Skip to main content

Home/ Classroom 2.0/ Group items tagged technology-integration

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
David McGavock

CITE Journal - Editorial - 21 views

www.citejournal.org/...article1.cfm

technology integration Judi Harris editorial journal technocentrism

shared by David McGavock on 28 Aug 10 - Cached
  • A classroom that has successfully integrated technology into the curriculum would be one where you would not really notice it because it would be so second nature. The teacher would not have to think up ways to use whatever tools were available, but would seamlessly use them to enhance the learning of whatever content was being covered. Technology [would be] used to assist in acquiring content knowledge, and the acquisition of technology skills [would be] secondary. Contrast this depiction with what the International Society for Technology in Education’s (ISTE) National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS-S; ISTE, 2002) say about technology integration: Curriculum integration with the use of technology involves the infusion of technology as a tool to enhance the learning in a content area or multidisciplinary setting….Effective integration of technology is achieved when students are able to select technology tools to help them obtain information in a timely manner, analyze and synthesize the information, and present it professionally. The technology should become an integral part of how the classroom functions—as accessible as all other classroom tools.
  • his urging to shift the focus from the learning tools to what is being learned and how that learning happens still needs to be heeded—almost 20 years later.
  • Integration is defined not by the amount or type of technology used, but by how and why it is used.
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • many of these technology-specific studies did not explore more fundamental issues in technology and education
  • what needs to be further developed, examined, and shared
  • particular curriculum standards-based instructional strategies that are appropriately matched to students’ learning needs and preferences
  • understanding the processes and interim results of how and why specific tools can and should be appropriated
  • help students with distinct needs and preferences to achieve identified learning goals.
  • the STaR Chart
  • According to the national StaR Chart, then, technology use in what is typically described as “constructivist” learning is preferable to technology used to “reinforce basic academic skills.”
  • Constructivists view people as constructive agents and view the phenomenon of interest (meaning or knowledge) as built instead of passively “received”
  • curriculum-based integration of educational technologies – defined in Education and Technology: An Encyclopedia (Kovalchick & Dawson, 2004) as “the effective integration of technology throughout the curriculum to help students meet the standards and outcomes of each lesson, unit, or activity”
  • As discerning educators and researchers, we should question why teachers’ roles “must” change to integrate technology effectively into K-12 curricula.
  • the technologies themselves do not require this shift
  • Though teachers in the nationally representative sample they studied acknowledged that computers helped them to change instructional practice over time, they cited experience, organized professional learning, and school culture as the primary factors provoking instructional changes.
  • In districts in which teachers’ academic freedom is preserved—at least in part—aren’t the pedagogical approaches to be used the result of decisions that each teacher makes, preferably rooted in a well-informed knowledge base of both students’ learning needs and preferences and corresponding methodological alternatives?
  • Can it really be assumed that a particular approach “works best” in all teaching, learning, school, district, and community contexts?
  • perhaps a new approach is warranted at this point in time—one that genuinely respects pedagogical plurality and honors teachers’ academic freedom.
  • David McGavock on 28 Aug 10
     
    A classroom that has successfully integrated technology into the curriculum would be one where you would not really notice it because it would be so second nature. The teacher would not have to think up ways to use whatever tools were available, but would seamlessly use them to enhance the learning of whatever content was being covered. Technology [would be] used to assist in acquiring content knowledge, and the acquisition of technology skills [would be] secondary. Contrast this depiction with what the International Society for Technology in Education's (ISTE) National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS-S; ISTE, 2002) say about technology integration: Curriculum integration with the use of technology involves the infusion of technology as a tool to enhance the learning in a content area or multidisciplinary setting….Effective integration of technology is achieved when students are able to select technology tools to help them obtain information in a timely manner, analyze and synthesize the information, and present it professionally. The technology should become an integral part of how the classroom functions-as accessible as all other classroom tools.
anonymous

Critical Issue: Using Technology to Improve Student Achievement - 0 views

www.ncrel.org/...te800.htm

shared by anonymous on 23 Feb 10 - Cached
  • Technologies available in classrooms today range from simple tool-based applications (such as word processors) to online repositories of scientific data and primary historical documents, to handheld computers, closed-circuit television channels, and two-way distance learning classrooms. Even the cell phones that many students now carry with them can be used to learn (Prensky, 2005).
  • Bruce and Levin (1997), for example, look at ways in which the tools, techniques, and applications of technology can support integrated, inquiry-based learning to "engage children in exploring, thinking, reading, writing, researching, inventing, problem-solving, and experiencing the world." They developed the idea of technology as media with four different focuses: media for inquiry (such as data modeling, spreadsheets, access to online databases, access to online observatories and microscopes, and hypertext), media for communication (such as word processing, e-mail, synchronous conferencing, graphics software, simulations, and tutorials), media for construction (such as robotics, computer-aided design, and control systems), and media for expression (such as interactive video, animation software, and music composition). In a review of existing evidence of technology's impact on learning, Marshall (2002) found strong evidence that educational technology "complements what a great teacher does naturally," extending their reach and broadening their students' experience beyond the classroom. "With ever-expanding content and technology choices, from video to multimedia to the Internet," Marshall suggests "there's an unprecedented need to understand the recipe for success, which involves the learner, the teacher, the content, and the environment in which technology is used."
  • In examining large-scale state and national studies, as well as some innovative smaller studies on newer educational technologies, Schacter (1999) found that students with access to any of a number of technologies (such as computer assisted instruction, integrated learning systems, simulations and software that teaches higher order thinking, collaborative networked technologies, or design and programming technologies) show positive gains in achievement on researcher constructed tests, standardized tests, and national tests.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Boster, Meyer, Roberto, & Inge (2002) examined the integration of standards-based video clips into lessons developed by classroom teachers and found increases student achievement. The study of more than 1,400 elementary and middle school students in three Virginia school districts showed an average increase in learning for students exposed to the video clip application compared to students who received traditional instruction alone.
  • Wenglinsky (1998) noted that for fourth- and eighth-graders technology has "positive benefits" on achievement as measured in NAEP's mathematics test. Interestingly, Wenglinsky found that using computers to teach low order thinking skills, such as drill and practice, had a negative impact on academic achievement, while using computers to solve simulations saw their students' math scores increase significantly. Hiebert (1999) raised a similar point. When students over-practice procedures before they understand them, they have more difficulty making sense of them later; however, they can learn new concepts and skills while they are solving problems. In a study that examined relationship between computer use and students' science achievement based on data from a standardized assessment, Papanastasiou, Zemblyas, & Vrasidas (2003) found it is not the computer use itself that has a positive or negative effect on achievement of students, but the way in which computers are used.
  • Another factor influencing the impact of technology on student achievement is that changes in classroom technologies correlate to changes in other educational factors as well. Originally the determination of student achievement was based on traditional methods of social scientific investigation: it asked whether there was a specific, causal relationship between one thing—technology—and another—student achievement. Because schools are complex social environments, however, it is impossible to change just one thing at a time (Glennan & Melmed, 1996; Hawkins, Panush, & Spielvogel, 1996; Newman, 1990). If a new technology is introduced into a classroom, other things also change. For example, teachers' perceptions of their students' capabilities can shift dramatically when technology is integrated into the classroom (Honey, Chang, Light, Moeller, in press). Also, teachers frequently find themselves acting more as coaches and less as lecturers (Henriquez & Riconscente, 1998). Another example is that use of technology tends to foster collaboration among students, which in turn may have a positive effect on student achievement (Tinzmann, 1998). Because the technology becomes part of a complex network of changes, its impact cannot be reduced to a simple cause-and-effect model that would provide a definitive answer to how it has improved student achievement.
  • When new technologies are adopted, learning how to use the technology may take precedence over learning through the technology. "The technology learning curve tends to eclipse content learning temporarily; both kids and teachers seem to orient to technology until they become comfortable," note Goldman, Cole, and Syer (1999). Effective content integration takes time, and new technologies may have glitches. As a result, "teachers' first technology projects generate excitement but often little content learning. Often it takes a few years until teachers can use technology effectively in core subject areas" (Goldman, Cole, & Syer, 1999). Educators may find impediments to evaluating the impact of technology. Such impediments include lack of measures to assess higher-order thinking skills, difficulty in separating technology from the entire instructional process, and the outdating of technologies used by the school. To address these impediments, educators may need to develop new strategies for student assessment, ensure that all aspects of the instructional process—including technology, instructional design, content, teaching strategies, and classroom environment—are conducive to student learning, and conduct ongoing evaluation studies to determine the effectiveness of learning with technology (Kosakowski, 1998).
Nigel Coutts

Shaping the Curriculum - Exploring Integration - The Learner's Way - 11 views

thelearnersway.net/...rriculum-exploring-integration

curriculum integration learner teaching collaboration

shared by Nigel Coutts on 16 Oct 16 - No Cached
  • Nigel Coutts on 16 Oct 16
     
    After two days of talking about curriculum, integration, STEM, STEAM and HASS I am left with more questions than I started with. In some respects, the concept of curriculum integration is simple. It is after all something that Primary teachers almost take for granted. But for Senior and Tertiary educators the question of curriculum integration is inherently complex. At all levels questions emerge of what curriculum integration might achieve, what purposes it serves, what it could and should look like and how it should be supported by curriculum planners. In the current climate, with its debate around the role of education within an innovation economy, shaped by technology and confronting demands for a STEAM enabled workforce the shape of our curriculum is under pressure. 
David Wetzel

Integrating Technology into Project Based Learning - 0 views

www.teachscienceandmath.com/...logy-in-project-based-learning

audacity flickr glogster google docs interacitve posters itunes podcasts presentations project based learning slideshows Technology voicethread web 20 tools

shared by David Wetzel on 02 Apr 10 - Cached
  • David Wetzel on 02 Apr 10
     
    "Integration of technology is an integral part of project based learning, because technology is an integral part of life outside the classroom as revealed in this part of the definition - "types of learning and work people do in the everyday world outside the classroom.""
Net Volution

Ten Steps to Better Student Engagement | Edutopia - 0 views

www.edutopia.org/t-learning-teaching-strategies

shared by Net Volution on 19 Mar 09 - Cached
  • Net Volution on 19 Mar 09
     
    Thousands of articles, videos, slide shows, expert interviews, blog entries, and other resources highlight success stories in K-12 education. Core concepts include integrated studies, project learning,technology integration, teacher development, social and emotional learning, and assessment." /> text/html; charset=utf-8
Steve Ransom

Technology in Schools Faces Questions on Value - NYTimes.com - 9 views

www.nytimes.com/...-faces-questions-on-value.html

technology schools change critique measurement effectiveness integration

shared by Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11 - No Cached
  • Critics counter that, absent clear proof, schools are being motivated by a blind faith in technology and an overemphasis on digital skills — like using PowerPoint and multimedia tools — at the expense of math, reading and writing fundamentals. They say the technology advocates have it backward when they press to upgrade first and ask questions later.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      A valid criticism when technology implementation is decoupled from meaningful and effective pedagogy. You can't buy measurable change/improvement.
  • district was innovating
  • how the district was innovating.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Again, this is very different than how TEACHERS are innovating their PRACTICES. It's much more challenging than making a slick brochure that communicates how much technology your district has.
  • ...23 more annotations...
  • there is no good way to quantify those achievements — putting them in a tough spot with voters deciding whether to bankroll this approach again
  • “We’ve jumped on bandwagons for different eras without knowing fully what we’re doing. This might just be the new bandwagon,” he said. “I hope not.”
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      There's a confidence building statement for you....
  • $46.3 million for laptops, classroom projectors, networking gear and other technology for teachers and administrators.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Exactly... and how much was spent on equipping teachers to change their practices to effectively leverage this new infrastructure?
  • If we know something works
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      And what is that "something"? New technology? If so, you missed the boat.
  • it is hard to separate the effect of the laptops from the effect of the teacher training
  • The high-level analyses that sum up these various studies, not surprisingly, give researchers pause about whether big investments in technology make sense.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Why does the argument for making schools relevant and using current cultural tools need to be backed with performance data? Give politicians and superintendents horses instead of cars and see how long that lasts.
  • Good teachers, he said, can make good use of computers, while bad teachers won’t, and they and their students could wind up becoming distracted by the technology.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Finally, a valid point.
  • “Test scores are the same, but look at all the other things students are doing: learning to use the Internet to research, learning to organize their work, learning to use professional writing tools, learning to collaborate with others.”
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Exactly. But somehow, "value" has been equated with test scores alone. Do we have a strong body of research on pencil effectiveness or clay effectiveness or chair effectiveness?
  • “It’s not the stuff that counts — it’s what you do with it that matters.”
  • “There is a connection between the physical hand on the paper and the words on the page,” she said. “It’s intimate.”
  • “They’re inundated with 24/7 media, so they expect it,”
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      And you expect them to always engage enthusiastically with tools that are no longer relevant in their culture?
  • The 30 students in the classroom held wireless clickers into which they punched their answers. Seconds later, a pie chart appeared on the screen: 23 percent answered “True,” 70 percent “False,” and 6 percent didn’t know.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Okay... and you follow up with a totally trivial example of the power of technology in learning.
  • term” that can slide past critical analysis.
  • engagement is a “fluffy
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Very true
  • rofessor Cuban at Stanford argues that keeping children engaged requires an environment of constant novelty, which cannot be sustained.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      If that is so, why not back up your claim by linking to the source here. I have a feeling he has been misquoted and taken out of context here.
  • that computers can distract and not instruct.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Computers don't really "instruct". That's why we have teachers who are supposed to know what they are doing and why they are doing it... and monitoring kids while keeping learning meaningful.
  • guide on the side.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      But many teachers are simply not prepared for how to do this effectively. To ignore this fact is just naive.
  • Professor Cuban at Stanford
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Are they in love with Cuban or something? Perhaps they should actually look at the research... or interview other authorities. Isn't that what reporting is all about? I think this reporter must be a product of too much Google, right?
  • But she loves the fact that her two children, a fourth-grader and first-grader, are learning technology, including PowerPoint
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Again, the fact that any supporter is happy that their kids are learning PowerPoint illustrates the degree of naiveté in their understanding of technology's role in learning.
  • creating an impetus to rethink education entirely
  • Mr. Share bases his buying decisions on two main factors: what his teachers tell him they need, and his experience. For instance, he said he resisted getting the interactive whiteboards sold as Smart Boards until, one day in 2008, he saw a teacher trying to mimic the product with a jury-rigged projector setup. “It was an ‘Aha!’ moment,” he said, leading him to buy Smart Boards, made by a company called Smart Technologies.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Herein lies another huge problem. Mr. Director of Technology seems to base no decisions on what the learning and technology literature have to say... nor does he consult those who would be considered authorities on technology infused learning (emphasis on learning here)
  • This is big business.
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      No kidding.
  • “Do we really need technology to learn?” she said. “It’s a very valid time to ask the question, right before this goes on the ballot.”
    • Steve Ransom
      Steve Ransom on 04 Sep 11
       
      Anyone who asks that should volunteer to have their home and work computer confiscated. After all, it's just a distraction, right?
Lucy Gray

Technology Integration Matrix - 84 views

fcit.usf.edu/...gradelevel.php

integration matrix lessons

shared by Lucy Gray on 02 Aug 11 - No Cached
  • Lucy Gray on 02 Aug 11
     
    This page provides a breakdown of videos within the Technology Integration Matrix by grade level. Although you may be primarily interested in a particular level, we encourage you to view the ways in which technology is used in other grade levels. For example, you will find videos of high school classrooms in which the technology tools could be used in the same way with middle school or elementary level students. Some videos involve students from both middle and high school grades and some involve students from both middle and elementary grades. These videos appear in both lists below.
  • Peggy George on 03 Aug 11
     
    The Florida Tech Integration Matrix is fantastic and the AZ K12 Center has also created a tech matrix modeled after it that incorporates AZ tech standards. Do you happen to know where we might find any of the teacher evaluation rubrics or tools for the Florida Tech Integration Matrix? Even self-evaluation, reflection rubrics for teachers to use would be incredibly valuable. If you haven't seen the AZ Tech Matrix you can check it out here: http://azk12.org/tim/
  • anonymous on 08 Aug 11
     
    Welcome to my website thi truong bat dong san DAT BINH DUONG you'll have new look into Vietnamese real estate. Dat Binh Duong | Mua Ban Nha Dat | Dong Do Dai Pho | Can Ho Anh Tuan
Ruth Howard

Students as 'Free Agent Learners' : April 2009 : THE Journal - 0 views

www.thejournal.com/...24308_3

learning learners curriculum collaboration future of education games technology

shared by Ruth Howard on 02 May 09 - No Cached
  • 51 percent of teachers are interested in learning how to integrate gaming into daily learning activities;
  • Sixty-five percent said it appeals to different learning styles; another 65 percent said it increases student engagement. Others said it allows for student-centered learning (47 percent), helps develop problem-solving and critical thinking skills (40 percent), helps develop creativity (39 percent), allows students to gain experience through trial and error (37 percent), and helps students visualize difficult concepts (35 percent).
  • Of those who have some interest in gaming, responses were varied as to its value in education. Sixty-five percent said it appeals to different learning styles; another 65 percent said it increases student engagement. Others said it allows for student-centered learning (47 percent), helps develop problem-solving and critical thinking skills (40 percent), helps develop creativity (39 percent), allows students to gain experience through trial and error (37 percent), and helps students visualize difficult concepts (35 percent).
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Of those who have some interest in gaming, responses were varied as to its value in education. Sixty-five percent said it appeals to different learning styles; another 65 percent said it increases student engagement. Others said it allows for student-centered learning (47 percent), helps develop problem-solving and critical thinking skills (40 percent), helps develop creativity (39 percent), allows students to gain experience through trial and error (37 percent), and helps students visualize difficult concepts (35 percent).
  • Ruth Howard on 02 May 09
     
    Students want more control over their own learning experiences through technology and want to define their own educational destinies and determine the direction of their learning. "This free agent learner is one that is technology-enabled, technology-empowered, and technology-engaged to be ... an important part of driving their own educational destiny. To some extent they feel ... it's a responsibility. They also feel it's a right to be able to do that. So technology has enabled this free agent learner. We have the opportunity in education to make sure they're on the right track and to be supportive of their learning experiences." Ive been waiting for this! This is exciting it points to the idea that students will co-create their curriculum. In my mind it will become imperitive that individuals choose their highest bliss-subjects and projects that reflect their passions. In the new collaborative work environments students will be more highly valued for their contributions to areas that they are most naturally motivated to explore. Their resulting contributions will result in inventiveness and cutting edge investigations via passion, self motivation and peer inspiration and direct access to thought leaders/mentors in the field. Teachers might become guides to ensuring students intentions are achieved- teachers as arbiters of human potential. Students will no longer be compared to each other. They will score according to their own self affirmed destinations-allowing of course for reviews and changes of destiny.Teachers might also need roles in law and ethics to ensure students are safe in their online world activities, monitoring students and their online peers, intercepting or prompting inside the conversations?
  • Ruth Howard on 02 May 09
     
    Of those who have some interest in gaming, responses were varied as to its value in education. Sixty-five percent said it appeals to different learning styles; another 65 percent said it increases student engagement. Others said it allows for student-centered learning (47 percent), helps develop problem-solving and critical thinking skills (40 percent), helps develop creativity (39 percent), allows students to gain experience through trial and error (37 percent), and helps students visualize difficult concepts (35 percent). But perhaps the most significant trend in education technology, Evans said, is the emergence of the student as a "free agent learner": Students want more control over their own learning experiences through technology and want to define their own educational destinies and determine the direction of their learning. "This free agent learner is one that is technology-enabled, technology-empowered, and technology-engaged to be ... an important part of driving their own educational destiny. To some extent they feel ... it's a responsibility. They also feel it's a right to be able to do that. So technology has enabled this free agent learner. We have the opportunity in education to make sure they're on the right track and to be supportive of their learning experiences."
J Black

Web 2.0 Tools - Web 2.0 That Works: Marzano & Web 2.0 - 4 views

www.web2thatworks.com/index.php

marzano web2.0 tools technology education

shared by J Black on 13 Feb 09 - Cached
  • J Black on 13 Feb 09
     
    Web 2.0 Tools From Web 2.0 That Works: Marzano & Web 2.0 Jump to: navigation, search Master List of Web 2.0 Tools "Y" Under each category indicates that this tool can be used with this strategy. "Free +" Indicates that the tool is free at the basic level, but that more advanced versions are available at a cost. Category Key: SD = Identifying Similarities and Differences CL = Cooperative Learning SNT = Summarizing and Note-Taking ER = Reinforcing Effort and Providing Recognition HP = Homework and Practice NR = Nonlinguistic Representation OF = Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback HYP = Generating and Testing Hypotheses QCO = Questions, Cues, and Advance Organizers Tool Link Desc Cost SD CL SNT ER HP NR OF HYP QCO Notes Ajax13 [[1]] Online Graphic Editor Free Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Requires Firefox 1.5 (or higher) Browser Backpack [[2]] Online Personal Organizer Free + Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Basecamp [[3]] Online Project Collaboration Free + Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Blogger [[4]] Blog Hosting Website Free Y Y Y Y Y Y bubbl.us [[5]] Online Brainstorming Free Y Y Y Y del.icio.us [[6]] Online Social Bookmarks Free Y Y Y Y Diigo [[7]] Online Social Annotation Free Y Y Y Y Y Y EditGrid [[8]] Online Spreadsheets Free + Y Y Y Y Y Integrates with Facebook and iPhone EduBlogs [[9]] Blog Hosting Website Free Y Y Y Y Y Y Exploratree [[10]] Online Graphic Organizer Free Y Y Y Y Y Y Interactive, pre-made graphic organizers that can be edited online Flickr [[11]] Photo Hosting Website Free + Y Y Y Y Part of Zoho Suite of Online Apps Gliffy [[12]] Online Diagramming Software Free + Y Y Y Google Documents [[13]] Online Word Processor Free Y Y Y Y Y Y Also contains Spreadsheets & Presentations Google Earth [[14]] Dynamic Global Geographic App Free Y Y Downloads to computer Google Maps [[15]] Online Ma
Nik Peachey

Development - ELT and the Crisis in Education: Technology in the Classroom | Delta Publ... - 0 views

www.deltapublishing.co.uk/...on-technology-in-the-classroom

web2.0 tefl edtech education

shared by Nik Peachey on 11 Jan 11 - No Cached
  • Nik Peachey on 11 Jan 11
     
    "One of the most common criticisms leveled at teachers who do attempt to integrate technology into their classroom environment, is that this often results in a lot of 'faffing around' or time wasted while struggling to get the technology to work properly. To some extent I feel that this criticism is fair, but I don't think it's a criticism that should be leveled at teachers, but would be better directed at the people who control the way technology is layered onto the classroom environment, so lets look at that."
  • Nik Peachey on 11 Jan 11
     
    ne of the most common criticisms leveled at teachers who do attempt to integrate technology into their classroom environment, is that this often results in a lot of 'faffing around' or time wasted while struggling to get the technology to work properly. To some extent I feel that this criticism is fair, but I don't think it's a criticism that should be leveled at teachers, but would be better directed at the people who control the way technology is layered onto the classroom environment, so lets look at that.
Hare Marke

Buy Google 5 Star Reviews - 100% Non-Drop,Safe,Real 5 Star Reviews.... - 0 views

realserviceit.com/...buy-google-5-star-reviews

education technology web2.0 learning tools teaching resources collaboration science Free

shared by Hare Marke on 26 Jul 23 - No Cached
  • nathanielcowan54 on 26 Jul 23
     
    Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Introduction If you have a business and need to get more customers, the Google 5 Star Reviews service is an excellent way to do it. This will help your business get more customers on the internet and grow its brand. Google 5-Star Reviews Service The Google reviews service is a way to get 5-star reviews from your customers. It's a very simple process and can be completed in just a few minutes, which makes it ideal for businesses that want to improve their online reputation but don't have time or money for traditional marketing techniques. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Google Reviews Service Costs: There are three different ways you can use this service: You can pay $3 per review submitted through the Google site; You can pay $10 per month (or $99 annually), which includes an integrated email address where they will send out all customer emails sent by you; Or you can pay $25 per month (or $250 annually), which includes access to all other features of our platform as well as automated scheduling capabilities so that we know when exactly each company should post its latest review! Can you pay for 5 star google reviews? Yes, you can buy Google 5 Star Reviews. You can pay for verified Google 5 Star Reviews and reviews from people that have been working in the service industry for years. You can get a lot of information about a business or individual on Google by searching their name or title and seeing what comes up in the search results. If this person has written reviews on Google then they are probably telling you the truth about their experience with that company or individual. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews We're not just talking about content either-we mean real time human interaction that actually takes place between two living, breathing humans who happen to be talking face-to-face right now! Why should you buy google 5 star reviews from online? We are the best platform for you to get your business listed in Google. We have an exper
  • ...4 more comments...
  • wallaceclient56 on 02 Aug 23
     
    Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Introduction If you have a business and need to get more customers, the Google 5 Star Reviews service is an excellent way to do it. This will help your business get more customers on the internet and grow its brand. Google 5-Star Reviews Service The Google reviews service is a way to get 5-star reviews from your customers. It's a very simple process and can be completed in just a few minutes, which makes it ideal for businesses that want to improve their online reputation but don't have time or money for traditional marketing techniques. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Google Reviews Service Costs: There are three different ways you can use this service: You can pay $3 per review submitted through the Google site; You can pay $10 per month (or $99 annually), which includes an integrated email address where they will send out all customer emails sent by you; Or you can pay $25 per month (or $250 annually), which includes access to all other features of our platform as well as automated scheduling capabilities so that we know when exactly each company should post its latest review! Can you pay for 5 star google reviews? Yes, you can buy Google 5 Star Reviews. You can pay for verified Google 5 Star Reviews and reviews from people that have been working in the service industry for years. You can get a lot of information about a business or individual on Google by searching their name or title and seeing what comes up in the search results. If this person has written reviews on Google then they are probably telling you the truth about their experience with that company or individual. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews We're not just talking about content either-we mean real time human interaction that actually takes place between two living, breathing humans who happen to be talking face-to-face right now! Why should you buy google 5 star reviews from online? We are the best platform for you to get your business listed in Google. We have an exper
  • wallaceclient56 on 02 Aug 23
     
    Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Introduction If you have a business and need to get more customers, the Google 5 Star Reviews service is an excellent way to do it. This will help your business get more customers on the internet and grow its brand. Google 5-Star Reviews Service The Google reviews service is a way to get 5-star reviews from your customers. It's a very simple process and can be completed in just a few minutes, which makes it ideal for businesses that want to improve their online reputation but don't have time or money for traditional marketing techniques. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Google Reviews Service Costs: There are three different ways you can use this service: You can pay $3 per review submitted through the Google site; You can pay $10 per month (or $99 annually), which includes an integrated email address where they will send out all customer emails sent by you; Or you can pay $25 per month (or $250 annually), which includes access to all other features of our platform as well as automated scheduling capabilities so that we know when exactly each company should post its latest review! Can you pay for 5 star google reviews? Yes, you can buy Google 5 Star Reviews. You can pay for verified Google 5 Star Reviews and reviews from people that have been working in the service industry for years. You can get a lot of information about a business or individual on Google by searching their name or title and seeing what comes up in the search results. If this person has written reviews on Google then they are probably telling you the truth about their experience with that company or individual. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews We're not just talking about content either-we mean real time human interaction that actually takes place between two living, breathing humans who happen to be talking face-to-face right now! Why should you buy google 5 star reviews from online? We are the best platform for you to get your business listed in Google. We have an exper
  • nathanielcowan54 on 04 Aug 23
     
    Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Introduction If you have a business and need to get more customers, the Google 5 Star Reviews service is an excellent way to do it. This will help your business get more customers on the internet and grow its brand. Google 5-Star Reviews Service The Google reviews service is a way to get 5-star reviews from your customers. It's a very simple process and can be completed in just a few minutes, which makes it ideal for businesses that want to improve their online reputation but don't have time or money for traditional marketing techniques. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Google Reviews Service Costs: There are three different ways you can use this service: You can pay $3 per review submitted through the Google site; You can pay $10 per month (or $99 annually), which includes an integrated email address where they will send out all customer emails sent by you; Or you can pay $25 per month (or $250 annually), which includes access to all other features of our platform as well as automated scheduling capabilities so that we know when exactly each company should post its latest review! Can you pay for 5 star google reviews? Yes, you can buy Google 5 Star Reviews. You can pay for verified Google 5 Star Reviews and reviews from people that have been working in the service industry for years. You can get a lot of information about a business or individual on Google by searching their name or title and seeing what comes up in the search results. If this person has written reviews on Google then they are probably telling you the truth about their experience with that company or individual. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews We're not just talking about content either-we mean real time human interaction that actually takes place between two living, breathing humans who happen to be talking face-to-face right now! Why should you buy google 5 star reviews from online? We are the best platform for you to get your business listed in Google. We have an exper
  • wallaceclient56 on 17 Aug 23
     
    Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Introduction If you have a business and need to get more customers, the Google 5 Star Reviews service is an excellent way to do it. This will help your business get more customers on the internet and grow its brand. Google 5-Star Reviews Service The Google reviews service is a way to get 5-star reviews from your customers. It's a very simple process and can be completed in just a few minutes, which makes it ideal for businesses that want to improve their online reputation but don't have time or money for traditional marketing techniques. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Google Reviews Service Costs: There are three different ways you can use this service: You can pay $3 per review submitted through the Google site; You can pay $10 per month (or $99 annually), which includes an integrated email address where they will send out all customer emails sent by you; Or you can pay $25 per month (or $250 annually), which includes access to all other features of our platform as well as automated scheduling capabilities so that we know when exactly each company should post its latest review! Can you pay for 5 star google reviews? Yes, you can buy Google 5 Star Reviews. You can pay for verified Google 5 Star Reviews and reviews from people that have been working in the service industry for years. You can get a lot of information about a business or individual on Google by searching their name or title and seeing what comes up in the search results. If this person has written reviews on Google then they are probably telling you the truth about their experience with that company or individual. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews We're not just talking about content either-we mean real time human interaction that actually takes place between two living, breathing humans who happen to be talking face-to-face right now! Why should you buy google 5 star reviews from online? We are the best platform for you to get your business listed in Google. We have an exper
  • marciabeard on 30 Dec 23
     
    Google Reviews Service Costs: There are three different ways you can use this service: You can pay $3 per review submitted through the Google site; You can pay $10 per month (or $99 annually), which includes an integrated email address where they will send out all customer emails sent by you; Or you can pay $25 per month (or $250 annually), which includes access to all other features of our platform as well as automated scheduling capabilities so that we know when exactly each company should post its latest review! Can you pay for 5 star google reviews? Yes, you can buy Google 5 Star Reviews. You can pay for verified Google 5 Star Reviews and reviews from people that have been working in the service industry for years. You can get a lot of information about a business or individual on Google by searching their name or title and seeing what comes up in the search results. If this person has written reviews on Google then they are probably telling you the truth about their experience with that company or individual. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews We're not just talking about content either-we mean real time human interaction that actually takes place between two living, breathing humans who happen to be talking face-to-face right now! Why should you buy google 5 star reviews from online? We are the best platform for you to get your business listed in Google. We have an experienced team that can do it for you, and we provide all the tools, such as automation and reporting, so that your website or listing is optimized for search engines. We also have a large network of people who are willing to write reviews about your products or services online as well as offline because they know how important it is for them to give an honest opinion about what they have used before purchasing anything online or offline from another company's brand name (you). This means that when someone searches for "buy google 5 star reviews" using their own search engine or smartphone a
  • Hare Marke on 18 Apr 24
     
    Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Introduction If you have a business and need to get more customers, the Google 5 Star Reviews service is an excellent way to do it. This will help your business get more customers on the internet and grow its brand. Google 5-Star Reviews Service The Google reviews service is a way to get 5-star reviews from your customers. It's a very simple process and can be completed in just a few minutes, which makes it ideal for businesses that want to improve their online reputation but don't have time or money for traditional marketing techniques. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews Google Reviews Service Costs: There are three different ways you can use this service: You can pay $3 per review submitted through the Google site; You can pay $10 per month (or $99 annually), which includes an integrated email address where they will send out all customer emails sent by you; Or you can pay $25 per month (or $250 annually), which includes access to all other features of our platform as well as automated scheduling capabilities so that we know when exactly each company should post its latest review! Can you pay for 5 star google reviews? Yes, you can buy Google 5 Star Reviews. You can pay for verified Google 5 Star Reviews and reviews from people that have been working in the service industry for years. You can get a lot of information about a business or individual on Google by searching their name or title and seeing what comes up in the search results. If this person has written reviews on Google then they are probably telling you the truth about their experience with that company or individual. Buy Google 5 Star Reviews We're not just talking about content either-we mean real time human interaction that actually takes place between two living, breathing humans who happen to be talking face-to-face right now! Why should you buy google 5 star reviews from online? We are the best platform for you to get your business listed in Google. We have an exper
Tom Daccord

Teaching History With Technology - 1 views

thwt.org

history technology teaching socialstudies web2.0 Tom Daccord thwt.org thwt edtech

shared by Tom Daccord on 07 Jun 09 - Cached
  • Tom Daccord on 07 Jun 09
     
    EdTechTeacher.org presents The Center for Teaching History with Technology, a resource created to help K-12 history and social studies teachers incorporate technology effectively into their courses. Find resources for histlaptop classory and social studies lesson plans, activities, projects, games, and quizzes that use technology. Explore inquiry-based lessons, activities, and projects. Learn about new and emerging technologies such as blogs, podcasts, wikis, ipods, and online social networks and explore innnovative ways of integrating them into the curriculum. Find out how others are using technology in the classroom.
Neil O'Sullivan

Technology Integration Research Review | Edutopia - 1 views

www.edutopia.org/ion-research-learning-outcomes

technology research education integration

shared by Neil O'Sullivan on 05 Aug 13 - No Cached
  • Neil O'Sullivan on 05 Aug 13
     
    Technology Integration Research Review
Jim Farmer

Twelve Essentials for Technology Integration - 1 views

content.yudu.com/...index.htm

technology integration Web2.0 essentials resources education

shared by Jim Farmer on 26 Jul 09 - Cached
  • Jim Farmer on 26 Jul 09
     
    12 Free services for integrating technology easily into a classroom. From blogging to video sites. Short reviews and links to some great resources.
peter Woodhead

Technology Integration Matrix - 97 views

fcit.usf.edu/matrix.php

matrix professional_development teachers integration techintegration

shared by peter Woodhead on 17 Jan 12 - No Cached
  • Judy Robison on 17 Jan 12
     
    "The Technology Integration Matrix (TIM) illustrates how teachers can use technology to enhance learning for K-12 students. The TIM incorporates five interdependent characteristics of meaningful learning environments: active, constructive, goal directed (i.e., reflective), authentic, and collaborative (Jonassen, Howland, Moore, & Marra, 2003). The TIM associates five levels of technology integration (i.e., entry, adoption, adaptation, infusion, and transformation) with each of the five characteristics of meaningful learning environments. Together, the five levels of technology integration and the five characteristics of meaningful learning environments create a matrix of 25 cells "
Jeff Johnson

Generation YES » Youth & Educators Succeeding - 0 views

www.genyes.com

technology education collaboration students teaching GenYes web2.0 teachers

shared by Jeff Johnson on 21 Jan 09 - Cached
  • Jeff Johnson on 21 Jan 09
     
    GenYES is an innovative program that creates 21st century leaders and learners. GenYES students help teachers use technology in classrooms, supporting effective technology integration school-wide. Eleven years of research proves GenYES empowers students and changes the way teachers integrate technology in their lessons.
Dwayne Abrahams

Tools for the TEKS: Integrating Technology in the Classroom - 47 views

www.wtvi.com/teks

technology education web2.0 edtech integration resources tools

shared by Dwayne Abrahams on 10 Apr 10 - Cached
  • Dwayne Abrahams on 10 Apr 10
     
    This website is maintained for K-16 educators interested in the effective use of technology in the classroom. An accompanying column to this website is published in the TechEdge, the Technology and Education Newsletter of the Texas Computer Education Association. Many are also reprinted with permission by Technology and Learning Magazine, for whom I servde as the "IT guy" in the past.
  • Dwayne Abrahams on 10 Apr 10
     
    This website is maintained for K-16 educators interested in the effective use of technology in the classroom. An accompanying column to this website is published in the TechEdge, the Technology and Education Newsletter of the Texas Computer Education Association. Many are also reprinted with permission by Technology and Learning Magazine, for whom I servde as the "IT guy" in the past.
Paul Beaufait

Making Mistakes is Important to Learning - 36 views

blog.wiziq.com/takes-is-important-to-learning

education emotional intelligence learning mistakes teaching teaching practices technology

shared by Paul Beaufait on 08 Aug 12 - No Cached
  • The integration of technology into the curriculum will not succeed unless teachers are allowed to make mistakes as they practice, explore, conceptualize, and collaborate with their peers and instructors.
  • Paul Beaufait on 08 Aug 12
     
    Dr. Nellie Deutsch (2012.08.03) argued that in order to successfully integrate technology to teachers' practices, they must endeavour "to embrace their mistakes" (Fear of Making Mistakes, ¶2), with personal as well as technological support (Technology at School, & Teachers Need Support).
David Wetzel

To Blog or Not To Blog in Science or Math Class - 0 views

www.teachscienceandmath.com/...-blog-in-science-or-math-class

blogging technology education learning science teach and math why create blog web project strategies based teaching

shared by David Wetzel on 12 Aug 10 - Cached
  • David Wetzel on 12 Aug 10
     
    The primary purpose of blog is to facilitate interaction between a teacher and his or her students. This is possible because a blog is a dynamic tool which can be easily updated or transformed as necessary to meet the needs of a science or math class. The integration of blog technology in a class requires an investment of time. Because of this commitment, additional evidence is needed to support the integration this technology in a science or math class curriculum.
Chris McEnroe

Technology Integration - Technology Integration for Teachers - 38 views

www.techforteachers.net/technology-integration.html

shared by Chris McEnroe on 06 Dec 09 - Cached
  • Mario Pires on 06 Dec 09
     
    "This set of guidelines helps outline best practices in integration, where technology is used as a tool to enhance the teaching and learning experience. When designing classroom activities that utilize computers, it's important to focus on the pedagogy, not the computer skill. As the following outline indicates, pre-teaching and utilizing planning materials like graphic organizers help improve the process. This information will help teachers that are just beginning the process of using technology to help the students learn in new ways."
1 - 20 of 195 Next › Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page