Group items tagged

IR also indirectly induces DNA damage by stimulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) production

IR is known to induce EMT in vitro

p53 is activated in response to IR-induced DNA damage

IR paradoxically also promotes tumour recurrence and metastasis

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs)

cancer cells undergoing EMT acquire invasive and metastatic properties

changes in the tumour microenvironment (TME)

IR seems to induce EMT and CSC phenotypes by regulating cellular metabolism

EMT, stemness, and oncogenic metabolism are known to be associated with resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy

Hanahan and Weinberg proposed ten hallmarks of cancer that alter cell physiology to enhance malignant growth: 1) sustained proliferation, 2) evasion of growth suppression, 3) cell death resistance, 4) replicative immortality, 5) evasion of immune destruction, 6) tumour-promoting inflammation, 7) activation of invasion and metastasis, 8) induction of angiogenesis, 9) genome instability, and 10) alteration of metabolism

EMT is a developmental process that plays critical roles in embryogenesis, wound healing, and organ fibrosis

IR is known to induce stemness and metabolic alterations in cancer cells

transforming growth factor-β [TGF-β], epidermal growth factor [EGF]) and their associated signalling proteins (Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, nuclear-factor kappa B [NF-κB], extracellular signal-regulated kinase [ERK], and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K]/Akt

activate EMT-inducing transcription factors, including Snail/Slug, ZEB1/δEF1, ZEB2/SIP1, Twist1/2, and E12/E47

Loss of E-cadherin is considered a hallmark of EMT

IR has been shown to induce EMT to enhance the motility and invasiveness of several cancer cells, including those of breast, lung, and liver cancer, and glioma cells

IR may increase metastasis in both the primary tumour site and in normal tissues under some circumstance

sublethal doses of IR have been shown to enhance the migratory and invasive behaviours of glioma cells

ROS are known to play an important role in IR-induced EMT

High levels of ROS trigger cell death by causing irreversible damage to cellular components such as proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids, whereas low levels of ROS have been shown to promote tumour progression—including tumour growth, invasion, and metastasis

hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is involved in IR-induced EMT

Treatment with the N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a general ROS scavenger, prevents IR-induced EMT, adhesive affinity, and invasion of breast cancer cells

Snail has been shown to play a crucial role in IR-induced EMT, migration, and invasion

IR activates the p38 MAPK pathway, which contributes to the induction of Snail expression to promote EMT and invasion

NF-κB signalling that promotes cell migration

ROS promote EMT to allow cancer cells to avoid hostile environments

HIF-1 is a heterodimer composed of an oxygen-sensitive α subunit and a constitutively expressed β subunit.

Under normoxia, HIF-1α is rapidly degraded, whereas hypoxia induces stabilisation and accumulation of HIF-1α

levels of HIF-1α mRNA are enhanced by activation of the PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)

IR is known to increase stabilisation and nuclear accumulation of HIF-1α, since hypoxia is a major condition for HIF-1 activation

IR induces vascular damage that causes hypoxia

ROS is implicated in IR-induced HIF-1 activation

IR causes the reoxygenation of hypoxic cancer cells to increase ROS production, which leads to the stabilisation and nuclear accumulation of HIF-1

IR increases glucose availability under reoxygenated conditions that promote HIF-1α translation by activating the Akt/mTOR pathway

The stabilised HIF-1α then translocates to the nucleus, dimerizes with HIF-1β, and increases gene expression— including the expression of essential EMT regulators such as Snail—to induce EMT, migration, and invasion

TGF-β signalling has been shown to play a crucial role in IR-induced EMT

AP-1 transcription factor is involved in IR-induced TGF-β1 expression

Wnt/β-catenin signalling is also implicated in IR-induced EMT

Notch signalling is known to be involved in IR-induced EMT

IR also increases Notch-1 expression [99]. Notch-1 is known to induce EMT by upregulating Snail

PAI-1 signalling is also implicated in IR-induced Akt activation that increases Snail levels to induce EMT

EGFR activation is known to be associated with IR-induced EMT, cell migration, and invasion by activating two downstream pathways: PI3K/Akt and Raf/MEK/ERK

ROS and RNS are also implicated in IR-induced EGFR activation

IR has also been shown to activate Hedgehog (Hh) signalling to induce EMT

IR has been shown to induce Akt activation through several signalling pathways (EGFR, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 [CXCR4]/C-X-C motif chemokine 12 [CXCL12], plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 [PAI-1]) and upstream regulators (Bmi1, PTEN) that promote EMT and invasion

CSCs possess a capacity for self-renewal, and they can persistently proliferate to initiate tumours upon serial transplantation, thus enabling them to maintain the whole tumour

Conventional cancer treatments kill most cancer cells, but CSCs survive due to their resistance to therapy, eventually leading to tumour relapse and metastasis

identification of CSCs, three types of markers are utilised: cell surface molecules, transcription factors, and signalling pathway molecules

CSCs express distinct and specific surface markers; commonly used ones are CD24, CD34, CD38, CD44, CD90, CD133, and ALDH

Transcription factors, including Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, c-Myc, and Klf4,

signalling pathways, including those of TGF-β, Wnt, Hedgehog, Notch, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and JAK/STAT

microRNAs (miRNAs), including let-7, miR-22, miR-34a, miR-128, the miR-200 family, and miR-451

Non-CSCs can be reprogrammed to become CSCs by epigenetic and genetic changes

EMT-inducing transcription factors, such as Snail, ZEB1, and Twist1, are known to confer CSC properties

Signalling pathways involved in EMT, including those of TGF-β, Wnt, and Notch, have been shown to play important roles in inducing the CSC phenotype

TGF-β1 not only increases EMT markers (Slug, Twist1, β-catenin, N-cadherin), but also upregulates CSC markers (Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Klf4) in breast and lung cancer cells

some CSC subpopulations arise independently of EMT

IR has been shown to induce the CSC phenotype in many cancers, including breast, lung, and prostate cancers, as well as melanoma

Genotoxic stress due to IR or chemotherapy promotes a CSC-like phenotype by increasing ROS production

IR has been shown to induce reprogramming of differentiated cancer cells into CSCs

In prostate cancer patients, radiotherapy increases the CD44+ cell population that exhibit CSC properties

IR also induces the re-expression of stem cell regulators, such as Sox2, Oct4, Nanog, and Klf4, to promote stemness in cancer cells

EMT-inducing transcription factors and signalling pathways, including Snail, STAT3, Notch signalling, the PI3K/Akt pathway, and the MAPK cascade, have been shown to play important roles in IR-induced CSC properties

STAT3 directly binds to the Snail promoter and increases Snail transcription, which induces the EMT and CSC phenotypes, in cisplatin-selected resistant cells

Other oncogenic metabolic pathways, including glutamine metabolism, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and synthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol, are also enhanced in many cancers

metabolic reprogramming

HIF-1α, p53, and c-Myc, are known to contribute to oncogenic metabolism

metabolic reprogramming

tumour cells exhibit high mitochondrial metabolism as well as aerobic glycolysis

occurring within the same tumour

CSCs can be highly glycolytic-dependent or oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)-dependen

mitochondrial function is crucial for maintaining CSC functionality

cancer cells depend on mitochondrial metabolism and increase mitochondrial production of ROS that cause pseudo-hypoxia

HIF-1 then enhances glycolysis

CAFs have defective mitochondria that lead to the cells exhibiting the Warburg effect; the cells take up glucose, and then secrete lactate to 'feed' adjacent cancer cells

lactate transporter, monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)

nutrient microenvironment

Epithelial cancer cells express MCT1, while CAFs express MCT4. MCT4-positive, hypoxic CAFs secrete lactate by aerobic glycolysis, and MCT1-expressing epithelial cancer cells then uptake and use that lactate as a substrate for the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle

MCT4-positive cancer cells depend on glycolysis and then efflux lactate, while MCT1-positive cells uptake lactate and rely on OXPHOS

metabolic heterogeneity induces a lactate shuttle between hypoxic/glycolytic cells and oxidative/aerobic tumour cells

bulk tumour cells exhibit a glycolytic phenotype, with increased conversion of glucose to lactate (and enhanced lactate efflux through MCT4), CSC subsets depend on oxidative phosphorylation; most of the glucose entering the cells is converted to pyruvate to fuel the TCA cycle and the electron transport chain (ETC), thereby increasing mitochondrial ROS production

the major fraction of glucose is directed into the pentose phosphate pathway, to produce redox power through the generation of NADPH and ROS scavengers

HIF-1α, p53, and c-Myc, are known to contribute to oncogenic metabolism

regulatory molecules involved in EMT and CSCs, including Snail, Dlx-2, HIF-1, STAT3, TGF-β, Wnt, and Akt, are implicated in the metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells

HIF-1 induces the expression of glycolytic enzymes, including the glucose transporter GLUT, hexokinase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and MCT, resulting in the glycolytic switch

HIF-1 represses the expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK), which inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), thereby inhibiting mitochondrial activity

STAT3 has been implicated in EMT-induced metabolic changes as well

TGF-β and Wnt play important roles in the metabolic alteration of cancer cells

Akt is also implicated in the glycolytic switch and in promoting cancer cell invasiveness

EMT, invasion, metastasis, and stemness

pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), LDH, and pyruvate carboxylase (PC), are implicated in the induction of the EMT and CSC phenotypes

decreased activity of PKM2 is known to promote an overall shift in metabolism to aerobic glycolysis

LDH catalyses the bidirectional conversion of lactate to pyruvate

High levels of LDHA are positively correlated with the expression of EMT and CSC markers

IR has been shown to induce metabolic changes in cancer cells

IR enhances glycolysis by upregulating GAPDH (a glycolysis enzyme), and it increases lactate production by activating LDHA, which converts pyruvate to lactate

IR enhances glycolysis by upregulating GAPDH (a glycolysis enzyme), and it increases lactate production by activating LDHA, which converts pyruvate to lactate

IR also elevates MCT1 expression that exports lactate into the extracellular environment, leading to acidification of the tumour microenvironment

IR increases intracellular glucose, glucose 6-phosphate, fructose, and products of pyruvate (lactate and alanine), suggesting a role for IR in the upregulation of cytosolic aerobic glycolysis

Lactate can activate latent TGF-

lactate stimulates cell migration and enhances secretion of hyaluronan from CAF that promote tumour metastasis

promote tumour survival, growth, invasion, and metastasis; enhance the stiffness of the ECM; contribute to angiogenesis; and induce inflammation by releasing several growth factors and cytokines (TGF-β, VEGF, hepatocyte growth factor [HGF], PDGF, and stromal cell-derived factor 1 [SDF1]), as well as MMP

tumours recruit the host tissue’s blood vessel network to perform four mechanisms: angiogenesis (formation of new vessels), vasculogenesis (de novo formation of blood vessels from endothelial precursor cells), co-option, and modification of existing vessels within tissues.

immunosuppressive cells such as tumour-associated macrophages (TAM), MDSCs, and regulatory T cells, and the immunosuppressive cytokines, TGF-β and interleukin-10 (IL-10)

immunosuppressive cells such as tumour-associated macrophages (TAM), MDSCs, and regulatory T cells, and the immunosuppressive cytokines, TGF-β and interleukin-10 (IL-10)

intrinsic immunogenicity or induce tolerance

cancer immunoediting’

three phases: 1) elimination, 2) equilibrium, and 3) escape.

The third phase, tumour escape, is mediated by antigen loss, immunosuppressive cells (TAM, MDSCs, and regulatory T cells), and immunosuppressive cytokines (TGF-β and IL-10).

IR can elicit various changes in the TME, such as CAF activity-mediated ECM remodelling and fibrosis, cycling hypoxia, and an inflammatory response

IR activates CAFs to promote the release of growth factors and ECM modulators, including TGF-β and MMP

TGF-β directly influences tumour cells and CAFs, promotes tumour immune escape, and activates HIF-1 signalling

MMPs degrade ECM that facilitates angiogenesis, tumour cell invasion, and metastasis

IR also promotes MMP-2/9 activation in cancer cells to promote EMT, invasion, and metastasis

IR-induced Snail increases MMP-2 expression to promote EMT

Radiotherapy has the paradoxical side-effect of increasing tumour aggressiveness

IR promotes ROS production in cancer cells, which may induce the activation of oncogenes and the inactivation of tumour suppressors, which further promote oncogenic metabolism

Metabolic alterations

oncogenic metabolism

elicit various changes in the TME

Although IR activates an antitumour immune response, this signalling is frequently suppressed by tumour escape mechanisms

We sought to systematically evaluate the evidence base for all new drugs and new indications for the treatment of solid tumours and haematological malignancies approved by the EMA in the five year period 2009-13

Three investigators (AP, EP, and EG) independently extracted data on and descriptively analysed the following trial features: characteristics of the participant population, study design (randomisation, crossover from experimental to control group, and blinding of investigators and participants), experimental and control groups, enrolment, primary and secondary endpoints, magnitude of benefit on survival and quality of life, and narrative interpretation of the findings

Only 18 of the 68 (26%) were supported by a pivotal study powered to evaluate overall survival as the primary outcome

From 2009 to 2013, the EMA approved use of 48 oncology drugs

Seventeen drugs were approved for treatment of haematological malignancies and 51 for treatment of solid tumours

Overall, 72 clinical trials supported the approval of 68 novel drug uses

Our scoring was limited to drugs for solid tumours

Among 68 cancer drug indications approved by the EMA in the period 2009-13, and with a median of 5.4 years’ follow-up, only 35 (51%) were associated with a significant improvement in survival (26/35) or quality of life (9/35) over existing treatment options, placebo, or as add on treatment

Only two of the 26 drugs shown to extend life also showed benefits on quality of life

33 (49%) had not shown any improvement on survival or quality of life

This systematic evaluation of oncology drug approvals by the EMA in 2009-13 shows that most of the drugs (39/68, 57%) entered the market without evidence of improved survival or quality of life

At a minimum 3.3 years after market entry, there was still no conclusive evidence that 33 of these 39 cancer drugs either extended or improved life

What are potential reasons for the paucity of drug approvals with demonstrable survival advantages over existing treatments?

Firstly, only 18 (26%) indications for use in our cohort were supported by trials in which extension of life was the primary outcome

None of the pivotal studies supporting oncology drug approvals from 2009 to 2013 included quality of life as a primary outcome measure

Most new oncology drugs authorised by the EMA in 2009-13 came onto the market without clear evidence that they improved the quality or quantity of patients’ lives

secretion of MCP-1, resistin, and other proinflammatory cytokines is increased by obesity, the adipose secretion of the anti-inflammatory protein adiponectin is decreased

the peroxisome proliferators- activated receptor (PPAR) family are involved in the regulation of inflammation and energy homestasis

natural agonists, including unsaturated fatty acids and eicosanoids

PPARα also regulates inflammatory processes, mainly by inhibiting inflammatory gene expression

upregulation of COX-2 is seen in alcoholic steatohepatitis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and has been directly linked to the progression of steatosis to steatohepatitis, the inhibitory effect of PPARα on COX-2 may reduce steatohepatitis

PPARα agonists have a clear anorexic effect resulting in decreased food intake, evidence is accumulating that PPARα may also directly influence adipose tissue function, including its inflammatory status.

PPARα may govern adipose tissue inflammation in three different ways: (1) by decreasing adipocyte hypertrophy, which is known to be connected with a higher inflammatory status of the tissue [3, 11, 59], (2) by direct regulation of inflammatory gene expression via locally expressed PPARα, or (3) by systemic events likely originating from liver

PPARγ is considered the master regulator of adipogenesis

Unsaturated fatty acids and several eicosanoids serve as endogenous agonists of PPARγ

PPARγ2, which is adipose-tissue specific

two different molecular mechanisms have been proposed by which anti-inflammatory actions of PPARγ are effectuated: (1) via interference with proinflammatory transcription factors including STAT, NF-κB, and AP-1

and (2) by preventing removal of corepressor complexes from gene promoter regions resulting in suppression of inflammatory gene transcription

diet-induced obesity is associated with increased inflammatory gene expression in adipose tissue via adipocyte hypertrophy and macrophage infiltration

PPARγ is able to reverse macrophage infiltration, and subsequently reduces inflammatory gene expression

Inflammatory adipokines mainly originate from macrophages which are part of the stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue [18, 19], and accordingly, the downregulation of inflammatory adipokines in WAT by PPARγ probably occurs via effects on macrophages

By interfering with NF-κB signaling pathways, PPARγ is known to decrease inflammation in activated macrophages

Recent data suggest that activation of PPARγ in fatty liver may protect against inflammation

PPARs may influence the inflammatory response either by direct transcriptional downregulation of proinflammatory genes

anti-inflammatory properties of PPARs in human obesity

the percentage of macrophages in a given adipose tissue depot is positively correlated with adiposity and adipocyte size

Il-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine produced by macrophages and lymphocytes

Il-10 exerts its anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting Tnf-induced NFκB activation by reducing IKK activity [38]

adipose tissue macrophages are responsible for nearly all adipose tissue Tnf expression and a significant portion of Nos2 and Il6 expression

One theory holds that the expansion of adipose tissue leads to adipocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia and that large adipocytes outstrip the local oxygen supply leading to cell autonomous hypoxia with activation of cellular stress pathways

The use of the anti-inflammatory compounds, salicylate and its derivative aspirin, for treating symptoms of T2DM dates back over 100 years

elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin (IL-8) have all been reported in various diabetic and insulin resistant states

overnutrition and obesity are often accompanied by elevations in tissue and circulating FFA concentrations, and saturated FFAs can directly activate pro-inflammatory responses

Adipokines such as resistin, leptin and adiponectin, which are secreted by adipocytes, can also affect inflammation and insulin sensitivity

In skeletal muscle insulin promotes glucose uptake by stimulating translocation of the GLUT4 glucose transporter

macrophages are also capable of undergoing a phenotypic switch from an M1 state, which was defined as the “classically activated” pro-inflammatory macrophage, to the M2 state or the “alternatively activated” non-inflammatory cell

saturated fatty acids are the most potent inducers of this inflammatory response

Several inducers of insulin resistance, including FFAs, pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress, activate the expression of Nos2, the gene that encodes iNOS (reviewed in [33]

Adipose tissue insulin signaling results in decreased hormone sensitive lipase activity and this anti-lipolytic effect inhibits free fatty acid (FFA) efflux out of adipocytes.

In the liver, insulin inhibits the expression of key gluconeogenic enzymes and, therefore, insulin resistance in liver leads to elevated hepatic glucose production

elevated JNK activity in liver, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle of obese insulin resistant mice, and knockout of Jnk1 (Jnk1−/−) leads to amelioration of insulin resistance in high fat diet

Adipose tissue from obese mice contains proportionately more M1 macrophages, whereas, lean adipose tissue contains more M2 macrophages, and increased M1 content positively correlates with inflammation, macrophage infiltration and insulin resistance

C-reactive protein (CRP)

these studies highlight the possibility that increased iNOS activity plays a direct role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance

the important role of Ikkb in the development of obesity and inflammation-induced insulin resistance.

It is probable that local concentrations of inflammatory mediators, such as FFAs, Tnf or other cytokines/adipokines contribute to this polarity switch

Tnf and other cytokines/chemokines are symptomatic of inflammation, and while they propagate and/or maintain the inflammatory state, they are not the initial cause(s) of inflammation

Tlr4, in particular, is stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an endotoxin released by gram-negative bacteria

Tlr4 belongs to the family of Toll-like receptors that function as pattern recognition receptors that guard against microorganismal infections as part of the innate immune system.

Tlr4 stimulation results in the activation of both Ikkb/NFκB and JNK/AP-1 signaling, culminating in the expression and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, including, Il1b, IL-6, Tnf, Mcp1, etc. (reviewed in [57