Article(s): Self- and Peer-Assessment Online - 0 views
-
no peer ever wrote more than three sentences.
-
lizmedina on 31 May 21Indeed, this is a valuable part of peer editing that is oftentimes not properly sued by students and requires much more practice in implementing
-
-
students that cannot provide feedback due to the lack of necessary skills, whether it be education background or language
-
why?
- ...30 more annotations...
-
sample peer evaluation
-
higher education institutions
-
provide guidance on how to judge their own and others’ contributions.
-
Students must feel comfortable and trust one another in order to provide honest and constructive feedback
-
students' motivation to learn increases when they have self-defined, and therefore relevant, learning goals.
-
they need to be taught strategies
-
Represent a student's progress over time
-
This is probably my favorite characteristic of a portfolio -- how they show progress over time. It is instructive and just plain fun to view growth at the end of the course by viewing a portfolio of work. So often, it is difficult to see growth on a day-by-day basis. But when one steps back and takes a long-term view, growth is plainly evident.
-
-
with instructions
-
When I have utilized peer-assessment in the 9-12 level, the most success I had is when I gave the group direct instructions and a time limit. For example, I might tell them they have 7 minutes "on-the-clock" to read their partners introduction, followed by 7 minutes of discussion. Then we move on to the next section. This helps the group stay focused and on-task, rather than giving a 40 minute block of time to just "peer-review" and give no other direction.
-
-
In this paradigm, self-assessment is not the same as self-grading. Rather, students are looking at their work and judging the degree to which it reflects the goals of the assignment and the assessment criteria the teacher will be using to evaluate the work
-
This was my thought when I was reading the last article "Why and When Peer Grading is Effective for online learning." I didn't feel that Peer Grading is the same as Peer Assessment. I like the idea of Peer or Self assessment where they reflect and improve on their learning, but not necessarily be given a grade based on the assessment. I think even as teacher's if we spent more time assessing students without giving a grade, we could get a lot more learning from the students.
-
Would self-assessment be seen differently/positively through the eyes of our students if their grades were standards-based instead of points/letter grades?
-
-
Over and over again, students rejected their own judgments of their work in favor of guessing how their teacher or professor would grade it.” (p. 168)
-
I see way too many students try and do this, especially students who feel they must have an A at all cost. They don't want to actually learn the material, they just want to know what they have to do. I see where this has lead to students taking less risk and less thinking for themselves trying to problem solve how to do something on their own.
-
-
When they self-assessed, these students reported that they checked their work, revised it, and reflected on it more generally
-
Checking work, revising it and reflecting on it seems to always go hand and hand with writing. I've always wondered and even tried to dabbled with a way to do revisions in math courses without just having the students "redo" a problem to get the right answer. Unfortunately, in my attempts, I get just that. I can't get the students to necessarily reflect on what they did wrong, but rather another attempt at getting the correct answer.
-
-
One way to make sure students understand this type of evaluation is to give students a practice session with it
-
For peer evaluation to work effectively, the learning environment in the classroom must be supportive.
-
•Encourages student involvement and responsibility.
-
When learners are at a similar skill level.
-
They also recommend that teachers share expectations for assignments and define quality. Showing students examples of effective and ineffective pieces of work can help to make those definitions real and relevant.
-
I barely touched on the use of rubrics, which is the tool I suggest for evaluating the completed team project itself.
-
Considering the high level of emotion that can occur with group projects, I could never imagine assigning a group task without a solid rubric. The subjective nature of a group project means I need solid expectations in order to clarify any grey area as well as hold students responsible who do not meet those expectations.
-
-
•increase student responsibility and autonomy •strive for a more advanced and deeper understanding of the subject matter, skills and processes •lift the role and status of the student from passive learner to active leaner and assessor
-
Most did not see the larger value of the skill they were developing. Most did not use self-assessment in their other courses.
-
“Professors in the trenches tend to hold their monopoly on evaluating their students’ work dearly, since it helps them control the classroom better by reinforcing their power and expertise,”
-
In the 'Self-Assessment Does Not Mean Self-Grading' article, it stated that most students in the study didn't perform self-assessments in their other classes...even though we know self-assessment creates deeper learning, independence, critical thinking, and several more positives that teachers hope for. This statement reminds me why self-assessment doesn't exist in most secondary classrooms...it's a control-thing.
-
-
When learners are mature, self-directed and motivated
-
Advantages:
-
Students may have little exposure to different forms of assessment and so may lack the necessary skills and judgements to effectively manage self and peer assessments.
-
Students that fell into this group were physically and cognitively lazy, not contributing to the process as required.
-
with an eye for improvement.
-
student’s grade
-
At first these can be provided by the instructor; once the students have more experience, they can develop them themselves. An example of a peer editing checklist for a writing assignment is given in the popup window. Notice that the checklist asks the peer evaluator to comment primarily on the content and organization of the essay.
-
For example, a student may agree to work toward the grade of "B" by completing a specific number of assignments at a level of quality described by the instructor. Contracts can serve as a good way of helping students to begin to consider establishing goals for themselves as language learners.
-
Portfolios are purposeful, organized, systematic collections of student work that tell the story of a student's efforts, progress, and achievement in specific areas.
-
6) Learners have a developed set of communication skills.