Miles per dollar - 0 views
-
I agree with that logic, though from my perspective "mp$" could be even more useful as we enter a world in which the gallons we're using aren't directly comparable, and as electricity enters the transportation mainstream, resisting easy conversion to gallons without heroic assumptions and creating potentially over-optimistic assessments of the overall efficiency of plug-in hybrid cars.
-
Miles per dollar has much to recommend it, particularly for its simplicity and alignment with the priority consumers put on value. However, it also has two key disadvantages. Unlike mpg, it changes every time fuel prices do, so any comparisons based on mp$ are only snapshots at a point in time. Nor does it address the emissions associated with that dollar's worth of energy, though mpg doesn't do that, either.
-
We can always create more money (not by printing though). And energy is abundant. So if climate change is what we're concern about, miles per kg CO2, or kg CO2 per mile should be the measure. Either can work. We have sports where either low or high scores are good, so it should not confuse too many.