Group items tagged

“Intrinsic processes” include those that result in mutations due to random errors in DNA replication whereas “extrinsic factors” are environmental factors that affect mutagenesis rates (such as UV radiation, ionizing radiation, and carcinogens

intrinsic factors do not play a major causal role.

intrinsic cancer risk should be determined by the cancer incidence for those cancers with the least risk in the entire group controlling for total stem cell divisions

if one or more cancers would feature a much higher cancer incidence, for example, lung cancer among smokers vs. non-smokers, then this most likely reflects additional (and probably extrinsic) risk factors (smoking in this case)

Particularly, for breast and prostate cancers, it has long been observed that large international geographical variations exist in their incidences (5-fold for breast cancer, 25-fold for prostate cancer)14, and immigrants moving from countries with lower cancer incidence to countries with higher cancer rates soon acquire the higher risk of their new country

Colorectal cancer is another high-incidence cancer that is widely considered to be an environmental disease17, with an estimated 75% or more colorectal cancer risk attributable to diet

melanoma, its risk ascribed to sun exposure is around 65–86%

non-melanoma basal and squamous skin cancers, ~90% is attributable to UV

75% of esophageal cancer, or head and neck cancer are caused by tobacco and alcohol

HPV may cause ~90% cases in cervical cancer23, ~90% cases in anal cancer24, and ~70% in oropharyngeal cancer

HBV and HCV may account for ~80% cases of hepatocellular carcinoma

H pylori may be responsible for 65–80% of gastric cancer

While a few cancers have relatively large proportions of intrinsic mutations (>50%), the majority of cancers have large proportions of extrinsic mutations, for example, ~100% for Myeloma, Lung and Thyroid cancers and ~80–90% for Bladder, Colorectal and Uterine cancers, indicating substantial contributions of carcinogen exposures in the development of most cancers

onsistent estimate of contribution of extrinsic factors of >70–90% in most common cancer types. This concordance lends significant credibility to the overall conclusion on the role of extrinsic factors in cancer development

On the whole, prospective epidemiological data do not support the hypothesis that the 2-hydroxyestrogen pathway is protective, and the 16α-hydroxyestrogen pathway harmful, in hormone-dependent cancers

Both 2- and 4-hydroxyestrogens are catecholestrogens, and it has been suggested that catecholestrogens increase risk of oestrogen-mediated cancers through direct genotoxic effects, rather than through stimulation of cell proliferation via binding to oestrogen receptors

the evidence is stronger for 4-hydroxyestrogens than for 2-hydroxyestrogens

a significant increase in risk of breast cancer with levels of 2-OHE1 has also been reported previously, although it was limited to hormone receptor-negative tumours

Far more important than the SUVmax is the pattern rather than intensity of metabolic abnormality and the correlative CT findings

Descriptively, we define SUV < 5 as “low intensity”, 5–10 as “moderate”, 10–15 as “intense” and >15 as “very intense”

Evolving literature suggests that intensity of uptake is an independent prognostic factor and in some tumour subtypes superior to histopathologic characterisation.

aerobic glycolysis

Our practice of thresholding the grey and colour scale to liver as detailed above results in similar image intensity to a fixed upper SUV threshold of 8 to 10

The advantage of using the liver as a reference tissue is also aided by this organ having rather low variability in metabolic activity

When the liver is abnormal and cannot be used as a reference organ, we use the default SUV setting of an upper SUV threshold of 8

One of the most challenging aspects of oncologic FDG PET/CT review, however, is to recognise all the patterns of metabolic activity that are not malignant and which consequently confound interpretation

Many benign and inflammatory processes are also associated with high glycolytic activity

Future articles in the “How I Read” series will address the specific details of reading PET/CT in various cancers

The intensity of uptake in metastases usually parallels that in the primary site of disease

For example, discordant low-grade activity in an enlarged lymph node in the setting of intense uptake in the primary tumour suggests it is unlikely malignant and more likely inflammatory or reactive

By CT criteria the enlarged node is ‘pathologic’ but the discordantly low metabolic signature further characterises this is as non-malignant since such a node is not subject to partial volume effects and therefore the intensity of uptake should be similar to the primary site

The exception is when the lymph node is centrally necrotic as a small rim of viable tumour is subject to partial volume effects with expectant lower intensity of uptake; integrating the CT morphology is therefore critical to reaching an accurate interpretation

Small nodes that are visualised on PET are conversely much more likely to be metastatic as such nodes are subject to partial volume effects.

The exception to this rule is tumours with a propensity for tumour heterogeneity at different sites

The combination of FDG and a more specific tracer, which visualises the well-differentiated disease can be very useful to characterise this phenomenon

“metabolic signature”

For the majority of malignant processes, the intensity of metabolic abnormality correlates with degree of aggressiveness or proliferative rate.

a negative PET/CT study in a patient with biopsy proven malignancy would be considered false-negative

Warburg effect

There, however, are a significant minority of tumours that utilise substrates other glucose such as glutamine or fatty acids as a source of the carbon atoms required for growth and proliferation

This includes a subset of diffuse gastric adenocarcinomas, signet cell colonic adenocarcinomas and some sarcomas, particularly liposarcoma

There may be a role for other radiotracers such as fluorothymidine (FLT) or amino acid substrates in this setting.

Some tumours harbour mutations that result in defective aerobic mitochondrial energy metabolism, effectively simulating the Warburg effect

patients with hereditary paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma highlight this phenomenon

These have intense uptake on FDG PET/CT despite often having low proliferative rate.

Uterine fibroids, hepatic adenomas, fibroadenomas of the breast and desmoid tumours are benign or relatively benign lesions that can have quite high FDG-avidity.

Metabolic activity switches off rapidly following initiation of therapy

Common examples where patients have commenced active therapy but the referrer is requesting “staging” includes hormonal therapy (eg. tamoxifen) in breast cancer, oral capecitabine in colorectal cancer or high dose steroids in Hodgkin’s lymphoma

It is therefore critical to perform PET staging before commencement of anti-tumour therapy

The potential advantage of routine diagnostic CT is improved anatomic localisation and definition

Without intravenous contrast, additional identification of typical oncologic complications such as pulmonary embolism or venous thrombosis cannot be identified

If the study is performed as an “interim” restaging study after commencement of therapy but before completion, in order to reach a valid or clinically useful conclusion findings must be interpreted in the context of known changes that occur at a specific timing and type of therapy

The most well studied use of interim PET is in Hodgkin’s lymphoma where repeat PET after two cycles of ABVD-chemotherapy provides powerful prognostic information and may improve outcomes by enabling early change of management

some steroid hormone-induced nuclear events can occur in minutes

the genomic effects of steroid hormones take longer, with changes in gene expression occurring on the timescale of hours

Classical steroid hormone signaling occurs when hormone binds nuclear receptors (NR) in the cytoplasm, setting off a chain of genomic events that results in, among other changes, dimerization and translocation to the nucleus where the ligand-bound receptor forms a complex with coregulators to modulate gene transcription through direct interactions with a hormone response element (HRE)

NRs have been found at the plasma membrane of cells, where they can propagate signal transduction often through kinase pathways

Membrane-localized ER, PR and AR have been reported to modulate the activity of MAPK/ERK, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt), nitric oxide (NO), PKC, calcium flux and increase inositol triphosphate (IP3) levels to promote cell processes including autophagy, proliferation, apoptosis, survival, differentiation, and vasodilation

ERα36, a 36kDa truncated form of ERα that lacks the transcriptional activation domains of the full-length protein. Membrane-localized ERα36 can activate pathways including protein kinase C (PKC) and/or mitogen activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) to promote the progression of various cancers

G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30), also referred to as G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), is a membrane-localized receptor that has been observed to respond to estrogen to activate rapid signaling

hormone-responsive G protein coupled receptor is Zip9, which androgens can activate

GPRC6A is another G protein-coupled membrane receptor that is responsive to androgen

androgen-mediated non-genomic signaling through this GPCR can modulate male fertility, hormone secretion and prostate cancer progression

non-NR proteins located at the cell surface can bind to steroid hormones and respond by eliciting rapid signaling events

Estrogens have been shown to induce rapid (i.e. seconds) calcium flux via membrane-localized ER (mER)

ER-calcium dynamics lead to activation of kinase pathways such as MAPK/ERK which can result in cellular effects like migration and proliferation

17β-estradiol (E2) has been reported to promote angiogenesis through the activation of GPER

Membrane NRs may also mediate rapid signaling through crosstalk with growth factor receptors (GFR)

A similar crosstalk occurs between the receptor tyrosine kinase insulin-related growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR) and ERα. Not only does IGF-IR activate ERα, but inhibition of IGF-IR downregulates estrogen-mediated ERα activity, suggesting that IGF-IR is essential for maximal ERα signaling

Further, ER activates IGF-IR pathways including MAPK

GPER is involved in the transactivation of the EGFR independent of classical ER

tight interconnection between genomic and non-genomic effects of NRs.

non-genomic pathways can also lead to genomic effects

androgen-bound AR associates with the kinase Src at the plasma membrane, activating Src which then leads to a signaling cascade through MAPK/ERK

However, Src can also increase the expression of AR target genes by the ligand-independent transactivation of AR

extranuclear steroid hormone actions can potentially reprogram nuclear NR events

estrogen modulated the expression of several genes including endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) via rapid signaling pathways

epigenetic changes can then mediate genomic events in uterine tissue and breast cancer cells