All companies can provide an orientation program that does not forget the small things like greeting a new employee warmly, taking her or him to lunch, and providing a functioning
workstation on Day 1.
Most companies of any size have an employee referral program. Best in class programs provide 40% or more of their new hires through employee referrals. Many studies show that employee referral hire...
Kathy,
This was a really good article, gave me new perspective on employee referrals. I periodically monitor the job board here at my company for myself and a few of my business contacts outside of the company. I need to suggest to my contacts that we become more aware of all our skill sets to help ensure a better fit when looking for employment.
On the SHRM website they have great information for all sorts of HR topics. Click on the "download your free report" as this is a great tool for onboarding. They discuss the Four C's (Compliance, Clarification, Culture, Connection).
You beat me to it, this is my go to website to see if any new regs, or pubs come out! Trends are a big one which seem to be what drives organizational change. The problem with trends is they fizzle out quickly. I mean come on seriously? New Coke? Come on!!!
I saw this website when I was looking at articles but didn't know if it was a good one or not. Sounds as if you both use it so will have to keep that as a good source.
This is a repeat from a previous class but I still like the way Simon explains a few things specifically the WHY question.
Apply the why to your mission at home, work, where ever and see if new results occur!
“This is a pivotal stage of the employee/employer relationship, and there are ways to emphasize people’s individuality so they can bring it out into their jobs.
Good article, nice to see the 7 C's and an observation point from a leadership level owning up to be a contributing factor for new employee success rate.
There it is again with that compatible non-sense. That is why organizations get jammed up in lawsuits, and lose huge sums of money. Its a whole new generation of employers thinking that they should hire based on "Cultural matches" which are made up in the first place. That is a preference, and it cannot be articulated on the bench in front of a jury of 12. If you can't defend it, then don't make it a core competency or requirement. Make it a subfield, or a preference.
Kristin,
This is an interesting talk and topic that can help employers who have short-term openings connect with people who can work limited hours or days. When I worked in New York, my former company used some of these boards to hire short-term, or event driven employees. It was only used for jobs that required limited skills. I am not sure that if this would be viable in roles that require a lot of experience or technical skills.
The first day on the job is often the worst, but some companies are turning to orientations that seem more collegiate than corporate: Think networking sessions and officewide scavenger hunts.
Effective employee onboarding has a positive domino effect: it ensures that new hires feel welcome and prepared in their new positions, in turn giving them the confidence and resources to make an impact within the organization, and ultimately allowing the company to continue carrying out its mission.
Top companies like GE say identifying talented leaders early on, and placing them in stretch assignments, often before they think they're ready is an approach that works for them to support their growth strategies
ut usually they don't. I believe pay is primarily determined by market forces, with most jobs placed in a pay range prior to an employee's hiring.
Because no two people come similarly equipped, they draw upon the unique pluses and minuses they were endowed with at birth along with compensatory assets they subsequently developed
What's more, people don't want to pay a high price for acknowledging their need for improvement -- which is exactly what they would do if they arm the boss with the kind of personal information he or she would need to help them develop.
Because one-way accountability inevitably creates distrust
It's the boss's responsibility to find a way to work well with an imperfect individual, not to convince the individual there are critical flaws that need immediate correcting, which is all but guaranteed to lead to unproductive game playing and politically inspired back-stabbing.
lead to just-in-case and cover-your-behind activities that reduce the amount of time that could be put to productive use
Inquiry contrasts with most performance reviews, which begin with how the evaluator sees the individual and what that boss has already decided most needs enhancing.
I found this to be a thought provoking article which seems to perfectly illustrate everything that can go bad with a performance review. I liked the practical approach to encourage open relationship which can provide the honest feedback we each need to address our self-improvement barriers.
Enjoyed the simple format that can easily be put into action. Also the link to creating metrics as that feels like a difficult part to draft without some ideas.
aking new hires accountable for noticing how their colleagues and managers live those values every day helps brings those behaviors to life. (Source: Great Places to Work)