The Guardian reports this morning on a private report to Gordon Brown that suggests that Britain should oppose binding target for renewable energies in Europe (20% of all energy by 2020, as agreed earlier this year at this spring's EU Summit). The Guardian flags the juicy political bits ("work with Poland and other governments sceptical about climate change to "help persuade" German chancellor Angela Merkel and others to set lower renewable targets", "a potentially significant cost in terms of reduced climate change leadership"), but also provides some of the apparent underlying reasons provided, which are worth commenting upon:
it undermines the carbon-trading scheme which "allows wealthy governments to pay others to reduce emissions";
it costs too much money (£4 billion a year to get to 9% by 2020);
it does not help push for new nuclear plants as it "reduces the incentives to invest in other carbon technologies like nuclear power";
Let's say it plainly: each of these arguments is stupid, short-sighted and, quite simply, false. Let me take you through them in turn (under the fold).
1More
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY BLOG - Solar-Energy-Wind-Power.com: House Passes 15% Renewable Energ... - 0 views
1More
Energy Efficient Appliances To Become Lighting Market Standard - 0 views
1More
China Invested $88 billion in High Speed Rail in 2009 - HSR | Clean Fleet Report - 1 views
WattHead: All New Homes Should Be Zero-Net-Energy By 2020 Says California Utility Commi... - 0 views
1More
EU Passes New Climate Directive « Renewable Energy Information - 0 views
1More
Norway sets ambitious renewables target | Green Oil Plantations - 0 views
2More
Peak Energy: US's First Freshwater Offshore Wind Farm Planned for Lake Erie - 0 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 100
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page