Contents contributed and discussions participated by Keri-Lee Beasley
Why Social Interaction Is Essential To Learning Math - 1 views
Dealing With Digital Cruelty - NYTimes.com - 1 views
10 Ways Principals Can Use Twitter | Mr. Carter's Office - 0 views
4 Principles for Graphic Design in the Classroom | Thinking In Mind - 0 views
AIGA | Graphic Design Theory? - 0 views
Teach Yourself Graphic Design: A Self-Study Course Outline - Tuts+ Design & Illustratio... - 1 views
Thousands of Free Media Files in the Public Domain Project - 0 views
Raw Density Design - 0 views
Parents, Calm Down About Infant Screen Time | TIME - 1 views
How Families Can Balance Screen Time | The Cyber Safety Lady - 0 views
'Juvenoia,' Part 1: Why Internet fear is overrated - NetFamilyNews.org | NetFamilyNews.org - 0 views
Elyse Eidman-Aadahl on Writing in the 21st Century | Spotlight on Digital Media and Lea... - 2 views
-
Absolutely. When we think about writing at the National Writing Project, we think about multimodal composition: words, audio, video, graphic texts, etc. That said, no one is abandoning words. We’re just acknowledging that today your ability to create and publish, say, a video affords opportunities for expression that go beyond just words.
-
Yes, absolutely. Whether in email, texts, or posting status updates, most people in the world are probably writing and publishing more words, images, video and audio now than ever before. Facebook is one of the biggest publishing platforms in the world. It’s word dependent, but it also includes audio and video—and creating audio and video are deeply compositional. The question is how can we take advantage of the fact that so many people are now creating and circulating content to improve teaching and learning.
-
Going public and writing for an audience is something we always cared about. Maybe the real shift is that now it’s easier and more expansive.
- ...3 more annotations...
Connie Yowell on Digital Media and Learning, Then and Now | Spotlight on Digital Media ... - 0 views
-
The Holy Grail in learning and education is context. The problem is that education is focused on generic outcomes. And as soon as you shift to that conversation, you forget about context of the learner. You forget that learning is social, and about identity, and fundamentally connected to what the learner cares about.
-
I saw a video of you talking recently. You said starting with outcomes and working backward was a big mistake. You said we should start thinking about the student and then design forward. What does that actually mean, and is that related to what you’re saying about context? In education, we traditionally think about content. We think about content as the outcomes we’re striving for. Does a kid know X? That’s what all our tests measure, and that’s how we lose the kid. We lose the kid to our focus on content—we talk more about STEM than we do about kids.
-
People talk about kids learning content and then testing them on that content. People like Katie and Will are thinking about designing the context for participation. That’s the Holy Grail. Its through participation that learning happens.
Why Some Teams Are Smarter Than Others - NYTimes.com - 2 views
-
"Instead, the smartest teams were distinguished by three characteristics. First, their members contributed more equally to the team's discussions, rather than letting one or two people dominate the group. Second, their members scored higher on a test called Reading the Mind in the Eyes, which measures how well people can read complex emotional states from images of faces with only the eyes visible. Finally, teams with more women outperformed teams with more men. Indeed, it appeared that it was not "diversity" (having equal numbers of men and women) that mattered for a team's intelligence, but simply having more women. This last effect, however, was partly explained by the fact that women, on average, were better at "mindreading" than men."
« First
‹ Previous
161 - 180 of 708
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page