Skip to main content

Home/ OLLIE Iowa/ Group items tagged resources

Rss Feed Group items tagged

jhash84

ollie-afe-2021: Article: Attributes from Effective Formative Assessment (CCSSO) - 0 views

  • In this type of classroom culture, students will more likely feel they are collaborators with their teacher and peers in the learning process.
    • dulrich
       
      What is the saying.... Culture eats Structure for lunch. If your class doesn't have the collaborative culture in place the structural changes you want to make in feedback will be less effective.
  • In addition to teacher feedback, when students and their peers are involved there are many more opportunities to share and receive feedback.
    • dulrich
       
      It takes time to develop the class culture for self and peer feedback, but it provides students with so much more information than just waiting for instructor feedback. Helping students think meta-cognitively is huge, especially when looking to close gaps.
    • cjd203
       
      Your idea of building culture/structural supports through collaboration and sharing is key! It allows for self-assessment through reflection and metacognitive analysis. To get students to really dig in and think about their learning through shared experience is the name of the game.
  • Where am I going? Where am I now? How can I close the gap?
    • dulrich
       
      All three of these are important for effective feedback. I think that is probably more emphasis on the "Where am I now?" aspect than the other two points.
  • ...24 more annotations...
  • One key feature of this definition is its requirement that formative assessment be regarded as a process rather than a particular kind of assessment.
    • cjd203
       
      I think the term "during" is the important to key in on this statement. Formative assessment helps us keep a pulse on learning as it is happening along the way. Although summative assessment is often referred to as more high stakes, formative assessment is equally if not more important. By the time you get to the summative part of a unit it is often too late to help support students working towards mastery.
  • There has been substantial interest in formative assessment among U.S. educators during recent years. Increasing numbers of educators regard formative assessment as a way not only to improve student learning, but also to increase student scores on significant achievement examinations.
    • cjd203
       
      I am curious as to how often my classmates formatively assess student learning? Would you say daily, weekly, monthly? Anybody have any formative strategies that work well for them? I have had success w/ the thumbs up, down and sideways strategy...
    • Janet Wills
       
      I do formative assessment at least weekly-- one big revelation I've been working with is that formative assessment doesn't have to be big and fancy;it just needs to show the level of understanding kids are at
    • mcairney
       
      You are probably formally assessing every day. It doesn't have to be 'formal' or planned. But I imagine that each day you are gathering information that will help to drive your instruction for the following day.
  • during
  • A teacher needs to have modeled good feedback with students and talked about what acceptable and unacceptable comments look like in order to have created a safe learning environment.
    • cjd203
       
      Modeling what positive & constructive feedback looks like is something to definitely consider when implementing peer review in the classroom. Getting started with the process of peer review/collaboration in terms of students knowing what to do and not to do allows for safety in the process and help build a classroom atmosphere that can be engaging and student driven.
    • brippentrop-nuss
       
      This makes sense if students have seen feedback modeled they would have an understanding of the concept and open to giving feedback to their peers and receiving it from peers.
  • opportunities for students to monitor their ongoing progress.
    • cjd203
       
      Allowing for student self-assessment in the learning process is HUGE! It can allow for reflection and encourage ownership in one's education.
  • involve both teachers and students
    • brippentrop-nuss
       
      This is an important concept to remember. I think many students are set in the mindset of school that learning is forgotten. Having the students be more involved might change the mindset that their opinions/thoughts do relate to what is being taught.
  • With this kind of descriptive feedback and collaboration, the teacher clarifies the goal for the student, provides specific information about where the student is in relation to meeting the criteria, and offers enough substantive information to allow the student an opportunity to identify ways to move learning forward.
    • brippentrop-nuss
       
      I agree with this statement. Questions that come to mind deal with time. How can we offer effective & detailed feedback in a timely manner to all of our students?
  • helping students to provide constructive feedback to each other
    • brippentrop-nuss
       
      Constructive feedback is sometimes challenging for students. It needs to be helpful not hurtful is the phrase I try to repeat when we do utilize peer feedback. It is also interesting for me to see what kind of feedback they give each other. I can make adjustments or clarifications for future activities.
  • The primary purpose of the formative assessment process, as conceived in this definition, is to provide evidence that is used by teachers and students to inform instruction and learning during the teaching/learning process.
    • Janet Wills
       
      can be as simple as 'reading the room'
    • pnbolton
       
      That is one thing I struggle with my online learners, if they don't advocate and speak up that they may be confused and their camera is off I am missing the opportunity to physically see if students udnerstand/struggling.
    • mcairney
       
      I can see how that can be a challenge. I have had participants finsih a course and THEN tell me that they found the platform and technology challenging. But it's so hard to help if the communication isn't working between you and your students.
  • Learning goals and criteria for success should be clearly identified and communicated to students.
    • Janet Wills
       
      don't keep things a mystery for students to guess at!
    • mcairney
       
      How much time is wasted with students guessing at what teachers want from them? And then grading it and saying--this isn't what I was looking for!
  • Helping students think meta-cognitively about their own learning fosters the idea that learning is their responsibility
    • Janet Wills
       
      everyone benefits if students can do self-assessment!
    • Stephanie Monahan
       
      I wholeheartedly agree. Whether students actively take pat in self-assessment varies greatly depending on the level of course I'm teaching. I have many students that just want to know the amount of points something is worth...they aren't concerned with whether they have learned anything or not. Maybe I need to do a better job of modeling...and start earlier with self-assessment.
  • process requires the teacher to share learning goals with students
    • ceberly
       
      As an instructional coach I have been able to observe that this makes a difference for students whether they are 5 or 15
  • evidence-based feedback that is linked to the intended instructional outcomes
    • ceberly
       
      The use of rubrics can be helpful in defining evidence.
  • Students can use a rubric to provide feedback to a peer by articulating reasons why a piece of work is at one level and discussing how it could be improved to move it to the next level.
    • ceberly
       
      I have found this to be very challenging for students at the elementary level. They need lots of modeling and practice to be effective
  • connect formative assessment opportunities to the short-term goals to keep track of how well their students’ learning is moving forward.
    • Stephanie Monahan
       
      This sentence resonated with me visually...having completed a learning progression in class a couple weeks ago and then attaching how I'm assessing my students.
  • timely feedback
    • Stephanie Monahan
       
      This is what I see most colleagues struggle with. Timely to me means by the next class period; timely to others means within 2 days or one week.
    • pnbolton
       
      I know as teachers we have so much going on in our professional and personal life, but students need that feedback to make sure they are doing it right or can come seek extra help!! It's defiantly a balance!
    • mcairney
       
      Timely feedback is so challenging! It's hard for teaachers to get all that done and not have to be working into the night. Digital tools can probably help with some of that, but it still isn't perfect!
  • sense of trust between and among students and their teachers; by norms of respect, transparency, and appreciation of differences; and by a non-threatening environment.
    • Stephanie Monahan
       
      I think this whole paragraph is great. The two words that stuck out the most were transparency and non-threatening. If there are learning progressions for students to follow and formative assessments along the progression, transparency and non-threatening should be achievable.
  • adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students’ achievement of intended instructional outcomes.
    • pnbolton
       
      I have a wide range of students (freshmen- seniors) in the majority of my classes and I sometimes struggle to differentiate for so many different groups.
  • collecting evidence
    • pnbolton
       
      At Knoxville we use Canvas and I love the features they have to get the evidence and quick feedback.
  • cators representing approximately 2
    • jhash84
       
      dd
  • From a learning progression teachers have the big picture of what students need to learn,
    • jhash84
       
      Being able to gather this "big picture" idea of what a student needs to learn can be very difficult to do. Everybody's 'big picture" will be different as well.
  • Students build on this learning in later stages of the progression to develop an understanding that people represent and interpret the past in different ways (e.g., through pictures, plays, films, reconstructions, museum displays, and fiction and nonfiction accounts), and that the interpretations reflect the intentions of those who make them (e.g., writers, archaeologists, historians, and filmmakers). A goal for students at each level of the progression would be to investigate a set of artifacts in increasingly sophisticated ways to extract information about a particular period or event in history. Not only would such investigations support the students’ development of historical reasoning, they would also provide evidence of the students’ ability to reason in increasingly complex ways. This involves moving from the early stages of reasoning based on simple observation to the more complex stages based on indirect observation and the synthesis of multiple sources of information. Using the evidence elicited from such tasks connected to the goals of the progression, a teacher could identify the “just right gap” – a growth point in learning that involves a step that is neither too large nor too small – and make adjustments to instruction accordingly.
    • jhash84
       
      This is a really great process of "high order thinking" Being able to assess resources on their own and then go beyond that to be able to solve the question or problem with that source take some inner drive to complete. A lot of students just want to you tell them what to do.
  • However, for students to be actively and successfully involved in their own learning, they must feel that they are bona fide partners in the learning process.
    • jhash84
       
      I really do believe that students can get to higher order of thinking if they can take some pride or a lead on their own learning. Again, something that can be very hard to get kids to do.
  • in a sixth grade math class students working in groups
    • jhash84
       
      I think that group work is a great way to get the most out of some. Also, using competition can bring the best out of the group.
jhash84

ollie-afe-2021: Educational Leadership: The Quest for Quality--article - 3 views

  • department or grade-level common assessments
    • pnbolton
       
      I am the only FCS teacher at Knoxville High School and we are looking to switch to standards based grading. I am having to switch over my 7 courses as a solo teacher and it is hard to not have that team to bounce ideas off of or help create the course rubrics.
  • The purpose is to inform others—policymakers, program planners, supervisors, teachers, parents, and the students themselves—about the overall level of students' performance.
    • pnbolton
       
      I believe clear criteria is going to be the most helpful for when my courses are switched over to standards based. I want my students to know exactly what they are expected to learn and assessed on. In doing this they then can effectively reflect back on their learning and assess their own learning.
    • Janet Wills
       
      This seems like a common sense approach and students won't have to guess what you're looking for.
    • cjd203
       
      SBG is a targeted form of assessment that can be effective if expectations are both clear and concise. It is important that learning targets and objectives are delivered in a "student friendly" language. "I can" statements work well as do other objectives as long as students know what they need to be able to do.
  • igure 1
    • pnbolton
       
      I like how this figure shows what test questions link to specific learning targets and points awarded. If a student were to pass 3 of the 4 learning targets then we know that they need more time with one specific learning target. We can then spend time relearn concepts so they can reassess and show their learning again.
    • lizmedina
       
      I agree, this is useful in determinig language barries that may have gotten in the way rather than not understanding the content
  • ...25 more annotations...
  • A grade of D+
    • pnbolton
       
      When it comes to grades and feedback, I believe their needs to also be a mindset change in students and parents. A lot of time students ask me what grade they received, and they determine if they are okay with that percentage before taking time to look at feedback and look at the learning that has happened. I will need to change the conversation from "What grade did I get" to "Did I sufficiently meet the learning target and provide evidence of my learning"
  • Teachers should design the assessment so students can use the results to self-assess and set goals.
    • pnbolton
       
      We are currently doing a book study on assessments and they stated that your classroom should be 80/20. 80% reflection and 20% concepts. I am not sure if I agree with this breakdown but I do know I will need to take time to teach my students how to properly self assess and reflect.
    • ceberly
       
      Wow 80% does seem very high. I would imagine it will take some time to shift the thinking of both teachers and students
    • Stephanie Monahan
       
      I've never seen/heard that breakdown before but it does make logical sense. Reflection/metacognition is a key component to creating a deeper connection to anything. I have asked students to reflect upon their understanding of content by checking boxes next to learning targets as we progress through a unit and to assess themselves on learning targets after a summative. I feel that students completed reflections as something that just needed to be done instead of a means to better understand themselves, so I totally agree that it will take time to shift the mindset...my big question is how do we set up a plan to do that?
  • NCLB
    • Janet Wills
       
      NCLB had a very negative impact on the social studies. I could write reams about the cost of this impact.
    • cjd203
       
      What was one of the bigger negatives you saw/experienced from NCLB.
  • the assessor should organize the learning targets represented in the assessment into a written test plan that matches the learning targets represented in the curriculum.
    • Janet Wills
       
      I feel like this is something that would take a long time to set up, but would ultimately make evaluating an assessment easier.
    • Stephanie Monahan
       
      From experience, it does take an adequate amount of time...and it can be quite humbling. I began this process several years ago after an Assessment for Learning training. Analyzing an assessment that you have curated over several years (thinking you've created something that justly assesses students), and finding misrepresentation of learning targets is an eye-opening experience.
  • if students will be the users of the results because the assessment is formative, then teachers must provide the results in a way that helps students move forward.
    • Janet Wills
       
      It's important that students see formative assessments as something that will help them
    • lizmedina
       
      Most definitely, formative can be a great tool not only for the teacher but also for the student. It can be a great focus of communication to enable a student to become an independent learner.
    • Gina Rogers
       
      This reminds me of a session with John Hattie that I attended on feedback. He talked about the purpose of feedback is to show the student where to go next. Feedback is an essential element in formative assessment. If there is no feedback then it isn't really formative.
  • Assessment literacy is the foundation for a system that can take advantage of a wider use of multiple measures.
    • Janet Wills
       
      seems that assessment literacy would include the ability to interpret the data
    • brippentrop-nuss
       
      Ability to interpret data is key for those (myself included) that don't understand the data. I need help breaking it down so I can actually use the data to make adjustments.
  • clear picture of what achievement he or she intends to measure.
    • lizmedina
       
      This is definitely important in properly assessing and supporting students. This is where I begin when a teacher asks for help I'm accommodating a student.
    • mcairney
       
      I remember in the first grade classroom having to record myself reading word problems for students to listen to because I wanted to assess their application of the math and not their ability to read and decode a word problem. Life changing.
    • Gina Rogers
       
      @mcairiney - this makes a ton of sense. We see built in screen readers now in the ISASP's for 7-12 students on the reading exam because what is being tested is not necessarily decoding, but rather comprehension.
  • This key ensures that the assessor has translated the learning targets into assessments that will yield accurate results.
    • lizmedina
       
      Absolutely, it is very frustrating to see a student struggle with an assessment that does not give information on a standard or learning target
  • benchmark,
    • cjd203
       
      We have used MAP testing in the past as a measure of student academic progress and growth. MAP testing allows for periodic benchmarks that is student specific, providing a snapshot of where they are at compared to their peers.
    • ceberly
       
      MAP gave great information. Its great downfall was the amount of time required to administer it. Wish they had a "lite" version
    • brippentrop-nuss
       
      I do like the the MAP tests better because they adjust to the students better. It seems like they see improvement and that is usually a motivator for them. However, it does take awhile to administer. But I appreciate the reports more because I can see growth for each student.
    • mcairney
       
      I always thought MAPs was a powerful assessment tool as well. I thought the resources that provided guidelines of where to take students next or how to strengthen skills that were challenging was helpful!
  • including students
    • cjd203
       
      Communicating learning targets to the learner is essential as well. Not only do instructors need to know how they intend to apply metrics within assessment, students need too as well. Rubrics can be effective tools to support the interpretation of assessments.
  • plan
    • cjd203
       
      This Math Test Plan is helpful. It breaks the test down into an item analysis chart by question number. Individual questions are weighted (with point totals) and linked to learning targets. This plan would be a nice tool to give to students as well to help them guide them in their studying for assessments.
    • ceberly
       
      I love this idea! "...assign the appropriate balance of points in relation to the importance of each target." I think this example would really help teachers look at their assessments a little differently than just taking the test right from the book.
    • mcairney
       
      I think being very clear with students what each question is assessing is also helpful to make sure that an answer is given to PROVE their understanding instead of trying to figure out exactly what a teacher is looking for. Takes the guessing out of the game.
  • the instructional hours sacrificed to testing will return dividends in the form of better instructional decisions
    • ceberly
       
      In elementary we give the FAST assessments 3x per year. I DO feel that these tests help us to make better instructional decisions IF we take the time to break down and analyze the data.
    • Gina Rogers
       
      I really wonder if all of the assessing is paying off in the instructional dividends that we would expect. I
  • assessor must begin with a clear picture of why he or she is conducting the assessment
    • Stephanie Monahan
       
      This simple, basic statement is very often overlooked by most educators I have worked with. In my experience, most educators create an assessment because it is part of the normal progression - plan, teach, assess. An assessment is simply something 'to do' without reflection as to why or how.
  • Figure 2 clarifies which assessment methods are most likely to produce accurate results for different learning targets.
    • Stephanie Monahan
       
      I like this visual. It gives concrete information that can easily be used to create an assessment. Categorization of learning targets is a reflective process for teachers which directly influences the creation of an assessment.
  • students to track their own progress
    • brippentrop-nuss
       
      I like this concept of having students keeping track or their own learning process. I think this is a beneficial concept that carries past secondary education.
  • develop coordinated plans
    • brippentrop-nuss
       
      Coordinated would be essential with the training to actually make it impactful.
  • decisions
    • mcairney
       
      Not to mention the amount of instructional time we lose while administering more in-depth testing. If we are using up instructional time, we need to make sure that the results of the assessment are providing powerful data that will help us move teachers and students forward.
    • Gina Rogers
       
      I really agree with this statement. Sometimes the assessments that we give do not tell us the whole picture. They might flag us to know that something is wrong, but they don't tell us exactly what is wrong. That is when we have to dig deeper. We need to look at different types of information to make valid decisions.
  • the use of multiple measures does not, by itself, translate into high-quality evidence.
    • ajmoss80
       
      Absolutely true. Just giving an "assessment" does not automatically produce data that is relevant or easily used to make instructional decisions!
  • it's important to know the learning targets represented in the written curriculum
    • ajmoss80
       
      This seems so simple -- in order to assess something, you need to know what that "thing" is. But just because something is "simple" doesn't mean it is "easy" to do!
  • The goal of a balanced assessment system is to ensure that all assessment users have access to the data they want when they need it, which in turn directly serves the effective use of multiple measures.
    • ajmoss80
       
      This is very true. I've seen some good ideas for diagnostics or screener tests that were not properly utilized because the user interface/database was so hard to use; or it was confusing; or it was a mess of data that scared people away. The ability to access the data, when needed, in a manner that is easy to utilize, is very important. But not necessarily easy to accomplish.
  • Use a reading score from a state accountability test as a diagnostic instrument for reading group placement. Use SAT scores to determine instructional effectiveness. Rely solely on performance assessments to test factual knowledge and recall. Assess learning targets requiring the "doing" of science with a multiple-choice test.
    • ajmoss80
       
      I think this is a pretty solid list of "don't do's" . Unfortunately I think I've seen each one used in the past. The first bullet -- using reading scores as a diagnostic. I could maybe see a state test used as a "screener" -- it can give an initial idea of which students are strong or weak in reading -- but not as a "diagnostic" -- the state test will tell you that *something* is wrong, but it can't diagnose the difficulty that the student is having (decoding? dyslexia? etc...)
  • testing
    • jhash84
       
      I remember when I was in college, having instructors talk about how much testing was going to go into NCLB and the cost of all the aspects that were going to have to go into that process.
  • Performance skill targets
    • jhash84
       
      In the world of Vocational Education, the performance skills are way more efficient to be able to grade or check for proficiency because a lot of the work is project based and use more rubrics or completion grading to evaluate that.
  • Teachers have choices in the assessment methods they use,
    • jhash84
       
      I like to be able to use multiple types of assessments to meet the needs of the student to test for proficiency. Not all student like T/F, or Short Answer or whatnot.
  • Students learn best when they monitor and take responsibility for their own learning.
    • jhash84
       
      I could not agree more on the idea of when student take ownership of their learning or their work, they learn a lot more, understand a lot more and will typically give a lot my effort as well. Ownership of something will bring that out of students.
Evan Abbey

ollie-afe-2020: Educational Leadership: The Quest for Quality--article - 7 views

  • The assessor must begin with a clear picture of why he or she is conducting the assessment.
    • bhauswirth
       
      I feel like sometimes we get caught up on we have to assess our students on all topics. One nice thing about mastery in certain topics is with math, math concepts keep coming up in chapter 1 then in chapter 3.
  • The assessor needs to have a clear picture of what achievement he or she intends to measure.
    • bhauswirth
       
      This also goes with the why am I assessing on this.
    • jnewmanfd
       
      I'm not sure that this works for science classes. In these classes, students are to be figuring out. They are not supposed to know what they are learning about until they have discovered it. I thinking that making the assessment clear at the beginning would ruin this. Now I will say that you could be clear on how students will be assessed. For example, you will have to support your claims using reasoning and evidence.
    • jessed44
       
      I often wonder where this argument fits with discovery learning, and other forms of self-directed methods. Are we constraining ourselves too much here?
  • "I can make good inferences.
  • ...51 more annotations...
  • "I can make good inferences.
    • bhauswirth
       
      Student-friendly language has been a huge part of our school district. Especially when dealing with many ELL and Sp.Ed students. Also, referring to the learning target multiple times throughout the lesson. One thing I could do in my class is to put the learning target on my quizzes.
    • nkrager
       
      I could also do this more/better. It does get challenging when you teach multiple classes if you want them posted on your board etc.
    • kshadlow
       
      I agree. I started adding hyperlinks to vocabulary.com for any words I thought they might struggle with.
  • identify struggling students and the areas in which they struggle.
    • bhauswirth
       
      This is a huge part for me in my teaching. I use our three question quizzes to allow myself to better understand misconceptions that I have over seen and to see what I need to do to better my students.
    • ravelinga
       
      Agree! In my economics class I do periodic checkpoint quizzes. These formative assessments have two purposes. One to check how well my students are understanding the content. And secondly, how well am I teaching the material. Sometimes the students are not getting the content, because my teaching was ineffective.
  • As a "big picture" beginning point in planning for the use of multiple measures, assessors need to consider each assessment level in light of four key questions, along with their formative and summative applications1 :
    • bhauswirth
       
      These four points are things that we do everyday. Understanding what I need to do for students, understanding what the information will tell me and where do I go next.
  • But NCLB has exposed students to an unprecedented overflow of testing.
    • Val Rosenthal
       
      too many tests; students get anxiety when taking a test
    • Evan Abbey
       
      I agree! Testing not only causes anxiety, but it can give students the wrong impression of their abilities.
    • parkerv
       
      Unfortunately over testing takes away from quality instructional time and student learning. What's really sad but all too true is that we are seeing over testing being pushed down on even our youngest learners, our 3 and 4 year old preschoolers.
    • tkofoot
       
      The concern of all my Special Ed students is testing. I teach them test-taking strategies, but they get to a test and can't use them.
    • jessed44
       
      I don't think the act of retrieving information is bad, in fact, research says it is good. It is the importance and finality that is often attached to it that can be detrimental.
  • the use of multiple measures does not, by itself, translate into high-quality evidence.
    • Val Rosenthal
       
      more tests doesn't necessarily produce good results
  • Students learn best when they monitor and take responsibility for their own learning.
    • Val Rosenthal
       
      Education has to make this happen more. I'd like to find a good way for them to monitor their learning.
    • nkrager
       
      Yes, agreed! We know that this true but we need to help build this in our students. The internal motivation is hard to build!
    • leipoldc
       
      Taking responsibility is the key to learning. The best years to help students understand and take responsibility is middle school. They want to be in charge and they need support to do it well.
  • assessment-literate teachers
    • Val Rosenthal
       
      I really don't seem to have a good background on assessment and would like to be assessment-literate.
  • Clear Purpose
    • nkrager
       
      The purpose is so important! I feel like sometimes we test just to test...and then send the results off to someone else. The kids need to understand the purpose as internal motivation is not always there.
    • kshadlow
       
      So important! I think about myself and the hoops we need to jump through in our lives without understanding the purpose. That purpose definitely leads to motivation.
    • jhatcher
       
      The purpose has to be tied to helping the students discover information about himself. How to improve? What has been learned? Then move forward.
  • Teachers have choices in the assessment methods they use, including selected-response formats, extended written response, performance assessment, and personal communication. Selecting an assessment method that is incapable of reflecting the intended learning will compromise the accuracy of the results.
    • nkrager
       
      All teachers know that they have choice in the types of assessments to give students but I wonder if we all really think through what type we are giving every time. Do we just give what we did last year? Do we give what is easiest? The fastest to grade? Things to think about...
  • This key relates directly back to the purpose of the assessment.
    • nkrager
       
      Feedback can be challenging as we all know. I tend to get frustrated when I have taken the time to provide detailed feedback and the students could care less about it, they just want to know a grade and move on.
    • kshadlow
       
      so true...
  • From a formative point of view, decision makers at the classroom assessment level need evidence of where students are on the learning continuum toward each standard,
    • nkrager
       
      This would go along with students taking ownership for their own learning....we would WANT them to want to know where they are at for individual purposes!
    • ravelinga
       
      Most of my formative assessments have been multiple choice or short answer quizzes. After learning more about rubrics, I would like to start using rubrics in two ways for formative assessments. One the students will do a self assessment on where they feel they are at. Then a teacher to student-conference with the rubric to see where they are at. With the end goal of making the assessment portion less stressful for my students, because they know where they are at.
    • nkrager
       
      ^^^ Love this idea! I hope I can get there also with some projects!
    • jhatcher
       
      I was thinking the same thing about rubrics that you wrote here. Students would hopefully see themselves moving on the rubric as they improve their skills /learn. This should be motivating and students would know exactly what is expected.
  • not only are they limited in key formative uses, but they also cannot measure more complex learning targets at the heart of instruction.
    • nkrager
       
      which leads to frustration...
  • Given the rise in testing, especially in light of a heightened focus on using multiple measures
    • lwinter14
       
      Although I would say this is definitely still true in the courses we teach (we still emphasize bigger, summative assessments), I think we have changed how we view student progress. Our summative assessments aren't all tests, some of them are projects or performance assessments. Those assessments are also no longer considered "one-and-done" opportunities. Students can retake assessments or make corrections, etc. to show progress in their learning even if they didn't get it right the first time. It's less focused on the final grade and instead, assessing what students have learned.
    • jessed44
       
      This is great. However, when juxtaposed with having 200 students like I do, it is not always feasible to have numerous projects and reassessments. How do we change the change the way that teachers spend their day so this is possible?
  • the assessment formatively—as practice or to inform students about their own progress
    • lwinter14
       
      I find this distinction between summative and formative assessment interesting. In our freshman group of teachers, we have a category for both formative and summative assessment. Formative is weighted at 20% and summative is weighted at 80%. So although in my courses we were taught not to grade formatives, we still assign a score to it and put it into the gradebook. Also, if formatives weren't graded, I wonder how much of them would actually be completed by students?
    • ravelinga
       
      This has been a goal of mine this year, to use formative assessments to help make instructional decisions in my class. It has been a work in progress, but I have seen some success. I use the information from the formative assessment to decide is it a small group that needs reteaching or is it an entire class that needs reteaching. I don't normally grade my formative assessments, but I go give them completion points. For the most part if a student sees they are not getting something, they appreciate the reteaching opportunity.
    • parkerv
       
      Too often I see teachers not fully use the formative assessment data they have to intentionally inform instruction. If done properly formative assessment is very powerful. I also like the idea of giving participation points for formative assessments.
    • tkofoot
       
      Some teachers give 0% for formative assessments at my school. The Science department has figured out a way to have labs count as a way to assess a standard. I think practice is important and should have some weight.
  • it's important to know the learning targets represented in the written curriculum.
    • lwinter14
       
      My school has increased its emphasis on learning targets this year. We are all using a 5D+ template to write unit plans and the learning targets are similarly broken down into knowledge targets, academic targets (transferable skills), and performance targets. I think that writing unit plans and sitting down and thinking about the individual types of targets has really strengthened the types of instruction teachers are carrying out in their classrooms. They are more familiar with the targets they want students to meet, and in turn, students are also more familiar with what's expected of them.
    • kshadlow
       
      I like the specific targets here. I guess I have been generalizing them for awhile. My plans would be better defined for myself and students if I focused on them more.
    • jnewmanfd
       
      Our middle school is beginning this work as well. We are trying to get a system wide learning plan template developed and going. Our goal is to help all teachers fully understand their learning targets and how they relate to student understanding. I know that all teachers look at them, but I'm not sure how many break them down to fully understand them and what students outcomes should be.
  • highlight crucial words (for instance, most, least, except, not).
    • lwinter14
       
      I also do this on other assessment types such as short answer. I've gotten into the habit of bolding things that I want to make sure students don't forget to do. For example, they may be required to answer a question but then they need to follow that with explanation or justification. I often bold the second half so that they don't forget to include the explanation, which often highlights their thinking, which can be more important than the first half of the answer.
    • jhatcher
       
      I do this too. I find this is very helpful for kids. Sometimes in rubrics when going through them, I'll have kids underline or circle key words instead just to force their attention a bit. It does help.
  • it is not capable of informing the student about the next steps in learning.
    • lwinter14
       
      It is SO important that our feedback is more than a score or letter grade if we want to emphasize progress and the ability to improve for our students.
    • emilysjohnson
       
      Agreed! And if the targets are clear and communicated to students, they should know what steps they need to take to grow! It shouldn't be a mystery!
    • maryhumke
       
      "Do the results provide clear direction for what to do next?"
  • The purpose is to inform others—policymakers, program planners, supervisors, teachers, parents, and the students themselves—about the overall level of students' performance.
    • kshadlow
       
      Wouldn't that be interesting if the "we" mentioned here were all actually on the same page, wanting and assessing the same things. A common purpose. Nothing like focusing on the negative here, but all of these people are being informed in different ways and gathering different data for a different endpoint.
    • benrobison
       
      The piece of policymakers is the most frustrating to me (and most likely all educators). I have always struggled with the notion that the people making the majority of decisions are not the ones in the trenches, nor do they have the background to make those. I have been pleased with the direction PLC work has gone as of late; I think this gives more valid work to inform decision making on part of the teachers.
  • Do the results provide clear direction for what to do next?
    • kshadlow
       
      Sometimes an assessment is just an end. Information is used in the next unit, but the assessment doesn't always tell the student they are ready for what is coming next.
    • anonymous
       
      Yes, and it makes me wonder why so many of us provide copious amounts of feedback on summative assessments when students do not have the opportunity to do anything with the learning and provide less feedback on formative assessments along the way when students could actually do something with that feedback.
    • benrobison
       
      In the SBG system we use, which seems to evolve constantly, we don't really every get to a summative assessment. Kids are (supposed to be) constantly re-learning and re-assessing. Their results on assessment give the kids, and the teacher for that matter, a path on how to proceed.
    • leipoldc
       
      Our students are allowed to re-take summative assessments, so notes and conversations can assist in their learning (I guess they are not really summative then are they?)
  • Using data from these assessments, schools now make decisions about individual students, groups of students, instructional programs, resource allocation, and more.
    • kshadlow
       
      How much money and time was spent in areas unnecessarily? Data is no good if it is tainted. I am glad we have moved farther away from the traditional state testing.
  • better instructional decisions and improved high-stakes test scores.
    • aripperger
       
      I see some teachers more hopeful that ISASP, with its better alignment to state standards, will be a truer indicator of success. Other teachers, however, are still so jaded toward standardized testing.
    • jhatcher
       
      Good point! ISASP should be a better indicator of student achievement.Some of the best indicators are teacher formative and summative tests. These are still the most useful for teachers.
  • four categories of learning targets
    • aripperger
       
      This is a helpful breakdown of learning targets for me. In a core discipline area like history, it's easy to forget about performance skill and product targets. But there are definitely areas where these type of learning targets are present, and knowing those areas can help me decide how best to assess.
  • erode accurate results
    • aripperger
       
      Easy to forget about bias! So many other things take our time and attention when we write tests, that it's easy to forget about spelling, formatting mistakes, and other unintentional things that give students a clue as to the right answer in ways that don't truly test mastery of content.
  • Annual state and local district standardized tests serve annual accountability purposes, provide comparable data, and serve functions related to student placement and selection, guidance, progress monitoring, and program evaluation
    • aripperger
       
      One of our school's frustrations with the new ISASP format is that no itemization or further guidance is provided at the building/district level as to how our students performed on specific components of the test. Perhaps this will change, or maybe we're missing it, but it's difficult to program evaluate without this breakdown.
  • will be capable of informing sound decisions.
    • jnewmanfd
       
      I think this is an important thing to think about. How often do we really use assessments to make changes in our instruction. When I was a student I was thankful for tests. I could cram the material into my head and once the test was over, I could forget it and move on; clearing the way for new information. As a teacher, I realize that isn't the intent, but I wonder how often we still get caught up the type of thinking. Are we assessing so we feel better about moving on or are we assessing so we can make course corrections to support student learning and understanding?
  • Teachers should design the assessment so students can use the results to self-assess and set goals.
    • anonymous
       
      This reminds me of self-reported grading. Hattie says self-reported grading has an effect size of 1.33 but it seems that it is rare for teachers to actually use it.
  • all available assessment methods
    • anonymous
       
      This article focused solely on formal assessment, but I also think it is important to discuss the role and value of informal assessment opportunities and how powerful immediate feedback based on informal assessment can be in a F2F setting.
  • enable them to immediately take action
    • anonymous
       
      One of the easiest ways to ensure that students respond to feedback is to design opportunities that require them to engage with the feedback and do something with the feedback, but this is frequently dismissed due to the quantity of standards and learning required of students at each grade level. Many teachers feel like they need to prioritize "covering" all the standards over students truly engaging in their learning.
  • Are results communicated in time to inform the intended decisions
    • jhatcher
       
      I have 140 students so it can take a while to get results back to them. I know the quicker I can get the results back in their hands, the more they care about their score and the assessment. They are more likely to want to fix mistakes and learn from it. If I take too long it has a negative impact on motivation. We have to correct quickly but correctly.
  • affect individuals and groups of students on the basis of a single measure is part of our past and current practice.
    • mkanost
       
      This is detrimental to English Learners-Kanost
  • assessments
    • mkanost
       
      Using data from multiple assessments can help determine where exactly a student is at in their learning. Kanost
  • cultural insensitivity.
    • mkanost
       
      This can really hurt our students with that lack background knowledge obtained in white, christian, middle class society. Kanost
  • clear and understandable to everyone, including students
    • emilysjohnson
       
      It is especially important that students know what the intended learning is! Unfortunately, too many students think grades are given to them by their teacher instead of earned by their work. When they don't know what is being assessed, this adds to that narrative.
    • tkofoot
       
      This is where it is important to have a clear rubric with student language. Students, even learning adults, need to have guidance on why they are learning so they can be assessed accurately.
  • Reasoning targets
    • emilysjohnson
       
      This is an area I feel like we don't capture as much as we should as teachers. It's the process over product idea!
  • appropriate balance of points in relation to the importance of each target
    • emilysjohnson
       
      I'm glad to see a number of items for each target instead of just one or two in order to get a better understanding of the learning.
  • Figure 2 clarifies which assessment methods are most likely to produce accurate results for different learning targets.
    • parkerv
       
      This chart is really helpful, I will refer back to it often. I like that it gives some of the rationale for saying it is a good match or not.
  • Specific, descriptive feedback
    • parkerv
       
      This is so important. Feedback that is too general, not clear and/or not descriptive enough to lead to concrete actions on the students part limit their effectiveness as an instructional tool.
    • leipoldc
       
      I agree. Providing complete and clear feedback in language the student can comprehend is key to helping them move forward.
  • Inherent in its design is the need for all assessors and users of assessment results to be assessment literate—to know what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate uses of assessment results—thereby reducing the risk of applying data to decisions for which they aren't suited.
    • parkerv
       
      The term assessment literate is a great term. Often is seems teachers don't get all the information they could from an assessment because they haven't sufficiently thought through this question. And then sometimes they are used to make decisions in inappropriate ways.
  • For each assessment, regardless of purpose, the assessor should organize the learning targets represented in the assessment into a written test plan that matches the learning targets represented in the curriculum.
    • jnewmanfd
       
      This is something that I have been improving on and is not something I knew about when I first started teaching. I actually used to think that a good test was a simple repeat of information that I told the students during the unit. I wrote tests over the "facts" that I taught them. Wow, have I learned a lot. Now in my PLC we take the time to organize the learning targets and make sure that our assessments match the learning targets in our curriculum.
  • The classroom is also a practical location to give students multiple opportunities to demonstrate what they know and can do, adding to the accuracy of the information available from that level of assessment.
    • jnewmanfd
       
      My administrator and I were just talking about something similar. We are trying to work on grading practices in our building. We both agree that students need multiple opportunities to show what they know and that assessments shouldn't be viewed as a one a done item that is checked off. We even got into the idea if a student is assessed once and gets a 58%, a second time and gets a 78% and third time and gets a 98% do you average all those scores, or do you think to yourself, "It took them three times but they finally go it, let's celebrate, here's your A"?
  • If we don't begin with clear statements of the intended learning
    • benrobison
       
      In our district, there has been a major focus on writing clear, concise learning targets as "I CAN" statements to introduce learning. These are posted throughout the lesson, and are written out on the assessment for our kids. In my own teaching, it has really focused my attention to the task at hand, and I've eliminated a lot of the fluff I had in there previously. I'm only assessing the things I want them to learn/do...not the extra stuff that just kind of happened.
  • Performance skill targets, which ask students to use knowledge to perform or demonstrate a specific skill
    • benrobison
       
      This is 75% of grading in PhysEd (well, at least our PhysEd program). We have gone away from sport-ed, and moved to almost completely fitness-based education. We grade on heart rate data, specifically time spent in the Target Heart Rate Zone. Our goal is to make competent movers to enhance health beyond the school setting.
  • they involve where and how teachers can improve instruction—next year
    • benrobison
       
      This has been tough to do when results from assessments don't come back to us in a timely matter. Side note: Not that PhysEd is targeted area, but I'm so glad Iowa isn't a high-stakes testing state. I cannot imagine having that pressure on top of balancing all of the other things asked of us. I cannot imagine teacher morale being high.
    • leipoldc
       
      I agree - it is so tough to improve instruction - next time when the data arrives after instruction has begun. This makes the need for multiple types of assessment an vital part of the educational setting.
  • quality and balance
    • tkofoot
       
      What does quality and balance look like compared to the instruction?
  • through the use of clear curriculum maps for each standard
    • leipoldc
       
      The curriculum map needs to ensure standards are addressed at multiple grades levels. If standards are missed at a level, this needs to be communicated so we dont create gaps in our kids' learning. Gaps make for students who are insecure in their understanding and hesitant to try new ideas. :(
  • The assessor must begin with a clear picture of why he or she is conducting the assessment.
    • jessed44
       
      Teachers and students are both culpable in this 'teaching to the test' mode. My students will often ask if something is on the test, and if not, they show less attentiveness. And I think there may be some implicit pressure on teachers to emphasize the assessments we are to give. It really is sad.
  • e assessor must begin with a clear picture of why he or she is conducting the assessment. Who will use the results to inform what decisions? The assessor might use the assessment formatively
    • maryhumke
       
      In a data driven world, which I totally agree with, the data is only valid if the reason for the data is clear and understood.
  • Do the results provide clear direction for what to do next?
    • maryhumke
       
      This must be the purpose for data. What direction will come from the results? Otherwise, it becomes busy work.
  • At the level of annual state/district standardized assessments, they involve where and how teachers can improve instruction—next year.
    • maryhumke
       
      Intersting it is not the same the same sampling of students.
  • Inherent in its design is the need for all assessors and users of assessment results to be assessment literate—to know what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate uses of assessment results—thereby reducing the risk of applying data to decisions for which they aren't suited.
    • maryhumke
       
      I think too often we are told what data to take but do not know why and don't have a genuine investment in the collection. How many teachers have been involved in taking data from an IEP goal and have no idea what the actual goal says.
  • No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
susanbrown87

ollie-afe-2020summer: Educational Leadership: The Quest for Quality--article - 4 views

  • We're betting that the instructional hours sacrificed to testing will return dividends in the form of better instructional decisions and improved high-stakes test scores.
    • dsunderman
       
      As an elementary teacher, I spend. so much time with my learners that I feel I can pretty accurately predict the outcome of the assessment. So the loss of instructional time is very frustrating. I know that middle school and high school teachers do not get as much time with their learners, so maybe this is not as true for them.
    • erinlullmann
       
      This is a common concern for the majority of our elementary teachers as well. We have to have 5 data points (assessments) for every standard we are reporting out, in every subject area, per quarter. We feel like all we do is assess and we don't have enough time to actually teach what we need to be teaching in between assessments.
  • Creating a plan like this for each assessment helps assessors sync what they taught with what they're assessing.
    • dsunderman
       
      When do teachers have time to create a plan like this for each assessment? Our math series has something similar already laid out, but I won't lie I don't always have or take the time to look at it.
  • avoid providing clues or making the correct answer obvious, and highlight crucial words (for instance, most, least, except, not).
    • dsunderman
       
      I struggle when writing multiple choice with not making the write answer obvious. I had not thought to highlight key directional words. I talk to my class about reading carefully and how one little word can change the question but I like the idea of highlight those words.
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • Are results communicated in time to inform the intended decisions? Will the users of the results understand them and see the connection to learning? Do the results provide clear direction for what to do next?
    • dsunderman
       
      This was a struggle when we suddenly went online in the spring. My students were so use to face to face feedback that I really struggled getting them to look at the feedback through Schoology. I plan to teach that skill right away this fall.
  • Because classroom teachers can effectively use all available assessment methods, including the more labor-intensive methods of performance assessment and personal communication, they can provide information about student progress not typically available from student information systems or standardized test results
    • dsunderman
       
      So true and ofter forgotten or overlooked.
  • a
  • The four categories of learning targets
    • bushb13
       
      We are required to post content and language targets each day. I really like how this puts learning targets in four categories and provides examples. This information would make it helpful when determining and writing the targets for each class period.
    • erinlullmann
       
      I agree. In addition, I think it would be helpful to look at the standard from the Iowa Core that we are trying to instruct or assess. The wording of the standard should help indicate which type of learning target it should be and therefore we need to make sure to teach and assess it accordingly. Often times, teachers will slightly tweak the wording in a standard to change it from a performance skill to a knowledge target.
  • Specific, descriptive feedback linked to the targets of instruction and arising from the assessment items or rubrics communicates to students in ways that enable them to immediately take action, thereby promoting further learning.
    • bushb13
       
      I know how important specific and descriptive feedback is for students to understand their mistakes and move forward. I use various forms of formative assessment, but struggle to be timely when the feedback must be very specific. In face-to-face classes, this can be done quickly. How can I be efficient with providing constructive feedback in an online course?
  • Figure 2 clarifies which assessment methods are most likely to produce accurate results for different learning targets.
    • bushb13
       
      Figure 2 provides an efficient and helpful way to determine which type of assessment method is best for various types of learning targets. It would also be helpful for ensuring that you use various types of assessment methods on your classes.
    • erinlullmann
       
      I love this table. It clearly outlines the purpose for learning/type of learning target and aligns the assessment methods. I think this would be extremely beneficial to teachers who are in the process of writing assessments.
  • assessment-literate teachers would not Use a reading score from a state accountability test as a diagnostic instrument for reading group placement.
    • bushb13
       
      In my school district, a student's ELA score on the Iowa Statewide Assessment of Student Progress (ISASP) is used to determine if a student is placed in an LA Support class. In a previous section, the article states that standardized test scores can serve functions related to student placement and selection. Does this mean it is okay to use standardized test scores to determine placement or that it isn't appropriate?
    • erinlullmann
       
      I think you brought up a great point. We also use FAST and ISASP to determine placement in courses. However, when I read the bulleted statement that you highlighted, I interpreted it differently than course placement. In my mind, this was referring to a teacher using something like FAST CBM-Reading results (like a words per minute score) to determine placement in a small reading group during classtime. The FAST assessment is meant to screen students for possible reading difficulties. It is not meant to be used as a diagnostic assessment, which would be an assessment that could pinpoint specific gaps in the students knowledge. In reading this could be a decoding issue, a letter-sound correspondence issue, a phonemic awareness issue, etc. When making small reading groups, we would need to take into account much more information than simply words per minute from the FAST assessment to determine strengths and needs of a student.
  • assessment literate—to know what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate uses of assessment results
    • erinlullmann
       
      I believe that in my district, especially at the elementary level, we have the need to increase our assessment literacy. As an instruction coach, I am considering including this topic in professional development sessions in the future. Does anyone have suggestions for books, videos, speakers, or resources that would be beneficial for this task?
  • Students learn best when they monitor and take responsibility for their own learning.
    • erinlullmann
       
      John Hattie's meta-analysis found that students self-reported their grades had an effect size of 1.33. This means that by self-reporting grades a student can more than triple the amount of learning in one year's time. When students truly understand what is expected of them, what success looks like, and they have tools to help them determine where they are at in the learning progression, they are more motivated and engaged in learning and therefore will learn more and achieve at higher levels. Knowing that though (and I'm coming from an elementary background) - how can we build this into our classrooms? What does this look like for kindergartners?
  • teachers must provide the results in a way that helps students move forward.
  • Specific, descriptive feedback linked to the targets of instruction and arising from the assessment items or rubrics communicates to students in ways that enable them to immediately take action, thereby promoting further learning.
    • susanbrown87
       
      I think this step gets missed sometimes due to time constraints in the classroom when face to face. This is something I need to improve on, without it the assessment is essentially worthless. Online this spring I was able to give more specific feedback to all as they competed assignments.
  • We're betting that the instructional hours sacrificed to testing will return dividends in the form of better instructional decisions and improved high-stakes test scores.
    • susanbrown87
       
      A few years ago we found ourselves testing 4 times a year and in some subjects 7 times a year. It felt like all we did was test and teachers were not using the results to drive instruction so the time was wasted. Whenever assessments are given the results are only worth the time if incorporated into instruction. The more we tested we found the students putting forth less effort and we didn't feel like the assessments were accurate representations of ability.
  • Students learn best when they monitor and take responsibility for their own learning.
    • susanbrown87
       
      I agree with you, students learn more when they take responsibility for their learning. Any ideas on how to motivate them to do this? There are a few that jump up to the plate, its hard to get all to see the benefit.
  • assessment-literate teachers would not Use a reading score from a state accountability test as a diagnostic instrument for reading group placement.
    • susanbrown87
       
      In addition to the FAST score our district also looked at results from the NWEA test that was taken 3 times a year to plan interventions and group students.
  • Because classroom teachers can effectively use all available assessment methods, including the more labor-intensive methods of performance assessment and personal communication, they can provide information about student progress not typically available from student information systems or standardized test results
    • susanbrown87
       
      Often stakeholders do not see this. I wonder if going standards based would be beneficial to allow everyone to see the progress and success rather than just a number. This makes communication so important.
olga1203

Online Instructional Activities Index - ION Professional eLearning Programs - Universit... - 0 views

  •  
    A variety of suggested online activities
olga1203

Right Questions To Ask For Online Course Feedback - eLearning Industry - 0 views

    • olga1203
       
      This article has some specific ideas for requesting actionable feedback from your online course participants.
  • On the bright side, there’s nothing more valuable than getting constructive criticism from the people who take your online courses.
  • The biggest enemies of good feedback are generalities and niceties.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • In General
  • What did you wish to see in the course (and it wasn’t there)?
  • If you could change one specific thing, what would that be?
  • Which topics do you wish were more in-depth?
  • Have you applied anything that you have learned? Why or why not?
  • What was the most useful thing that you have learned?
  • Did you connect with other learners (sharing resources, ideas)? Why or why not?
  • Were there any moments when you felt frustrated? Why?
« First ‹ Previous 281 - 289 of 289
Showing 20 items per page