Group Evaluations by NWahid - 6 views
It appears that we are only allowed a certain number of forum posts and some groups papers are no longer available, so I will put all of my evaluations in one post. Group 3 Our group was able to ...
This group is for ETC677 students enrolled in spring 2009 to conduct Treatise paper peer evaluations.
It appears that we are only allowed a certain number of forum posts and some groups papers are no longer available, so I will put all of my evaluations in one post. Group 3 Our group was able to ...
I think we did a good job at organizing and explaining what we wanted to about Online Learning. We also followed APA guidelines, and used multiple outside of class resources to help back up our pap...
I think you did a really good job considering there are only two in your group. I think your paper could have been a bit more organized and had a bit more resources, but otherwise you had a great a...
This paper had a good use of APA and organization. The quote in the beginning really got you interested in seeing where the paper went. Grade 5
This overall was a good paper. It had good points and a great deal of personal knowledge. I think it could have been organized a bit better (transitions) and it could have had more resources to bac...
This paper get a score of 5. Was clear and well thought out, ideas went smoothly from one to the next, and good resources to support the argument.
This paper gets a score of 5. Good argument that is well organized. It gives a good definition of online learning as well as evidence in learning theory and how individuals learn. It gives good sup...
I was a member of group 6 and I thought that we were able to come together to produce a good paper. It took some time for us to get to together and figure things out, but once we did, we seems to ...
Group 3, I thought you did a great job on your paper. I like the way you broke up each section and gave a summary of each. It was thorough and very detailed. I believe that it followed APA forma...
Group 4 Evaluation: 4 Group Members: Tracy Botts, Renee Marshall Group 4 provided a strong argument for online learning. They very effectively tied information together and gave a good overview of...
Group 3 Evaluation: 5 Group Members: Melissa Carroll, Marta Herrera, Nasreen Wahid Group 3 provided us with a very engaging introduction that set the tone for the paper. There is al a very strong ...
Group 2 Evaluation: 4 Group Members: MJ Hall, Jeanette Layton, Beth Summerhill Group 2 tied together the three sections of the paper together in a seamless manner. They thoroughly defined online l...
Group 1 Evaluation: 4.5 Group Members: Marilyn Robinson, Scott Pfister, Suzanne Sallee Group 1's introduction provided a basis for the entire paper and guided the reader through what they should e...
Score: 5 Fantastic paper. It was very thorough and very interesting. You used several different resources & references. The paper flowed very well, you all write well together!!
Score: 5 Very well written paper. You cited several different references. I liked how you titled each section. I also love the quote that starts off your paper!!
Score: 5 Excellent paper. Very well thought out and great information. Your paper really flowed. You used several different references and covered a variety of issues.