Group items tagged

re-order

order in which the four modules may be used is not critical

ocus and emphasis on the types of texts

What changes

is the

analytic reading

examining its meaning

read and reread deliberately.

understand the central ideas

supporting details

entails the careful gathering of observations

overall understanding and judgment

omparison and synthesis of ideas

drawing on relevant prior knowledge

suggests that educators select a minimum number of grade-level-appropriate short texts

as well as one extended text

in lower grades, chosen texts should include content from across the disciplines.

upper grades, content-area teachers are encouraged to consider how best to implement informational reading across the disciplines

present their analyses in writing and speaking

all students need access to a wide range of materials on a variety of topics and genres

students improve both their reading comprehension and their writing skills when writing in response to texts.

notes, summaries, learning logs, writing to learn tasks, or even a response to a short text selection or an open-ended question.[9]

hese responses can vary in length based on the questions asked and tasks performed, from answering brief questions to crafting multiparagraph responses in upper grades.

narrative story and narrative description

creative fiction, as well as memoirs, anecdotes, biographies, and autobiographies

include writing under time constraints

writing over multiple drafts

generate writing pieces in response to teacher-provided prompts and to their own prompts

For reading and writing in each module

Understand and apply grammar:

Cite evidence and analyze content

Understand and apply vocabulary

Conduct discussions and report findings:

grades 3-5

two standards progression charts for each grade level

Writing

peaking and Listening

Graham, S., and M. A. Hebert. 2010. Writing to Read: Evidence for How Writing Can Improve Reading. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report. Washington, D.C.: Alliance for Excellent Education.

suggests both the number and types

Students

offer one way of organizing the standards

quarterly modules

reflects the integrated nature

four sections

to express an opinion/make an argument or to inform/explain

write

citing evidence

analyzing

grammar

vocabulary

discussions

reporting

I met with each teacher one-on-one to ask questions and understand their hopes, fears, and support needs in the upcoming year. By choosing to listen rather than to talk, I conveyed that I saw my primary duty as supporting good teaching.

Rather than reject his adapted style, I tried to build off of it

As his coach, I sought to model, little by little, some strategies I had learned on the job, such as literacy-building techniques, structuring controversial debates, and charting student discussions on the board for visual impact.

in the basic forms, as well as in the content of people's thinking.

The early 1930

had experienced the conditions necessary to alter radically the content and form of their thought.

we expected that they would display a predominance of those forms of thought that come from activity that is guided by the physical features of familiar objects.

Therefore we began, as most field work with people does, by emphasizing contact with the people who would serve as our subjects. We tried to establish friendly relations so that experimental sessions seemed natural and non-threatening. We were particularly careful not to conduct hasty or unprepared presentations of the test materials.

As a rule, our experimental sessions began with long conversations which were sometimes repeated with the subjects in the relaxed atmosphere of a tea house, where the villagers spent most of their free time, or in camps in the field and in mountain pastures around the evening campfire. These talks were frequently held in groups. Even when the interviews were held with one person, the experimenter and other subjects made up a group of two or three who listened attentively to the person being interviewed and who sometimes offered remarks or comments on what he said. The talk often took the form of a free-flowing exchange of opinion between participants, and a particular problem might be solved simultaneously by two or three subjects, each proposing an answer. Only gradually did the experimenters introduce the prepared tasks, which resembled the “riddles” familiar to the population and therefore seemed like a natural extension of the conversation.

He characterized primitive thinking as “prelogical” and “loosely organized.” Primitive people were said to be indifferent to logical contradiction and dominated by the idea that mystical forces control natural phenomena

We conceived the idea of carrying out the first far-reaching study of intellectual functions among adults from a non-technological non-literate, traditional society

hamlets

nomad

1. Women living in remote villages who were illiterate and who were not involved in any modern social activities. There were still a considerable number of such women at the time our study was made. Their interviews were conducted by women, since they alone had the right to enter the women's quarters. 2. Peasants living in remote villages who were in no way involved with socialized labor and who continued to maintain an individualistic economy. These peasants were not literate. 3. Women who attended short-term courses in the teaching of kindergarteners. As a rule, they had no formal schooling and almost no training in literacy. 4. Active kolhoz (collective farm) workers and young people who had taken short courses. They were involved as chairmen running collective farms, as holders of other offices on the, collective farm, or as brigade leaders. They had considerable experience in planning production, distributing labor, and taking stock of output. By dealing with other collective farm members, they had acquired a much broader outlook than isolated peasants. But they had attended school only briefly, and many were still barely literate. 5. Women students admitted to teachers school after two or three years of study. Their educational qualifications, however, were still fairly low.

Short-term psychological experiments would have been highly problematic under the field conditions we expected to encounter