 and Cell.
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      You're welcome! And thanks for the question!
  • human noroviruses have yet to be cultivated in the laboratory (18).
  • Our understanding of norovirus biology has been greatly enhanced by the discovery of murine norovirus (MNV) in 2003 (19),
  • Previous reports have also highlighted a potential association of the norovirus VPg protein with components of the eIF3 complex (28) and eIF4E, PABP, and eIF4G as well as the ribosomal protein S6 (29), although the functional relevance of these interactions has yet to be demonstrated. Here we describe the proteomic characterization of the murine norovirus translation initiation factor complex, demonstrating that VPg associates directly with the core components of the eIF4F complex and PABP. We further demonstrate that the interaction between eIF4G and VPg is essential for norovirus translation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that eIF4G is required for efficient virus replication in cell culture.
  • although these cells are not permissive to MNV infection due to the lack of a suitable receptor, robust MNV translation and replication occurs upon transfection of viral RNA into the cytoplasm (22).
    • slgoogin8981
       
      It is very cool that this virus can still use human translation equipment even though it is a marine from of the virus. How did they enter the virus genome into the cytoplasm?
  • It is worth noting, however, that in addition to disrupting electrostatic interactions, increasing sodium chloride concentrations stabilize hydrophobic interactions.
  • It is important to note that in both these approaches low levels of eIF4E remained (Fig. 8C) and 4E-BP1 expression in the MNV permissive cells did not completely block the eIF4E-4G interaction. Therefore, further studies on the role of eIF4E during the norovirus life cycle are clearly warranted, but it is worth noting that in addition to a direct role in cap binding for translation initiation, eIF4E plays numerous roles in the regulation of gene expression.
    • jpolanco10
       
      Why did this not block the eIF4E-4G interaction? Is there a really high affinity or was it able to recruit other proteins to aide it? It seems that the low level of eIF4E was still able to do its job, mainly regulation of the genes
  • Murine macrophage RAW264.7 and microglial BV2 cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), and 10 mm HEPES buffer. Baby hamster kidney cells (BHK-21) expressing T7 RNA polymerase (BSRT7 cells) were cultured in similar media lacking HEPES but containing 1 mg/ml G418. Similarly, HEK 293T cells were maintained in media lacking HEPES. HEK 293T cells stably expressing pMEP4-NTAP or pMEP4-NTAP MNV VPg plasmids were supplemented with 50 μg/ml hygromycin B and nonessential amino acids. The HEK293 TREX cells stably expressing pcDNA4/TO-NTAP derivatives of MNV VPg were supplemented with 5 μg/ml Blasticidin and 200 μg/ml Zeocin. All cell lines were maintained at 37 °C and 10% CO2.
    • nkasdagly
       
      Are they setting up the primary and secondary antibodies here or am i totally off? Just wondering because i see they used fetal calf serum and baby hampster kidney cells... 
  • Noroviruses, members of the Caliciviridae family of small positive-strand RNA viruses, are a major cause of acute gastroenteritis in man (8) but have also been identified in a number of other species including dogs (9, 10), cats (11), sheep (12), and cattle (13
    • Sean Hogan
       
      Work?
  • the first step in translation is the binding of the initiation factor eIF4E, a component of the eIF4F complex, to the 5′ cap structure.
  • eIF4F is a complex of three initiation factors; eIF4E is the cap-binding protein, eIF4A functions as an RNA helicase, and eIF4G acts as a scaffold to bridge the mRNA to the 40 S ribosomal subunit via its interaction with eIF3 (3).
  • 14 individual point mutations in VPg were introduced into the MNV infectious clone,
  • the effect of mutations on the ability of VPg to associate with initiation factors was assessed by the enrichment of the eIF4F complex using m7GTP-Sepharose followed by Western blotting for VPg.
  • the mutations V115A, D116A, and F123A altered the levels of infectious virus produced;
  • the mutants V115A, D116A, and F123A showed a consistently reduced interaction with eIF4F (Fig. 4).
  • The degree to which the mutation affected virus recovery appeared to correlate with the ability of VPg to be co-purified with initiation factors (Fig. 4).
  • These data would indicate that the disordered C terminus of the norovirus VPg protein contains amino acids involved in the interaction with eIF4G.
  • We recently analyzed the solution structure of the core domain of VPg using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and found that the MNV VPg protein consists of a compact structured core formed by a pair of α-helices that is flanked by long, flexible N and C termini (35). The region we have identified as being involved in the direct interaction with eIF4G, namely the C-terminal domain, is disordered and, therefore, is likely to adopt a fixed structure only upon interaction with eIF4G.
    • rmeloche10
       
      Using this advanced spectroscopy to find the structured core is an awesome break in technology. It shows the C-terminal is disordered until interaction with the initiation factor, does this disorder provide any advantage within the virus?
    • Casey Finnerty
  • eIF4GI
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      eIF4GI and eIF4GII are related forms of eIF4G.
  • This approach was used in place of authentic infection to enable the use of the F123A VPg mutant as a specificity control as this cDNA clone does not produce infectious virus (Fig. 4).
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      Throughout the paper, the authors have included helpful explanatory text like this.
  • These data indicate that the VPg binding site lies within residues 654–1131 of eIF4GI, a region known to contain both eIF4A and eIF3 binding sites (7).
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      Couldn't the binding site be narrowed further to 675-1131?
  • Noroviruses, a major cause of gastroenteritis in man, have evolved a mechanism that relies on the interaction of translation initiation factors with the virus-encoded VPg protein covalently linked to the 5′ end of the viral RNA.
    • apopp10
       
      I guess this comment never got adhered to my original highlight. Here it is once more. As someone who has gastrointestinal issues including inflammation, i wonder if this virus could have played a role in the cause of my condition, Ulcerative Colitis. I think interrupting this interaction could provide an effective treatment against this virus.
  •  
    Journal Article for our Week 4 discussion.
slgoogin8981

HSV carrying WT REST establishes latency but reactivates only if the synthesis of REST ... - 7 views

  • R111 recombinant is not reactivation-defective because it is able to reactivate in the presence of inhibitors of protein synthesis in the same manner as the WT parent virus, and (b) because the only significant difference in the WT and R111 viruses is the presence of the REST gene in the latter virus, the data suggest that expression of this gene blocks reactivation and that suppression of protein synthesis, including that of REST, enables reactivation.
    • becky214
       
      I am confused about when REST blocks reactivation and when it enables it. It says the gene blocks reactivation but continues to say it enables it. Does REST only enable reactivation if it plays a role in suppressing protein synthesis?
  • with dexamethasone or dexamethasone and cycloheximide
  • Specifically, a stress response generated by virus entry recruits or activates REST to enable the assembly of the HCLR complex. Stress responses have been postulated to activate REST
    • becky214
       
      I think this is interesting because REST is not usually found in neurons. I'm curious as to how the neuron recruits this gene. Does the virus actually recruit it? Or is it just a cellular response to the stress of viral entry? 
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • HSV takes advantage of the neuronal stress response to enter into a silent, latent state. To assist in the execution of this plan, HSV evolved a DNA sequence that allows itself to be suppressed in neurons and a mechanism to maintain an equilibrium between total suppression and potential to exit from the latent state.
  • translocated from satellite cells
  • The fundamental question is the identity of the mechanism by which a vigorously replicating virus, on entry into the body, is silenced in neurons harboring latent virus.
    • laceemarie
       
      Just to make sure that I understand this, once the virus enters the body, it quickly replicates and all the new virus particles find a nerve cell to infect and once there, the virus is able to sit in silence, so to speak?
  • Thus, VP16, a virion protein brought into the cells during infection, recruits several cellular proteins, including LSD1, to derepress α gene promoters
    • laceemarie
       
      VP16, a virion protein and a recruiter - this protein sounds pretty important to me. Is there a way or has there been work done with this protein to not allow the derepression at this checkpoint? Is it possible to keep a virus in latency because of alpha gene promoters not getting derepressed so as to not allow the virus to infect the host? I'm not sure if that's a reasonable antiviral therapy or not.
  • In some neurons, the virus establishes a latent, silent state. In other neurons, the virus replicates, and it is most likely that the virus in these neurons is transmitted and replicates in other ganglionic cells.
    • laceemarie
       
      Is this a random event or does this have something to do with the environment of the neuron? I would assume that specific, different environments would be ideal for each.
  • Finally, in contrast to the events following entry of virus after retrograde transport from the periphery, the data suggest that reactivation does not trigger a stress response that leads to activation of REST
    • alexridesducati
       
      Has anyone been able to pinpoint the exact step in infection that activates REST so that it can be studied? If so, perhaps it is possible to manipulate the effects of that step in order to induce an artificial response to the reactivation of HSV1 from its latency period in order to retrigger the stress response that leads to REST activation.
  • Thus, VP16, a virion protein brought into the cells during infection, recruits several cellular proteins, including LSD1, to derepress α gene promoters. One α gene product, infected cell protein 0 (ICP0), derepresses β and γ1 genes. Ultimately, the onset of viral DNA synthesis enables the expression of very late, or γ2, genes (4).
    • Sean Hogan
       
      Is this why the latent infection occurs in the ganglia of the PNS? The necessary proteins for gene derepression can't be recruited in the CNS or other cells?
  • In contrast, simultaneous expression of all viral genes during reactivation from latency is likely to minimize yield, but the mission of the virus is to assemble enough viruses to reach the portal of egress from the body (e.g., mouth, genitals) rather than to overwhelm the host with infectious virus.
    • Sean Hogan
       
      This might be the coolest statement in the whole paper. The discussion above kind of painted a picture of HSV infecting the PNS only but the reason for it's inability to reach the CNS didn't receive as much attention. I think this statement summed it all up though.HSV doesn't care about high virion yields or whether a productive or latent infection is necessary, it just wants to reach the body portals. The virus is "smart," enough to avoid the CNS and keep it's host alive.
  • Between 5 and 24 h after excision, mRNAs representative of all viral gene kinetic groups increase 100-fold in amount. Viral DNA also increases in amount, indicating that viral proteins are made. At the same time, viral LAT and miRNA concentrations decrease at least 10-fold (34). It is convenient to define the initial phase lasting no more than 5 h as the preactivation phase and the remaining time interval as the activation phase.
    • rmeloche10
       
      I'm having trouble grasping why the massive disparity between viral DNA and viral LAT. Obviously there would be some disparity when reactivation occurs, but wouldn't the production of more DNA contribute to even a small amount of LAT production and not a minimal 10 fold decrease?
  • The same concentration of HDAC inhibitor was ineffective in inducing the reactivation of R111 recombinant virus in ganglionic organ cultures maintained in medium containing anti-NGF antibody.
    • ameliaobert
       
      Interesting: That there is an inhibitor for chromatin remodelling (HDAC). Confusing: Is if HDAC can inhibit properly for WT virus, but not for R111 recombinant, that obtains REST. How does REST make the HDAC inhibitor ineffective ia stressed neuron? I understand that REST is what the DNA can be wrapped about and help with latency, so it that why the HDAC cannot inhibit, since REST is already aiding in latency.
    • nleonard11
       
      I thought this process of finding out that the HCLR complex activates from stress was very interesting. Using WT viral genomes appears to be a very effective way to test many virus functions.
    • nleonard11
       
      I was just wondering why the virus goes into a latent after 30 days? What exactly is it waiting to do and what conditions need to be present for it to become active again.
    • slgoogin8981
       
      It would be interesting to know the amount that REST is seen in non-neural cells and nerve cells in the absents of HSV-1. I was state earlier that REST is not normally found in never cells.
Casey Finnerty

Research - A Neuro-Oncology Laboratory at Northwestern University in Chicago - 1 views

  • Most adenoviruses that have been historically used for gene therapy have been based on serotype 5 (AdWT). Unfortunately, expression of the primary receptor for Ad5 (the coxsackie-adenovirus receptor, CAR) is highly variable on cancer cells. In fact, several studies have demonstrated a resistance of malignant glioma to adenoviral vectors, a finding that was subsequently attributed to the quantitative deficiency of CAR on brain tumor cells.
  • First, we tested a variety of tumor specific promoters and identified survivin (S) as an excellent tumor specific promoter for transcriptional control of E1a, a gene essential for CRAd replication (J Neurosurg 104:583, 2006; Cancer Biol Ther 6:679, 2007).
  • Based on the above date data, we then created a novel oncolytic adenoviral vector which utilizes the survivin promoter and binds to heparan sulfate proteoglycans expressed on malignant brain tumors and named this new vector CRAd-S-pk7 (Hum Gene Ther 18:589, 2007).
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      How specific is the binding/tropism? HS is fairly widespread throughout the body.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Second, we have identified several receptors that are over-expressed on brain tumor cells and created a series of pseudotyped Ad5 vectors that recognize these receptors
  • Our studies with CRAd-S-pk7 indicate that the virus provides the highest level of viral replication and tumor oncolysis in glioma cell lines. At the same time, we observed minimal viral replication and toxicity in normal human brain. Injection of CRAd-S-pk7 inhibited xenograft brain tumor growth by more than 300%.
  • We were the first group in the country to show that human mesenchymal stem cells can be effectively loaded with a replication competent virus and effectively deliver it to an experimental glioma model
  • When oncolytic vectors are loaded onto stem cells, the virus effectively "hides" from the immune system for an extended period of time. The ability of stem cells to suppress the anti-viral immune response in a permissive and tumor-bearing animal model is the subject of one of our latest manuscript
  • Finally, to further enhance the therapeutic efficacy of stem cells, we have optimized them to specifically traffic to intracranial tumors via genetic modification with single-chain antibodies against antigens expressed on gliomas
  • Our latest work in this area supports the development of neural stem cell based cell carriers for oncolytic virotherapy
jiyoung yoon

Genomic Characterization of a Novel Virus of the Family Tymoviridae Isolated from Mosqu... - 3 views

  •  
    in this article we can know about unique novel tymoviridae virus. they are characterising about this new virus. one of the most unique feature about them is they can replicate even in mosquitoes!in consider that no mosquitoes have been reported as vectores of plant viruse,this research is quite suprising thing! but something i want to recommend is ...first At the result, it said cell lysates did not react with antisera to known only a few arboviruses of the genera. And said this virus is an uncommon arbovirus . I think the author should define more specially about the subject. and second, this research said that CuTLV virus may be transferred to male mosquitoes feed on plant juices and can started to replicate in the insect also. Because marifviruses can potentially replicate both in plants and in insects but, I can't figure out how this viruse can move into human,(animal) different kinds of species , can make a disease even by male ! I think the writer should more explain about that route. the last thing is There is many pictures .but some of them ,like figure 4&figure 5, are too massy to be hard recognized or unneeded thing. So I think they need more arrangement about picture.
kwedul

A Multicomponent Animal Virus Isolated from Mosquitoes: Cell Host & Microbe - 68 views

  • reverse genetics system
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      Please be ready to explain why reverse genetics was a necessary approach for studying this virus.
  • GCXV
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      Here is an example of a stickie note.
  • Viral replication was detected in three mosquito cell lines and in intrathoracically inoculated adult female mosquitoes
  • ...14 more annotations...
  • Selective degradation with RNase I demonstrates that GCXV has a single-stranded RNA genome.
    • Casey Finnerty
       
      RNaseI is specific for ssRNA.
  • reverse genetics system
  • Multicomponent plant viruses were recognized on the basis of deviations from the expected relationship between infectious dose and the number of lesions on infected leaves (i.e., exhibiting multi-hit rather than single-hit kinetics; Flint et al., 2009xPrinciples of Virology Volume I: Molecular Biology. Flint, S.J., Enquist, L.W., Racaniello, V.R., Skalka, A.M., Barnum, D.R., and de Evaluación, E. See all References, Sánchez-Navarro et al., 2013xEffects of the number of genome segments on primary and systemic infections with a multipartite plant RNA virus. Sánchez-Navarro, J.A., Zwart, M.P., and Elena, S.F. J. Virol. 2013; 87: 10805–10815Crossref | PubMedSee all References).
    • jsackett13
       
      This was explained in the blog article.
  • of any other group of organisms (
    • aceastep
       
      wow
  • no Illumina reads aligned to the segment 5 sequences from the other isolates, and no contigs from ACH27 exhibited significant similarity to the segment 5 sequences from the other isolates. Therefore, segment 5 appears to be absent from ACH27 and TR7094.
  • However, only four segments were assembled for ACH27 and TR7094 (genome size ∼10.6 kb). For these two isolates, the four assembled segments corresponded to the four largest segments assembled in the other isolates (Figure 1Figure 1, segments 1–4).
  • The phylogeny inferred from segment 5 is also inconsistent with those of the other segments. In addition to the absence of this segment in TR7094 and ACH27, this segment exhibited very low levels of nt divergence (0.4%–2.3%), with most sequence variations only present in a single isolate.
  • with each genome segment separately packaged into virions. Although multicomponent genomes are relatively common among RNA viruses that infect plants and fungi, this method of genome organization has not previously been seen in animal viruses (
    • kwedul
       
      Is this the only thing required for a genome to be considered multicomponent?
  • RNA extracted from purified GCXV particles confirmed the presence of a segmented genome (
    • kwedul
       
      So what exactly is it about this purified GCXV that shows it is segmented?
  • The mosquito pools for both ACH27 and TR7094 contained multiple viruses capable of replicating in mosquito cells, so we were unable to obtain pure cultures for these isolates (
    • kwedul
       
      What is it about there being multiple viruses capable of replicating that made them unable to obtain pure cultures for the isolates?
  • Nuclease digestion assays (Figure 1Figure 1B), along with 5′ and 3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), confirmed that all five genome segments were single-stranded, positive-sense RNA (ssRNA+).
    • kwedul
       
      What about these tests confirms all five genome segments were single-stranded positive-sense RNA?
  • all five segments, (2) segments 1–4, and (3) segments 2–5
    • kwedul
       
      Why did they use these three combinations?
  • the number of plaques decreased more quickly than expected with dilution of the inoculant) (
    • kwedul
       
      Why? What is the significance of this?
  • segments 1–5 (passage 1) and segments 1–4 (passage 2)
    • kwedul
       
      What about a second passage, including 1-4, makes it brighter?
Sean Hogan

PLOS Pathogens: Different Modes of Retrovirus Restriction by Human APOBEC3A and APOBEC3... - 22 views

  • One such family of restriction factors is the apolipoprotein B editing complex 3 (A3) cellular cytidine deaminases (CDA). While A3 genes are found in all mammals, their number differs from species to species. For example, humans have 7 A3 genes (A3A to A3H) while mice have only one gene. All proteins in this family contain at least one CDA domain that deaminates carbon 4 of cytidine in single-stranded DNA, resulting in a uracil that causes G to A transitions in the opposing strand [3].
    • alexridesducati
       
      Can these genes be exploited for antiviral therapy and if so, can it be done without harm to the host due to mutations?
  • viral cDNA accumulation
  • Packaging of A3G into virions is counteracted by HIV Vif (viral infectivity factor) protein. In virus-producer cells, Vif binds to A3G as well other A3 family members, and recruits cellular E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes, leading to ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation, thereby preventing packaging of A3G into budding virions [12]–[14]. Lentiviral Vif proteins show strong species-specificity. For example, HIV-1 Vif counteracts human A3G but only certain simian A3G homologues [15], [16]; it also does not interact with mouse A3 [17].
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • Other members of the A3 family are believed to affect other exogenous viruses as well as endogenous retrovirus/retroelement movement within the genome. In particular, human A3A is a potent inhibitor of IAP and MusD and other retrotransposons such as LINE-1 and this inhibition is CDA-independent, at least in cultured cells [18]–[20]. A3A also inhibits adeno-associated virus replication, a nuclear-replicating parvovirus, via CDA-independent means [20]. In monocytes, A3A restricts HIV-1 infection and the decrease in A3A levels that occurs during monocyte-to-macrophage development is concomitant with increased susceptibility to HIV-1 infection [21]. A3A is not packaged into HIV virions and is thought to restrict infection by targeting incoming virus [22]–[24]. In contrast, A3A is packaged in human T-lymphotropic virus type-I virions and restricts infection, at least in transfected cells [25]. A3A preferentially deaminates cytidines that are in a TC motif [26].
  • Different A3 family members block infection by diverse retroviruses from different species, including HIV-2 [27], porcine endogenous retrovirus [28], [29], xenotropic, Friend (F-MLV) and Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) [30]–[32] and mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) [33]. Additionally, A3 proteins may restrict other virus families, including parvoviruses [20], [34], hepatitis B virus [35]–[37], papillomaviruses [38] and herpes simplex virus I [39]. Thus, it has been suggested that A3 proteins exist, at least in part, to prevent zoonotic transmission of viruses [40].
  • Here, we show that transgenic mice expressing the human A3A or A3G proteins restrict murine retrovirus infection in vivo in disparate ways. A3G was packaged into virions in vivo, leading to the deamination of both MLV and MMTV viral genomes. In contrast, A3A was not packaged, and appeared to restrict infection in a largely CDA-independent manner. Finally, we show that Vif/A3G interactions can be studied in this in vivo model, thus providing a potentially useful system for the analysis of small molecule inhibitors of A3 proteins and Vif.
  • To determine the level of transgene expression, we first isolated RNA from different tissues, including peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and performed reverse-transcribed real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). RNA from human H9 cultured cells and human and C57BL/6 mouse PBMCs served as controls. For each transgene, there was one high- (A3Ghigh, A3Ahigh) and one low- (A3Glow, A3Alow) expressing strain, defined by their relative expression in lymphoid tissues. The A3Ghigh strain expressed higher levels of the transgene than the endogenous mouse gene in spleen and thymus, but similar A3G levels in mouse and human PBMCs, while the A3Glow strain expressed approximately 10-fold lower levels in these tissues (Figure 1A). In contrast, the A3Ahigh strain expressed similar or lower levels than mouse A3; there was also about 2-fold lower expression of A3A in mouse PBMCs than in human PBMCs (Figure 1B). The A3Alow strain had very low but detectable levels of expression in several tissues. Since the β-actin regulatory region was used, transgene expression was seen in many tissues and in several at levels higher than endogenous mouse A3 (e.g. heart, brain and liver) (Figure 1A and 1B). We also performed western blots on different tissues from the 4 different mouse strains, using antiserum that detects both A3A and A3G. The relative protein expression levels were similar to that seen at the RNA level (Figure S1A and S1B).
  • We next determined if the in vivo-produced A3A and A3G proteins were functionally active. Extracts were prepared from primary splenocyte cultures and equal amounts (total protein concentration/volume) were incubated with FAM-labeled substrates containing the A3A- or A3G-preferred target sequence (S50-TTC and S50-CCC, respectively). As controls, we also performed these assays with extracts prepared from 293T cell lines transfected with A3A or A3G. Activity could be readily detected in transgenic mice expressing high levels of A3A or A3G. Further, in accord with the known specificity of the cytidine deaminases, extracts from the A3Ahigh mice deaminated the TTC- more efficiently than CCC-containing substrates, while those from A3Ghigh mice more efficiently deaminated the CCC substrate (Figure 2). For both A3Alow and A3G low, trace amounts of activity were detectable with the preferred substrates, while no activity was detectable with either endogenous mA3 or from mA3 knockout splenocytes. No deaminase activity was detected with WT mouse extracts, perhaps because the mouse protein has lower overall activity or expression. These data show that the transgenic mice expressed catalytically active human deaminases in these heterologous cells.
  • Humans have 7 APOBEC3 genes and determining how each specifically functions to inhibit retroviruses like HIV is complicated, because all 7 can be produced in a given cell type or tissue.
    • laceemarie
       
      What cell/tissue type(s) are these APOBEC3 genes naturally turned on in? 
  • To overcome this limitation, we made transgenic mice that express two of the human proteins, APOBEC3A and APOBEC3G in mice that do not express their own APOBEC3. These mice were able to effectively block infection by several mouse retroviruses
    • laceemarie
       
      What cell type(s) did they use? Does it matter which?
  • We were unable to perform similar assays with in vivo produced MMTV, because the only cell-free virus in mice is found in milk and mammary tumors and we have not yet established breeding colonies of virus-infected human A3 transgenic mice.
    • laceemarie
       
      Was this a screw up, or is it not that important to look at assays with in vivo produced MMTV. And by "not yet," does that mean they are going to? I feel like if your going to use this virus in your experimental studies, you should figure out ways to perform the assays, regardless of how you get the virus. It would appear that they knew this information before hand, so maybe an assay on MMTV is less relevant. 
    • laceemarie
       
      *you're
  • A3G and A3A inhibit retrovirus infection by different means.
    • becky214
       
      Since they use different means of inhibition, do they work together to prevent infection? Or is an and either/or type scenario?
  • Two A3A and A3G mouse strains each were generated, expressing levels of these proteins within the range or at levels lower than that seen in human cells. This likely has relevance to what occurs in individual humans, where non-coding region polymorphisms in A3 genes alter expression levels and may influence progression to HIV-induced disease
    • laceemarie
       
      Could this have something to do with how HIV works in the HIV controllers? Where they still exhibit virus particles, but at a lower amount, don't necessarily spread the virus as much, and don't exhibit as intense of HIV symptoms?
    • ameliaobert
       
      If A3A is less clear, but does not get packaged, where must the A3A involvement with the incoming virus be located (for myeloid cells)? As well as if it is known to use retroelement retotransposition and replication inhibiton in paraoviruses by nh2 to oh independent means, how does the A3A know to be signlle to change the structure of cystine?
  • An additional limitation of previous studies done on human A3 proteins is the reliance on transfecting constructs expressing A3 proteins, which may not reflect the endogenous levels of a protein expression found in vivo
    • Sean Hogan
       
      Couldn't they mimic the in vivo environment by overexpressing necessary proteins in the host?
  •  
    Focus paper for retrovirus presentation.
  •  
    This will be the focus paper for 11/14.
Casey Finnerty

Baculoviruses - 0 views

  •  
    This site has the best diagram and flash video I've found to show the baculovirus replication cycle.
Casey Finnerty

'Binding, bending and bonding': polypurine tract-primed initiation of plus-strand DNA s... - 0 views

  •  
    This review describes nicely HIV replication and the role of the PPTs.
Casey Finnerty

PLoS Pathogens: Polydnaviruses as Symbionts and Gene Delivery Systems - 5 views

  •  
    This paper describes the fascinating replication cycle of brachoviruses, which integrate their genomes (or portions of their genomes) into both wasp and caterpillar hosts, to benefit the parasitic wasp. In this role, these viruses function as endosymbionts, challenging the traditional view of all viruses as parasites.
  •  
    Please read this paper for the course. I don't plan to discuss it much more in the course, but there may be questions on this story on your exam.
slgoogin8981

Virus-Mediated Compartmentalization of the Host Translational Machinery - 22 views

  • Similarly, the viral single-stranded RNA binding protein σNS localized to the factory margins and had a tubulovesicular staining pattern that extended a short distance from the margins of the factories and colocalized with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) markers.
    • nleonard11
       
      This reovirus has single-stranded RNA rather than double stranded. Research. σNS is a binding protein that has an affinitiy for single-stranded RNA. Why is it used for doulbe-stranded RNA.
  • We further show that the nonstructural protein σNS strongly colocalizes and immunoprecipitates with two proteins in the 43S preinitiation complex (PIC), eIF3A and pS6R, suggesting a role for σNS in the recruitment or maintenance of ribosomes within VF.
    • laceemarie
       
      If σNS is involved in ribosome recruitment and/or maintenance, this seems like a good target for an antiviral therapy. 
  • This model implies that newly synthesized viral proteins must, by some mechanism(s), be trafficked back into the factory to participate in replication and assembly. Data supporting this model are limited.
    • laceemarie
       
      "Limited," but still exists. So under what circumstances did/could this happen? Could it be a possible way to avoid an antiviral drug that inhibits σNS?
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Within the VF, viral core particles transcribe and release viral mRNAs that possess a dimethylated cap 1 structure at the 5′ terminus but lack a poly(A) tail (19).
    • alexridesducati
       
      It seems that Reovirus recruits host proteins in order to replicate, and in this sentence we see that the viral mRNAs use a dimethlyated cap vs. the traditional host methylguanosine cap. Does this have any sort of impact on initiation factors associated with the ribosome? The viral mRNA also seems to be lacking in a poly-A tail. Is it because the mRNAs are created in a VF that they dont need to worry about having one?
    • abachman12
       
      I was also thinking the same thing. Does this have any effects on the initiation factors in whole? Does it change anything or do anything different than normal?
  • Consistent with our findings, the authors noted that the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) made numerous contacts with VF, which they suggested may indicate a role for RER in the transport of newly synthesized viral proteins to the VF, as is the case for rubella virus (64).
    • joeyevenson
       
      The rough endoplasmic reticulum may be involved in the transport of newly synthesizes viral proteins to the viral factory, could an antiviral that targets the endoplasmic reticulum prevent these newly synthesized proteins from ever getting that far? Does the host do this as a response to the virus? Or is it the virus controlling the cell to transport the viral proteins?
  • To address this, we monitored protein expression levels of eIF4E, eIF4A1, and eIF4G over the course of an infection. As others have found (39), we were unable to detect any difference in the levels of total protein in mock versus infected cells from 0 to 20 h p.i. (Fig. 3C and data not shown). Together, these data suggest that cellular translation proteins are redistributed to the VF.
    • becky214
       
      I am confused as to how the data is showing that these proteins are redistributed to the VF.
  • Most reovirus strains form filamentous VF through an association with stabilized microtubules. However, the T3D strain used in these experiments contains a temperature-sensitive mutation in the viral protein μ2 that prevents this association, resulting in the production of globular VF at 37°C (27, 28). Therefore, to evaluate if PMY labeling occurs within filamentous viral factories, we infected cells with the serotype 1 Lang (T1L) strain. As we found for T3D-infected cells, the PMY labeling localized to T1L VF at 18 h postinfection
    • rmeloche10
       
      Is this temperature sensitive mutation put in place by the authors? Or is the mutation a natural feature of the virus, if it is would there be any reason for inhibiting the micro tubule stabalization? 
  • It was unclear if this was a result of increased expression levels or as a consequence of redistribution of the proteins to the factories. To address this, we monitored protein expression levels of eIF4E, eIF4A1, and eIF4G over the course of an infection. As others have found (39), we were unable to detect any difference in the levels of total protein in mock versus infected cells from 0 to 20 h p.i. (Fig. 3C and data not shown). Together, these data suggest that cellular translation proteins are redistributed to the VF.
    • Sean Hogan
       
      I had a little trouble wrapping my brain around this part. If the IF proteins are expressed at similar levels then what is the cause of the redistribution? Does it have to do with the sigma NS interaction and then eventually the preinitiation complex is recruited?
  • Our finding that σNS interacts with eIF3A and pS6R suggests that translational machinery is recruited to the factory by viral proteins. This is consistent with the finding of others that σNS cosediments with 40S and 60S ribosomes (62) and suggests that σNS is directly involved in viral translation.
    • Sean Hogan
       
      I feel like a  loss of function experiment (sigma NS) would provide an answer for this.  
  • FIG 3  Cellular translation initiation factors colocalize to viral factories. (A, B) CV-1 cells were infected with T3D or T1L at an MOI of 1. At 18 h p.i., RPM-labeled cells were coimmunostained for μNS and eIF4E (A) or eIF3A (B). Scale bars, 10 µm. (C) CV-1 cells were infected with T3D, MOI of 3, for the times indicated. Protein levels were assessed by immunoblotting. M = mock.
    • apopp10
       
      I am having trouble interpreting both this figure and figure 4 immediately following it. How do these figures exactly support the claim that transcription initiation, elongation, termination and recycling factors are recruited to viral factories?
    • slgoogin8981
       
      Does the viral factor protect the dsRNA from RIG-1? Earlier the paper spoke of energy balances, does the viral factor require a lot of energy to be created?
  •  
    Focus paper for friday
Casey Finnerty

Introduction of the Six Major Genomic Deletions of Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA)... - 0 views

  • In mice, CVA mutants with up to three deletions showed slightly enhanced virulence, suggesting that gene deletion in replicating vaccinia virus (VACV) can result in gain of fitness in vivo.
Sarah Muncy

ScienceDirect.com - Vaccine - Intranasal and intramuscular immunization with Baculoviru... - 0 views

  • An anti-malarial transmission-blocking vaccine (TBV) that prevents fertilization and/or ookinete/oocyst development within the mosquito is an attractive strategy to limit the transmission of malaria
  • The present study used this system to generate a Plasmodium vivax transmission-blocking immunogen (AcNPV-Dual-Pvs25).
  • Plasmodium vivax
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • A variety of expression vectors (e.g., Escherichia coli, Pichia pastoris and DNA) have been used to express Pvs25 protein which has been administered alone or in combination with adjuvants
  • To date these studies suggest that the recombinant protein currently requires both not only linear, but conformation dependent epitopes, and a strong adjuvant to induce transmission-blocking antibodies.
  • Intranasal and intramuscular immunization with Baculovirus Dual Expression System-based Pvs25 vaccine substantially blocks Plasmodium vivax transmission
  • Recently, we have developed a new vaccine vector system based on the baculovirus Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrosis virus (AcNPV) termed the “Baculovirus Dual Expression System”, which drives expression of vaccine candidate antigens by a dual promoter that consists of tandemly arranged baculovirus-derived polyhedrin and mammalian-derived CMV promoters. It has been shown that AcNPV, an enveloped double-stranded DNA virus that naturally infects insects, possesses strong adjuvant properties that can activate dendritic cell-mediated innate immunity
  • Mucosal vaccines have several attractive features compared with parenteral vaccines (e.g., safety, cost-effectiveness and ease of administration), but studies on their use have been limited almost exclusively to protection against mucosally transmitted pathogens. We provide evidence that i.n. immunization is a feasible alternative for preventing malaria, which is transmitted through non-mucosal routes
  • These results are consistent with our previous work showing that intranasal immunization with the baculovirus-based vaccine induced strong systemic humoral immune responses with high titres of antigen-specific antibodies and conferred complete protection against malaria blood-stage challenge
  • which can induce immunological memory against heterologous antigens in a rodent model; however, it is precluded from clinical use due to its enterotoxicity and potential hazardous effects on olfactory nerves [22]. In contrast, a baculovirus-based delivery system may offer an attractive immunization method, as AcNPV exhibits low cytotoxicity and is incapable of replication in mammalian cells
  • The data described here adds to previously presented data showing the significant potential of the baculovirus dual expression system against the blood stages of the parasite
  • but also demonstrates clearly its ability to induce antibodies against the ookinete surface protein Pvs25, and to elicit a transmission-blocking immune response against the P. vivax isolates from endemic areas, and a transgenic rodent malaria parasite model in preliminary studies.
  • One was SMFA on peripheral blood from P. vivax infected patients.
  •  
    Reference paper #2. Gave me information on malaria and baculoviruses.
sdahlseng10

Possible applications for replicating HIV 1 vectors - 0 views

  •  
    Review Article; Journal club 1: This is a basic review article about HIV virus vectors and their potential uses in clinical science.
mattgreatens

The Potential of Avian H1N1 Influenza A Viruses to Replicate and Cause Disease in Mamma... - 6 views

  •  
    This is the topic of my focus paper.
Casey Finnerty

HIV Latency - 0 views

  • For HIV-1, the term latency was initially used in the clinical sense to describe the long asymptomatic period between initial infection and the development of AIDS. However, with the advent of sensitive RT-PCR assays for viremia (Piatak et al. 1993), it became clear that HIV-1 replicates actively throughout the course of the infection, even during the asymptomatic period. The major mechanism by which HIV-1 evades immune responses is not latency but rather through rapid evolution of escape mutations that abrogate recognition by neutralizing antibodies and cytolytic T lymphocytes (Bailey et al. 2004). Nevertheless, it has become clear that HIV-1 can establish a state of latent infection at the level of individual T cells
Sarah Muncy

Herd immunity: cow virus successfully targeted for extinction | Ars Technica - 1 views

    • Sarah Muncy
       
      I have a hard time feeling glad that an organism (fine, a nucleic acid in a protein capsid that replicates inside hosts and uses their cell machinery to make new component parts) of any kind is gone in the wild. As humans we want to eliminate some parts of nature but not others. Sure there's still these viruses in a lab somewhere, but they are a part of the ecosphere, no? Since we know so little about them, is it wise to think we can eliminate some with no consequences?
1 - 20 of 29 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page