Skip to main content

Home/ Classroom 2.0/ Group items tagged open source

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Hare Marke

Buy Glassdoor Reviews - 100% Non-Drop,Safe, Permanent, Cheap ... - 0 views

  •  
    Are glassdoor reviews reliable Glassdoor reviews are not a guarantee of job security. They aren't a guarantee of job performance, either-you can get a bad review, even if you're doing great in your current role. And they aren't guaranteed to tell you everything about the company or organization that posted them: some companies might be more transparent than others, while others may hide certain aspects from their employees in order to maintain secrecy (this is common practice). Buy Glassdoor Reviews Glassdoor reviews also don't necessarily reflect what potential employees will find when they start working there; sometimes people say nice things about an employer because they want something from them but have no intention of actually taking it up when they apply for jobs there! In fact, Glassdoor reviews can be pretty misleading because they fail at capturing all aspects related to what makes an organization great as well as how happy its employees feel working there-but this isn't always intentional; sometimes employers just don't care enough about how their workers feel about themselves or their jobs at all! Buying Glassdoor reviews can help you hire great sales and marketing talent. Buying Glassdoor reviews can help you hire great sales and marketing talent. Glassdoor is a trusted source of information about companies, jobs and industries. It's also one of the best places to find out what employees think about their employers and peers in the industry. When you buy glassdoor reviews, it's important to know that they're safe, permanent and cheap! You'll also get reliable data from people who have worked at your target company or job before (or are currently working there). Buy Positive Glassdoor Reviews When you're looking for a job, it can be difficult to find the right company and job. If you have no experience in sales or marketing, finding the right role may feel impossible. However, if you buy positive Glassdoor reviews from truste
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    Are glassdoor reviews reliable Glassdoor reviews are not a guarantee of job security. They aren't a guarantee of job performance, either-you can get a bad review, even if you're doing great in your current role. And they aren't guaranteed to tell you everything about the company or organization that posted them: some companies might be more transparent than others, while others may hide certain aspects from their employees in order to maintain secrecy (this is common practice). Buy Glassdoor Reviews Glassdoor reviews also don't necessarily reflect what potential employees will find when they start working there; sometimes people say nice things about an employer because they want something from them but have no intention of actually taking it up when they apply for jobs there! In fact, Glassdoor reviews can be pretty misleading because they fail at capturing all aspects related to what makes an organization great as well as how happy its employees feel working there-but this isn't always intentional; sometimes employers just don't care enough about how their workers feel about themselves or their jobs at all! Buying Glassdoor reviews can help you hire great sales and marketing talent. Buying Glassdoor reviews can help you hire great sales and marketing talent. Glassdoor is a trusted source of information about companies, jobs and industries. It's also one of the best places to find out what employees think about their employers and peers in the industry. When you buy glassdoor reviews, it's important to know that they're safe, permanent and cheap! You'll also get reliable data from people who have worked at your target company or job before (or are currently working there). Buy Positive Glassdoor Reviews When you're looking for a job, it can be difficult to find the right company and job. If you have no experience in sales or marketing, finding the right role may feel impossible. However, if you buy positive Glassdoor reviews from truste
  •  
    What are the Benefits of Glassdoor Reviews? Glassdoor Reviews are an excellent way to find out more about a company before you apply for a job there. They can help you decide whether or not to apply for a job at a company, or if the company is right for you. Glassdoor Reviews are also valuable because they give employees an opportunity to voice their opinions on various aspects of their jobs and life at the company. Why is it necessary to obtain Glassdoor reviews? There are many reasons to obtain Glassdoor reviews. The first is that they're a good way to find out what other people think about a company, both from the perspective of how employees feel about it, and also from the perspective of customers who have interacted with them. The second reason is that Glassdoor reviews can help you decide whether or not you want to work for a certain company. They provide insight into: Buy Glassdoor Reviews How successful the company has been (i.e., their revenue growth rate) What kind of culture exists within their organization (i.e., how open-minded are employees about different points-of-view?) How does glassdoor verify reviews Glassdoor reviews are verified by a third party to ensure that the reviews are genuine. The company has its own verification process, which includes verifying the identity of each reviewer and checking their employment history, educational background and other details. This ensures that you're getting a realistic picture of what the worker actually thinks about working at your company. Buy Glassdoor Reviews Glassdoor Reviews Are glassdoor reviews reliable Glassdoor reviews are not a guarantee of job security. They aren't a guarantee of job performance, either-you can get a bad review, even if you're doing great in your current role. And they aren't guaranteed to tell you everything about the company or organization that posted them: some companies might be more transparent than others, while others may hide certain aspects from their
  •  
    Buy Glassdoor Reviews Introduction Glassdoor is a website that allows you to review different companies and jobs. It's an easy way to find out what other people think about your favorite employers or job opportunities. Glassdoor reviews are important because they can help you make an educated decision about whether or not to work for a particular company or hire someone for a specific position. What is Glassdoor? Glassdoor is a company that allows employees to review their employers anonymously. The purpose of Glassdoor is to give you the information you need to make your best possible decision about where you want to work, so that you can find the job that will fit into your life and career goals. Buy Glassdoor Reviews We're sure there are a lot of people out there who want an honest review about their current or previous employer-and we're happy we can provide this service for them! What are the Benefits of Glassdoor Reviews? Glassdoor Reviews are an excellent way to find out more about a company before you apply for a job there. They can help you decide whether or not to apply for a job at a company, or if the company is right for you. Glassdoor Reviews are also valuable because they give employees an opportunity to voice their opinions on various aspects of their jobs and life at the company. Why is it necessary to obtain Glassdoor reviews? There are many reasons to obtain Glassdoor reviews. The first is that they're a good way to find out what other people think about a company, both from the perspective of how employees feel about it, and also from the perspective of customers who have interacted with them. The second reason is that Glassdoor reviews can help you decide whether or not you want to work for a certain company. They provide insight into: Buy Glassdoor Reviews How successful the company has been (i.e., their revenue growth rate) What kind of culture exists within their organization (i.e., how open-minded are employees about different
Siobhan Chapman

UK Schools ICT: Everything has changed - 0 views

  •  
    UK has axed the education IT government quango BECTA. What's more, UK is looking at Open source software and the Dell Streak. But John Spencer predicts anarchy.
  •  
    UK has axed the education IT government quango BECTA. What's more, UK is looking at Open source software and the Dell Streak. But John Spencer predicts anarchy.
Ted Curran

[Must Read!] Advice for Small Schools on the LMS Selection Process | e-Literate - 0 views

  • Migration is inevitable:
  • Migration can be an opportunity:
  • All of these systems are pretty good: It’s easy to get worried about making a “wrong” decision and picking the “inferior” product. The truth of the matter is that, given the needs of your institution (both present and foreseeable future), any of the major systems available in the US that I have some familiarity with (ANGEL, Blackboard, Desire2Learn, Moodle, and Sakai) will provide you with adequate functionality.
  • ...14 more annotations...
  • Accept the possibility that you may have Stockholm Syndrome:
  • If you are an LMS support person, then it is likely that you are too close to the day-to-day operations to have good perspective on all aspects of how well your current system is meeting your school’s needs. Make sure you get input from people with a broad range of experiences, roles, and perspectives.
  • All of these systems are pretty bad:
  • all of these systems will probably fare pretty well. But part of that is because our expectations are low. The state of the art in LMS design is frankly not great.
  • Having a system with 39,000 seldom-used features that require a course to learn how to use is not as valuable to you as having a system with 39 features that most people will find useful and can figure out how to use on their own.
  • You may not be a good judge of usability:
  • a system seems easy to use once you know how to use it.
  • Your current faculty LMS heroes may be the worst judges of usability: There is nobody on your campus more likely to have Stockholm Syndrome than the faculty member who taught her first online class using your current LMS, has never used anything different, and has devoted literally hundreds of hours to optimising her course—squeezing every ounce of value out your current system by exploiting every weird little feature and even figuring out how to turn a couple of a couple of bugs to her advantage. There are ways in which her perspective will be extremely valuable to you (which I’ll get to shortly), but judging usability is not one of them.
  • Somebody who has taught using multiple LMS’s could be a good judge of usability: Faculty members who have taught using 2 or 3 (or more) LMS’s generally have some sense of what differences between platforms really matter and what differences don’t in a practical sense.
  • The quality of the support vendor is almost certainly more important than the quality of the software:
  • Don’t assume that you know what the deal is with open source:
  • Your relationship with your LMS is not that different than your relationship with GMail or Yahoo! Mail. It’s hosted on somebody else’s servers; you don’t know anything about the details of the software—the programming langauge it’s written in, how much of it is open source, what the architecture is, what hardware it runs on, etc.—and you don’t care.
  • What matters to you is that the thing that appears in your web browser works reliably and does what you need it to do. Go to the open source LMS support vendors. Tell them what your requirements and capabilities are. Either they will be able to meet your needs or they won’t. Don’t decide in advance of getting the facts.
  • Don’t worry too much about the long-term financial viability of the vendors:
ibcmass ibcmass

http://www.ibcmass.com/blogs/show/255 - 0 views

  •  
    Open Source 2.0 platform, created in Spain. Oificial Presentation.
  •  
    Presentación oficial TOG, Extensive open source Social Network Platform
Judy Robison

Free & Open Source Software Portal:Software/Science and Education/Physics - 0 views

  •  
    Free & Open Source Software Portal: Software: Science and Education: Physics
Judy Robison

Free & Open Source Software Portal:Software/Science and Education/Mathematics - 0 views

  •  
    Free & Open Source Software Portal: Software: Science and Education: Mathematics
Jeremy Davis

Appnr - Get Ubuntu Applications! - 0 views

  •  
    All the open source apps you could want
yc c

ShiftSpace | An open source layer above any webpage - 0 views

  •  
    ShiftSpace (pronounced: §) is an open source browser plugin for collaboratively annotating, editing and shifting the web.Annotate, hightlight, swap images, edit pages with a group
Mitch Weisburgh

Light and Matter: open-source physics textbooks - 0 views

  •  
    open source physics textbooks
Clay Leben

Comt open source commenting plugin - 0 views

  •  
    Collaborative writing software. Open source install on server or pay for hosted version. Write and revise proposals and see changes by all.
Shane Brewer

edbuzz.org » Revenge of the Edupunks - 20 views

  • The education futurists see the development of Web 2.0 as the final death knell of the 20th century learning model. The proliferation of open source learning tools, social media technology, mobile learning tools, and the ability of educators to cheaply and effectively construct rich, complex, individualized learning experiences for students is bound to revolutionize education.
  • In some ways, integrating technology with high school and college curriculum may seem like a simple task, but any experienced educator will tell you it’s definitely not. Shifting from a classroom mindset to an online mindset not only presents significant practical problems, but the transformation can be very difficult for teachers to conceptualize.
  • Although the potential benefits online learning presents are exciting, shifting the way educators think about teaching and learning is definitely not an easy task. Nevertheless, the more students and their parents demand highly individualized and inexpensive curriculum, educators will be forced to change the way they deliver instruction. The market forces that are shaping today’s schools will, at the most fundamental level, disrupt the current educational model. The problem we face as educators is deciding which tools we should use and the best ways to use them. Finding a solution to this problems might require the sort of radical thinking the edupunks like to embrace.
  •  
    "The education futurists see the development of Web 2.0 as the final death knell of the 20th century learning model. The proliferation of open source learning tools, social media technology, mobile learning tools, and the ability of educators to cheaply and effectively construct rich, complex, individualized learning experiences for students is bound to revolutionize education."
Judy Robison

Saylor Media Library - 33 views

  •  
    online Media Library, built on the open source DSpace repository platform, provides a growing list of about 6,000 total resources, including 3,000 open educational resources, 1,300 videos, 124 full-length textbooks, and 2,500 articles. Resources cover the arts, sciences, humanities, social sciences, engineering, business, and test prep. Materials include primary texts (such as Beowulf and Hamlet), references (such as the Catholic Encyclopedia), textbooks (such as The Electronic Introduction to Old English), maps, presentations, audio recordings, assessments, assignments, data sets, and others.
Carlos Quintero

Innovate: Future Learning Landscapes: Transforming Pedagogy through Social Software - 0 views

  • Web 2.0 has inspired intense and growing interest, particularly as wikis, weblogs (blogs), really simple syndication (RSS) feeds, social networking sites, tag-based folksonomies, and peer-to-peer media-sharing applications have gained traction in all sectors of the education industry (Allen 2004; Alexander 2006)
  • Web 2.0 allows customization, personalization, and rich opportunities for networking and collaboration, all of which offer considerable potential for addressing the needs of today's diverse student body (Bryant 2006).
  • In contrast to earlier e-learning approaches that simply replicated traditional models, the Web 2.0 movement with its associated array of social software tools offers opportunities to move away from the last century's highly centralized, industrial model of learning and toward individual learner empowerment through designs that focus on collaborative, networked interaction (Rogers et al. 2007; Sims 2006; Sheely 2006)
  • ...19 more annotations...
  • learning management systems (Exhibit 1).
  • The reality, however, is that today's students demand greater control of their own learning and the inclusion of technologies in ways that meet their needs and preferences (Prensky 2005)
  • Tools like blogs, wikis, media-sharing applications, and social networking sites can support and encourage informal conversation, dialogue, collaborative content generation, and knowledge sharing, giving learners access to a wide range of ideas and representations. Used appropriately, they promise to make truly learner-centered education a reality by promoting learner agency, autonomy, and engagement in social networks that straddle multiple real and virtual communities by reaching across physical, geographic, institutional, and organizational boundaries.
  • "I have always imagined the information space as something to which everyone has immediate and intuitive access, and not just to browse, but to create” (2000, 216). Social software tools make it easy to contribute ideas and content, placing the power of media creation and distribution into the hands of "the people formerly known as the audience" (Rosen 2006).
  • the most promising settings for a pedagogy that capitalizes on the capabilities of these tools are fully online or blended so that students can engage with peers, instructors, and the community in creating and sharing ideas. In this model, some learners engage in creative authorship, producing and manipulating digital images and video clips, tagging them with chosen keywords, and making this content available to peers worldwide through Flickr, MySpace, and YouTube
  • Student-centered tasks designed by constructivist teachers reach toward this ideal, but they too often lack the dimension of real-world interactivity and community engagement that social software can contribute.
  • Pedagogy 2.0: Teaching and Learning for the Knowledge Age In striving to achieve these goals, educators need to revisit their conceptualization of teaching and learning (Exhibit 2).
  • Pedagogy 2.0: Teaching and Learning for the Knowledge Age In striving to achieve these goals, educators need to revisit their conceptualization of teaching and learning
  • Pedagogy 2.0 is defined by: Content: Microunits that augment thinking and cognition by offering diverse perspectives and representations to learners and learner-generated resources that accrue from students creating, sharing, and revising ideas; Curriculum: Syllabi that are not fixed but dynamic, open to negotiation and learner input, consisting of bite-sized modules that are interdisciplinary in focus and that blend formal and informal learning;Communication: Open, peer-to-peer, multifaceted communication using multiple media types to achieve relevance and clarity;Process: Situated, reflective, integrated thinking processes that are iterative, dynamic, and performance and inquiry based;Resources: Multiple informal and formal sources that are rich in media and global in reach;Scaffolds: Support for students from a network of peers, teachers, experts, and communities; andLearning tasks: Authentic, personalized, learner-driven and learner-designed, experiential tasks that enable learners to create content.
  • Instructors implementing Pedagogy 2.0 principles will need to work collaboratively with learners to review, edit, and apply quality assurance mechanisms to student work while also drawing on input from the wider community outside the classroom or institution (making use of the "wisdom of crowds” [Surowiecki 2004]).
  • A small portion of student performance content—if it is new knowledge—will be useful to keep. Most of the student performance content will be generated, then used, and will become stored in places that will never again see the light of day. Yet . . . it is still important to understand that the role of this student content in learning is critical.
  • This understanding of student-generated content is also consistent with the constructivist view that acknowledges the learner as the chief architect of knowledge building. From this perspective, learners build or negotiate meaning for a concept by being exposed to, analyzing, and critiquing multiple perspectives and by interpreting these perspectives in one or more observed or experienced contexts
  • This understanding of student-generated content is also consistent with the constructivist view that acknowledges the learner as the chief architect of knowledge building. From this perspective, learners build or negotiate meaning for a concept by being exposed to, analyzing, and critiquing multiple perspectives and by interpreting these perspectives in one or more observed or experienced contexts. In so doing, learners generate their own personal rules and knowledge structures, using them to make sense of their experiences and refining them through interaction and dialogue with others.
  • Other divides are evident. For example, the social networking site Facebook is now the most heavily trafficked Web site in the United States with over 8 million university students connected across academic communities and institutions worldwide. The majority of Facebook participants are students, and teachers may not feel welcome in these communities. Moreover, recent research has shown that many students perceive teaching staff who use Facebook as lacking credibility as they may present different self-images online than they do in face-to-face situations (Mazer, Murphy, and Simonds 2007). Further, students may perceive instructors' attempts to coopt such social technologies for educational purposes as intrusions into their space. Innovative teachers who wish to adopt social software tools must do so with these attitudes in mind.
  • "students want to be able to take content from other people. They want to mix it, in new creative ways—to produce it, to publish it, and to distribute it"
  • Furthermore, although the advent of Web 2.0 and the open-content movement significantly increase the volume of information available to students, many higher education students lack the competencies necessary to navigate and use the overabundance of information available, including the skills required to locate quality sources and assess them for objectivity, reliability, and currency
  • In combination with appropriate learning strategies, Pedagogy 2.0 can assist students in developing such critical thinking and metacognitive skills (Sener 2007; McLoughlin, Lee, and Chan 2006).
  • We envision that social technologies coupled with a paradigm of learning focused on knowledge creation and community participation offer the potential for radical and transformational shifts in teaching and learning practices, allowing learners to access peers, experts, and the wider community in ways that enable reflective, self-directed learning.
  • . By capitalizing on personalization, participation, and content creation, existing and future Pedagogy 2.0 practices can result in educational experiences that are productive, engaging, and community based and that extend the learning landscape far beyond the boundaries of classrooms and educational institutions.
  •  
    About pedagogic 2.0
  •  
    Future Learning Landscapes: Transforming Pedagogy through Social Software Catherine McLoughlin and Mark J. W. Lee
Maggie Verster

Sustaining Open-Source Curriculum? - 13 views

  •  
    Who payes for open education
Russell D. Jones

News: Making Wikis Work for Scholars - Inside Higher Ed - 0 views

  • Others, noting features of the Web site that contribute to inaccuracies and shortchange the value of expertise, are building variations on the model that are more amenable to academics and to peer review.
  • "I use Wikipedia a lot for my own research and for course preparation. Often, to the extent that [Wikipedia articles] appear on my syllabi it’s to give students a quick overview of a subject or concept when I’m looking less for a theoretical or critical perspective and more for this kind of open-source knowledge, or kind of 'crowd-sourced' perspective,"
    • Russell D. Jones
       
      Uses of Wikipedia in the Classroom
  • Still, some continue to worry that the very structure of Wikipedia encourages editors (who can be anyone) to disregard expertise and undermine the basic mechanics of peer review and academic credibility.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • In other words, what happens to articles once they're posted? Will they be watered down or made inaccurate by someone with no relevant credentials? Wikipedians would argue that credentials are besides the point -- that anyone with a computer can police the encyclopedia by judging source material, sifting through edits and using a neutral tone to describe disputes. It's a dynamic that Sorin Matei, a communications professor at Purdue University, describes this way: "He who can sit for the longest in front of the computer is right."
  • accountability
David McGavock

Steve Hargadon: Rescheduled for May 11th - Interview with Hugh McGuire, Founder of Libr... - 2 views

  • Hugh McGuire, the founder of LibriVox.org, the terrific crowd-sourced audiobooks service.  We'll talk Web 2.0, books, learning, and more in the context of thinking about education.
  • "I do bookish R and D on the web. I build webby things, and find out if people like them. I also write and speak often enough about media, publishing, the web, technology, mass collaboration, online community-building, open culture, copyright, in places like Huffington Post, Forbes.com, and O’Reilly Radar. I’m also editing an O’Reilly book about the future of publishing."
  •  
    Join me Wednesday, May 11th, for a live and interactive FutureofEducation.com webinar with Hugh McGuire, the founder of LibriVox.org, the terrific crowd-sourced audiobooks service. We'll talk Web 2.0, books, learning, and more in the context of thinking about education.
DSL Academy

Ds Training Academy Provides The Best Php Training Courses In Ahmedabad - 0 views

  •  
    PHP is a free, open source framework for building highly interactive web applications. Our PHP Certification Courses focuses on user interfaces, program structure, language syntax, and implementation detail.
‹ Previous 21 - 40 of 128 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page